Prediction of Iron Deficiency Anemia in Third Trimester of Pregnancy Based on Data in the First Trimester: A Prospective Cohort Study in a High-Income Country.

Background: Systematic iron supplementation may be harmful in pregnant women with non-depleted iron. Our objectives were to estimate the prevalence of anemia at the third trimester of pregnancy (T3) and to identify the parameters at the first trimester (T1), which best predict anemia at T3. Methods: This prospective cohort study in France included pregnant women at T1 without non-iron deficiency anemia. Clinical and social characteristics, health-related quality of life, blood count, and a frozen blood sample were collected at T1 and/or T3. Secondly, a matched nested case−control study was built for women with anemia at T3 but not at T1. Multivariate analyses and ROC curves were used to identify the best predictive parameter(s) of anemia at T3. Results: The prevalence of anemia at T3 in the cohort (629 women) was 21.9% (95% CI 18.7−25.2%). In the matched nested case−control study (256 women), hemoglobin (Hb), serum ferritin (SF) and the SF/soluble transferrin receptor ratio at T1 were predictive of anemia at T3 (p < 0.001); however, clinical and social characteristics, as serum hepcidin were not. In multivariate analyses, Hb at T1 was the best predictive biomarker of anemia at T3 with a cut-off value of 120 g/L (specificity 87.5%). Conclusions: The prevalence of anemia at the end of pregnancy remained high in a High-Income Country. Clinical, social, and biochemical parameters did not seem useful to predict anemia at T3 and could not guide iron supplementation. We suggest systematically performing a simple blood count in the first trimester of pregnancy and offering oral iron supplementation for women with Hb < 120 g/L.

[Factor V inhibitor: case report and literature review]. / Anticoagulant acquis anti-facteur V : à propos d'un cas et revue de la littérature.

Acquired inhibitors to factor V are considered rare events and the cause is often unknown. Diagnostic haemostasis assays to correctly assess this phenomenon are not always perfect and reproducible. Various treatments have been attempted but a standardised management of patients is still lacking. We report the case of a patient who developed a factor V inhibitor and we take the opportunity to make an inventory of the latest data.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Construction of a pretest diagnostic score derived from the analysis of a prospective multinational database, with internal validation.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) requires pretest probability assessment and dedicated laboratory assays. OBJECTIVE: To develop a pretest score for HIT. DESIGN: Observational; analysis of prospectively collected data of hospitalized patients suspected with HIT (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00748839). SETTING: Thirty-one tertiary hospitals in France, Switzerland, and Belgium. PATIENTS: Patients tested for HIT antibodies (2280 evaluable), randomly allocated to derivation and validation cohorts. MEASUREMENTS: Independent adjudicators diagnosed HIT based on the prospectively collected data and serotonin release assay results. RESULTS: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia was diagnosed in 234 (14.7%) and 99 (14.5%) patients in the two cohorts. Eight features were associated with HIT (in brackets, points assigned for score calculation of the score): unfractionated heparin (1); therapeutic-dose heparin (1); cardiopulmonary bypass (cardiac surgery) (2); major trauma (3); 5- to 21-day interval from anticoagulation initiation to suspicion of HIT (4); ≥40% decrease in platelet count over ≤6 days (3); thrombotic event, arterial (3) or venous (3). The C-statistic was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.82). In the validation cohort, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.80). Three groups of scores were defined; HIT prevalence reached almost 30% in the high-probability group. LIMITATION: The performance of the score may depend on settings and practices. CONCLUSION: The objective, easy-to-collect, clinical features of HIT we evidenced were incorporated into a pretest score, which may guide clinical decisions regarding diagnostic testing and anticoagulation.

[Evaluation of the coagulometer STA R Max® (Stago) for routine coagulation parameters]. / Évaluation des performances de l'automate STA R Max® (Stago) pour les paramètres d'hémostase de routine.

The STA R Max® is a fully automated multiparameter coagulometer using clotting (viscosity-based detection system), chromogenic and immunologic assays. STA R Max® is equipped with an innovative software (STA Coag Expert®) designed to assist laboratory in accreditation. The aim of this study was to evaluate its performances for the certification according to ISO 15189 quality standard in the haemostasis unit of our university hospital. The following tests were evaluated: prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), kaolin cephalin clotting time (KCCT), fibrinogen, anti-Xa assay and D-dimers. In normal and pathological range, the intra-assay coefficients of variation (CV) for PT, aPTT, KCCT and fibrinogen were below 4.0%. Intra-assay CV was of 4.0% for the anti-Xa assay and intra-assay CV was of 7.9% for D-dimers. Inter-assay CV were below 5.0% for PT, aPPT, KCCT and fibrinogen, 14.9% for anti-Xa assay and 8.6% for D-dimers. The interlaboratory comparisons were below 8.7% for PT, aPPT and KCCT, 5.0% for fibrinogen and 15.5% for anti-Xa assay. All results were acceptable according to suitable CV established by GFHT and the provider. The concordance between all coagulometers was excellent, with correlation coefficient close to 1 (0.99 for all parameters except for aPPT which was 0.98) calculated thanks to an intra-class correlation study. In conclusion, the STA R Max® analyser is suitable for haemostasis laboratories and facilitates certification of a laboratory.

Epidemiology and outcome of thrombocytopenic patients in the intensive care unit: results of a prospective multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To assess the epidemiology of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with thrombocytopenia (TP). METHODS: All consecutive ICU-admitted patients with TP either on admission or acquired during ICU stay were included. TP was defined as either absolute (platelet count <100 × 10(9)/L) or relative (decrease in the platelet count >30 %). Extensive diagnostic workup of TP including bone marrow aspiration was performed. RESULTS: Absolute TP was diagnosed in 208 patients and relative TP in 93. In six patients (2 %), no cause of TP was identified. The median number of TP etiologies per patient was two, with sepsis being the leading cause. Bone marrow aspirates were analyzed in 238 patients. They showed a normal megakaryocyte number in 221 (93 %) and provided novel information for diagnosis in 52 (22 %). Results were susceptible to having an impact on patient management in 22 cases (11 %). The frequency of bone marrow aspiration with results susceptible to having an impact on management did not differ between patients with and without disseminated intravascular coagulation (P = 0.22) and with and without sepsis/septic shock (P = 0.7) but was significantly lower in patients with relative TP than in those with absolute TP (P < 0.01). A serious bleeding event was observed in 30 patients (14.9 %) and a nadir platelet count below 50 × 10(9)/L was an independent risk factor (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In thrombocytopenic patients, sepsis is the leading cause of TP. Bone marrow aspirates may yield significant information on TP mechanisms and contribute to the subsequent management of patients, especially those with absolute TP.

Proposal of a score combining red blood cell indices for early differentiation of beta-thalassemia minor from iron deficiency anemia.

This study evaluates the diagnostic reliability of 11 red blood cells indices, together with our new index, referred to as '11T', in differentiation of beta-thalassemia minor (BTm) from iron deficiency anemia (IDA). A total of 129 patients with microcytic anemia were involved in a retrospective study, 80 with IDA and 49 with BTm. Using an automatic program, we calculated 11 discrimination indices and a new score, 11T, based on the results of these 11 tests. To confirm the interest of 11T, we performed a prospective study with 53 patients. 11T was most effective in differentiating BTm from IDA: 11T had the highest Youden's index (83%) and the best percentage of correctly identified patients (93%) and gave optimal performance in our prospective study. We proposed a score, 11T, which is able to discriminate between IDA and BTm with high specificity and high sensitivity in order to conduct the appropriate confirmatory examination.