Understanding the experience of compensatory and restorative memory rehabilitation: A qualitative study of stroke survivors.

Memory impairment is common following stroke. Memory skills groups (MSGs) utilising compensatory strategies and computerised cognitive training (CCT) are two rehabilitation approaches available to improve memory function; however, there is no consensus as to which is more effective following stroke. This study aimed to explore and contrast the qualitative experiences of 20 stroke survivors (Mage = 61.90, SD = 10.48, range: 34-77 years) who received six weeks' training in MSG (manualised memory skills group, n = 10) or individual-CCT (LumosityTM, n = 10). Using semi-structured interviews, data were collected and analysed thematically, adopting a critical realist approach. Six themes were identified: (1) Facilitators and barriers to intervention engagement, (2) Improving knowledge and understanding, (3) Connecting with others, (4) Perception of the intervention, (5) Impact on everyday memory and (6) Impact on emotions and sense of purpose. Encouragingly, most participants valued and enjoyed participating in the memory interventions, irrespective of rehabilitation approach. MSG participants reported learning and sharing with similar others as important to the experience and described everyday memory improvements. CCT participants described enjoyment of its game-like nature, yet reported frustration associated with game-specific characteristics, and did not report everyday memory improvements.

Providing rehabilitation services to major traumatic injury survivors in rural Australia: perspectives of rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers.

PURPOSE: The delivery of healthcare services in rural locations can be challenging. From the perspectives of rural rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers, this study explored the experience of providing and coordinating rehabilitation services for rural major traumatic injury survivors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews with 14 rural rehabilitation practitioners and 10 compensation claims managers were transcribed, and reflexive thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Six themes were identified (1) Challenges finding and connecting with rural services, (2) Factors relating to insurance claims management, (3) Managing the demand for services, (4) Good working relationships, (5) Limited training and support, and (6) Client resilience and community. System-related barriers included a lack of available search resources to find rural rehabilitation services, limited service/clinician availability and funding policies lacking the flexibility to meet rehabilitation needs in a rural context. Strong peer and interdisciplinary relationships were viewed as crucial facilitators, which rural practitioners were particularly adept at developing. CONCLUSIONS: Greater consideration of unique needs within rural contexts is required when developing service delivery models. Specifically, flexible and equitable funding policies; facilitating interdisciplinary connections, support and training for rehabilitation practitioners and compensation claims managers; and harnessing clients' resilience may improve the delivery of rural services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRural survivors of major traumatic injury often have ongoing health and rehabilitation needs and struggle to access required treatment services.Rehabilitation providers and compensation claims managers highlighted areas for improvement in rural areas, including resources for locating available services, funding the additional costs of rural service delivery, and greater service choice for clients.Building rural workforce capacity for treatment of major traumatic injury is needed, including improved clinician access to specialist training and support.Developing good working relationships between clients and clinicians, including interdisciplinary collaborations, and supporting client resilience and self-management should be promoted in future service delivery models.

Perspectives of major traumatic injury survivors on accessibility and quality of rehabilitation services in rural Australia.

PURPOSE: For the 30% of Australians who live in rural areas, access to rehabilitation services after sustaining a major traumatic injury can be challenging. This study aimed to explore the experience of rural major traumatic injury survivors accessing rehabilitation services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 21 rural major traumatic injury survivors (Mage = 47.86; SD = 11.35; Range: 21-61) who were an average of seven years post-injury (SD = 3.10; Range: 3.25-13.01). Transcribed interviews were thematically analysed. RESULTS: Four themes were identified: (1) Managing the transition back to local services, (2) Independence and determination to get better, (3) Rehabilitation is an ongoing process, and (4) Limited service access and quality. While injury-related symptoms persisted for many participants, they expressed strong determination for independence and self-management of their recovery. Barriers to accessing rehabilitation services included poor knowledge of local services, travel burden, financial costs, and a lack of local practitioners experienced in major traumatic injury rehabilitation. Facilitating factors included financial, psychological, community, and informal supports. CONCLUSIONS: To support recovery, future rural service models should improve consideration of factors resulting from living at a distance to services and harness independence to self-manage.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRural major traumatic injury survivors need support to navigate numerous barriers to accessing rehabilitation services.Rural participants expressed their preference for greater involvement in planning their transition back home following hospitalisation and help to link with available services in their local area.Specialist training and support for rural rehabilitation practitioners is needed, to effectively treat impairments related to major traumatic injury, particularly psychological and cognitive difficulties.Future service delivery models should incorporate methods to locate rural services; facilitate telehealth access and client self-management; and provide financial and mental health support to both rural survivors of major traumatic injury and their carers.