Acute opioid withdrawal syndrome from naloxone/naloxegol interaction.

Naloxegol is a new peripherally acting mu-opioid receptor antagonist to treat opioid-induced constipation with supposedly no effect on opioid analgesia. We present a patient with cancer-related pain who developed acute opioid withdrawal symptoms due to an interaction between the opioid antagonist naloxone and naloxegol. He was treated with oxycodone sustained release because of poor pain control. For opioid-related constipation, he had been receiving naloxegol. He complained about worsening pain and constipation and oxycodone was switched to oxycodone/naloxone. Shortly after intake, he experienced acute severe agitation, anxiety, sweating, tachycardia, disorientation and yawning without improvement after intravenous midazolam. Only after intravenous morphine administration, symptoms were controlled. He was switched back to the previous oxycodone dose without naloxone, with naloxegol being maintained. In the light of this case we suggest to avoid the use of naloxone and naloxegol in combination, or at least, to use it with extreme caution and monitorisation of tolerance.

Radiation therapy alone in elderly with early stage non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy (RT) alone is frequently used in elderly patients with medically inoperable early stage (I/II) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We retrospectively investigated the effectiveness of RT alone in this patient population treated in our institution. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between 1995 and 1999, a total of 33 patients were treated with RT alone in our institution, all being males. RT doses ranged 66-78 Gy (median, 70 Gy) using standard fractionation (2.0 Gy per fraction). The age range was 71-97 years (median, 75 years) with 11 patients being >or=80 years old. Twenty-two (67%) patients had a squamous cell carcinoma. There were 24 (73%) stage I and nine (27%) stage II patients. RESULTS: Radiographic objective response rate was observed in 23 (70%) patients. The median survival time was 37.4 months and 3-year survival time was 50%, while the median cause-specific survival time was 48.1 months and a 3-year cause-specific survival rate was 55.3%. The median time to local recurrence was 36.8 months and a 3-year local recurrence-free survival rate was 50.2%, while the median time to distant metastasis was not achieved yet, the 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rate being 71.4%. One (3%) patient died of RT-induced acute lung toxicity, while only two (6%) patients experienced late grade 3 lung toxicity. No other high-grade toxicity was observed during this study. CONCLUSIONS: RT alone was effective and low toxic in elderly with early stage (I/II) NSCLC and could be considered as treatment of choice in this patient population.

Efficacy of granisetron in the antiemetic control of nonsurgical intestinal obstruction in advanced cancer: a phase II clinical trial.

The objective of this study was to assess antiemetic efficacy of granisetron in inoperable intestinal obstruction caused by advanced cancer. The study was open, prospective, and multi-centered. We assessed 24 patients (mean age: 61.3 years; 10 males, 14 females) with intestinal obstruction who were refractory to previous antiemetics. Obstruction involved the upper intestine in six patients, the lower intestine in three, and was at multiple levels in 15. Daily treatment included intravenous granisetron (3mg) and dexamethasone (8 mg); nasogastric drainage was not allowed. Subcutaneous haloperidol was available as rescue therapy. A numeric scale was used to evaluate nausea, pain, asthenia, and anorexia at baseline visit and every 24 hours up to the completion of four days of treatment (final visit). Treatment failure was defined as nausea >4 on the numeric scale, vomiting 2/day or more, and rescue therapy with haloperidol at 5mg/day or more. Of the 24 patients, 23 were evaluable for efficacy. Evaluation pre- vs. post-treatment indicated a significant decrease in the severity of nausea (score 6.9 vs. 0.8; P<0.001), number of episodes of vomiting (5.3 vs. 1.0; P<0.001), and abdominal pain (score 4.4 vs. 1.2; P<0.001). Nausea and vomiting control was achieved in 86.9% of patients. Although there was a trend toward greater efficacy in the lower and multiple levels of obstruction, the differences were not statistically significant owing, probably, to small sample size. We conclude that granisetron may be highly efficacious in the control of emesis resulting from intestinal obstruction caused by metastatic cancer, and can be used effectively in patients refractory to other antiemetics.