Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Chem Res Toxicol ; 37(1): 98-108, 2024 01 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38150050

RESUMO

Hexafluoropropylene oxide dimer acid (HFPO-DA; trade name GenX), as a substitute for perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA), has been attracting increasing attention. However, its impact and corresponding mechanism on hepatic lipid metabolism are less understood. To investigate the possible mechanisms of GenX for hepatotoxicity, a series of in vivo and in vitro experiments were conducted. In in vivo experiment, male mice were exposed to GenX in drinking water at environmental concentrations (0.1 and 10 µg/L) and high concentrations (1 and 100 mg/L) for 14 weeks. In in vitro experiments, human hepatocellular carcinoma cells (HepG2) were exposed to GenX at 10, 160, and 640 µM for 24 and 48 h. GenX exposure via drinking water resulted in liver damage and disruption of lipid metabolism even at environmental concentrations. The results of triglycerides (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) in this study converged with the results of the population study, for which TG increased in the liver but unchanged in the serum, whereas TC increased in both liver and serum concentrations. KEGG and GO analyses revealed that the hepatotoxicity of GenX was associated with fatty acid transport, synthesis, and oxidation pathways and that Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor (PPARα) contributed significantly to this process. PPARα inhibitors significantly reduced the expression of CD36, CPT1ß, PPARα, SLC27A1, ACOX1, lipid droplets, and TC, suggesting that GenX exerts its toxic effects through PPARα signaling pathway. In general, GenX at environmental concentrations in drinking water causes abnormal lipid metabolism via PPARα signaling pathway.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Induzida por Substâncias e Drogas , Água Potável , Fluorocarbonos , Propionatos , Camundongos , Masculino , Humanos , Animais , Metabolismo dos Lipídeos , PPAR alfa/farmacologia , Água Potável/análise , Fluorocarbonos/farmacologia , Fígado , Transdução de Sinais
2.
Environ Res ; 250: 118485, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38373549

RESUMO

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) have already drawn a lot of attention for their accumulation and reproductive toxicity in organisms. Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and perfluorooctanoic sulfonate (PFOS), two representative PFAS, are toxic to humans and animals. Due to their widespread use in environmental media with multiple toxicities, PFOA and PFOS have been banned in numerous countries, and many substitutes have been produced to meet market requirements. Unfortunately, most alternatives to PFOA and PFOS have proven to be cumulative and highly toxic. Of the reported multiple organ toxicities, reproductive toxicity deserves special attention. It has been confirmed through epidemiological studies that PFOS and PFOA are not only associated with reduced testosterone levels in humans, but also with an association with damage to the integrity of the blood testicular barrier. In addition, for women, PFOA and PFOS are correlated with abnormal sex hormone levels, and increase the risk of infertility and abnormal menstrual cycle. Nevertheless, there is controversial evidence on the epidemiological relationship that exists between PFOA and PFOS as well as sperm quality and reproductive hormones, while the evidence from animal studies is relatively consistent. Based on the published papers, the potential toxicity mechanisms for PFOA, PFOS and their substitutes were reviewed. For males, PFOA and PFOS may produce reproductive toxicity in the following five ways: (1) Apoptosis and autophagy in spermatogenic cells; (2) Apoptosis and differentiation disorders of Leydig cells; (3) Oxidative stress in sperm and disturbance of Ca2+ channels in sperm membrane; (4) Degradation of delicate intercellular junctions between Sertoli cells; (5) Activation of brain nuclei and shift of hypothalamic metabolome. For females, PFOA and PFOS may produce reproductive toxicity in the following five ways: (1) Damage to oocytes through oxidative stress; (2) Inhibition of corpus luteum function; (3) Inhibition of steroid hormone synthesis; (4) Damage to follicles by affecting gap junction intercellular communication (GJIC); (5) Inhibition of placental function. Besides, PFAS substitutes show similar reproductive toxicity with PFOA and PFOS, and are even more toxic to the placenta. Finally, based on the existing knowledge, future developments and direction of efforts in this field are suggested.


Assuntos
Ácidos Alcanossulfônicos , Caprilatos , Fluorocarbonos , Reprodução , Fluorocarbonos/toxicidade , Humanos , Ácidos Alcanossulfônicos/toxicidade , Caprilatos/toxicidade , Animais , Reprodução/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Masculino , Poluentes Ambientais/toxicidade
3.
Water Res ; 259: 121866, 2024 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852393

RESUMO

Although unregulated aliphatic disinfection byproducts (DBPs) had a much higher concentration and cytotoxicity than known aromatic DBPs, a recent study indicated that seven classes of regulated and unregulated priority DBPs (one and two-carbon-atom DBPs) just accounted for 16.2% of disinfected water cytotoxicity in the U.S., meaning some of the highly toxic aliphatic DBPs may be overlooked. Haloketones (HKs) are an essential class of priority DBPs with a 1-100 µg/L concentration in drinking water but lack cytotoxicity data. This study investigated the cytotoxicity of seven HKs using Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. The order for cytotoxicity of HKs from most to least toxic was: 1,3-dichloroacetone (LC50: 1.0 ± 0.20 µM) ≈ 1,3-dibromoacetone (1.5 ± 0.19 µM) ≈ bromoacetone (1.9 ± 0.49 µM) > chloroacetone (4.3 ± 0.22 µM) > 1,1,3-trichloropropanone (6.6 ± 0.46 µM) > 1,1,1-trichloroacetone (222 ± 7.7 µM) > hexachloroacetone (3269 ± 344 µM). The cytotoxicity of HKs was higher than most regulated and priority aliphatic DBPs in mono-halogenated, di-halogenated, and tri-halogenated categories. A prediction model of HK cytotoxicity was developed based on the quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR), optimizing structures and computing descriptors with Gaussian 09 W. The average concentrations of HKs in representative drinking water samples from South Carolina (U.S.) and Suzhou (China) were 12.4 and 0.9 µg/L, respectively, accounting for 18.8% and 1.7% of their specific total DBPs measured (i.e. not TOX). For South Carolina drinking water, their contributions to total calculated additive cytotoxicity of aliphatic DBPs and overall drinking water cytotoxicity were 86.7% and 14.0%, respectively, demonstrating that HKs are an essential class of overlooked DBPs with a high contribution to drinking water cytotoxicity. Our study can help to explain the conflict that why regulated and priority DBPs (except HKs) just accounted for 16% of chlorinated drinking water cytotoxicity even enough they had much higher concentration and cytotoxicity than known aromatic DBPs.


Assuntos
Cricetulus , Água Potável , Poluentes Químicos da Água , Animais , Células CHO , Poluentes Químicos da Água/toxicidade , Desinfecção , Purificação da Água , Cricetinae , Cetonas/toxicidade , Desinfetantes/toxicidade
4.
Sci Total Environ ; 912: 169469, 2024 Feb 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38154650

RESUMO

Soil is the source and sink of microplastics (MPs), which is more polluted than water and air. In this paper, the pollution levels of MPs in the agriculture, roadside, urban and landfill soils were reviewed, and the influence of MPs on soil ecosystem, including soil properties, microorganisms, animals and plants, was discussed. According to the results of in vivo and in vitro experiments, the possible risks of MPs to soil ecosystem and human health were predicted. Finally, in light of the current status of MPs research, several prospects are provided for future research directions to better evaluate the ecological risk and human health risk of MPs. MPs concentrations in global agricultural soils, roadside soils, urban soils and landfill soils had a great variance in different studies and locations. The participation of MPs has an impact on all aspects of terrestrial ecosystems. For soil properties, pH value, bulk density, pore space and evapotranspiration can be changed by MPs. For microorganisms, MPs can alter the diversity and abundance of microbiome, and different MPs have different effects on bacteria and fungi differently. For plants, MPs may interfere with their biochemical and physiological conditions and produce a wide range of toxic effects, such as inhibiting plant growth, delaying or reducing seed germination, reducing biological and fruit yield, and interfering with photosynthesis. For soil animals, MPs can affect their mobility, growth rate and reproductive capacity. At present epidemiological evidences regarding MPs exposure and negative human health effects are unavailable, but in vitro and in vivo data suggest that they pose various threats to human health, including respiratory system, digestive system, urinary system, endocrine system, nervous system, and circulation system. In conclusion, the existence and danger of MPs cannot be ignored and requires a global effort.


Assuntos
Microbiota , Solo , Animais , Humanos , Ecossistema , Microplásticos , Plásticos , Agricultura
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA