A single arm Phase I/II trial on the combination of carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel and avastin as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (TORG1424/OLCSG1402: CARNAVAL).

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab with platinum doublet therapy including paclitaxel + carboplatin improves the survival of patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer. However, in a previous trial (CA031), paclitaxel + carboplatin led to Grade > 3 neutropenia in a Japanese population. Nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel exhibits an improved toxicity profile. We evaluated the safety, dosage and response rate of the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination in a Japanese population. METHODS: Chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer were included. The dosage schedule was established in the Phase I trial as follows: 4-6 cycles of carboplatin (area under the concentration-time curve = 6 on Day 1) + nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel (100 mg/m2 on Days 1, 8 and 15) + bevacizumab (15 mg/kg on Day 1), followed by maintenance therapy (nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + bevacizumab). The response rate and presence of adverse effects were evaluated in the Phase II trial. RESULTS: The overall response rate was 56.5% (90% confidence interval: 44.5-68.5), and 93% of patients (43/46) showed tumor shrinkage or maintained a stable disease course. The primary endpoint was achieved. At the median follow-up duration of 42 months, the median overall survival was 18.9 (range: 10.5-32.4) months. The most frequently observed Grade ≥ 3 adverse effects were neutropenia (72%), leukopenia (50%) and anemia (30%). CONCLUSIONS: All adverse effects were manageable and none resulted in patient death. In conclusion, the nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel + carboplatin + bevacizumab combination is favorable and well tolerated in Japanese patients as first-line treatment for advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.

An open-label, crossover study to compare different formulations and evaluate effect of food on pharmacokinetics of pimitespib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

This study compared the bioavailability of two pimitespib formulations (Formulations A and B), evaluated the food effect on Formulation A, and evaluated the safety and efficacy of multiple pimitespib doses in patients with solid tumors. This clinical, pharmacological multicenter study had two cohorts and periods. A single dose of Formulation A or B was administered in a crossover design to compare the pharmacokinetics in Cohort 1. In Cohort 2, the effects of fed vs fasting conditions were evaluated among those receiving Formulation A. Subsequently, multiple Formulation A doses were administered to all patients for safety and efficacy assessments. In Cohorts 1 and 2, 12 and 16 patients, respectively, were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. Thirty patients were analyzed for safety and efficacy. Maximum concentration (Cmax), area under the curve (AUC)last, and AUCinf geometric mean ratios for Formulations A and B (90% confidence interval [CI]) were 0.8078 (0.6569-0.9933), 0.7973 (0.6672-0.9529), and 0.8094 (0.6697-0.9782), respectively; 90% CIs were not within the bioequivalence range (0.80-1.25). In Cohort 2, mean Cmax, AUClast, and AUCinf were higher in fed vs fasting conditions. No safety concerns emerged with single or multiple administration. Overall response rate, disease control rate, and median progression-free survival were 0%, 33%, and 1.5 months, respectively. Four patients had stable disease ≥ 5 months. Bioequivalence of the two formulations was unconfirmed. Systemic exposure of Formulation A was approximately 20% less than Formulation B. A high-fat/calorie meal increased the relative pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of a single 160-mg dose. Trial Registration: JapicCTI-184191 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center) registered on November 5, 2018.

Programmed cell death ligand 1 measurement study in granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-producing lung cancer: an observational study.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-producing lung cancer induces severe inflammation and a high white blood cell (WBC) count and is associated with poor prognosis. A recent case of G-CSF-producing lung adenocarcinoma showed high expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and was treated with pembrolizumab as first-line therapy, which was extremely effective. We hypothesized that G-CSF-producing lung cancers are associated with high PD-L1 expression. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with lung cancer at Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital (Kanagawa, Japan) between 2009 and 2019. The PD-L1 status of 13 patients with high plasma G-CSF levels (≥40 pg/mL) was assessed by conducting immunohistochemical analysis of tissue samples. RESULTS: Of the total patients, 11 were men and 2 were women, with a median age of 74 years (70-85 years). Four, five, and three patients had adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and others, respectively. The median G-CSF level and WBC count were 85.5 pg/mL (range, 40.8-484 pg/mL) and 15,550/µL (range, 6,190-56,800/µL), respectively. The PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPSs) were ≥50%, 1%-49%, and <1% in 9, 1, and 3 patients, respectively. The median overall survival time was 7.3 months. Pembrolizumab was administered in six patients as first-line treatment, with two patients showing partial response, one patient with stable disease, and three patients with progressive disease. All six patients had a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50%. CONCLUSION: G-CSF-producing lung cancers may be associated with increased PD-L1 expression. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors are an important treatment option for G-CSF-producing tumors, their effects are limited.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin + S-1 versus cisplatin + other third-generation agents for locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis of individual participant data.

BACKGROUND: For decades, concurrent chemo-radiotherapy with cisplatin-based regimen has been a standard therapy for locally advanced stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted individual-participant-data (IPD) meta-analyses to compare S-1/cisplatin versus other third-generation anti-cancer medications plus cisplatin regimens with the goal of determining whether or not S-1/cisplatin was the ideal choice for treatment accompanied by radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: A thorough search was performed using multiple electronic databases. We integrated the IPD of each trial and analyzed the resulting meta-database. The primary endpoint was the overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints included the progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), toxicities, and treatment delivery. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on baseline characteristics. Statistical analyses were stratified by trials. RESULTS: Three randomized control trials (WJOG5008L study, SPECTRA study, and TORG1018 study) were found. Of the 316 patients enrolled in those studies, 159 received S-1/cisplatin (SP), and 157 were assigned to other combination chemotherapy. The median OS for the SP arm was 48.2 months, and that of the non-SP arm was 42.4 months. The combined hazard ratio (HR) for the OS was 0.895 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.638-1.256), and no heterogeneity was noted among the trials (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.87; I2 = 0). The median PFS for the SP and non-SP arms was 12.8 and 14.0 months, respectively. The corresponding HR for the PFS was 1.022 (95% CI 0.776-1.347), and there was evidence of moderate heterogeneity among the trials (test for heterogeneity, p = 0.16; I2 = 0.46). The ORRs were 69.7% (95% CI 62.1-76.7%) and 70.9% (95% CI 63.7-78.1%) in the SP and non-SP arms, respectively. The toxicity profile showed that SP caused significantly fewer instances of grade 3-4 leukopenia and neutropenia than non-SP regimens. CONCLUSION: No marked differences were detected in the OS, PFS, or ORR between the SP and non-SP arms. SP had significantly less myelosuppression and better treatment compliance as a chemotherapy regimen for concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced NSCLC than non-SP regimens.

Phase I/II study of erlotinib plus S-1 for patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer: Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 0808/0913.

Introduction In preclinical data, the combination therapy with S-1 and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) had a synergistic antitumor effect on non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), regardless of the EGFR mutation status. Patients and Methods Patients with previously treated NSCLC and adequate organ function regardless of EGFR mutation status were eligible for the phase I study, with wild-type EGFR were eligible for the phase II study. Treatment consisted of erlotinib 150 mg/body orally once every day and S-1 60 mg/m2, 70 mg/m2, or 80 mg/m2 (level 0, level 1, or level 2) orally on days 1-14 every three weeks. The primary endpoint for the phase I study was the determination of the recommended dose (RD), the phase II study was the overall response rate (ORR). Results A total of 7 patients with performance-status (PS) 0 or 1 were enrolled as subjects in phase I. Five of these subjects were EGFR-mutation positive. Four subjects were enrolled at S-1 dose level 1 and 3 were enrolled at S-1 dose level 2. No dose-limiting toxicities were observed in these subjects. The RD was decided as erlotinib 150 mg/body and S-1 80 mg/m2. In phase I, 5 subjects achieved partial response, and the ORR was 71.4%. A total of 10 patients with PS 0, 1, or 2 EGFR-wild type NSCLC were enrolled in phase II. In phase II, the ORR was 10.0%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 40.0%. After the enrollment of 10 subjects, enrollment was stopped based on two treatment-related deaths. Conclusion The combination therapy of erlotinib plus S-1 was not feasible in the EGFR wild-type NSCLC at least and early stopped. Trial registration: UMIN-CTR Identifier: 000003421 (2010/03/31, phase I), 000003422 (2010/03/31, Phase II).

Phase I study of TAS-121, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

Purpose We investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of TAS-121, a novel, potent, and highly selective third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) in Japanese patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) previously treated with EGFR-TKI. Methods This was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center, dose escalation, phase I study conducted in three phases (dose escalation, expansion, and extension phases). TAS-121 was administered orally once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID) under fasting conditions in a 21-day treatment cycle. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) during Cycle 1 of the dose escalation phase. Results In total, 134 patients received treatment. Five and three patients presented a DLT with the QD and BID regimens, respectively. The DLTs were drug-induced liver injury, platelet count decreased, urticaria, interstitial lung disease, and left ventricular failure. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was 10 mg/day QD and 8 mg/day BID in the dose escalation phase. The most common adverse drug reactions (ADRs) were dermatological toxicity (89.6%), platelet count decreased (67.2%), and pyrexia (44%) among all patients. Rate of discontinuations due to ADRs at the MTD level were 11.1% with TAS-121 10 mg/day QD and 7.9% with TAS-121 8 mg/day BID. Among 86 T790M-positive patients (confirmed by blood serum sampling in most patients), the objective response rate (ORR) was 28% and highest at 8 mg/day BID (39%). Among 16 T790M-negative patients, the ORR was 19%. Conclusions TAS-121 was well tolerated up to the MTD and demonstrated antitumor activity in Japanese T790M-positive NSCLC patients. Clinical trial registration: JapicCTI-142651.

Comparison of the efficacies of first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors for brain metastasis in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations.

BACKGROUND: Compared with standard chemotherapy, epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) are more effective in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations. However, data comparing the efficacies of different EGFR-TKIs, especially regarding the presence of brain metastasis, are lacking. METHODS: EGFR-TKI naive patients with recurrent or stage IIIB/IV NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations, excluding resistance mutations, were enrolled in this study. We retrospectively determined progression-free survival (PFS) using the Kaplan-Meier method with log-rank test in patients treated with either gefitinib or erlotinib, cumulative incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression using the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model, and favorable prognostic factors for CNS progression by multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Seventy-seven EGFR-TKI-naive patients were started on either gefitinib (n = 55) or erlotinib (n = 22) in our hospital from April 2010 to April 2016. Among the patients with brain metastasis, PFS tended to be longer in the erlotinib than in the gefitinib group. In the analysis of cumulative incidence, the probability of CNS progression was lower in the erlotinib group than in the gefitinib group. Particularly, in a subgroup analysis of the patients with brain metastasis, there was a significant difference between the erlotinib and gefitinib groups (hazard ratio 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.81; p = 0.021). Of the prognostic factors for CNS progression evaluated, the absence of brain metastasis before EGFR-TKI therapy and receiving erlotinib (vs gefitinib) had a significantly favorable effect on patient prognosis. CONCLUSION: Although this was a retrospective analysis involving a small sample size, erlotinib is potentially more promising than gefitinib for treatment of brain metastasis in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

Phase I/II study of induction chemotherapy using carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for elderly patients with limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC): TORG 0604.

BACKGROUND: The role of irinotecan for elderly patients with LD-SCLC has been unclear, and the timing of TRT combined with chemotherapy has not been fully evaluated. METHODS: Patients aged > 70 years with untreated, measurable, LD-SCLC, performance status (PS) 0-2, and adequate organ function were eligible. Treatment consisted of induction with carboplatin on day 1 and irinotecan on days 1 and 8, every 21 days for 4 cycles, and sequential TRT (54Gy in 27 fractions). Carboplatin doses were based on AUC of 4 and 5 (levels 1 and 2, respectively), with a fixed irinotecan dose (50 mg/m2). Primary objective of the phase II study was overall responce rate. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled and forty-one were finally analyzed (median age: 75 years [range 70-86 years); males 31; PS 0/1/2, n = 22/18/1]. Two patients were excluded because of protocol violation (ascertained to be extensive disease). Twelve patients were accrued at phase I and the number of patients with carboplatin dose-limiting toxicities at levels-1 (n = 6) and -2 (n = 6) were 1(grade 3 hypertension) and 2 (grade 4 thrombocytopenia), respectively. The phase II trial was expanded to 29 additional patients receiving the level 1 carboplatin dose, total of 35 patients. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 4 (range 1-4), and the median radiation dose was 54Gy (range 36-60). Toxicities were generally mild. There were 4 complete and 27 partial responses (response rate 88.6%). With a median follow-up of 52 months, the median progression-free and overall survival times of phase II were 11.2 and 27.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Induction chemotherapy of carboplatin plus irinotecan and sequential TRT was well tolerated and effective for elderly patients with LD-SCLC. Additional confirmatory studies are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: UMIN000007352 Name of registry: UMIN. Date of registration: 1/Dec/2006. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: 6/Feb/2007. Clinical trial registration date: 1/Feb/2006 (prospective).

A Phase II/III study comparing carboplatin and irinotecan with carboplatin and etoposide for the treatment of elderly patients with extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (JCOG1201).

A randomized Phase II/III trial commenced in Japan in December 2013. Carboplatin plus etoposide is the current standard treatment for elderly extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer. The purpose of this study is to confirm the superiority of carboplatin plus irinotecan in terms of overall survival over carboplatin plus etoposide for elderly extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer patients in a Phase II/III design. A total of 370 patients will be accrued from 38 Japanese institutions within 5 years. In the Phase II part, the primary endpoint is the response rate of the carboplatin plus irinotecan arm and the secondary endpoint is adverse events. In the Phase III part, the primary endpoint is overall survival and the secondary endpoints are progression-free survival, response rate, adverse events, serious adverse events and symptom score. This trial has been registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000012605 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/index.htm).

A prospective study of shortened vitamin supplementation prior to cisplatin-pemetrexed therapy for non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Prior supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12 is required to reduce pemetrexed therapy toxicity; the recommended lead-in time is at least 7 days. On the basis of previous pharmacokinetic and clinical studies, we hypothesized that the lead-in time could be shortened to 24 hours, enabling earlier commencement of standard chemotherapy; thus, we planned the first prospective trial of this regimen. METHODS: Patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer who had not previously received cytotoxic chemotherapy were enrolled. After measurement of homocysteine concentrations, the patients received 1,000 µg of vitamin B12 by intramuscular injection and began taking 350-500 µg of oral folic acid daily. Starting 24-48 hours after the vitamin B12 injection, the patients received intravenous 500 mg/m(2) pemetrexed and 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin for 4 cycles at 3 weekly intervals. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who developed neutropenia grade ≥3. RESULTS: Thirty patients received chemotherapy starting within 48 hours of the vitamin B12 injection. No treatment-related deaths or grade 4 toxicity occurred. Neutropenia grade ≥3, other laboratory toxicities grade ≥3, and nonlaboratory toxicities grade ≥3 occurred in 6.7%, 13%, and 13% of patients, respectively. The baseline homocysteine concentrations were not higher in patients with grade ≥3 toxicities than in the remainder of the cohort (mean values, 8.6 and 10.7 µmol/L, respectively). The response rate to chemotherapy was 43%. CONCLUSION: The shortened vitamin supplementation was well tolerated and retained antitumor efficacy. Analysis of baseline homocysteine concentrations confirmed the efficacy of short-term vitamin supplementation.

A feasibility study of carboplatin plus irinotecan treatment for elderly patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVE: The role of platinum agents plus irinotecan has been unclear for elderly patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer. We conducted a feasibility study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of carboplatin plus irinotecan in preparation for a planned Phase III study. METHODS: Based on another Phase I study, carboplatin area under the curve of four Day 1 plus irinotecan 50 mg/m(2) Days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for four courses was administered. Patients aged ≥70 years with a performance status of 0-2 were eligible. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as the percentage of patients who have received three or more courses of chemotherapy. If the feasibility was ≥60% in the first 10 patients, this endpoint would be considered to be met. RESULTS: Eleven patients were registered. The median age was 77 years, and nine patients had a performance status of 1. Ten patients completed four courses of treatment, and neither dose omission nor modification was required. The feasibility was 91% (10/11) and the relative dose intensity was 76.9%. Because neutropenia was frequently prolonged, the next course was delayed in 53% of all courses. Other toxicities were generally mild, and the only Grade 4 toxicity was hyponatremia. The overall response rate was 90% (9/10), and the progression-free survival and the overall survival were 5.1 and 10.9 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This regimen appears to be feasible and effective. Based on these results, a Phase II/III trial comparing carboplatin plus etoposide with carboplatin plus irinotecan for elderly patients with extensive disease small-cell lung cancer is being planned by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group.

Patterns and Incidence of Pneumonitis and Initial Treatment Outcomes with Durvalumab Consolidation Therapy after Radical Chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Durvalumab consolidation after chemoradiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become the standard of care. Single-center results were examined for treatment outcomes and patterns of pneumonitis in clinical practice. Patients with stage III NSCLC who underwent chemoradiotherapy at our institution (n = 150) were included. The patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy and durvalumab consolidation (Group D, n = 69) or chemoradiotherapy alone (Group N, n = 81). The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and the incidence of and risk factors for 12-month pneumonitis grade ≥ 2 (G2) were investigated. Two-year OS rates were 71.6% in Group D and 52.7% in Group N (p = 0.052). Two-year PFS rates were 43.0% in Group D and 26.5% in Group N (p = 0.010), although a propensity score matched analysis showed no significant difference. The incidence of 12-month pneumonitis ≥ G2 tended to be higher in Group D than in Group N (41.9% vs. 26.3%, p = 0.080). However, there was no difference in pneumonitis ≥ G3 rates (10.5% vs. 12.6%, p = 0.657). A multivariate analysis showed that the lung volume spared from 5 Gy (VS5) < 1800 cm3 was a risk factor for pneumonitis ≥ G2 in Group D. Durvalumab consolidation showed the potential to prolong PFS without increasing the severity of pneumonitis.

A Phase â ¡ Study of Ubenimex Combined With Pembrolizumab, Nab-Paclitaxel, and Carboplatin for Previously Untreated Advanced Squamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: TORG2241 (UBE-Q).

BACKGROUND: According to the results of the KEYNOTE-407 trial, pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy is the standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Ubenimex, a potent aminopeptidase inhibitor, is an oral drug with immunostimulatory and antitumor activities. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of ubenimex in combination with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective, single-arm, multicenter, phase II clinical trial is conducted to confirm the tolerability and efficacy of the tested drugs. Patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC will receive a predetermined daily dose of ubenimex orally plus 4 cycles of pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin, followed by continuous administration of ubenimex and pembrolizumab for a maximum of 2 years. To confirm tolerability, the daily dose of ubenimex will begin at level 1 (30 mg), which will be increased to levels 2 (60 mg) and 3 (120 mg) according to the escalation criteria, with a standard 3 + 3 design for achieving the target dose-limiting toxicity rate of 33%. The efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ubenimex at the determined dose level will be analyzed. The primary endpoint of the efficacy evaluation will be the objective response rate assessed by an independent review committee. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ubenimex combined with pembrolizumab, nab-paclitaxel, and carboplatin in patients with previously untreated advanced squamous NSCLC. The results will help devise future treatment strategies.

Association of PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥20% with early resistance to osimertinib in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) resistance, including osimertinib, and programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression status in EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) remains unclear. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 64 patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic NSCLC carrying EGFR exon 19 deletions (ex19del) or EGFR exon 21 L858R substitutions (L858R) who received osimertinib as the first-line treatment. We compared progression-free survival (PFS) between eligible patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion scores (TPS) ≥20% and PD-L1 TPS <20% using the Kaplan-Meier survival plots with a log-rank test. Multivariate analysis was performed to examine the poor prognostic factors of PFS. RESULTS: The PD-L1 TPS ≥20% group included 22 cases (median [range] age: 70.5 [33-86] years; 10 women [45.5%]; 11 current or ex-smokers [50%]); ECOG performance status (PS) of 0-1/2/3/4 was noted in 16/4/1/1 patients, respectively. The PD-L1 TPS <20% group included 42 patients (median [range] age 73 [43-88] years; 29 women [69%]; 12 current or ex-smokers [28.6%]); ECOG PS of 0-1/2/3/4 was noted in 33/6/3/0 cases, respectively. The median PFS was 9.1 and 28.1 months in the PD-L1 TPS ≥20% and PD-L1 TPS <20% groups, respectively (log-rank p = 0.013). Multivariate analysis revealed that PD-L1 TPS ≥20% was associated with PFS (hazard ratio: 2.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.09-5.08, p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: PD-L1 TPS ≥20% in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC may be associated with early resistance to osimertinib.

Multicenter, single-arm phase II study of modified carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel in untreated performance status 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: TORG1426.

Background: Currently, only a few treatment options exist for performance status (PS) 2 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the carboplatin/nab-paclitaxel (CBDCA/nab-PTX) regimen is attracting attention as a standard of care for PS 0-1 patients because of its wide suitability and modest risk of peripheral neuropathy. However, the treatment dose and schedule should be optimized for PS 2 patients. Therefore, we planned a single-arm phase II study to characterize the efficacy and tolerability of our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen for untreated PS 2 patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Enrolled patients were treated with CBDCA (area under the curve 5 on day 1) plus nab-PTX (70 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) every 4 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was the progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. As exploratory analyses, the reasons for PS 2 (disease burden versus comorbidities/indeterminant) and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) were evaluated as efficacy indicators. Results: This study was terminated early because of slow accrual. Seventeen patients [median age, 68 years (range, 50-73 years)] received a median of three cycles. The 6-month PFS rate, median PFS, and median overall survival were 20.8% [95% confidence interval (CI): 0-41.6], 3.0 months (95% CI: 1.7-4.3), and 9.5 months (95% CI: 5.0-14.0), respectively. Exploratory analyses suggested better overall survival in patients whose PS was not attributable to the disease burden (median, 9.5 vs. 7.2 months) or whose CCI was ≤3 (median, 15.5 vs. 7.2 months). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 12 (71%) patients, and grade 5 pleural infection occurred in one (6%) patient. Meanwhile, only one (6%) patient each experienced grade 1 peripheral neuropathy and grade 2 interstitial pneumonitis. Conclusions: No conclusion could be drawn from this study because of its early termination. However, our modified CBDCA/nab-PTX regimen might be useful for PS 2 patients who hesitate to use regimens other than nab-PTX, and particularly patients concerned about peripheral neuropathy or interstitial pneumonitis. The potential role of PS 2 and CCI as efficacy predictors for this regimen should be further examined.

Carboplatin and irinotecan (CI) vs. carboplatin and etoposide (CE) for the treatment of extended-stage small-cell lung cancer in an elderly population: A phase II/III randomized control trial.

OBJECTIVES: Cisplatin plus irinotecan has been considered as the standard therapy in younger (<70 years old) patients for extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC) in Japan. However, there is a lack of high-quality evidence for the use of irinotecan in elderly patients with ED-SCLC. This study aimed to demonstrate that carboplatin plus irinotecan (CI) improves overall survival (OS) in elderly patients with ED-SCLC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a randomized Phase II/III trial which enrolled elderly patients with ED-SCLC. Patients were randomized to the CI or carboplatin plus etoposide (CE) arm in a 1:1 ratio. The CE group intravenously received carboplatin (AUC 5 mg/ml/min on day 1) and etoposide (80 mg/m2 on days 1-3) every 3 weeks for four cycles. The CI group received carboplatin (AUC 4 mg/ml/min on day 1) and irinotecan (50 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) intravenously every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. RESULTS: In total, 258 patients were enrolled and randomized (CE arm, 129 patients; CI arm, 129 patients). The median overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate of the CE vs. CI arms were 12.0 (95% CI, 9.3-13.7) vs. 13.2 (95% CI, 11.1-14.6) months (HR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.65-1.11)) (one-sided P = 0.11), 4.4 (95% CI, 4.0-4.7) vs. 4.9 (95% CI, 4.5-5.2) months (HR, 0.85 (95% CI, 0.66-1.09)), and 59.5% vs. 63.2%, respectively. A higher incidence of myelosuppression was observed in the CE group, whereas a higher incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity was observed in the CI group. Three treatment-related deaths occurred (one due to lung infection in the CE arm, and one due to lung infection and sepsis each in the CI arm). CONCLUSIONS: The CI treatment showed favorable efficacy; however, the difference was not statistically significant. These results suggest that CE should remain as the standard chemotherapy regimen for elderly patients with ED-SCLC.

Entrectinib Response to ROS1-Fusion-Positive Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer That Progressed on Crizotinib with Leptomeningeal Metastasis: A Case Report.

Introduction: C-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) translocation is an oncogenic driver-mutation identified in 1-2% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Although crizotinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) against ALK/ROS1, is known to be effective against ROS1-fusion-positive NSCLC, such cases sometimes progress with brain metastases. The most frequently reported crizotinib-resistance mutation is ROS1 G2032R, and some studies have found that even newly developed ROS1 TKIs, such as entrectinib and lorlatinib, show a decreased efficacy against it. The optimal therapies for ROS1-fusion-positive NSCLC and how such cases can be sequenced have not yet been established. Case Presentation: We herein report a patient with ROS1-fusion-positive NSCLC diagnosed at 34 years old. Crizotinib was started at the diagnosis and switched after 25 months to cisplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab once the disease progressed with multiple brain metastases that were resistant to stereotactic radiation therapy. The cytotoxic chemotherapy stabilized the patient's condition for 17 months until he developed leptomeningeal metastasis (LM). He underwent lumboperitoneal shunting and whole-brain radiotherapy, followed by crizotinib re-administration. Despite crizotinib treatment, his neurological symptoms, such as double vision, headache, weakness in the legs, and walking difficulties, progressed. Eventually, subsequent entrectinib treatment was initiated, which resolved all of the symptoms mentioned above. Regrettably, liquid next-generation sequencing had failed to detect the resistance mechanism due to minimal ctDNA in this case. Conclusion: These findings imply that sequential entrectinib administration may be effective in patients with disease progression limited to central nervous system metastases during crizotinib administration.

Acute pancreatitis or severe increase in pancreatic enzyme levels following remdesivir administration in COVID-19 patients: an observational study.

Remdesivir has been shown to reduce recovery time and mortality among patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, data regarding the efficacy and safety of remdesivir use are limited in Japan. We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study at Yokohama Municipal Citizen's Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan. Patients with COVID-19 pneumonia treated with remdesivir were included. The onset of acute pancreatitis and increased pancreatic enzyme levels and clinical, laboratory, treatment, and outcome data were collected and analyzed. A total of 201 patients were included. Among the 201 patients treated with remdesivir, 177 recovered from COVID-19. Increased pancreatic enzyme levels of grade 3 or higher or acute pancreatitis developed in 23 of the 201 patients. The potential etiopathogenetic effects of remdesivir on increased pancreatic enzyme levels of grade 3 or higher or acute pancreatitis were ascertained by reviewing the characteristics of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who did not receive remdesivir treatment. Only 3 of 159 patients had increased pancreatic enzyme levels of grade 3 or higher during the treatment course. Multivariate analysis indicated remdesivir administration and severe COVID-19 infection by National Institute of Health standards as independent risk factors. Acute pancreatitis and severe increases in pancreatic enzyme levels were observed among patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir.

A case of pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy following lymphedema on the lower extremities.

Pulmonary tumor thrombotic microangiopathy (PTTM) is a rare manifestation of malignancy. The antemortem diagnosis is difficult, since patients present with rapidly progressive symptoms. We recently observed a case of PTTM following lymphedema of the lower extremities. We did not reach a diagnosis, even after performing BAL and TBLB. The patient manifested pulmonary hypertension and died on the 9th day of admission. Autopsy revealed a tumor embolism in the pulmonary arterioles accompanied by fibrocellular epithelial cell proliferation, but the primary organ was not identified. To our knowledge, this is the first reported case of PTTM with lymphedema.

A case of slowly progressive malignant pericardial mesothelioma suggesting the involvement of BAP1 loss.

Malignant pericardial mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare tumour that arises from the mesothelial cells of the pericardium. No standard treatment has been established owing to a poor treatment response; therefore, MPM has a poor prognosis. We herein report a rare case of MPM in a 70-year-old man that was diagnosed immunohistopathologically using cell block sections of pericardial fluid and in which long-term survival for more than 3 years was achieved with only periodic pericardial drainage. Immunohistopathological staining investigations, especially BRCA1-associated protein 1 (BAP1) immunostaining using cell block sections of pericardial effusion, are effective in making a diagnosis of MPM. Well-differentiated papillary mesothelioma (WDPM) with BAP1 loss progresses to MPM in the long term, showing that BAP1 loss may induce phenotypical evolution of WDPM. BAP1 loss may also progress to malignant mesothelioma in situ and then to invasive mesothelioma. BAP1 immunohistochemistry should be considered for the early diagnosis of MPM.