Response Bias for Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery Surveys after Knee Surgery.

The Press Ganey Ambulatory Surgery (PGAS) survey is an emerging tool used to capture patient satisfaction after elective surgery. Evaluating patient satisfaction is important; however, quality improvement (QI) surveys used to capture the patient experience may be subject to nonresponse bias. An orthopaedic registry was used to retrospectively identify patients who underwent ambulatory knee surgery from June 2015 to December 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of PGAS survey nonresponse and response. In the cohort of 1,161 patients, 142 (12.2%) completed the PGAS survey. Multiple logistic regression demonstrated that male sex, Black race, not living with a caretaker, student or unemployment status, and worse preoperative Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) fatigue were predictors of nonresponse. The results of this study highlight the presence of nonresponse bias in the PGAS survey after elective knee surgery.

Acute Hematogenous Osteomyelitis Resulting in Atraumatic Pediatric Forearm Compartment Syndrome.

Acute hematogenous osteomyelitis is well described after minor trauma in the pediatric population, with an incidence of 1 to 13 cases per 100,000 individuals. Compartment syndrome (CS) in children is a rare, but potentially devastating disease, classified as "cannot miss diagnosis." Compared with adults, CS may exhibit a variable presentation with a wide range of symptoms in children, often leading to delayed diagnosis. Expeditious diagnosis and treatment of CS is paramount in minimizing adverse sequelae and maximizing potential functional outcome, regardless of etiology. Here, we present a rare case of atraumatic CS resulting from ruptured subperiosteal abscess secondary to acute hematogenous osteomyelitis in a pediatric male patient with 2 weeks of forearm pain and evolving neurologic deficits with initial delay in presentation to our facility. The ramifications of delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis of CS emphasize the importance of a high index of suspicion despite atypical presentations in the pediatric patient.

Risk of Avascular Necrosis with The Modified Dunn Procedure in SCFE Patients: A Meta-Analysis.

In situ stabilization is a widely accepted treatment for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) despite risks of avascular necrosis (AVN) and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). The modified Dunn procedure with surgical hip dislocation attempts to maintain epiphyseal perfusion and allows anatomic epiphyseal repositioning, theoretically reducing AVN and FAI risks. We systematically evaluated the literature, elucidating overall and stability-stratified rates of AVN following the modified Dunn procedure, and revision rates in non-AVN patients. Using Ovid and MEDLINE (PubMed), studies involving the modified Dunn procedure were evaluated for age, stability, preoperative slip (Southwick) angle, ROM at follow-up, outcome metrics, and revisions. Utilizing a random effect model of proportions, we determined overall and stability-stratified AVN rates, and revision rates in patients without AVN.673 patients (688 SCFEs) who underwent modified Dunn procedure were included. Overall AVN rate was 14.3% with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) of 9.3 to 20.2%. AVN rate in stable slips was 10.9% (95% CI: 6.0 to 17.1%) and 19.9% (95% CI: 12.8% to 28.1%) in unstable slips. Revision rate in non-AVN patients was 13.3% (95% CI: 8.3% to 19.2%). Fixation failures occurred following K-wire or small-caliber (<6.5 mm) screw fixation. Overall mean Harris Hip Score (HHS) was excellent (>90 points). Mean HHS was 98.9 points (range of means: 86 to 99 points) in stable cases, and 90.5 points (range of means: 73 to 98 points) in unstable cases. Patients undergoing modified Dunn procedure had excellent clinical outcomes and low incidences of AVN. Further studies are needed to determine if modified Dunn osteotomy with surgical hip dislocation is a viable alternative to in situ pinning for treatment of severe SCFE.

Blockade of Osteoclast-Mediated Bone Resorption With a RANKL-Inhibitor Enhances Bone Formation in a Rat Spinal Fusion Model.

STUDY DESIGN: Rat spine fusion model. OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to determine whether administration of osteoprotegerin (OPG) in a rat model of spinal fusion increases bone volume, bone density, and decreases osteoclasts in the fusion mass. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OPG is a soluble RANK-ligand inhibitor that blocks osteoclast differentiation and activation. This makes it a potential agent to control the remodeling process and enhance bone mass during spinal fusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight male Sprague-Dawley rats received a one-level spinal fusion of L4-L5 with bone allograft. Rats were then divided into four groups according to initiation of treatment: (1) saline on day 0 (saline), (2) OPG on day 0 (OPG D0), (3) OPG on day 10 (OPG D10), and (4) OPG on day 21 (OPG D21) postsurgery. After their initial injection, rats received weekly subcutaneous injections of OPG (10 mg/kg) and were euthanized six weeks postsurgery. MicroCT analysis of the fusion site and histological analysis of bone surface for quantification of osteoclast lining was performed. RESULTS: Increased bone volume in the fusion site and around the spinous process was seen in OPG D0 and OPG D10 when compared with saline. Mean trabecular thickness was greater in all groups receiving OPG compared with saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having significantly greater mean trabecular thickness than OPG D21. All OPG groups had less bone surface lined with osteoclasts when compared with Saline, with OPG D0 and OPG D10 having fewer than OPG D21. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that OPG inhibited osteoclast bone resorption, which led to greater bone at the fusion site. Future studies investigating OPG on its own or in combination with an osteogenic factor to improve spinal fusion outcomes are warranted to further elucidate its potential therapeutic effect.

Single-Stage Versus 2-Stage Bilateral Intramedullary Nail Fixation in Patients With Bilateral Femur Fractures: A Multicenter Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate rates of complications in patients with bilateral femur fractures treated with intramedullary nailing (IMN) during either 1 single procedure or 2 separate procedures. DESIGN: A multicenter retrospective review of patients sustaining bilateral femur fractures, treated with IMN in single or 2-stage procedure, from 1998 to 2018 was performed at 10 Level-1 trauma centers. SETTING: Ten Level-1 trauma centers. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred forty-six patients with bilateral femur fractures. INTERVENTIONS: Intramedullary nailing. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of complications. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, with 188 single-stage and 58 two-stage patients. Gender, age, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score, secondary injuries, Glasgow coma scale, and proportion of open fractures were similar between both groups. Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) occurred at higher rates in the 2-stage group (13.8% vs. 5.9%; P value = 0.05). When further adjusted for age, gender, injury severity score, abbreviated injury score, Glasgow coma scale, and admission lactate, the single-stage group had a 78% reduced risk for ARDS. In-hospital mortality was higher in the single-stage cohort (2.7% compared with 0%), although this did not meet statistical significance (P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest multicenter study to date evaluating the outcomes between single- and 2-stage IMN fixation for bilateral femoral shaft fractures. Single-stage bilateral femur IMN may decrease rates of ARDS in polytrauma patients who are able to undergo simultaneous definitive fixation. However, a future prospective study with standardized protocols in place will be required to discern whether single- versus 2-stage fixation has an effect on mortality and to identify those individuals at risk. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Factors influencing management of bilateral femur fractures: A multicenter retrospective cohort of early versus delayed definitive Fixation.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the factors that influence the timing of definitive fixation in the management of bilateral femoral shaft fractures and the outcomes for patients with these injuries. METHODS: Patients with bilateral femur fractures treated between 1998 to 2019 at ten level-1 trauma centers were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into early or delayed fixation, which was defined as definitive fixation of both femurs within or greater than 24 hours from injury, respectively. Statistical analysis included reversed logistic odds regression to predict which variable(s) was most likely to determine timing to definitive fixation. The outcomes included age, sex, high-volume institution, ISS, GCS, admission lactate, and admission base deficit. RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-eight patients were included; 164 patients were included in the early fixation group and 164 patients in the delayed fixation group. Patients managed with delayed fixation had a higher Injury Severity Score (26.8 vs 22.4; p<0.01), higher admission lactate (4.4 and 3.0; p<0.01), and a lower Glasgow Coma Scale (10.7 vs 13; p<0.01). High-volume institution was the most reliable influencer for time to definitive fixation, successfully determining 78.6% of patients, followed by admission lactate, 64.4%. When all variables were evaluated in conjunction, high-volume institution remained the strongest contributor (X2 statistic: institution: 45.6, ISS: 8.83, lactate: 6.77, GCS: 0.94). CONCLUSION: In this study, high-volume institution was the strongest predictor of timing to definitive fixation in patients with bilateral femur fractures. This study demonstrates an opportunity to create a standardized care pathway for patients with these injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Regenerative Medicine Approaches for the Treatment of Pediatric Physeal Injuries.

The physis, or growth plate, is a cartilaginous region at the end of children's long bones that serves as the primary center for longitudinal growth and characterizes the immature skeleton. Musculoskeletal injury, including fracture, infection, malignancy, or iatrogenic damage, has risk of physeal damage. Physeal injuries account for 30% of pediatric fractures and may result in impaired bone growth. Once damaged, cartilage tissue within the physis is often replaced by unwanted bony tissue, forming a "bony bar" that can lead to complications such as complete growth arrest, angular or rotational deformities, and altered joint mechanics. Children with a bony bar occupying <50% of the physis usually undergo bony bar resection and insertion of an interpositional material, such as a fat graft, to prevent recurrence and allow the surrounding uninjured physeal tissue to restore longitudinal bone growth. Clinical success for this procedure is <35% and often the bony bar and associated growth impairments return. Children who are not candidates for bony bar resection due to a physeal bar occupying >50% of their physis undergo corrective osteotomy or bone lengthening procedures. These approaches are complex and have variable success rates. As such, there is a critical need for regenerative approaches to not only prevent initial bony bar formation but also regenerate healthy physeal cartilage following injury. This review describes physeal anatomy, mechanisms of physeal injury, and current treatment options with associated limitations. Furthermore, we provide an overview of the current research using cell-based therapies, growth factors, and biomaterials in the different animal models of injury along with strategic directions for modulating intrinsic injury pathways to inhibit bony bar formation and/or promote physeal tissue formation. Pediatric physeal injuries constitute a unique niche within regenerative medicine for which there is a critical need for research to decrease child morbidity related to this injurious process.

A Rat Tibial Growth Plate Injury Model to Characterize Repair Mechanisms and Evaluate Growth Plate Regeneration Strategies.

A third of all pediatric fractures involve the growth plate and can result in impaired bone growth. The growth plate (or physis) is cartilage tissue found at the end of all long bones in children that is responsible for longitudinal bone growth. Once damaged, cartilage tissue within the growth plate can undergo premature ossification and lead to unwanted bony repair tissue, which forms a "bony bar." In some cases, this bony bar can result in bone growth deformities, such as angular deformities, or it can completely halt longitudinal bone growth. There is currently no clinical treatment that can fully repair an injured growth plate. Using an animal model of growth plate injury to better understand the mechanisms underlying bony bar formation and to identify ways to inhibit it is a great opportunity to develop better treatments for growth plate injuries. This protocol describes how to disrupt the rat proximal tibial growth plate using a drill-hole defect. This small animal model reliably produces a bony bar and can result in growth deformities similar to those seen in children. This model allows for investigation into the molecular mechanisms of bony bar formation and serves as a means to test potential treatment options for growth plate injuries.