Comprehensive assessment of the elderly cancer patient: the feasibility of self-report methodology.

PURPOSE: Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) has aided the medical community greatly in understanding the quality-of-life issues and functional needs of older patients. With its professional team assessment approach, however, CGA may be time consuming and costly. The goal of the present study was to assess the ability of cancer patients to complete a self-administered CGA and then to characterize cancer patients across multiple domains and age groups. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-six male outpatient oncology patients at the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center were asked to fill out a survey assessing 10 domains (demographics, comorbid conditions, activities of daily living, functional status, pain, financial well being, social support, emotional state, spiritual well-being, and quality of life). RESULTS: Seventy-six percent of the patients who received their surveys and kept their appointments returned the assessment tool. Older oncology patients had significantly less education (P <.0001), income (P =.05), frequent exercise (P =.01), and chance of being disease free (P =.003) than younger patients. Other findings in older patients were a higher rate of marriage (P =.02), more difficulty in taking medications (P =.05), and less cigarette (P =.03) and alcohol (P =.03) use. Members of all age cohorts reported a sense of social support, with younger patients deriving this more from family and friends than older patients, and older patients deriving social support more from membership in religious communities than younger patients. No differences were found across age groups for number and impact of comorbid illnesses, number of medications, basic and instrumental activities of daily living, pain, overall health rating, financial adequacy, anxiety, depression, and quality of life. CONCLUSION: CGA can be conducted in an outpatient cancer community using a self-report format. Despite the fact that this population varied demographically across age groups and is limited to veterans, this study demonstrated remarkable similarities between younger and older cancer patients in terms of functional status, health states, and quality of life.

The association between oral health and general health and quality of life in older male cancer patients.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the long-term effects of oral health problems on quality of life (QoL), functional status, pain, and general health in older male cancer patients. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a prospective observational study. SETTING: Community dwelling cancer patients served by a Department of Veterans Affairs hospital. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty male cancer patients responded to the question "Do you have tooth or mouth problems making it hard to eat?" The relationship between patients answering "yes" and the following parameters was assessed: demographics, comorbid conditions, habits, activities of daily living, pain, anxiety, depression, social support, spirituality, QoL, and overall health ratings. MEASUREMENTS: Chi-square contingency tables for dichotomous variables, Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel for ordered categorical variables, and t tests for associations with continuous variables. RESULTS: The median age of respondents was 67. Those reporting tooth or mouth problems had had their cancer diagnosed on average 2.9 years before, and 83.3% were found clinically to be cancer free. Patients with these problems had significantly lower global (P=.003) and subscale scores on QoL analysis and higher levels of anxiety (P<.001) and depression (P=.01) than those without tooth or mouth problems; they also had significantly more pain (P<.001) and lower physical functioning (P<.001) and were more impaired in activities of daily living (P<.001). Those with tooth or mouth problems were more likely to describe their overall health as fair or poor (P=.01). Having cancer located in the head and neck region related significantly to having mouth or tooth problems (P=.005), but these problems were not associated with race, education, income, insurance coverage, age, comorbid conditions, alcohol consumption, tobacco or medication usage, type of cancer treatment, tumor stage at diagnosis or follow-up, perceived social support, or spirituality. CONCLUSION: Older male cancer patients with mouth or tooth problems making it hard to eat are more likely to have a lower QoL, poorer emotional health, lower levels of physical functioning, and greater pain than patients without these problems.

Geriatric assessment and comorbidity.

Elderly persons, a rapidly growing population segment, have an increased incidence of cancer. The older cancer patient's clinical evaluation and treatment is influenced by conditions such as disabilities, comorbidity, and functional status, along with tumor type and stage. These conditions and other geriatric syndromes can be identified by comprehensive geriatric assessment to guide therapy and affect prognosis and quality of life. Comprehensive geriatric assessment involves the medical, functional, affective, social, spiritual, and environmental assessments. The medical assessment, which includes a nutrition, vision, hearing, continence, gait and balance, and cognition evaluation, can provide additional information to performance status and comorbidity. Although there are many assessment domains using several instruments, comprehensive geriatric assessment can be focused and efficient, especially with a multidisciplinary team of nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and other personnel. Comorbid illnesses may have complex interactions, with the underlying cancer influencing cancer diagnosis, disease course, treatment-related side effects, and mortality. Many instruments are available for comorbidity measurement, and retrospective studies in elderly cancer cohorts have shown comorbidity to influence survival. However, the ultimate aim would be to use comorbidity and comprehensive geriatric assessments prospectively in the older cancer patient to help predict the suitability and success of treatment with various antineoplastic modalities.

Assessing a prostate cancer brachytherapy technique using early patient-reported symptoms: a potential early indicator for technology assessment?

Brachytherapy for early prostate cancer can cause long-term urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction. Modifying technique may mitigate complications, but definitive outcome assessment requires long-term follow-up. Although radiation dose plausibly mediates all treatment-related toxicity, short-term symptoms may indicate long-term outcomes. We sought an early indication of whether a modified brachytherapy technique successfully decreased toxicity in the anticipated direction by assessing changes in symptoms and symptom distress 3 months after treatment. In a prospective study of clinically localized prostate cancer using a validated, patient-reported questionnaire, we assessed 85 men, whose primary treatment was brachytherapy alone, prior to treatment and 3 months after the procedure. Twenty-two men received standard ultrasound-guided brachytherapy (SB), and 63 men received magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy (MB), a technique intended to decrease urinary toxicity by reducing urethral irradiation. Patient age and other sociodemographic variables were similar in the 2 groups. The MB group experienced a greater increase in urinary obstruction/irritation symptoms (P = 0.02) and sexual function distress, but not sexual dysfunction (P = 0.22), whereas the SB group reported a smaller increase in bowel symptoms (P = 0.04) and bowel distress (P = 0.02). We found reduced short-term urinary obstruction/irritation and increased bowel problems after MB consistent with the hypothesized effects of the modified technique, although no obvious mechanism explains the decreased sexual function distress in MB patients. Whether these short-term changes predict long-term outcome differences will require much longer follow-up. However, these results suggest that measuring early symptoms may indicate whether an altered brachytherapy treatment technique has intended favorable consequences, potentially accelerating technology assessment.

Aging and cancer.

A substantial increase in the number of elderly people in the populations of developed nations in the coming years has been projected. Persons 65 years and older are at significantly higher risk of developing cancer when compared to younger individuals. There is a resulting increase in cancer incidence as well as mortality in this advanced age group. It is important to know how changes in physiological reserve and functional status in elderly patients, polypharmacy issues, comorbidities, and other age-related problems can affect cancer prognosis and management. Elderly patients are not adequately represented in clinical trials, thus creating a relative lack of information related to specific issues about elderly cancer patients and their care. Nevertheless, there is a substantial amount of guidance available, and in this review we will address selected issues of importance when considering the approach to the older cancer patient.

Geriatric oncology: past, present, future.

Efforts to integrate geriatric oncology principles in the training of all medical oncologists are underway.

Evaluation of agreement between physicians' notation of 'no evidence of disease' (NED) and patients' report of cancer status.

This study examines extent of agreement between oncologists' and cancer patients' reports of current cancer status. Participants with history of cancer were given a comprehensive geriatric assessment in which they were asked whether they had cancer at the present time. This was compared to cancer status concurrently recorded by their physicians in the chart. 75.5% of patients whose physicians reported 'no evidence of disease' (NED) reported that they currently had cancer. 30% of them were anxious and 27% were depressed. Among patients for whom both the patient and physician reported no cancer, only 12.5% were anxious and 7% depressed. Compared to patients with concordant responses, those who discrepantly reported they had cancer had significantly more comorbid illnesses, medications, and pain, and lower levels of social, emotional, and physical functioning. Moreover, equal levels of distress and dysfunction were found between those who reported cancer but had NED and those who reported cancer and did have active disease by physician notation. Although conclusions about cause and effect are limited due to study design, findings suggest that some patients might suffer unnecessarily from lack of understanding about current disease status. These findings also suggest the need for improved physician-patient communication and symptom recognition/management.

Effects of cancer history and comorbid conditions on mortality and healthcare use among older cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND: Older cancer survivors use healthcare services to an increased extent relative to their counterparts who have no history of malignant disease. In the current study, the authors set out to assess the effects of cancer history and comorbid conditions on healthcare use and mortality. METHODS: Using information from the 1992 North Carolina Established Populations for Epidemiologic Study of the Elderly database, study participants were classified as having no history of malignant disease or as having a recent (cancer diagnosed < 1 year earlier), intermediate (cancer diagnosed 1-6 years earlier), or remote (cancer diagnosed > 6 years earlier) history of malignancy. Overall, 15 different comorbid conditions were ascertained. Logistic regression models adjusted for sociodemographic factors, tobacco and alcohol use, and functional measures were used to determine the risk of emergency room, hospital, and nursing home (NH) admission in 1992 and also in 1996 according to history of malignancy and presence of comorbid conditions. Using data from the National Death Registry, a similar controlled analysis of 7-year mortality also was performed. RESULTS: There were 2567 participants in the current study (mean age, 79 years; range, 71-102 years); 69% of all participants were women, 55% were African American, and 14% reported having a history of malignancy. Participants with a history of malignancy had an average of 3 comorbid conditions, and differences across groups in terms of cardiovascular and lung disease incidence were noted. Controlled analyses revealed that recent cancer history (odds ratio [OR], 15.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.0-34.2) and intermediate cancer history (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3) were associated with same-year hospital admission. In addition, having a recent history of malignancy in 1992 was found to be correlated with NH admission 4 years later (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.1-9.1). History of malignancy was not associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer history had limited influence on healthcare use and mortality. Efforts aimed at improving health-related outcomes in older cancer survivors should continue to focus on attenuating the impact of comorbid conditions.