Application of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic concepts to the development of treatment regimens for sporadic canine urinary tract infections: Challenges and paths forward.

Antimicrobial efficacy can be predicted based on infection site exposure to the antimicrobial agent relative to the in vitro susceptibility of the pathogen to that agent. When infections occur in soft tissues (e.g., muscle, blood, and ligaments), exposure at the infection site is generally assumed to reflect an equilibrium between the unbound concentrations in plasma and that in the interstitial fluids. In contrast, for sporadic urinary tract infections (UTIs) in dogs and uncomplicated UTIs in humans, the primary site of infection is the bladder wall. Infection develops when bacteria invade the host bladder urothelium (specifically, the umbrella cells that form the urine-contacting layer of the stratified uroepithelium) within which these bacteria can avoid exposure to host defenses and antimicrobial agents. Traditionally, pathogen susceptibility has been estimated using standardized in vitro tests that measure the minimal concentration that will inhibit pathogen growth (MIC). When using exposure-response relationships during drug development to explore dose optimization, these relationships can either be based upon an assessment of a correlation between clinical outcome, drug exposure at the infection site, and pathogen MIC, or upon benchmark exposure-response relationships (i.e., pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices) typically used for the various drug classes. When using the latter approach, it is essential that the unbound concentrations at the infection site be considered relative to the MIC within the biological matrix to which the pathogen will be exposed. For soft tissue infections, this typically is the unbound plasma concentrations versus MICs determined in standardized media such as cation-adjusted Mueller Hinton broth, which is how many indices were originally established. However, for UTIs, it is the unbound drug concentrations within the urine versus the MICs in the actual urine biophase that needs to be considered. The importance of these relationships and how they are influenced by drug resistance, resilience, and inoculum are discussed in this review using fluoroquinolones and beta-lactams as examples.

Approaches to developing judicious uses of veterinary antibacterial drugs.

Development of new veterinary antibacterials is an important and challenging endeavor. Global recognition of antimicrobial resistance as a threat across human, animal, plant, food, and environmental sectors has increased the level of scrutiny on veterinary antibacterial use. Rigorous scientific evaluation of these products has and continues to be the underpinning of effectiveness evaluations and how hazards are identified, characterized, and ultimately used to make evidence-based and risk-based safety decisions. Some scientific factors commonly considered in the development of veterinary antibacterials include the pathogenesis and sequelae of the indicated disease, clinical and bacteriological improvement, dosage regimen (dose amount, route, duration, frequency), and antimicrobial-resistance qualitative risk assessments. Key discussion areas covered are how culture and susceptibility testing help determine if antibacterial effects are primarily responsible for clinical improvement and how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data can help predict success, aid in defining an adequate dosage regimen, and help minimize resistance emergence and spread.

Impact of ABCB1 genotype in Collies on the pharmacokinetics of R- and S-fexofenadine.

Thirty-two Collies were used to determine the impact of ABCB1 genotype and phenotype on the plasma pharmacokinetics of fexofenadine's (Fex) R- and S-enantiomers after bolus Fex administration, as human P-gp exhibits stereoselectivity. Each Collie's ABCB1 genotype and ivermectin (IVM) sensitivity (phenotype) was determined prior to study enrolment. Wild-type (WT) Collies had lower plasma concentrations of the individual enantiomers as compared to heterozygous IVM nonsensitive (HNS), heterozygous IVM-sensitive (HS) and homozygous mutant (MUT) Collies. Based on pairwise statistical comparison, WT Collies had statistically significantly lower (AUC0-last ) and peak (Cmax ) values compared to HS, HNS and MUT Collies. Tmax was not influenced by genotype/phenotype. Inter-individual variability in PK metrics tended to be largest for WT Collies. Although the influence of genotype/phenotype on Fex PK occurred with the individual isomers, impairment of S-Fex absorption, particularly in the MUT dogs, exceeded that associated with R-Fex. Since Fex elimination occurs primarily via biliary excretion via a transporter other than P-glycoprotein, and based upon our understanding of Fex absorption kinetics, we attributed these differences primarily to the absorption portion of the profile. These differences are expressed in a stereo-specific manner. These results demonstrate the potential negative impact on estimates of drug effectiveness and toxicity, especially for P-gp substrates that do not exhibit Central Nervous System toxicities.

Influence of ABCB1 Genotype in Collies on the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Loperamide in a Dose-Escalation Study.

Thirty-three Collies (14 male and 19 female) were used in a dose-escalation study to determine the impact of ABCB1 genotype on loperamide pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Loperamide was orally administered in four ascending doses (0.01, 0.05, 0.1, or 0.2 mg/kg) over a 4-wk period to fasted Collies. Comparisons were made within each dose to genotype, phenotype, and whether Collies received three (3D) or four (4D) loperamide doses. The 3D and 4D groupings had statistically significant differences in systemic drug exposure (defined by the area under the concentration-versus-time profile estimated from time zero to the last quantifiable drug concentration, AUC0-last). In contrast, statistical differences in AUC0-last only occurred in the comparison between wild-type (WT) Collies versus homozygous mutant (Mut) Collies administered 0.1 mg/kg. Statistical differences in the proportionality relationship were observed when comparing 3D to 4D Collies, and the WT to Mut Collies. Intersubject variability in drug exposure tended to be twice as high between Mut and WT Collies. Associations were observed between systemic drug exposure and ataxia or depression but not between systemic drug exposure and mydriasis or salivation. Thus, Collies expressing the greatest sensitivity to CNS-associated effects of loperamide (Mut) tended to have higher drug exposure compared with those less sensitive to the adverse effects of loperamide. Genotype and phenotype only partially explained differences in loperamide PK and PD, suggesting this relationship may not be straightforward and that other factors need to be considered. Accordingly, the PD and PK of one P-glycoprotein substrate only partially predicted the likelihood of adverse responses to unrelated substrates.

Canine gastrointestinal physiology: Breeds variations that can influence drug absorption.

Although all dogs belong to Canis lupus familiaris, the physiological diversity resulting from selective breeding can lead to wide interbreed variability in drug pharmacokinetics (PK) or in oral drug product performance. It is important to understand this diversity in order to predict the impact of drug product formulation attributes on in vivo dissolution and absorption characteristics across the canine population when the dog represents the targeted patient population. Based upon published information, this review addresses breed differences in gastrointestinal (GI) physiology and discusses the in vivo implications of these differences. In addition to the importance of such information for understanding the variability that may exist in the performance of oral dosage forms in dogs for the purpose of developing canine therapeutics, an appreciation of breed differences in GI physiology can improve our prediction of oral drug formulation performance when we extrapolate bioavailability results from the dog to the humans, and vice versa. In this literature review, we examine reports of breed associated diversity in GI anatomy and morphology, gastric emptying time (GET), oro-cecal transit time (OCTT), small intestinal transit time (SITT), large intestinal transit time (LITT), intestinal permeability, sodium/potassium fecal concentrations, intestinal flora, and fecal moisture content.

The challenges of assessing osteoarthritis and postoperative pain in dogs.

The challenge of measuring pain in veterinary medicine is compounded by the lack of fully validated, reliable methods to measure and assess pain in nonverbal patients. In human medicine, there are numerous, validated pain assessment tools (PATs) for assessing various, specific types of pain. The advances in human medicine pain management and numerous validated pain scales should serve as incentives and templates to facilitate similar advances in the development of validated PATs for use in dogs (and other species). The limited number of canine PATs constrains our ability to adequately and reliably assess pain. Improving the ability to quantify osteoarthritis and postoperative pain in dogs would enhance the development of analgesics for animals, advance the management of animal pain, facilitate the use of animal pain models in preclinical trials for human analgesics, and provide insight into the quantification of pain responses in humans who lack the ability to adequately communicate. This review describes the need for practical, valid, and reliable PATs for use in veterinary patients and discusses some currently available PATs commonly used to evaluate acute and chronic pain in dogs.

Pharmacogenetic and metabolic differences between dog breeds: their impact on canine medicine and the use of the dog as a preclinical animal model.

There is limited information describing species related pharmacogenetic differences in animals. Despite the lack of genetic information in veterinary medicine, breed specific responses to endogenous and exogenous substances have been reported across many species. This finding underscores the importance of obtaining insight into the genotypic and phenotypic variation present across breeds. This article provides a summary of the literature pertaining to canine breed differences in physiology, drug response, drug pharmacokinetics, and metabolic idiosyncrasies. The existing knowledge of pedigrees and the known phenotypes and genotypes of dogs provides important information for determining mode of inheritance, penetration, and other major characteristics of heritable traits. Understanding these breed differences will improve canine population predictions (for canine drug products) and may be of value when extrapolating toxicology data from dogs to humans.