[The coexistence of spinal canal stenosis in fragility fractures of the spine]. / Die Koexistenz der Spinalkanalstenose in der Alterstraumatologie.

BACKGROUND: In trauma care of fragility fractures of the spine, degenerative stenosis is often seen as an accompanying pathology. This may lead to a possible compression of neurogenic structures. The stenosis of the spinal canal can manifest itself with clinically significant complaints before the fracture occurs. This coexistence may have an impact on the injury itself or may provoke a complicated treatment of the fracture. AIM: The aim of this work is to differentiate these pathophysiologies and their merger in terms of clinical diagnostics and treatment options. DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS: The differential diagnosis is difficult and is often inadequately appreciated in everyday clinical life. The etiology and pathophysiology of both entities show, in several aspects, a congruence that enables joint treatment. If the indication is set for the decompression of a stenosing fracture, a pre-existing relevant stenosis can be addressed in the same session. Conversely, significant degenerative stenosis accompanying a fracture may lead to the indication of decompression.

Blunt Cerebrovascular Artery Injury and Stroke in Severely Injured Patients: An International Multicenter Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is considered to be a rare entity in patients with high-energy trauma and is a potentially preventable cause of secondary brain damage. If it occurs, it may be fatal or associated with poor outcomes related to devastating complications. We hypothesized that analyses of epidemiology and concomitant injuries may predict the development of BCVI and associated complications. METHODS: The TraumaRegister DGU® (TR-DGU), a prospectively maintained database, was used for retrospective data analysis (01/2009-12/2015). INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult trauma patients (≥16 years) with severe injuries (ISS ≥ 16 points) with and without BCVI. Subgroups: carotid artery injury (CAI) and vertebral artery injury (VAI). The degree of vascular injury was classified according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale values. Demographic, injury, therapy and outcome characteristic data (length of stay, stroke, multiple organ failure and mortality) were collected and analyzed for each patient with SPSS statistics (Version 23, IBM Inc., Armonk, NY). RESULTS: Out of 76,480 individuals, a total of 786 patients with BCVI (1%) were identified. The 435 CAI patients included 263 dissections, 78 pseudoaneurysms and 94 bilateral injuries. The 383 VAI patients presented with 198 dissections, 43 pseudoaneurysms, 122 thrombotic occlusions and 20 bilateral injuries. The risk for stroke was excessive in BCVI patients versus controls (11.5 vs. 1.1%, p < 0.001) and increased with vascular injury severity, up to 24.1% in CAI patients and 30.0% in VAI patients. We confirmed that cervical spine injuries were a major BCVI predictor (OR 6.46, p < 0.001, 95% CI 5.34-7.81); furthermore, high-energy mechanisms (OR 1.79), facial fractures (OR 1.56) and general injury severity (OR 1.05) were identified as independent predictors. Basilar skull fractures (BSF) were found with comparable frequency (p = 0.63) in both groups, and the predictive value was found to be insignificant (OR 1.1, p = 0.36, 95% CI 0.89-1.37). Age ≥ 60 years was associated with a decreased risk for BCVI (OR 0.54, p < 0.001, 95% CI 0.45-0.65); however, in BCVI patients over 60 years of age, mortality was excessive (OR 4.33, p < 0.001, 95% CI 2.40-7.80). Even after adjusting for head injuries, BCVI-associated stroke remained a significant risk factor for mortality (OR 2.52, p < 0.001, 95% CI 1.13-5.62). CONCLUSION: Our data validated cervical spine injuries as a major predictor, but the predictive value of BSF must be scrutinized. Patient age appears to play a contradictory role in BCVI risk and BCVI-associated mortality. Predicting which patients will develop BCVI remains an ongoing challenge, especially since many patients do not present with concomitant injuries of the head or spine and therefore might not be captured by standard screening criteria.

The efficacy of open partial aponeurectomy for recurrent Dupuytren's contracture.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the efficacy of open partial aponeurectomy for recurrent Dupuytren's contracture. METHODS: Eighteen patients with recurrent Dupuytren's contracture of 22 fingers were retrospectively assessed with a mean follow-up time of 94 months (range: 70-114 months). Examination parameters included the determination of range of motion (ROM), grip strength, pain and subjective outcome (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) questionnaire). SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: Dissection with special regard to former skin incision and expected wound defect. Modified incisions after Bruner (Mini-Bruner incisions) were facilitated. Dissection started at the palm. Fibrous tissue was resected proximally within the palm including vertical fibrotic septae. Direct preparation of the neurovascular bundles (NVB) was facilitated from proximal to distal. If the anatomy of the neurovascular structures became unclear around the natatory ligament preparation of the NVB at the distal end of the fibrous cord was performed. After complete preparation of a NVB, dissection was continued from medial to lateral until the other bundle was completely released. Transposition flaps and skin transplants were often used for sufficient wound closure. RESULTS: Recurrence rate was 36 % applying the definition of van Rijssen et al. Fifteen patients had a grip strength of 90 % or higher in comparison to the contralateral side. Ten patients had a pinch strength of 90 % or higher in comparison to the contralateral side. All patients except for one had pain reduction or none postoperatively. Fifteen patients had a DASH score of 15 or lower (range: 0-47). An unrelated ray amputation was suffered due to wound healing complications. CONCLUSIONS: Open partial aponeurectomy performed by a board certified hand surgeon proved to be safe. The postoperative functional outcome seemed to be related to the individual course of the disease.

[Diagnostics of acute compartment syndrome : Current gold standard and the state of science of noninvasive assessment methods]. / Diagnostik des akuten Kompartmentsyndroms : Aktueller Goldstandard und Stand der Wissenschaft nichtinvasiver Messmethoden.

Acute compartment syndrome (ACS) is defined by a disorder of the microcirculation due to a persistent pathological pressure increase within a muscle compartment. The ischemia of the tissue leads to an initially reversible functional impairment and finally irreversible damage of the musculature, nerves and other structures. Based on the understanding of the pathophysiology, the current diagnostic concepts and treatment using the so-called dermatofasciotomy of the affected muscle compartments can be derived. In addition to the suspicion of a possible ACS based on the medical history of the patient, the findings of the clinical examination are decisive. This review article gives a summary of all the essential aspects of the diagnostics. In clinically uncertain cases and for monitoring, an objectification of the findings using instrument-based techniques is increasingly required. Nowadays, invasive needle pressure measurement is available; however, due to limited reliability, specificity and sensitivity, these measurements only represent an aid to decision guidance supporting or advising against the indications for dermatofasciotomy. The increasing demands on making a certain diagnosis and justification of a surgical intervention from a legal point of view, substantiate the numerous scientific efforts to develop noninvasive instrument-based diagnostics. These methods are based either on detection of increasing intracompartmental pressure or decreasing perfusion pressure and microcirculation. The various measurement principles are summarized in a lucid form.

Models of hemorrhagic shock: differences in the physiological and inflammatory response.

INTRODUCTION: The hemorrhagic shock (HS) model is commonly used to initiate a systemic post-traumatic inflammatory response. Numerous experimental protocols exist and it is unclear how differences in these models affect the immune response making it difficult to compare results between studies. The aim of this study was to compare the inflammatory response of different established protocols for volume-controlled shock in a murine model. METHODS: Male C57/BL6 mice 6-10 weeks and weighing 20-25 g were subjected to volume-controlled or pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock. In the volume-controlled group 300 µl, 500 µl, or 700 µl blood was collected over 15 min and mean arterial pressure was continuously monitored during the period of shock. In the pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock group, blood volume was depleted with a goal mean arterial pressure of 35 mmHg for 90 min. Following hemorrhage, mice from all groups were resuscitated with the extracted blood and an equal volume of lactated ringer solution. Six hours from the initiation of hemorrhagic shock, serum IL-6, KC, MCP-1 and MPO activity within the lung and liver tissue were assessed. RESULTS: In the volume-controlled group, the mice were able to compensate the initial blood loss within 30 min. Approximately 800 µl of blood volume was removed to achieve a MAP of 35 mmHg (p<0.001). No difference in the pro-inflammatory cytokine (IL-6 and KC) profile was measured between the volume-controlled groups (300 µl, 500 µl, or 700 µl). The pressure-controlled group demonstrated significantly higher cytokine levels (IL-6 and KC) than all volume-controlled groups. Pulmonary MPO activity increased with the severity of the HS (p<0.05). This relationship could not be observed in the liver. CONCLUSION: Volume-controlled hemorrhagic shock performed following current literature recommendations may be insufficient to produce a profound post-traumatic inflammatory response. A decrease in the MAP following blood withdrawal (300 µl, 500 µl or 700 µl) was usually compensated within 30 min. Pressure-controlled hemorrhagic shock is a more reliable for induction of a systemic inflammatory response.

Can a modified anterior external fixator provide posterior compression of AP compression type III pelvic injuries?

BACKGROUND: Current anterior fixators can close a disrupted anterior pelvic ring. However, these anterior constructs cannot create posterior compressive forces across the sacroiliac joint. We explored whether a modified fixator could create such forces. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We determined whether (1) an anterior external fixator with a second anterior articulation (X-frame) would provide posterior pelvic compression and (2) full pin insertion would deliver higher posterior compressive forces than half pin insertion. METHODS: We simulated AP compression Type III instability with plastic pelvis models and tested the following conditions: (1) single-pin supraacetabular external fixator (SAEF) using half pin insertion (60 mm); (2) SAEF using full pin insertion (120 mm); (3) modified fixator with X-frame using half pin insertion; (4) modified fixator using full pin insertion; and (5) C-clamp. Standardized fracture compression in the anterior and posterior compartment was performed as in previous studies by Gardner. A force-sensitive sensor was placed in the symphysis and posterior pelvic ring before fracture reduction and the fractures were reduced. The symphyseal and sacroiliac compression loads of each application were measured. RESULTS: The SAEF exerted mean compressions of 13 N and 14 N to the posterior pelvic ring using half and full pin insertions, respectively. The modified fixator had mean posterior compressions of 174 N and 222 N with half and full pin insertions, respectively. C-clamp application exerted a mean posterior load of 407 N. CONCLUSIONS: Posterior compression on the pelvis was improved using an X-frame as an anterior fixation device in a synthetic pelvic fracture model. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This additive device may improve the initial anterior and posterior stability in the acute management of unstable and life-threatening pelvic ring injuries.

Screw placement in percutaneous acetabular surgery: gender differences of anatomical landmarks in a cadaveric study.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous reduction and periarticular screw implantation techniques have been successfully introduced in acetabular surgery. The advantages of this less invasive approach are attenuated by higher risks of screw misplacement. Anatomical landmarks are strongly needed to prevent malplacement. This cadaver study was designed to identify reliable anatomical osseous landmarks in the pelvic region for screw placement in acetabular surgery. Gender differences were specifically addressed. METHODS: Twenty-seven embalmed cadaveric hemipelvic specimens (13 male, 14 female) were used. After soft-tissue removal, anterior and posterior column acetabular screw placement was conducted by one orthopaedic trauma surgeon under direct vision. Each column was addressed by antegrade and retrograde screw insertion. Radiographic verification of ideal screw placement was followed by assessment of the distance from the different entry points to adjoining anatomical osseous structures. RESULTS: For anterior column screw positioning, the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), posterior inferior iliac spine (PIIS), iliopectineal eminence and centre of the symphysis were most reliable regarding gender differences. For posterior column screw positioning, the distance to the anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) and the ischial tuberosity showed the lowest deviation between the different gender specimens. Highest gender differences were seen in relation to the cranial rim of the superior pubic ramus in retrograde anterior column screw positioning (p = 0.002). Most landmarks could be targeted within a 2.5-cm range in all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The findings emphasise the relevance of osseous landmarks in acetabular surgery. By adhering to easily identifiable structures, screw placement can be safely performed. Significant gender differences must be taken into consideration during preoperative planning.

Comparison of ALIF and PLIF in Isthmic Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis. A Multicenter Surveillance Study of 602 cases from the German Spine Registry (DWG Register).

BACKGROUND: Isthmic spondylolisthesis most commonly occurs in the lumbosacral junction and can cause backpain and radicular pain as well as stiffness with progressive immobilization, with a negative impact on an individual's ability to work and quality of life. Multiple operative treatments are currently available. This study aims to compare complications, demography, and clinical features between anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and posterior lumber body fusion (PLIF) in the operative treatment in isthmic spondylolisthesis. METHODS: An analysis of data from the German spine registry (Deutsche Wirbelsäulengesellschaft [DWG]-Register) of patients who underwent operative treatment (PLIF and ALIF) for isthmic spondylolisthesis in the sacrolumbar junction in 170 departments between January 2017 and May 2021 was performed. Age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, surgical approach, smoker/nonsmoker, as well as severeness of the spondylolisthesis according to the Meyerding classification were evaluated. RESULTS: In total, 602 patients undergoing fusion in L5/S1 were identified in the registry, n = 570 PLIF (group 1) and n = 32 ALIF (group 2). A significant difference in the ASA score between the two groups was noted; group 1 had more patients suffering a more debilitating disease in comparison to group 2. There was no significant difference in gender, grade of spondylolisthesis, age, or smoking status. Significant differences were found in operative and postoperative variables and complications (fusion material, dura injury). CONCLUSION: No difference was found between the two procedures in terms of symptomatic benefit of patients who underwent either ALIF or PLIF. According to the DWG Register, PLIF was the preferred method to treat isthmic spondylolisthesis in the sacrolumbar junction in Germany. To compare these two spine fusion techniques, further studies with an adequate sample size and follow-up period are required.

Operative results of AO A3 and A4 traumatic injuries in the thoracic and lumbar spine. A multicenter surveillance study of 4230 patients from the German Spine Registry (DWG-Register).

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis, classification and treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures, continue to be controversial. Surgery is generally the preferred treatment for unstable fractures while stable fractures are managed conservatively. This study aims to describe surgical procedures, outcomes, complications, demography, clinical features and differences between A3 and A4 fractures (AO classification) of the thoracolumbar region. A subgroup of patients <91 years with osteoporotic fractures is included and analyzed. METHODS: Analysis of data from the DWG-Register German spine registry on operative treatment for thoracolumbar AO A3 and A4 fractures out of 170 departments from January 2017 to May 2021. The evaluated variables included age, gender, surgical approach (posterior, anterior combined), and re-operation. RESULTS: In total, 4230 AO A3 and A4 thoracolumbar fractures were identified in the registry; 2898 A3 (group 1) and 1332 A4 (group 2). The preoperative ASIA-impairment scale score in group 1 was significantly different compared with group 2 (P=0.02). Surgical procedures such as decompression/stabilization with rod-screw system cemented/non-cemented, as well as an anterior approach, were statistically significant between the groups. Odds ratio was calculated for variables that could be influenced for the type of fracture (A3 or A4): decompression 4.89, OR time >2 hours 48.22, osteoporosis 6.46 and posterior access 9.85. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides multicenter results from a huge number of surgically treated AO A3 and A4 fractures. Anterior approaches are more often used in A4 type fractures, probably because of its inherent instability related to burst fractures, surprisingly, not associated with the occurrence of added perioperative complications. Nevertheless, A3 type fractures are presented with worse ASIA Impairment-Scale at admission, in comparison with A4 type fractures of the thoracolumbar region.

Open Posterior Reduction and Stabilization of AO Spine C3 Sacral Fractures.

AO Spine C3 sacral fractures are defined by separation of the spine including S1 from the pelvic ring and are usually result of a high-energy injury. Besides their high biomechanical instability and high rate of associated neurological impairment, these fractures are often extremely difficult to reduce due to severe bony impaction and dislocation. Additional difficulties in management of these fractures arise from only a thin-layer of soft-tissue coverage overlying the injured area.

Inhalative vs. systemic IL-10 administration: differences in the systemic inflammatory response and end-organ inflammation following hemorrhagic shock.

Interleukin-10 is known to modulate the systemic inflammatory response after trauma. This study investigates differences in the systemic and end-organ inflammation in animals treated with either inhalative or systemic IL-10 after experimental hemorrhagic shock (HS). Pressure controlled HS was performed in C57/BL6 mice for 1.5h (6 animals per group). Inhalative or systemic recombinant mouse IL-10 (50 µg/kg dissolved in 50 µl PBS) was administered after resuscitation. Animals were sacrificed after 4.5 or 22.5h of recovery. Serum levels of IL-6, IL-10, KC, MCP-1, and LBP were determined by ELISA. Pulmonary and liver inflammation was analyzed by standardized Myeloperoxidase (MPO) kits. Systemic and inhalative IL-10 administration affected the systemic inflammatory response as well as end-organ inflammation differently. Differences were obvious in the early (6h) but not later (24h) inflammatory phase. Systemic IL-10 application was associated with a decreased systemic inflammatory response as well as hepatic inflammation, whereas nebulized IL-10 solely reduced the pulmonary inflammation. Our study demonstrates that systemic and nebulized IL-10 administration differentially influenced the systemic cytokine response and end-organ inflammation. Early pulmonary but not hepatic protection appears to be possible by inhalative IL-10 application. Further studies are necessary to assess exact pathways.

Knowledge transfer of spinal manipulation skills by student-teachers: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To assess the use of peer-assisted learning (PAL) of complex manipulative motor skills with respect to gender in medical students. METHODS: In 2007-2010, 292 students in their 3rd and 4th years of medical school were randomly assigned to two groups [Staff group (SG), PAL group (PG)] led by either staff tutors or student-teachers (ST). The students were taught bimanual practical and diagnostic skills (course education module of eight separate lessons) as well as a general introduction to the theory of spinal manipulative therapy. In addition to qualitative data collection (Likert scale), evaluation was performed using a multiple-choice questionnaire in addition to an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE). RESULTS: Complex motor skills as well as palpatory diagnostic competencies could in fact be better taught through professionals than through ST (manipulative OSCE grades/diagnostic OSCE score; SG vs. PG; male: P = 0.017/P < 0.001, female: P < 0.001/P < 0.001). The registration of theoretical knowledge showed equal results in students taught by staff or ST. In both teaching groups (SG: n = 147, PG: n = 145), no significant differences were observed between male and female students in matters of manipulative skills or theoretical knowledge. Diagnostic competencies were better in females than in males in the staff group (P = 0.041) Overall, students were more satisfied with the environment provided by professional teachers than by ST, though male students regarded the PAL system more suspiciously than their female counterparts. CONCLUSIONS: The peer-assisted learning system does not seem to be generally qualified to transfer such complex spatiotemporal demands as spinal manipulative procedures.

Is helical blade nailing superior to locked minimally invasive plating in unstable pertrochanteric fractures?

BACKGROUND: Technical advancements have produced many challenges to intramedullary implants for unstable pertrochanteric fractures. Helical blade fixation of the femoral head has the theoretical advantages of higher rotational stability and cutout resistance and should have a lower rate of reoperation than a locked plating technique. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked whether (1) helical blade nailing reduces the rate of reoperation within 24 months compared with locked plating and (2) any of various preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative factors predicted failure in these two groups. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 108 patients with unstable pertrochanteric fractures in a surgeon-allocated study between November 2005 and November 2008: 54 with percutaneous compression plates (PCCP) and 54 with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA). We evaluated patients regarding reoperation, mortality, and function. Seventy-four patients had a minimum followup of 24 months (mean, 26 months; range, 24-30 months). RESULTS: We found no differences in the number of reoperations attributable to mechanical problems in the two groups: PCCP = six and PFNA = five. Despite a greater incidence of postoperative lateral wall fractures with helical blade nailing, only postoperative varisation of the neck-shaft angle and tip-apex distance (33 mm versus 28 mm) predicted reoperation. Mortality and function were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest unstable pertrochanteric fractures may be fixed either with locked extramedullary small-diameter screw systems to avoid lateral wall fractures or with the new intramedullary systems to avoid potential mechanical complications of a broken lateral wall. Tip-apex distance and preservation of the preoperative femoral neck-shaft angle are the key technical factors for prevention of reoperation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Minimally invasive stabilisation of posterior pelvic-ring instabilities with a transiliac locked compression plate.

PURPOSE: Sacroiliac screw fixation is the method of choice for the definitive treatment of unstable posterior pelvic-ring injuries; however, this technique is demanding and associated with a high risk of iatrogenic neurovascular damage. This study evaluates whether minimally invasive transiliac locked compression plate stabilisation may be an alternative to sacroiliac screw fixation in unstable posterior pelvic-ring injuries. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with unstable pelvic-ring injuries treated with a transiliac locked compression plate at a level I trauma centre. Outcome evaluation was assessed using the Pelvic Outcome Score and analysis of complications, intraoperative fluoroscopic time, and duration of the surgical procedure. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients were available for follow-up after an average of 30 months. The main findings were as follows: Overall outcome for the Pelvic Outcome Score was excellent in 47.6% (ten patients), good in 19% (four patients), fair in 28.6% (six patients), and poor in 4.8% (one patient). Average operation time was 101 min and intraoperative fluoroscopic time averaged 74.2 s. No iatrogenic neurovascular injuries were observed. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive transiliac locked compression plate stabilisation may be a good alternative to sacral screw fixation because it is quick, safe and associated with a good functional outcome.

Impact of Obesity on Perioperative Complications on Treatment of Spinal Metastases: A Multicenter Surveillance Study from the German Spine Registry (DWG-Register).

Background The spine is a common location for the development of primary and metastatic tumors, spinal metastases being the most common tumor in the spine. Spinal surgery in obesity is challenging due to difficulties with anesthesia, intravenous access, positioning, and physical access during surgery. The objective was to investigate the effect of obesity on perioperative complications by discharge in patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases. Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the DWG-register on patients undergoing surgery for metastatic disease in the spine from January 2012 to December 2016. Preoperative variables included obesity (≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), age, gender, and smoking status. In addition, the influence of pre-existing medical comorbidity was determined, using the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score. Results In total, 528 decompressions with and without instrumentation undergoing tumor debulking, release of the neural structures, or tumor extirpation in metastatic disease of the spine were identified; 143 patients were obese (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30 kg/m 2 ), and 385 patients had a BMI less than 30 kg/m 2 . The mean age in the group with BMI 30 kg/m 2 or higher (group 1) was 67 years (56.6%). In the group with BMI less than 30 kg/m 2 (group 2), the mean age was 64 years. Most of the patients had preoperatively an ASA score of 3 and 4 (patients with severe general disease). The likelihood of being obese in the logistic regression model seems to be protective by 47.5-fold for blood loss 500 mL or higher. Transfusions occurred in 321/528 (60.7%) patients (group 1, n = 122 and group 2, n = 299; p = 0.04). A total of 19 vertebroplasties with percutaneous stabilization (minimally invasive spine [MIS]), 6 vertebroplasties, and 31 MIS alone were identified. The variables between these groups, with exception of preoperative status (ASA-score; p = 0.02), remained nonsignificant. Conclusion Obese patients were predisposed to have blood loss more than 500 mL more often than nonobese patients undergoing surgery for spinal metastases but with perioperative blood transfusions, invasiveness, nor prolonged hospitalization. Early postoperative mobilization and a low threshold for perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) are important in obese patients to appropriately diagnose, treat complications, and minimize morbidity.

Traumatic Hip Dislocations in Major Trauma Patients: Epidemiology, Injury Mechanisms, and Concomitant Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Traumatic hip dislocations (THDs) are severe injuries associated with considerable morbidity. Delayed recognition of fracture dislocations and neurovascular deficits have been proposed to cause deleterious long-term clinical outcomes. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to identify characteristics of epidemiology, injury mechanisms, and associated injuries to identify patients at risk. METHODS: For this study based on the TraumaRegister DGU® (January 2002-December 2017), the inclusion criterion was an Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥9 points. Exclusion criteria were an isolated head injury and early transfer to another hospital. The THD group was compared to a control group without hip dislocation. The ISS and New ISS were used for injury severity and the Abbreviated Injury Scale for associated injuries classification. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS: The final study cohort comprised n = 170,934 major trauma patients. We identified 1359 individuals (0.8%) with THD; 12 patients had sustained bilateral hip dislocations. Patients with THD were predominantly male (79.5%, mean age 43 years, mean ISS 22.4 points). Aortic injuries (2.1% vs. 0.9%, p ≤ 0.001) were observed more frequently in the THD group. Among the predictors for THDs were specific injury mechanisms, including motor vehicle accidents (odds ratio (OR) 2.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.57-3.45, p ≤ 0.001), motorcycle accidents (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.66-2.39, p ≤ 0.001), and suicide attempts (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06-1.75, p = 0.016). Despite a lower rate of head injuries and a comparable level of care measured by trauma center admission, both intensive care unit and total hospital stay were prolonged in patients with THD. CONCLUSIONS: Since early diagnosis, as well as timely and sufficient treatment, of THDs are of high relevance for long-term outcomes of severely injured individuals, knowledge of patients at risk for this injury pattern is of utmost importance. THDs are frequently related to high-energy mechanisms and associated with severe concomitant injuries in major trauma patients.

Challenging the dogma to "always operate" acute hip fractures: a proof-of-concept pilot study for nonoperative management of undisplaced femoral neck fractures.

BACKGROUND: The notion that all acute hip fractures are a surgical entity requiring either surgical fracture fixation or hip replacement represents a historic dogma, particularly within the orthopaedic community of the United States. The present study from a European regional trauma center was designed to challenge the notion that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures represent an absolute indication for surgical management. METHODS: The purpose of this study was to investigate the hypothesis that stable and undisplaced femoral neck fractures of the Garden types 1 and 2 can be safely managed nonoperatively. A retrospective observational cohort study was carried out at a regional orthopaedic trauma center in Germany from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2021. The inclusion criteria specified patients older than 18 years suffering a < 24 h, traumatic, femoral neck fracture Garden types 1 and 2. Exclusion criteria included Garden types 3 and 4 femoral neck fractures, pregnancy, active infection or previous surgery, tumor-associated fractures, medical history of femoral neck necrosis, vascular injury associated with femoral neck fractures, nerve injury associated to a femoral neck fracture and ≥ 24 h femoral neck fracture. The primary intention of this research was to identify deterioration of fracture retention with an ensuing unplanned trip to the operating room in femoral neck fractures Garden types 1 and 2. Secondary were included unplanned readmissions and complications such as surgical site infection. RESULTS: A total of 41 undisplaced femoral neck fractures (Garden types 1 and 2) were included in this study; n = 20 were in the resulting admission operatively treated (group 1) and n = 21 were treated conservatively. The mean age in group 1 was 76 years; women (70%). In group 2 it was 81 years with a female dominance (71.4%). Admission status: Garden types 1 and 2, group 1 n = 13/7 and group 2 n = 15/6. Subsequent femoral neck fracture displacement (Y/N) (in case of operation, before operation) group 1 n = 14/6 and group 2 n = 6/15. CONCLUSION: According with our results, patients sustaining Garden type 1 femoral neck fractures, depending on age and comorbidities, should be treated conservatively with weight bearing and under physiotherapeutic instructions. In case of femoral neck fractures Garden type 2, a surgical treatment should be performed in order to avoid femoral neck fractures to slip after weight bearing by lacking of fracture impaction.

Invasiveness has no influence on the rate of incidental durotomies in surgery for multisegmental lumbar spinal canal stenosis (≥3 levels) with and without fusion: analysis from the German Spine Registry data (DWG-Register).

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, perioperative complications as dural tear (DT) with subsequent neurological deficits are documented in independent registers. However, the relationship of these complications with the grade of invasiveness (≥3 levels) is still unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate perioperative complications, particularly DT with subsequent neurological deficits, between patients undergoing laminotomy and decompression and decompression and fusion in ≥3 levels. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the data pool of the DWG register based on cases described by 10 clinics between January 2012 and December 2016 was performed. Surgically treated LSS in ≥3 segments were divided into decompression with or without instrumentation and fusion. Cases with intraoperative DT in both subgroups were analysed for risk factor occurrence. The Surgical Invasive Index (SII) was used. RESULTS: DT occurred in 102/941 (10.8%) patients. Difference in DT between groups was non-significant. The likelihood of DT increased by 2.12-fold with previous spinal surgery at the same level and by 1.9-fold for BMI 30-34 and >35 in comparison with BMI 26-29, respectively. Postoperative deep wound infection was increased by 2.39-fold after DT than without. Significance in outcomes between patients with/without DT was not found. The invasiveness index explained 48% of the variation in blood loss and 51% of the variation in surgery duration. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of incidental DT during decompression for LSS with and without fusion in ≥3 levels was associated with BMI and previous surgery at the same spinal level. Invasivness (SII) is valid rather for variables proper to surgery such as bledding and Op-time but no with incidence for DT and subsequent CSF-leackage.

There is no difference in perioperative results between posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in adults: a multicenter surveillance study from the German Spine Registry (DWG Register).

BACKGROUND: Primary spondylodiscitis is a medically challenging disease that can lead to recurrent back pain, progressive kyphotic deformity, and neurologic deficits. The incidence rate of primary non-tuberculosis spondylodiscitis has been estimated from 2.2 to 2.4 cases per 100,000 person-years, and it has been reported to be increasing because of the aging population. The objectives were to determine the safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation (PI) with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in the treatment of primary spondylodiscitis by comparing perioperative data, functional outcomes, and overall infection-free survival. METHODS: Analysis of data from the DWG Registry on patients who have undergone posterior instrumentation with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis from the thoracolumbar junction to S1 (Th10-S1) at 10 institutions from January 2012 to December 2016. RESULTS: In total, 420 posterior instrumentations with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement in primary spondylodiscitis in the thoracolumbar junction to S1 were identified in the registry; N.=138 were exclusively percutaneous posterior instrumented (PPI), while N.=102 underwent open posterior instrumentation (OPI) without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement and N.=180 OPI with interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement. Clinical evaluation after surgery did not show a significant difference between groups including improvement of the mobilization and infection-free survival. However, with PPI the duration of operation and blood loss was significantly less than OPI with and without interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest interbody cage, bony attachment and debridement as not indispensable for treatment in primary spondylodiscitis. Therefore, we encourage the use of posterior stabilization alone in the treatment of spondylodiscitis as less invasive procedure reducing costs in instrumentation.