Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 29
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Lancet ; 383(9920): 880-8, 2014 Mar 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24315521

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a common and burdensome complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). Previous trials suggesting benefit of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS were small, single-centre studies without placebo control. We aimed to assess the efficacy of ECS, compared with placebo stockings, for the prevention of PTS. METHODS: We did a multicentre randomised placebo-controlled trial of active versus placebo ECS used for 2 years to prevent PTS after a first proximal DVT in centres in Canada and the USA. Patients were randomly assigned to study groups with a web-based randomisation system. Patients presenting with a first symptomatic, proximal DVT were potentially eligible to participate. They were excluded if the use of compression stockings was contraindicated, they had an expected lifespan of less than 6 months, geographical inaccessibility precluded return for follow-up visits, they were unable to apply stockings, or they received thrombolytic therapy for the initial treatment of acute DVT. The primary outcome was PTS diagnosed at 6 months or later using Ginsberg's criteria (leg pain and swelling of ≥1 month duration). We used a modified intention to treat Cox regression analysis, supplemented by a prespecified per-protocol analysis of patients who reported frequent use of their allocated treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00143598, and Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN71334751. FINDINGS: From 2004 to 2010, 410 patients were randomly assigned to receive active ECS and 396 placebo ECS. The cumulative incidence of PTS was 14·2% in active ECS versus 12·7% in placebo ECS (hazard ratio adjusted for centre 1·13, 95% CI 0·73-1·76; p=0·58). Results were similar in a prespecified per-protocol analysis of patients who reported frequent use of stockings. INTERPRETATION: ECS did not prevent PTS after a first proximal DVT, hence our findings do not support routine wearing of ECS after DVT. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/prevenção & controle , Meias de Compressão , Adulto , Idoso , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Canadá/epidemiologia , Terapia Combinada , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/epidemiologia , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Recidiva , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico
2.
Clin Trials ; 11(5): 547-52, 2014 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24902921

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Blinding is a fundamental design strengthening feature in randomized clinical trials. Blinding is particularly important in trials whose outcome measures include subjective assessment of signs and symptoms, such as trials investigating the post-thrombotic syndrome, a frequent chronic complication of deep vein thrombosis. PURPOSE: To determine whether strategies used to blind site investigators, research coordinators and patients were successful in a specific device trial, a multicenter trial of active versus placebo elastic compression stockings worn for 2 years to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome in patients with a first deep vein thrombosis (the SOX Trial). METHODS: Patients were randomized to the active or placebo stocking intervention, which were indistinguishable in appearance at baseline. Replacement stockings were shipped directly to patients' homes and were not worn to any of the study visits during the study. Guesstimates of treatment group assignment were completed by site investigators, research coordinators and patients at the end of study follow-up. Statistical assessments of blinding were performed using the James and Bang blinding indices. RESULTS: Overall rates of correct responses were 10.4% for site investigators, 17.8% for research coordinators and 29.4% for patients. James blinding index values suggest that blinding was achieved for site investigators, research coordinators and patients. The treatment specific Bang blinding index values suggest that blinding was achieved for site investigators and research coordinators, but detected possible unblinding and opposite guess for patients in the active and placebo elastic compression stocking groups, respectively. LIMITATIONS: Post-study assessment of blinding, as was done for the SOX Trial, cannot distinguish between degree of blinding and hunches about an intervention's efficacy. However, as rates of post-thrombotic syndrome along with adverse events in the SOX Trial were similar between treatment groups, it is unlikely that hunches would have interfered with our end-of-trial assessment for blinding. CONCLUSION: Blinding strategies used in our trial were successful overall and appeared to be most effective for site investigators and research coordinators. For patients, there may have been some degree of unblinding in the active stocking group. However, as the trial results were negative with active elastic compression stocking showing no benefit over placebo elastic compression stocking, this potential unblinding has minimal impact on the overall conclusions of the trial.


Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/prevenção & controle , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto/normas , Meias de Compressão , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Adulto , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Efeito Placebo , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/complicações
3.
JAMA ; 308(14): 1443-51, 2012 Oct 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23045213

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Even though red blood cells (RBCs) are lifesaving in neonatal intensive care, transfusing older RBCs may result in higher rates of organ dysfunction, nosocomial infection, and length of hospital stay. OBJECTIVE: To determine if RBCs stored for 7 days or less compared with usual standards decreased rates of major nosocomial infection and organ dysfunction in neonatal intensive care unit patients requiring at least 1 RBC transfusion. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind, randomized controlled trial in 377 premature infants with birth weights less than 1250 g admitted to 6 Canadian tertiary neonatal intensive care units between May 2006 and June 2011. INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to receive transfusion of RBCs stored 7 days or less (n = 188) vs standard-issue RBCs in accordance with standard blood bank practice (n = 189). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite measure of major neonatal morbidities, including necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and intraventricular hemorrhage, as well as death. The primary outcome was measured within the entire period of neonatal intensive care unit stay up to 90 days after randomization. The rate of nosocomial infection was a secondary outcome. RESULTS: The mean age of transfused blood was 5.1 (SD, 2.0) days in the fresh RBC group and 14.6 (SD, 8.3) days in the standard group. Among neonates in the fresh RBC group, 99 (52.7%) had the primary outcome compared with 100 (52.9%) in the standard RBC group (relative risk, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.82-1.21). The rate of clinically suspected infection in the fresh RBC group was 77.7% (n = 146) compared with 77.2% (n = 146) in the standard RBC group (relative risk, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.90-1.12), and the rate of positive cultures was 67.5% (n = 127) in the fresh RBC group compared with 64.0% (n = 121) in the standard RBC group (relative risk, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.22). CONCLUSION: In this trial, the use of fresh RBCs compared with standard blood bank practice did not improve outcomes in premature, very low-birth-weight infants requiring a transfusion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00326924; Current Controlled Trials Identifier: ISRCTN65939658.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Recém-Nascido de muito Baixo Peso , Peso ao Nascer , Bancos de Sangue/normas , Displasia Broncopulmonar , Método Duplo-Cego , Enterocolite Necrosante , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Hemorragias Intracranianas , Masculino , Morbidade , Retinopatia da Prematuridade , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
CMAJ ; 183(1): 37-44, 2011 Jan 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21098066

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Exercise training may have the potential to improve post-thrombotic syndrome, a frequent, chronic complication of deep venous thrombosis. We conducted a randomized controlled two-centre pilot trial to assess the feasibility of a multicentre-based evaluation of a six-month exercise training program to treat post-thrombotic syndrome and to obtain preliminary data on the effectiveness of such a program. METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive exercise training (a six-month trainer-supervised program) or control treatment (an education session with monthly phone follow-ups). Levels of eligibility, consent, adherence and retention were used as indicators of study feasibility. Primary outcomes were change from baseline to six months in venous disease-specific quality of life (as measured using the Venous Insufficiency Epidemiological and Economic Study Quality of Life [VEINES-QOL] questionnaire) and severity of post-thrombotic syndrome (as measured by scores on the Villalta scale) in the exercise training group versus the control group, assessed by t tests. Secondary outcomes were change in generic quality of life (as measured using the Short-Form Health Survey-36 [SF-36] questionnaire), category of severity of post-thrombotic syndrome, leg strength, leg flexibility and time on treadmill. RESULTS: Of 95 patients with post-thrombotic syndrome, 69 were eligible, 43 consented and were randomized, and 39 completed the study. Exercise training was associated with improvement in VEINES-QOL scores (exercise training mean change 6.0, standard deviation [SD] 5.1 v. control mean change 1.4, SD 7.2; difference 4.6, 95% CI 0.54 to 8.7; p = 0.027) and improvement in scores on the Villalta scale (exercise training mean change -3.6, SD 3.7 v. control mean change -1.6, SD 4.3; difference -2.0, 95% CI -4.6 to 0.6; p = 0.14). Most secondary outcomes also showed greater improvement in the exercise training group. INTERPRETATION: Exercise training may improve post-thrombotic syndrome. It would be feasible to definitively evaluate exercise training as a treatment for post-thrombotic syndrome in a large multicentre trial.


Assuntos
Exercício Físico , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/terapia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Tolerância ao Exercício , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/etiologia , Síndrome Pós-Trombótica/fisiopatologia , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
6.
CMAJ ; 182(14): E694-701, 2010 Oct 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20805210

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic neuropathic pain affects 1%-2% of the adult population and is often refractory to standard pharmacologic treatment. Patients with chronic pain have reported using smoked cannabis to relieve pain, improve sleep and improve mood. METHODS: Adults with post-traumatic or postsurgical neuropathic pain were randomly assigned to receive cannabis at four potencies (0%, 2.5%, 6% and 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol) over four 14-day periods in a crossover trial. Participants inhaled a single 25-mg dose through a pipe three times daily for the first five days in each cycle, followed by a nine-day washout period. Daily average pain intensity was measured using an 11-point numeric rating scale. We recorded effects on mood, sleep and quality of life, as well as adverse events. RESULTS: We recruited 23 participants (mean age 45.4 [standard deviation 12.3] years, 12 women [52%]), of whom 21 completed the trial. The average daily pain intensity, measured on the 11-point numeric rating scale, was lower on the prespecified primary contrast of 9.4% v. 0% tetrahydrocannabinol (5.4 v. 6.1, respectively; difference = 0.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-1.4). Preparations with intermediate potency yielded intermediate but nonsignificant degrees of relief. Participants receiving 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol reported improved ability to fall asleep (easier, p = 0.001; faster, p < 0.001; more drowsy, p = 0.003) and improved quality of sleep (less wakefulness, p = 0.01) relative to 0% tetrahydrocannabinol. We found no differences in mood or quality of life. The most common drug-related adverse events during the period when participants received 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol were headache, dry eyes, burning sensation in areas of neuropathic pain, dizziness, numbness and cough. CONCLUSION: A single inhalation of 25 mg of 9.4% tetrahydrocannabinol herbal cannabis three times daily for five days reduced the intensity of pain, improved sleep and was well tolerated. Further long-term safety and efficacy studies are indicated. (International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Register no. ISRCTN68314063).


Assuntos
Dronabinol/uso terapêutico , Fumar Maconha , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Estudos Cross-Over , Método Duplo-Cego , Dronabinol/administração & dosagem , Dronabinol/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Placebos , Qualidade de Vida , Sono/efeitos dos fármacos , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Ann Intern Med ; 149(12): 869-78, 2008 Dec 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19075206

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Home-based rehabilitation is a promising approach to improve access to pulmonary rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation is as effective as outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). DESIGN: Randomized, multicenter, noninferiority trial. SETTING: 10 academic and community medical centers in Canada. PATIENTS: 252 patients with moderate to severe COPD. INTERVENTION: After a 4-week education program, patients took part in home-based rehabilitation or outpatient, hospital-based rehabilitation for 8 weeks. They were followed for 40 weeks to complete the 1-year study. MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was the change in Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale score at 1 year. The primary analysis took a modified intention-to-treat approach by using all patients who provided data at the specified follow-up time, regardless of their level of adherence. The analysis used regression modeling that adjusted for the effects of center, sex, and baseline level. All differences were computed as home intervention minus outpatient intervention. RESULTS: Both interventions produced similar improvements in the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnea subscale at 1 year: improvement in dyspnea of 0.62 (95% CI, 0.43 to 0.80) units in the home intervention (n = 107) and 0.46 (CI, 0.28 to 0.64) units in the outpatient intervention (n = 109). The difference between the 2 treatments at 1 year was small and clinically unimportant. The 95% CI of the difference did not exceed the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.5: difference in dyspnea score of 0.16 (CI, -0.08 to 0.40). Most adverse events were related to COPD exacerbations. No serious adverse event was considered to be related to the study intervention. LIMITATION: The contribution of the educational program to the improvement in health status and exercise tolerance cannot be ascertained. CONCLUSION: Home rehabilitation is a useful, equivalent alternative to outpatient rehabilitation in patients with COPD.


Assuntos
Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Idoso , Canadá , Dispneia/reabilitação , Terapia por Exercício/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Serviços Hospitalares de Assistência Domiciliar/normas , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
9.
J Neurol Sci ; 271(1-2): 80-6, 2008 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18474371

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To determine (i) whether serum inflammatory markers TNFalpha, IL-1beta. IL-6, and leptin are increased in post-poliomyelitis syndrome (PPS) compared to healthy controls; and (ii) whether an association exists between elevated inflammatory markers and clinical parameters in PPS. The cause of PPS is unknown, but abnormal inflammatory responses have been implicated in several small studies. METHODS: Serum inflammatory markers were measured (by Luminex) in 51 PPS patients and 26 normal controls. Clinical parameters assessed included disease duration, muscle strength (Medical Research Council sumscore), fatigue (Fatigue Severity Scale and Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory), and pain (visual analog scale scores). RESULTS: In PPS, TNFalpha levels, as well as IL-6 and leptin were significantly increased compared to controls (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p=0.03 for TNFalpha, p=0.03 for IL-6, p=0.01 for leptin). The elevated TNFalpha levels in PPS were associated with increased pain due to illness (Spearman correlation coefficient r=0.36, 95% C.I. 0.09 to 0.57) and specifically, with muscle pain (r=0.38, 95% C.I. 0.11 to 0.59). There were no correlations between inflammatory markers in PPS and joint pain, muscle strength, fatigue, or disease duration. CONCLUSIONS: Serum TNFalpha, IL-6 and leptin levels are abnormally increased in PPS patients. Elevated TNFalpha levels appear to be specifically associated with increased muscle pain.


Assuntos
Citocinas/sangue , Leptina/sangue , Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite/sangue , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Fadiga/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular/fisiologia , Dor/etiologia , Medição da Dor , Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite/fisiopatologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estatísticas não Paramétricas
10.
CMAJ ; 178(13): 1669-78, 2008 Jun 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18559804

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic use of cannabis and cannabis-based medicines raises safety concerns for patients, clinicians, policy-makers, insurers, researchers and regulators. Although the efficacy of cannabinoids is being increasingly demonstrated in randomized controlled trials, most safety information comes from studies of recreational use. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of safety studies of medical cannabinoids published over the past 40 years to create an evidence base for cannabis-related adverse events and to facilitate future cannabis research initiatives. We critically evaluated the quality of published studies with a view to identifying ways to improve future studies. RESULTS: A total of 321 articles were eligible for evaluation. After excluding those that focused on recreational cannabis use, we included 31 studies (23 randomized controlled trials and 8 observational studies) of medical cannabis use in our analysis. In the 23 randomized controlled trials, the median duration of cannabinoid exposure was 2 weeks (range 8 hours to 12 months). A total of 4779 adverse events were reported among participants assigned to the intervention. Most (4615 [96.6%]) were not serious. Of the 164 serious adverse events, the most common was relapse of multiple sclerosis (21 events [12.8%]), vomiting (16 events [9.8%]) and urinary tract infection (15 events [9.1%]). The rate of nonserious adverse events was higher among participants assigned to medical cannabinoids than among controls (rate ratio [RR] 1.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.57-2.21); the rates of serious adverse events did not differ significantly between these 2 groups (RR 1.04, 95% CI 0.78-1.39). Dizziness was the most commonly reported nonserious adverse event (714 events [15.5%]) among people exposed to cannabinoids. INTERPRETATION: Short-term use of existing medical cannabinoids appeared to increase the risk of nonserious adverse events. The risks associated with long-term use were poorly characterized in published clinical trials and observational studies. High-quality trials of long-term exposure are required to further characterize safety issues related to the use of medical cannabinoids.


Assuntos
Canabinoides/efeitos adversos , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Sistemas de Notificação de Reações Adversas a Medicamentos , Canadá , Canabinoides/uso terapêutico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Humanos
11.
BMC Cardiovasc Disord ; 7: 21, 2007 Jul 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17711595

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Post thrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a burdensome and costly complication of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) that develops in 20-40% of patients within 1-2 years after symptomatic DVT. Affected patients have chronic leg pain and swelling and may develop ulcers. Venous valve disruption from the thrombus itself or thrombus-associated mediators of inflammation is considered to be a key initiating event for the development of venous hypertension that often underlies PTS. As existing treatments for PTS are extremely limited, strategies that focus on preventing the development of PTS in patients with DVT are more likely to be effective and cost-effective in reducing its burden. Elastic compression stockings (ECS) could be helpful in preventing PTS; however, data on their effectiveness are scarce and conflicting. METHODS/DESIGN: The SOX Trial is a randomized, allocation concealed, double-blind multicenter clinical trial. The objective of the study is to evaluate ECS to prevent PTS. A total of 800 patients with proximal DVT will be randomized to one of 2 treatment groups: ECS or placebo (inactive) stockings worn on the DVT-affected leg daily for 2 years. The primary outcome is the incidence of PTS during follow-up. Secondary outcomes are severity of PTS, venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence, death from VTE, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Outcomes will be evaluated during 6 clinic visits and 2 telephone follow ups. At baseline, 1 and 6 months, blood samples will be obtained to evaluate the role of inflammatory mediators and genetic markers of thrombophilia in the development of PTS (Bio-SOX substudy). DISCUSSION: The SOX Trial will be the largest study and the first with a placebo control to evaluate the effectiveness of ECS to prevent PTS. It is designed to provide definitive data on the effects of ECS on the occurrence and severity of PTS, as well as DVT recurrence, cost-effectiveness and quality of life. This study will also prospectively evaluate the predictive role of biomarkers that are reflective of putative underlying pathophysiological mechanisms in the development of clinical PTS. As such, our results will impact directly on the care of patients with DVT. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00143598 and ISRCTN71334751.


Assuntos
Síndrome Pós-Flebítica/prevenção & controle , Projetos de Pesquisa , Meias de Compressão , Trombose Venosa/terapia , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos
12.
Circulation ; 107(15): 1966-71, 2003 Apr 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12681997

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have reported correlations between infections and coronary artery disease, associations with endothelial dysfunction, its precursor, have not been established. This study assessed whether infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae (CP), cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), or Helicobacter pylori (HP) is associated with decreased endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-five male subjects, aged 20 to 45 years, with no risk factors or known coronary artery disease were enrolled in a seroepidemiological cross-sectional study. Endothelial function was determined by flow-mediated brachial vasodilation. Serum antibodies consisting of anti-CP IgG and IgM, anti-CMV IgG, anti-EBV nuclear antigen, and anti-HP IgG and markers of inflammation including high-sensitivity C-reactive protein were measured. Average age was 29.3+/-5.5 years. Seroprevalence values were 65.1%, 34.9%, 88.9%, and 14.3% for CP, CMV, EBV, and HP, respectively. Average values for endothelium-dependent and -independent vasodilation were 9.4+/-4.5% and 12.6+/-5.0%. Despite adequate statistical power (82% for the primary end point), no association between endothelial function and seropositivity to individual infectious agents, infectious burden, or C-reactive protein was observed in regression analyses controlling for variables including age, blood pressure, and lipid parameters. Moreover, no dose-response trends between serum titers and endothelial function were found. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of association between chronic infection with CP, CMV, EBV, HP, or pathogen burden and endothelial function was observed, suggesting that these agents are not implicated as early etiologic triggers in the genesis of coronary artery disease. These results do not preclude active involvement at later stages of the pathophysiological process, such as acceleration of existing atherosclerosis and acute plaque rupture.


Assuntos
Infecções por Chlamydophila/epidemiologia , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/etiologia , Endotélio Vascular/fisiologia , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Vasodilatação/fisiologia , Adulto , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Biomarcadores/sangue , Artéria Braquial/fisiologia , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Infecções por Chlamydophila/sangue , Chlamydophila pneumoniae/imunologia , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Infecções por Vírus Epstein-Barr/sangue , Infecções por Helicobacter/sangue , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Herpesvirus Humano 4/imunologia , Humanos , Imunoglobulina G/sangue , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valores de Referência , Fluxo Sanguíneo Regional/fisiologia , Fatores de Risco , Estudos Soroepidemiológicos
14.
Can Respir J ; 12(4): 193-8, 2005.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16003455

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation remains largely underused. Self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation is a promising approach to improving the availability of pulmonary rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To report the rationale and methods of a trial comparing the effectiveness of self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation with hospital-based, outpatient rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). STUDY DESIGN: A parallel-group, randomized, noninferiority, multicentre trial will be performed with 240 patients with moderate to severe COPD. INTERVENTION: Patients will be randomly assigned to conventional, supervised, hospital-based outpatient rehabilitation or self-monitored, home-based rehabilitation. Both interventions will include a standardized, comprehensive self-management program, in addition to the hospital-based outpatient or home-based exercise program. After the three-month intervention, patients in both groups will be encouraged to continue exercising at home. Patients will be assessed monthly with telephone interviews and in person at enrollment, three months and 12 months. OUTCOMES: The dyspnea domain of the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire (CRQ) at 12 months is the primary outcome variable. Secondary outcome variables include total and domain-specific CRQ scores; exercise tolerance and activity of daily living; health service use over the one-year study period; and direct and indirect costs of COPD treatment. ANALYSIS: An intent-to-treat approach will be used as the primary analysis. The primary analysis will focus on the change in the CRQ dyspnea score using a two-sided t distribution based on 95% CIs. The same approach will be used for secondary continuous outcome variables. CONCLUSION: The present trial will address two unresolved issues in pulmonary rehabilitation for patients with COPD: the short-term and long-term effectiveness of home-based pulmonary rehabilitation strategies. The authors will also determine if home-based pulmonary rehabilitation can reduce health service use (eg, hospitalizations and emergency visits) and if it can be done at a lower cost than the traditional hospital-based outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation.


Assuntos
Terapia por Exercício/métodos , Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/reabilitação , Adulto , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Seleção de Pacientes , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/fisiopatologia , Testes de Função Respiratória , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento
15.
J Pain ; 16(12): 1233-1242, 2015 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26385201

RESUMO

UNLABELLED: Cannabis is widely used as a self-management strategy by patients with a wide range of symptoms and diseases including chronic non-cancer pain. The safety of cannabis use for medical purposes has not been systematically evaluated. We conducted a prospective cohort study to describe safety issues among individuals with chronic non-cancer pain. A standardized herbal cannabis product (12.5% tetrahydrocannabinol) was dispensed to eligible individuals for a 1-year period; controls were individuals with chronic pain from the same clinics who were not cannabis users. The primary outcome consisted of serious adverse events and non-serious adverse events. Secondary safety outcomes included pulmonary and neurocognitive function and standard hematology, biochemistry, renal, liver, and endocrine function. Secondary efficacy parameters included pain and other symptoms, mood, and quality of life. Two hundred and fifteen individuals with chronic pain were recruited to the cannabis group (141 current users and 58 ex-users) and 216 controls (chronic pain but no current cannabis use) from 7 clinics across Canada. The median daily cannabis dose was 2.5 g/d. There was no difference in risk of serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.08, 95% confidence interval = .57-2.04) between groups. Medical cannabis users were at increased risk of non-serious adverse events (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 1.73, 95% confidence interval = 1.41-2.13); most were mild to moderate. There were no differences in secondary safety assessments. Quality-controlled herbal cannabis, when used by patients with experience of cannabis use as part of a monitored treatment program over 1 year, appears to have a reasonable safety profile. Longer-term monitoring for functional outcomes is needed. STUDY REGISTRATION: The study was registered with www.controlled-trials.com (ISRCTN19449752). PERSPECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety of cannabis use by patients with chronic pain over 1 year. The study found that there was a higher rate of adverse events among cannabis users compared with controls but not for serious adverse events at an average dose of 2.5 g herbal cannabis per day.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dronabinol/efeitos adversos , Maconha Medicinal/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Canadá , Cognição/efeitos dos fármacos , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Dronabinol/normas , Dronabinol/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Dose Máxima Tolerável , Maconha Medicinal/normas , Maconha Medicinal/uso terapêutico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Manejo da Dor/efeitos adversos , Manejo da Dor/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Controle de Qualidade , Qualidade de Vida , Adulto Jovem
16.
Transfus Med Rev ; 16(4): 296-303, 2002 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12415515

RESUMO

To ascertain the effectiveness of an intervention, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) is considered the gold standard. An obstacle to conducting an RCT only rarely discussed is the universal implementation of an intervention. Universal implementation clearly precludes the feasibility of conducting an RCT. Thus, the most attractive alternative study design in such instances becomes the before/after study. This article describes important methodologic considerations in undertaking a before/after evaluation. The methodologic considerations to be discussed are (1) threats to internal validity, (2) precision and (3) generalizability. Two before/after studies evaluating the potential effectiveness of universal leukoreduction serve as examples. Because of the universal application of many transfusion interventions, one has to consider carefully the methodologic rigor as to which of these interventions are evaluated. We have outlined the major methodologic issues one must consider when undertaking a before/after study design. When properly conceived, conducted, and analyzed, such a before/after study design can yield informative associations.


Assuntos
Transfusão de Eritrócitos/métodos , Projetos de Pesquisa/normas , Adulto , Separação Celular , Transfusão de Eritrócitos/normas , Feminino , Filtração , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Leucócitos , Masculino , Gravidez
17.
Health Serv Res ; 38(6 Pt 1): 1423-40, 2003 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14727781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Previous U.S. studies suggest that the incremental ("marginal") use of the aggressive approach to care for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in patients differing only in their distance to hospitals offering aggressive care may be associated with small mortality benefits. We hypothesized that the marginal benefits should be larger in Canada, as the country is operating on a lower margin because the approach to care is more conservative overall. METHODS: This retrospective study used administrative data of hospital admissions and health services for all patients admitted for a first AMI in Quebec in 1988 (n = 8,674). We used differential distances to hospitals offering aggressive care as instrumental variables when measuring mortality up to four years after AMI. RESULTS: Of the 4,422 subjects who were > or = 65 years old, 11 percent received cardiac catheterization within 90 days after admission. In a previous study that applied similar methodology to the 1987 U.S. Medicare population, 23 percent of subjects received catheterization within 90 days. As in the U.S. study, we found that subjects living closer to hospitals offering aggressive care were more likely to receive aggressive care than subjects living further away (26 percent versus 19 percent received cardiac catheterization within 90 days; 95 percent CI: 5 percent to 9 percent). Unlike the U.S. study, we found no differences in mortality across the "close" versus "far" differential distance groups (unadjusted differences at one year: 1 percent; 95 percent CI: -1 percent to 3 percent). This absence of association held in elderly (> or = 65 years) and younger age groups. Adjusted results also showed no differences between subjects receiving aggressive versus conservative care (at one year: 4 percent; 95 percent CI: -11 percent to 20 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to our hypothesis, but consistent with results from numerous randomized trials and observational studies, we cannot confirm that, on the margin, the aggressive approach to post-AMI care is associated with mortality benefits in Canada.


Assuntos
Cateterismo Cardíaco/estatística & dados numéricos , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Infarto do Miocárdio/terapia , Idoso , Viés , Feminino , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Quebeque/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
18.
BMJ ; 345: e5798, 2012 Sep 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22968722

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the relative risks of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and renal failure or dysfunction between antifibrinolytics and no treatment following the suspension of aprotinin from the market in 2008 for safety reasons and its recent reintroduction in Europe and Canada. DESIGN: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: A Cochrane review of antifibrinolytic treatments was chosen as the starting point for this systematic review. Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane register of trials were searched with no date restrictions for observational evidence. STUDY SELECTION: Propensity matched or adjusted observational studies with two or more of the interventions of interest (aprotinin, tranexamic acid, epsilon-aminocaproic acid, and no treatment) that were carried out in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. DATA ANALYSIS: Network meta-analysis was used to compare treatments, and odds ratios with 95% credible intervals were estimated. Meta-analyses were carried out for randomised controlled trials alone and for randomised controlled trials with observational studies. RESULTS: 106 randomised controlled trials and 11 observational studies (43,270 patients) were included. Based on the results from analysis of randomised controlled trials, tranexamic acid was associated on average with a reduced risk of death compared with aprotinin (odds ratio 0.64, 95% credible interval 0.41 to 0.99). When observational data were incorporated, comparisons showed an increased risk of mortality with aprotinin on average relative to tranexamic acid (odds ratio 0.71, 95% credible interval 0.50 to 0.98) and epsilon-aminocaproic acid (0.60, 0.43 to 0.87), and an increased risk of renal failure or dysfunction on average relative to all comparators: odds ratio 0.66 (95% credible interval 0.45 to 0.88) compared with no treatment, 0.66 (0.48 to 0.91) versus tranexamic acid, and 0.65 (0.45 to 0.88) versus epsilon-aminocaproic acid. CONCLUSION: Although meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials were largely inconclusive, inclusion of observational data suggest concerns remain about the safety of aprotinin. Tranexamic and epsilon-aminocaproic acid are effective alternatives that may be safer for patients.


Assuntos
Ácido Aminocaproico/efeitos adversos , Antifibrinolíticos/efeitos adversos , Aprotinina/efeitos adversos , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/induzido quimicamente , Ácido Tranexâmico/efeitos adversos , Ácido Aminocaproico/uso terapêutico , Antifibrinolíticos/uso terapêutico , Aprotinina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Infarto do Miocárdio/induzido quimicamente , Razão de Chances , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Insuficiência Renal/induzido quimicamente , Risco , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/induzido quimicamente , Ácido Tranexâmico/uso terapêutico
19.
PM R ; 1(5): 442-9, 2009 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19627931

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biopsychosocial correlates of general, physical, and mental fatigue in patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome (PPS) by assessing the additional contribution of potentially modifiable factors after accounting for important nonmodifiable disease-related factors. It was hypothesized that disease-related, behavioral, and psychosocial factors would contribute in different ways to general, physical, and mental fatigue in PPS and that a portion of fatigue would be determined by potentially modifiable factors. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: A tertiary university-affiliated hospital post-polio clinic. PATIENTS: Fifty-two ambulatory patients with PPS who were not severely depressed were included. ASSESSMENT OF RISK FACTORS: Potential correlates for fatigue included disease-related factors (acute polio weakness, time since acute polio, PPS duration, muscle strength, pain, forced vital capacity, maximum inspiratory pressure, maximum expiratory pressure, body mass index, disability, fibromyalgia), behavioral factors (physical activity, sleep quality), and psychosocial factors (depression, stress, self-efficacy). MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Fatigue was assessed with the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI; assesses fatigue on 5 subscales) and the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS). RESULTS: Multivariate models were computed for MFI General, Physical, and Mental Fatigue. Age-adjusted multivariate models with nonmodifiable factors included the following predictors of (1) MFI General Fatigue: maximum inspiratory pressure, fibromyalgia, muscle strength; (2) MFI Physical Fatigue: maximum expiratory pressure, muscle strength, age, time since acute polio; and (3) MFI Mental Fatigue: none. The following potentially modifiable predictors made an additional contribution to the models: (1) MFI General Fatigue: stress, depression; (2) MFI Physical Fatigue: physical activity, pain; and (3) MFI Mental Fatigue: stress. CONCLUSIONS: PPS fatigue is multidimensional. Different types of fatigue are determined by different variables. Potentially modifiable factors account for a portion of fatigue in PPS.


Assuntos
Fadiga/etiologia , Fadiga/psicologia , Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite/complicações , Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite/psicologia , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Nível de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Força Muscular , Testes Neuropsicológicos , Dor/etiologia , Dor/psicologia , Síndrome Pós-Poliomielite/fisiopatologia , Ventilação Pulmonar , Fatores de Risco , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estresse Psicológico/complicações
20.
Transfus Med Rev ; 23(1): 55-61, 2009 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19056034

RESUMO

Despite recent trends in decreasing transfusion thresholds and the development of technologies designed to avoid allogeneic exposure, allogeneic red blood cell (RBC) transfusions remain an important supportive and life-saving measure for neonatal intensive care patients experiencing illness and anemia. Reluctantly, a number of laboratory and observational studies have indicated that the amount of time RBCs are stored can affect oxygen delivery to tissues. Consequently, older RBCs may result in higher rates of organ dysfunction, nosocomial infection, and lengths of stay. Because of such harmful effects, an evaluation of the association between age of blood and nosocomial infection and organ dysfunction is warranted. The aim of the study was to determine if RBCs stored for 7 days or less (fresh RBCs) compared to current standard transfusion practice decreases major nosocomial infection and organ dysfunction in neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit and requiring at least one RBC transfusion. This study is a double-blind, multicenter, randomized controlled trial design. The trial will be an effectiveness study evaluating the effectiveness of stored vs fresh RBCs in neonates requiring transfusion. Neonatal patients requiring at least one unit of RBCs will be randomized to receive either (1) RBCs stored no longer than 7 days or (2) standard practice. The study was conducted in Canadian university-affiliated level III (tertiary) neonatal intensive care units. The primary outcome for this study will be a composite measure of major neonatal morbidities (necrotizing enterocolitis, retinopathy of prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular hemorrhage, and mortality). Secondary outcomes include individual items of the composite measure and nosocomial infection (bacteremia, septic shock, and pneumonia). The sample size calculations have been estimated based on the formula for 2 independent proportions using an alpha of .05, a (1-beta) of .80, and a 10% noncompliance factor. The baseline rate for our composite measure is estimated to be 65% as indicated by the literature. Assuming a 15% absolute risk reduction with the use of RBCs stored 7 days or less, our estimated total sample size required will be 450 (225 patients per treatment arm). The Age of Red Blood Cells in Premature Infants (ARIPI) trial is registered at the US National Institutes of Health (ClinicalTrials.gov) no. NCT00326924 and current controlled trials ISRCTN65939658.


Assuntos
Preservação de Sangue , Transfusão de Eritrócitos , Doenças do Prematuro/terapia , Recém-Nascido Prematuro , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA