Change in Physician Burnout between 2013 and 2020 in a Major Health System.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing changes in physician burnout over time can offer insight into the causes of burnout. Existing studies are limited by using different samples of physicians at each time point. Our objective was to assess changes in burnout between 2013-2014 and 2019-2020 overall and within a cohort of physicians who took the survey twice. METHODS: This is a longitudinal cohort and cross-sectional study of physicians in a major health system. They were administered the Maslach Burnout Inventory in 2013-2014 and 2019-2020. We separately assessed differences in odds of burnout and its subscales in 2013-2014 and 2019-2020 by physician characteristics and clinical time. We then assessed differences in the odds of reporting burnout and its subscales in 2019-2020 compared with 2013-2014 overall and by physician sex, race, and change in clinical full-time employment. RESULTS: There were 1220 respondents in 2013-2014, 503 in 2019-2020, and 149 who responded at both time points. Burnout increased from 35% to 56%. Compared with 2013-2014, physicians had 2.39 higher odds (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.92-2.98) of burnout in 2019-2020, and this change in burnout was significantly more pronounced for female versus male physicians (odds ratio 1.80; 95% CI 1.57-1.80). Compared with White physicians, non-White physicians had significantly lower odds of burnout at both time points, but their odds increased significantly more over time (odds ratio 1.36; 95% CI 1.05-1.57). CONCLUSIONS: We found a substantial increase in burnout over time, which was particularly pronounced for non-White and female physicians. Assessment over time is essential for understanding problematic trajectories of burnout that may be obscured by cross-sectional studies.

Informed Decision Making for Anticoagulation Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) must decide between warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), a decision involving important tradeoffs. Our objective was to understand whether physicians engage patients in informed decision making for anticoagulants. DESIGN: We performed an analysis of recorded conversations between physicians and anticoagulation-naïve patients in the Verilogue Point-of-Practice database. We assessed the presence of 7 elements of informed decision making, as well as a discussion of financial costs. RESULTS: Of 37 encounters with 21 physicians, 92% resulted in a DOAC prescription and 8% resulted in a warfarin prescription. Seventy percent met criteria for discussion of pros and cons, 70% for discussion of the alternatives, 43% presented the decision, 30% included an assessment of patient understanding, 22% included an explanation of the patient's role in decision making, 22% included an assessment of patient preferences, and 19% included a discussion of uncertainty. Two encounters (5%) included all 7 elements and 9 (24%) included none. Physicians discussed treatment costs with patients in 43% of encounters. LIMITATIONS: We assessed informed decision making in a single encounter. Physicians and patients may have had other discussions that were not captured in our data. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians often presented the alternatives but did not generally engage patients in informed decision making. The high rate of DOAC prescriptions is likely the result of physician preferences, as patient preferences were rarely assessed. IMPLICATIONS: Strategies to support physicians in engaging patients in informed decision making for anticoagulation are needed. HIGHLIGHTS: While physicians discussed the alternatives and presented pros and cons with patients, they rarely assessed patient preferences, explained the patient's role in decision making, or addressed uncertainty.The cost of treatment with DOACs versus warfarin was discussed by physicians in less than half of encounters, limiting patients' ability to make informed decisions for anticoagulation.Only 2 encounters (5%) fulfilled all 7 elements of informed decision making.

Adherence to the American Diabetes Association's Glycemic Goals in the Treatment of Diabetes Among Older Americans, 2001-2018.

OBJECTIVE: To assess trends in HbA1c and appropriateness of diabetes medication use by patient health status. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted cross-sectional analysis of 2001-2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). We included older adults age ≥65 years who had ever been told they had diabetes, had HbA1c >6.4%, or had fasting plasma glucose >125 mg/dL. Health status was categorized as good, intermediate, or poor. Being below goal was defined as taking medication despite having HbA1c ≥1% below the glycemic goals of the American Diabetes Association (ADA), which varied by patient health status and time period. Drugs associated with hypoglycemia included sulfonylureas, insulin, and meglitinides. RESULTS: We included 3,539 patients. Mean HbA1c increased over time and did not differ by health status. Medication use increased from 59% to 74% with metformin being the most common drug in patients with good or intermediate health and sulfonylureas and insulin most often prescribed to patients with poor health. Among patients taking medications, prevalence of patients below goal increased while prevalence of those above goal decreased from 2001 to 2018. One-half of patients with poor health and taking medications had below-goal HbA1c; two-thirds received drugs associated with hypoglycemia. Patients with poor health who were below goal had 4.9 (95% CI 2.3-10.4) times the adjusted odds of receiving drugs associated with hypoglycemia than healthy patients. CONCLUSIONS: In accordance with ADA's newer Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, HbA1c goals were relaxed but did not differ by health status. Below-goal HbA1c was common among patients with poor health; many were prescribed medications associated with a higher risk of hypoglycemia.

Estimating the costs of physician turnover in hospital medicine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Costs of physician turnover are lacking for specialties organized around a site of care. We sought to estimate the cost of physician turnover in adult hospital medicine (HM). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: A retrospective cohort study within a large integrated health system between July 2017 and June 2020. To understand likely variation across the country, we also simulated costs using national wage data and a range of assumptions. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Direct costs of turnover borne by our department and institution and indirect costs from reduced hospital billing. In our simulation, we measured costs per hired hospitalist. RESULTS: Between July 2017 and June 2020, 34 hospitalists left the practice, 97 hospitalists were hired, and a total of 234 hospitalists provided adult care at six hospitals. Direct costs of turnover totaled $6166 per incoming physician. Additional clinical coverage required at times of transition was the largest expense, followed by physician time recruiting and interviewing prospective candidates. The salary difference between outgoing and incoming hospitalists was cost-saving, while reduced billing would add to indirect costs per hire. In our simulation using national wage data, programs hiring one hospitalist would spend a mean of $56,943 (95% CI: $27,228-$86,659), programs hiring five hospitalists would spend a mean of $33,333 per hospitalist (95% CI: $9375-$57,292), and programs hiring 10 hospitalists would spend a mean of $30,382 per hospitalist (95% CI: $6877-$53,887). CONCLUSIONS: The financial cost of turnover in HM appears to be substantially lower than earlier estimates of the cost of turnover from non-hospitalist specialties.

Treatment and Outcomes of Inpatient Hypertension Among Adults With Noncardiac Admissions.

Importance: Despite high prevalence of elevated blood pressure (BP) among medical inpatients, BP management guidelines are lacking for this population. The outcomes associated with intensifying BP treatment in the hospital are poorly studied. Objectives: To characterize clinician response to BP in the hospital and at discharge and to compare short- and long-term outcomes associated with antihypertensive treatment intensification. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study took place from January 1 to December 31, 2017, with 1 year of follow-up at 10 hospitals within the Cleveland Clinic Hospitals health care system. All adults admitted to a medicine service in 2017 were evaluated for inclusion. Patients with cardiovascular diagnoses were excluded. Demographic and BP characteristics were used for propensity matching. Exposures: Acute hypertension treatment, defined as administration of an intravenous antihypertensive medication or a new class of an oral antihypertensive treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The association between acute hypertension treatment and subsequent inpatient acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, and stroke was measured. Postdischarge outcomes included stroke and myocardial infarction within 30 days and BP control up to 1 year. Results: Among 22 834 adults hospitalized for noncardiovascular diagnoses (mean [SD] age, 65.6 [17.9] years; 12 993 women [56.9%]; 15 963 White patients [69.9%]), 17 821 (78%) had at least 1 hypertensive BP recorded during their admission. Of these patients, 5904 (33.1%) were treated. A total of 8692 of 106 097 cases (8.2%) of hypertensive systolic BPs were treated; of these, 5747 (66%) were treated with oral medications. In a propensity-matched sample controlling for patient and BP characteristics, treated patients had higher rates of subsequent acute kidney injury (466 of 4520 [10.3%] vs 357 of 4520 [7.9%]; P < .001) and myocardial injury (53 of 4520 [1.2%] vs 26 of 4520 [0.6%]; P = .003). There was no BP interval in which treated patients had better outcomes than untreated patients. A total of 1645 of 17 821 patients (9%) with hypertension were discharged with an intensified antihypertensive regimen. Medication intensification at discharge was not associated with better BP control in the following year. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, hypertension was common among medical inpatients, but antihypertensive treatment intensification was not. Intensification of therapy without signs of end-organ damage was associated with worse outcomes.

Social Behaviors Associated With a Positive COVID-19 Test Result.

Objective To compare the social behaviors of individuals who were tested positive for COVID-19 relative to non-infected individuals.   Methods We sent COVID positive cases and age/gender-matched controls a survey regarding their social behaviors via MyChart (online patient portal). We called cases if they did not complete the electronic survey within two days. Data were collected from May to June 2020. Survey responses for cases without close contact and controls were compared using Pearson chi-square or Fisher's exact tests as appropriate.   Results A total of 339 participants completed the survey (113 cases, 226 controls); 45 (40%) cases had known contact with COVID-19. Cases were more likely to have recently traveled (4% vs. 0%, p = 0.01) or to work outside the home (40% vs. 25%, p = 0.02). There was no difference in the rates of attending private or public gatherings, mask/glove use, hand-washing, cleaning surfaces, and cleaning mail/groceries between cases and controls.   Conclusions Sixty percent of cases had no known contact with COVID-19, indicating ongoing community transmission and underlining the importance of contact tracing. The greater percentage of cases who work outside the home provides further evidence for social distancing and remote telework when possible.