Evaluation of Inhaled Alprostadil in Hospitalized Adult Patients.

BACKGROUND: Intermittent inhaled alprostadil (iPGE1) may be a viable alternative to inhaled nitric oxide or epoprostenol for management of right ventricular failure, pulmonary hypertension (pHTN) or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). However, limited evidence exists regarding iPGE1 use in adults, ideal dosing strategies, or optimal use cases. OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical characteristics of patients receiving iPGE1 and identify specific sub-populations warranting further research. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of inpatients who received at least one dose of iPGE1. The primary outcome was to describe patient characteristics and alprostadil dosing strategies. Secondary outcomes included changes in respiratory support requirements, hemodynamics, and inotropic/vasoactive use. Outcomes were stratified and compared based on primary therapeutic indication (cardiac or pulmonary). RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received iPGE1 40 (75%) for pulmonary (pHTN or ARDS) and 14 (25%) for cardiac indications. There was no difference between indications in the number of patients de-escalated from level of respiratory (53% vs 57%, P = 0.76), inotropic (70% vs 57%, P = 0.39), or vasopressor support (78% vs 57%, P = 0.17). Furthermore, there was no significant improvement in cardiopulmonary parameters at multiple time intervals after iPGE1 initiation. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: This is the largest study to date on the use of intermittent iPGE1 in adults. Alprostadil was safely utilized in novel populations; however, efficacy as evaluated by clinical or surrogate endpoints could not be demonstrated and further investigation is needed to determine its potential and optimal place in therapy.

The Safety of Midline Catheters for Intravenous Therapy at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Background: Midline catheters (MCs) have arisen as alternatives to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) for both general intravenous therapy and extended outpatient parenteral therapy. However, there is a lack of data concerning the safety of medication therapy through midline for extended durations. Objective: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety of MCs for extended intravenous use. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study evaluating patients who received intravenous therapy through an MC at a tertiary care academic medical center. The primary end point was the incidence of composite catheter-related adverse events that included local events, catheter dislodgment, infiltration, catheter occlusion, catheter-related venous thromboembolism, extravasation, and line-associated infection. Results: A total of 82 MC placements and 50 PICC placements were included; 50 MCs were for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy, and 32 were for inpatient intravenous use. There were 21 complications per 1000 catheter-days in the outpatient group and 7 complications per 1000 catheter-days in the PICC group (P = 0.91). The median time to complication in both groups was 8 days. The antimicrobial classes commonly associated with complications were cephalosporins, carbapenems, and penicillins. Conclusion and Relevance: Our results suggest that intravenous therapy with MCs is generally safe for prolonged courses that do not exceed 14 days as compared with PICC lines, which can be placed for months. There is still limited evidence for the use of MCs between 14 and 28 days of therapy. This study can help guide our selection of intravenous catheters for the purpose of outpatient antimicrobial therapy.

Clinical outcomes with unfractionated heparin monitored by anti-factor Xa vs. activated partial Thromboplastin time.

Anti-factor Xa (anti-Xa) monitoring of unfractionated heparin (UFH) is associated with less time to achieve therapeutic anticoagulation compared to the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, it is unknown whether clinical outcomes differ between these methods of monitoring. The aim of this research was to compare the rate of venous thrombosis and bleeding events in patients that received UFH monitored by anti-Xa compared to the aPTT. A retrospective review of electronic health records identified adult patients that received UFH given intravenously (IV) for ≥2 days, with either anti-Xa or aPTT monitoring at an academic tertiary care hospital. This was a pre/post study design conducted between January 1 to December 30, 2014 (aPTT), and January 1 to December 30, 2016 (anti-Xa). All UFH adjustments were based on institutional nomograms. The primary outcome was venous thrombosis and the secondary outcome was bleeding, both of which occurred between UFH administration and discharge from the index hospitalization. A total of 2500 patients were in the anti-Xa group and 2847 patients aPTT group. Venous thrombosis occurred in 10.2% vs 10.8% of patients in the anti-Xa and aPTT groups, respectively (P = .49). Bleeding occurred in 33.7% vs 33.6% of patients in the anti-Xa and aPTT groups, respectively (P = .94). Anti-Xa monitoring was not an independent predictor of either outcome in multivariate logistic regression analyses. Our study found no difference in clinical outcomes between anti-Xa and aPTT-based monitoring of UFH IV.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus warfarin in people living with human immunodeficiency virus.

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is associated with increased rates of cardiovascular disease and vascular events, and people living with HIV (PLWH) may often have indications for therapeutic anticoagulation. However, the ideal anticoagulant in PLWH remains unknown. This retrospective cohort evaluated the tolerability and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in PLWH. The primary outcome was tolerability, defined as a composite of bleeding and/or discontinuation rates. The secondary outcomes included recurrent thromboembolism, bleeding, and discontinuations, independently. There were 92 patients included for analysis, 48 in the direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) arm and 44 in the warfarin arm. There were 35 (38%) PLWH that did not tolerate oral anticoagulation therapy in the total cohort. Among these, 19 received a DOAC and 16 received warfarin. There were 16 (17%) PLWH that experienced a bleeding event: six in the DOAC arm and 10 in the warfarin arm. There were 15 (16%) PLWH that experienced recurrent thromboembolism, with similar rates between DOAC versus warfarin (10, 21% vs 5, 11%, respectively; p = 0.11). The most commonly prescribed HIV regimens were protease inhibitor and integrase inhibitor-based regimens. Overall, anticoagulation-related outcomes with either a DOAC or warfarin were poor in our cohort of PLWH, with high rates of bleeding, discontinuations, and recurrent thromboembolism. Further studies are necessary to validate and assess reasons for poor tolerability.

Botulinum toxin injection for dysphagia: a blinded retrospective videofluoroscopic swallowing study analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of botulinum toxin type A injections on dysphagia accompanied by upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction. DESIGN: A preinjection and postinjection blinded retrospective review was performed using the videofluoroscopic swallowing study video clips of eight patients administered botulinum toxin type A because of dysphagia with accompanying upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction at a dysphagia clinic in a department of rehabilitation medicine at a university hospital. The outcome variables applied were a functional dysphagia scale that included assessments of food residues in vallecula and piriform sinuses, and bolus transit time, and physician's judgment regarding which videos (preinjection or postinjection) were functionally superior in terms of aspiration frequency and bolus transit time. RESULTS: After botulinum toxin type A injection, residues in the piriform sinus significantly improved (P < 0.05), and the applied functional dysphagia scale showed a tendency toward improvement (P = 0.173). A blinded physician found postinjection to be superior to preinjection in terms of videofluoroscopic swallowing study results in six of eight cases. CONCLUSIONS: Botulinum toxin type A injection to the upper esophageal sphincter was found to improve swallowing function in patients with upper esophageal sphincter dysfunction and seems to offer a possible therapeutic option in these patients.