RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Coronavirus disease is associated with increased morbidity and mortality in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients. Recent breakthrough infection in vaccinated people has led some authorities to recommend a booster dose for patients fully vaccinated 5-8 months ago. We aimed to assess the humoral response of MHD patients following a booster dose with the BNT162b2 vaccine. METHODS: The study included 102 MHD patients vaccinated with 2 doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine. A third dose (booster) was recommended to all MHD patients in our center and was given to those who opted to receive it, resulting in a booster group and a control group that did not receive the booster. Previous exposure was excluded by testing for the presence of the anti-nucleocapsid antibody (SARS-CoV-2) or positive PCR. We assessed the humoral response before and after the booster dose. RESULTS: Of 66 patients in the booster group, 65 patients (98.5%) developed a positive antibody response, from 472.7 ± 749.5 to 16,336.8 ± 15,397.3, as compared to a sustained decrease in the control group (695.7 ± 642.7 to 383.6 ± 298.6), p < 0.0001. No significant adverse effects were reported. Prior antibody titers were positively correlated to IgG levels following the booster dose. There was a significant association between malnutrition-inflammation markers and the humoral response. CONCLUSIONS: Almost all MHD patients developed a substantial humoral response following the booster dose, which was significantly higher than levels reported for MHD patients following administration of 2 doses alone. Further studies and observations are needed to determine the exact timing and dosing schedule.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Vacinas contra COVID-19/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Diálise Renal , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
A nosocomial outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant infected 42 patients, staff and family members; 39 were fully vaccinated. The attack rate was 10.6% (16/151) among exposed staff and reached 23.7% (23/97) among exposed patients in a highly vaccinated population, 16-26 weeks after vaccination (median: 25 weeks). All cases were linked and traced to one patient. Several transmissions occurred between individuals wearing face masks. Fourteen of 23 patients became severely sick or died, raising a question about possible waning immunity.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Israel , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common healthcare-associated infections. Evaluating risk factors for SSIs among patients undergoing laparoscopic and open colorectal resections can aid in selecting appropriate candidates for each modality. METHODS: A cohort of all consecutive patients undergoing elective colorectal resections during 2008-2017 in a single center was analyzed. SSIs were prospectively assessed by infection control personnel. Patient data were collected from electronic medical records. Risk factors for SSIs were compared between patients who underwent laparoscopic and open surgeries. A multivariate analysis was performed for significant variables. RESULTS: During the study period, 865 patients underwent elective colorectal resection: 596 laparoscopic and 269 open surgeries. Mean age was 68.2 ± 15.1 years, weight 72.5 ± 18.3 kg and 441 (51%) were men. The most common indication for surgery was malignancy, in 767 patients (88.7%) with inflammatory bowel diseases and diverticulitis following (4.5% and 3.9%, respectively). Patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery were younger, had fewer comorbidities, shorter pre-operative hospitalizations, lower risk index scores, and lower rates of SSI, compared with open surgery. Independent risk factors for SSI following laparoscopic surgery were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [odds ratio (OR) 2.655 95% CI (1.267, 5.565)], risk index ≥ 2 [OR 2.079, 95% CI (1.041,4.153)] and conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery [OR 2.056 95%CI (1.212, 3.486)]. Independent risk factors for SSI following open surgery were immunosuppression [OR 3.378 95% CI (1.071, 10.655)], chronic kidney disease [OR 2.643 95% CI (1.008, 6.933)], and need for a second dose of prophylactic antibiotics [OR 2.519 95%CI (1.074, 5.905)]. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for SSIs differ between laparoscopic and open colorectal resections. Knowledge of specific risk factors may inform patient selection for these modalities.
Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Colectomia/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Proximal femoral fractures (PFF) are among the most common injuries in the elderly population treated by orthopedic surgeons. Postoperative complications, especially infections, are of great importance due to their effect on patient mortality and morbidity and healthcare costs. OBJECTIVES: To assess the main causes for postoperative infection among PFF patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of PFF patients in our medical center between 2015 and 2017. Patients were divided into two groups based on whether there was postoperative infection during immediate hospitalization and 30 days after surgery. Factors such as time from admission to surgery, duration of surgery, and length of stay were analyzed. Groups were analyzed and compared using a t-test, chi-squared and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Of 1276 patients, 859 (67%) underwent closed reduction internal fixation, 67 (5%) underwent total hip arthroplasty, and 350 (28%) underwent hemiarthroplasty. Of the total, 38 patients (3%) were diagnosed with postoperative infection. The demographics and co-morbidities were similar between the two study groups. The incident of infection was the highest among patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (6%, P < 0.0001). Length of hospitalization (15 vs. 8 days, P = 0.0001) and operative time (117 vs. 77 minutes, P = 0.0001) were found to be the most significant risk factors for postoperative infection. CONCLUSIONS: Predisposition to postoperative infections in PPF patients was associated with prolonged length of surgery and longer hospitalization. We recommend optimizing fast discharge, selecting the appropriate type of surgery, and improving surgical planning to reduce intraoperative delays and length of surgery.
Assuntos
Artroplastia de Quadril , Fraturas do Fêmur , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Hemiartroplastia , Duração da Cirurgia , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Idoso , Artroplastia de Quadril/efeitos adversos , Artroplastia de Quadril/métodos , Causalidade , Feminino , Fraturas do Fêmur/epidemiologia , Fraturas do Fêmur/cirurgia , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/efeitos adversos , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/métodos , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde , Hemiartroplastia/efeitos adversos , Hemiartroplastia/métodos , Humanos , Israel/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) is an opportunistic infection in immunocompromised patients. Clusters of PJP, especially among organ transplant recipients in clinic settings were described. Data regarding nosocomial PJP infection among inpatients are limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the magnitude and characteristics of inpatient healthcare-associated PJP infection (HCA-PJP) in HIV-negative patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of hospitalized PJP patients was performed to identify HCA-PJP. The study was performed at six medical centers in Israel from 2006 to 2016. HCA-PJP was defined as cases of hospital-onset or those with documented contact with a PJP patient. We reviewed and cross-matched temporal and spatial co-locations of patients. Clinical laboratory characteristics and outcomes were compared. RESULTS: Seventy-six cases of PJP were identified. Median age was 63.7 years; 64% men; 44% hematological malignancies; 18% inflammatory diseases; and 61% steroid usage. Thirty-two patients (42%) were defined as HCA-PJP: 18/32 (23.6%) were hospitalized at onset and 14/32 (18.4%) had a previous encounter with a PJP patient. Time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis was shorter in HCA-PJP vs. community-PJP (3.25 vs. 11.23 days, P = 0.009). In multivariate analysis, dyspnea at presentation (odds ratio [OR] 16.79, 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.78-157.95) and a tendency toward higher rate of ventilator support (72% vs. 52%, P = 0.07, OR 5.18, 95%CI 0.7-30.3) were independently associated with HCA-PJP, implying abrupt disease progression in HCA-PJP. CONCLUSIONS: HCA-PJP was common. A high level of suspicion for PJP among selected patients with nosocomial respiratory infection is warranted. Isolation of PJP patients should be considered.
Assuntos
Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecções Oportunistas/epidemiologia , Pneumocystis carinii/isolamento & purificação , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/epidemiologia , Idoso , Infecção Hospitalar/diagnóstico , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Progressão da Doença , Dispneia/etiologia , Feminino , Hospitais , Humanos , Israel , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecções Oportunistas/diagnóstico , Infecções Oportunistas/microbiologia , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/diagnóstico , Pneumonia por Pneumocystis/microbiologia , Respiração Artificial/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Prophylactic antibiotics to prolong latency and reduce the risk of neonatal and maternal infections are used for preterm premature rupture of membranes. This study compared outcomes between two macrolides: roxithromycin given twice a day for a week and azithromycin, given as a single dose, which is more convenient. METHODS: Two local protocols were retrospectively compared: roxithromycin and ampicillin from July 2005 to May 2016, and azithromycin and ampicillin from May 2016 to May 2018. Inclusion criteria were singleton pregnancy, at 24-34 weeks of gestation upon admission with preterm premature rupture of membranes. Primary outcome was length of the latency period, defined as time from first antibiotic dose to 34 + 0 weeks, or spontaneous or indicated delivery prior to 34 + 0 weeks. Secondary outcomes were rates of chorioamnionitis, delivery mode, birth weight and Apgar scores. RESULTS: A total of 207 women met inclusion criteria, of whom, 173 received penicillin and roxithromycin and 34 received penicillin and azithromycin. Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The latent period was longer in the azithromycin group than in the roxithromycin group (14.09 ± 14.2 days and 7.87 ± 10.2 days, respectively, P = 0.003). Rates of chorioamnionitis, cesarean deliveries, Apgar scores and birth weights were similar between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Azithromycin compared to roxithromycin results in a longer latency period in the setting of preterm premature rupture of membranes at 24-34 weeks of gestation. Given its more convenient regimen and our results, it seems justified to use azithromycin as the first-line treatment for patients with preterm premature rupture of membranes.
Assuntos
Ampicilina/administração & dosagem , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Ruptura Prematura de Membranas Fetais/tratamento farmacológico , Complicações do Trabalho de Parto/prevenção & controle , Roxitromicina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Antibioticoprofilaxia , Índice de Apgar , Azitromicina/administração & dosagem , Peso ao Nascer , Cesárea , Corioamnionite , Pesquisa Comparativa da Efetividade , Esquema de Medicação , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Resultado da Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Roxitromicina/administração & dosagem , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Increasing antibiotic resistance in the community results in greater use of empiric broad spectrum antibiotics for patients at hospital admission. As a measure of antibiotic stewardship it is important to identify a patient population that can receive narrow spectrum antibiotics. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate resistance patterns of Escherichia coli bloodstream infection (BSI) from strictly community-acquired infection and the impact of recent antibiotic use on this resistance. METHODS: This single center, historical cohort study of adult patients with E. coli BSI was conducted from January 2007 to December 2011. Patients had no exposure to any healthcare facility and no chronic catheters or chronic ulcers. Data on antibiotic use during the previous 90 days was collected and relation to resistance patterns was assessed. RESULTS: Of the total number of patients, 267 BSI cases met the entry criteria; 153 patients (57%) had bacteria sensitive to all antibiotics. Among 189 patients with no antibiotic exposure, 61% of isolates (116) were pan-sensitive. Resistance to any antibiotic appeared in 114 patients and 12 were extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producers. Quinolone use was the main driver of resistance to any antibiotic and to ESBL resistance patterns. In a multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio 1.1) and quinolone use (odds ratio 7) were independently correlated to ESBL. CONCLUSIONS: At admission, stratification by patient characteristics and recent antibiotic use can help personalize primary empirical therapy.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Escherichia coli/efeitos dos fármacos , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Gestão de Antimicrobianos , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli/isolamento & purificação , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Quinolonas/administração & dosagem , Quinolonas/farmacologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Adulto JovemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Isolation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in healthy individuals is not common in Israel. In our hospital, about 30% of MRSA isolates were SCCmec types IV and V. OBJECTIVES: To identify the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients carrying MRSA SCCmec type IV or V, and to compare them with each other and with those of patients with SCCmec types I-III. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study that included 501 patients from whom MRSA was isolated: 254 with SCCmec type I, II, or III, and 243 isolates from SCCmec types IV or V. RESULTS: MRSA was isolated from surveillance cultures in 75% of patients and from a clinical site in 25%. The majority of our study population was elderly, from nursing homes, and with extensive exposure to health care. First, we compared characteristics of patients identified through screening. Statistically significant predictors of SCCmec V vs. IV were Arab ethnicity (OR 7.44, 95% CI 1.5-37.9) and hospitalization in the year prior to study inclusion (OR 5.7, 95% CI 1.9-16.9). No differences were found between patients with SCCmec types I-III and patients with SCCmec type IV or V. Analysis of the subset of patients who had clinical cultures yielded similar results. CONCLUSIONS: SCCmec types IV and V were common in the hospital setting although rare in the community. It seems that in Israel, SCCmec IV and V are predominantly health care-associated MRSA.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar , DNA Bacteriano , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Resistência a Meticilina/efeitos dos fármacos , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina , Infecções Estafilocócicas , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Árabes , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/epidemiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/microbiologia , Infecções Comunitárias Adquiridas/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/microbiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Feminino , Humanos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Israel/epidemiologia , Masculino , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/genética , Staphylococcus aureus Resistente à Meticilina/isolamento & purificação , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etnologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/etiologia , Infecções Estafilocócicas/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Background: Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSIs) is essential for better prevention. We developed a screening method for SSIs in adults. Methods: The training dataset included data from patients who underwent orthopedic surgeries (N = 1,090), colorectal surgeries (N = 817), and abdominal hysterectomies (N = 523) during 2015-2018. The gold standard for the validation of the screening tool was the presence of SSI as determined by a trained infection control practitioner, via manual full medical record review, using the US Center for Disease Control and Prevention criteria. Using multivariable regression models, we identified the correlates of SSI. Patients who had at least one of these correlates were classified as likely to having SSI and those who did not have any of the correlates were classified as unlikely to have SSI. We calculated the sensitivity and specificity of this tool compared to the gold standard and applied the tool to a validation dataset (N = 1,310, years 2019-2020). Results: SSI was diagnosed by an infection control specialist in 8.2, 5.2, and 31.2% of the patients in the training dataset who underwent hysterectomies, orthopedic surgeries and colorectal surgeries, respectively, vs. 6.2, 6.6, and 25.5%, respectively, in the validation dataset. The correlates of SSI after abdominal hysterectomy were prolonged hospitalization, ordering wound or blood culture, emergency room visit and reoperation; in orthopedic surgery, emergency room visit, wound culture, reoperation, and documentation of SSI, and in colorectal surgeries prolonged hospitalization, readmission, and ordering wound or blood cultures. Area under the curve was >90%. The sensitivity and specificity (95% CI) of the screening tool were 98% (88-100) and 58% (53-62), for abdominal hysterectomy, 91% (81-96) and 82% (80-84) in orthopedic surgeries and 96% (90-98) and 62% (58-66) in colorectal surgeries. The corresponding values for the validation dataset were 89% (67-97) and 75% (69-80) in abdominal hysterectomy; 85% (72-93) and 83% (80-86) in orthopedic surgeries and 98% (93-99) and 59% (53-64) in colorectal surgeries. The number of files needed to be fully reviewed declined by 61-66. Conclusion: The presented semi-automated simple screening tool for SSI surveillance had good sensitivity and specificity and it has great potential of reducing workload and improving SSI surveillance.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Nosocomial bloodstream infections (NBSIs) are adverse complications of hospitalization. Most interventions focus on intensive care units. Data on interventions involving patients' personal care providers in hospitalwide settings are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of department-level NBSI investigations on infection incidence. METHODS: Beginning in 2016, positive cultures, classified as suspected of being hospital acquired, were prospectively investigated by patients' unit-based personal healthcare providers using a structured electronic questionnaire. After analyzing the conclusions of the investigation, a summary was sent quarterly to the departments and to hospital management. NBSI rates and clinical data during a 5-year period (2014-2018) were calculated and compared before and after the intervention (2014-2015 versus 2016-2018), using interrupted time-series analysis. RESULTS: Among 4,135 bloodstream infections (BSIs), 1,237 (30%) were nosocomial. The rate of NBSI decreased from 4.58 per 1,000 admissions days in 2014 and 4.82 in 2015, to 3.81 in 2016, 2.94 in 2017 and 2.86 in 2018. Following a 4-month lag after introducing the intervention, the NBSI rate per 1000 admissions dropped significantly by 1.33 (P = .04; 95% CI, -2.58 to -0.07). The monthly NBSI rate continued to decrease significantly by 0.03 during the intervention period (P = .03; 95% CI, -0.06 to -0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Detailed department-level investigations of NBSI events performed by healthcare providers, increased staff awareness and frontline ownership and were associated with a decrease in NBSI rates hospitalwide.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecção Hospitalar , Sepse , Humanos , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/prevenção & controle , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Hospitalização , Propriedade , Sepse/epidemiologia , Sepse/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Surveillance of surgical site infection after cesarean section is challenging due to the high volume of these surgeries. A manual chart review of women undergoing cesarean section between January and June 2017 (675 charts, 40 infections) was compared to charts identified via an algorithm (141 charts, 39 infections). The algorithm achieved 97.5% sensitivity and 83.9% specificity and reduced the workload of infection control personnel.
Assuntos
Cesárea , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/epidemiologia , Cesárea/efeitos adversos , Controle de Infecções , AlgoritmosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Escherichia coli is the leading cause of bloodstream infection (BSI). The incidence of E. coli BSI caused by antibiotic-resistant strains is increasing. We aimed to describe the nationwide incidence and resistance profile of E. coli BSI in Israel and its impact on mortality, to compare E. coli BSI mortality with all-cause mortality, and community-onset with hospital-onset E. coli BSIs. METHODS: We used mandatory BSI surveillance reports submitted by all Israeli hospitals to the Ministry of Health and the national death registry. All E. coli BSIs from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 31 2019 in patients aged 18 and over were included. RESULTS: A total of 11 113 E. coli BSIs occurred in 10 218 patients; 85% (9012/10 583) were community onset. Median age was 76 (IQR 65-85), and 57% (6304/11 113) of cases occurred in women. The annual incidence was 92.5 per 100 000 population. Antibiotic resistance was frequent and significantly more common in hospital-onset than in community-onset BSI; 65% (1021/1571) vs. 45% (4049/9012) were multidrug-resistant (MDR) (p < 0.001). The case fatality rate (CFR) was higher following hospital-onset BSI than community-onset: 23% (276/1214) vs. 12% (926/7620) at 14 days, 31% (378/1214) vs. 16% (1244/7620) at 30 days, and 55% (418/766) vs. 34% (1645/4903) at 1 year (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). The 1-year CFR was 47% (1258/2707) for MDR vs. 28% (928/3281) for non-MDR (p < 0.001). The annual mortality rate was 31.0 per 100 000 population, comprising 4.2% (31.0/734.8) of all causes of deaths. DISCUSSION: E. coli BSI carries a high burden, with a large proportion of MDR isolates, which are associated with increased incidence and CFR.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Sepse , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bacteriemia/microbiologia , Farmacorresistência Bacteriana , Escherichia coli , Infecções por Escherichia coli/microbiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Sepse/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Breakthrough COVID-19 may occur in vaccinated people, and may result from declining vaccine effectiveness or highly transmittable SARS-CoV-2 variants, such as the B.167.2 (delta) variant. We investigated risk factors and outcomes for infection with the delta variant among vaccinated hemodialysis patients. METHODS: Patients on maintenance hemodialysis who received two doses of the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine were analysed according to having developed COVID-19 (study group) or not (control group), in a retrospective, observational, comparative study. We compared risk-factors for developing breakthrough COVID-19 and assessed clinical outcomes, including 30-day mortality rates. RESULTS: Twenty-four cases of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were compared to 91 controls without infection. Breakthrough infection was associated with chronic immunosuppressive treatment, hematological malignancies, and low antibody levels against SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. All COVID-19 cases occurred at least 5 months after vaccination, and most were caused by the B.1.617.2 variant (at least 23/24 cases). COVID-19 was categorized as severe or critical disease in 11/24 patients (46%), and 54% required hospitalization and COVID-19-directed treatment. The source of infection was nosocomial in 6/24 cases (25%), and healthcare-related in 3/24 (12.5%). Mortality rate was 21%. Overall mortality was significantly higher in patients who developed COVID-19 than in controls (odds ratio for all-cause mortality 7.6, 95% CI 1.4-41, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Breakthrough COVID-19 with the B.1.617.2 variant can occur in vaccinated hemodialysis patients and is associated with immunosuppression and weaker humoral response to vaccination. Infections may be nosocomial and result in significant morbidity and mortality.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Infecção Hospitalar , Vacinas Virais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos , Estudos Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Glicoproteína da Espícula de CoronavírusRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The incidence of Escherichia coli bloodstream infections (BSI) is high and increasing. We aimed to describe the effect of season and temperature on the incidence of E. coli BSI and antibiotic-resistant E. coli BSI and to determine differences by place of BSI onset. METHODS: All E. coli BSI in adult Israeli residents between January 1, 2018 and December 19, 2019 were included. We used the national database of mandatory BSI reports and outdoor temperature data. Monthly incidence and resistance were studied using multivariable negative binomial regressions with season (July-October vs. other) and temperature as covariates. RESULTS: We included 10,583 events, 9012 (85%) community onset (CO) and 1571 (15%) hospital onset (HO). For CO events, for each average monthly temperature increase of 5.5 °C, the monthly number of events increased by 6.2% (95% CI 1.6-11.1%, p = 0.008) and the monthly number of multidrug-resistant events increased by 4.9% (95% CI 0.3-9.7%, p = 0.04). The effect of season was not significant. For HO events, incidence of BSI and resistant BSI were not associated with temperature or season. CONCLUSION: Temperature increases the incidence of CO E. coli BSI and CO antibiotic-resistant E. coli BSI. Global warming threatens to increase the incidence of E. coli BSI.
Assuntos
Bacteriemia , Infecções por Escherichia coli , Humanos , Adulto , Escherichia coli , Incidência , Temperatura , Bacteriemia/epidemiologia , Bacteriemia/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Escherichia coli/epidemiologia , Infecções por Escherichia coli/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/farmacologiaRESUMO
Background: Limited data exist on long-term consequences of bloodstream infections (BSIs). We aimed to examine incidence, 1-year mortality, and years of potential life lost (YPLL) following BSI. We estimated the relative contribution of hospital-onset BSI (HO-BSI) and antibiotic-resistant BSI to incidence, mortality and YPLL. Methods: We used data from Israel's national BSI surveillance system (covering eight sentinel bacteria, comprising 70% of all BSIs) and the national death registry. Adults with BSI between January 2018 and December 2019 were included. The outcomes were all-cause 30-day and 1-year mortality, with no adjustment for co-morbidities. We calculated the age-standardized mortality rate and YPLL using the Global Burden of Disease reference population and life expectancy tables. Findings: In total, 25,376 BSIs occurred over 2 years (mean adult population: 6,068,580). The annual incidence was 209·1 BSIs (95% CI 206·5-211·7) per 100,000 population. The case fatality rate was 25·6% (95% CI 25·0-26·2) at 30 days and 46·4% (95% CI 45·5-47·2) at 1 year. The hazard of death increased by 30% for each decade of age (HR=1·3 [95% CI 1·2-1·3]). The annual age-standardized mortality rate and YPLL per 100,000 were 50·8 (95% CI 49·7-51·9) and 1,012·6 (95% CI 986·9-1,038·3), respectively. HO-BSI (6,962 events) represented 27·4% (95% CI 26·9-28·0) of BSIs, 33·9% (95% CI 32·6-35·0) of deaths and 39·9% (95% CI 39·5-40·2) of YPLL. HO-BSI by drug-resistant bacteria (3,072 events) represented 12·1% (95% CI 11·7-12·5) of BSIs, 15·6% (95% CI 14·7-16·5) of deaths, and 18·4% (95% CI 18·1-18·7) of YPLL. Interpretation: One-year mortality following BSI is high. The burden of BSI is similar to that of ischemic stroke. HO-BSI and drug-resistant BSI contribute disproportionately to BSI mortality and YPLL. Funding: None.
RESUMO
Maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients have impaired immunological responses to pathogens and vaccines. In this study, we compared the humoral response to HBV and COVID-19 vaccines in a cohort of MHD patients. Demographic and clinical characteristics of vaccine responders and non-responders were also compared, and the association between the humoral responses to both vaccines was evaluated. The cohort included 94 MHD patients who were vaccinated at least once for HBV and twice for COVID-19. Among the 94 patients, 28 (29.8%) did not develop protective titers to HBV. Hypertension, coronary heart disease, and heart failure were more common in non-responders. Among MHD patients, 85% had positive IgG anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 levels 6 months after two doses of BNT162b2 (Pfizer/Biotech) vaccine. Age and immunosuppressive therapy were the main predictors of humoral response to COVID-19 vaccine. We did not find any association between non-responders to HBV and non-responders to COVID-19 vaccine. There was no difference in IgG anti-spike titers between HBV responders and non-responders (505 ± 644 vs. 504 ± 781, p = 0.9) Our results suggest that reduced humoral response to hepatitis B is not associated with reduced response to COVID-19 vaccine. Different risk-factors were associated with poor immune response to HBV and to COVID-19 vaccines.
RESUMO
Objectives: This study aims to examine the prevalence and risk factors of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) sero-positivity in health care workers (HCWs), a main risk group, and assess the sero-incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection between the first and second waves of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Israel. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted among 874 HCWs from nine hospitals. Demographics, health information, and blood samples were obtained at baseline (first wave-April-May 2020) and at follow-up (n = 373) (second wave-September-November 2020). Sero-positivity was determined based on the detection of total antibodies to the nucleocapsid antigen of SARS-CoV-2, using electro-chemiluminescence immunoassay (Elecsys® Anti-SARS-CoV-2, Roche Diagnostics, Rotkreuz, Switzerland). Results: The sero-prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies was 1.1% [95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.6-2.1] at baseline and 8.3% (95% CI 5.9-11.6) at follow-up. The sero-conversion of SARS-CoV-2 serum antibody was 6.9% (95% CI 4.7-9.9) during the study period. The increase in SARS-CoV-2 sero-prevalence paralleled the rise in PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections among the HCWs across the country. The likelihood of SARS-CoV-2 sero-prevalence was higher in males vs. females [odds ratio (OR) 2.52 (95% CI 1.05-6.06)] and in nurses vs. physicians [OR 4.26 (95% CI 1.08-16.77)] and was associated with being quarantined due to exposure to COVID-19 patients [OR 3.54 (95% CI 1.58-7.89)] and having a positive PCR result [OR 109.5 (95% CI 23.88-502.12)]. Conclusions: A significant increase in the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection was found among HCWs between the first and second waves of COVID-19 in Israel. Nonetheless, the sero-prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies remains low, similar to the general population. Our findings reinforce the rigorous infection control policy, including quarantine, and utilization of personal protective equipment that should be continued together with COVID-19 immunization in HCWs and the general population.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of implementing the Israeli national carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) guidelines on controlling a hospital-wide outbreak of Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). DESIGN: A before-and-after study from 2014 to 2018. SETTING: A 740-bed, secondary-care hospital in central Israel. INTERVENTION: Acquisition of CRAB was defined as a positive culture taken at least 48 hours after admission or a positive sample identified upon admission in a patient who had been readmitted within 30 days after discharge from our institution. The intervention included maintaining a case registry of all CRAB patients, cohorting patients under strict contact isolation, using dedicated nursing staff and equipment, rigorous cleaning, education and close monitoring of hospital staff, and involvement of hospital management. RESULTS: In total, 210 patients were identified with hospital-acquired CRAB: 141 before the intervention and 69 after the intervention. CRAB acquisition rates decreased by 77%, from 1.3 per 1,000 admissions before the intervention (2014-2015) to 0.3 per 1,000 admissions after the intervention (2016-2018) (P < .001). The decrease in acquisitions was observed hospital-wide, year by year (P for trend, <.001). In 2018, only 7 new acquisitions were detected in internal medicine wards (P = .058) and none in the ICUs (P = .006). CONCLUSIONS: A structured intervention based on the Israeli CRE management guidelines was successful in controlling a hospital-wide CRAB outbreak.
Assuntos
Infecções por Acinetobacter , Acinetobacter baumannii , Enterobacteriáceas Resistentes a Carbapenêmicos , Infecção Hospitalar , Infecções por Acinetobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Acinetobacter/epidemiologia , Infecções por Acinetobacter/prevenção & controle , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbapenêmicos/uso terapêutico , Infecção Hospitalar/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção Hospitalar/epidemiologia , Infecção Hospitalar/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças , Hospitais , Humanos , Controle de InfecçõesRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) was reported among immunosuppressed patients with deficits in cell-mediated immunity and in patients treated with immunomodulatory drugs. The aim of this study was to identify risk-factors for PJP in noninfected HIV patients. METHODS: This retrospective, test negative, case-control study was conducted in six hospitals in Israel, 2006-2016. Cases were hospitalized HIV-negative patients with pneumonia diagnosed as PJP by bronchoalveolar lavage. Controls were similar patients negative for PJP. RESULTS: Seventy-six cases and 159 controls were identified. Median age was 63.7 years, 65% males, 34% had hematological malignancies, 11% inflammatory diseases, 47% used steroids and 9% received antilymphocyte monoclonal antibodies. PJP was independently associated with antilymphocyte monoclonal antibodies (OR 11.47, CI 1.50-87.74), high-dose steroid treatment (OR 4.39, CI 1.52-12.63), lymphopenia (OR 8.13, CI 2.48-26.60), low albumin (OR 0.15, CI 0.40-0.54) and low BMI (OR 0.80, CI 0.68-0.93). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, rituximab, which is prescribed for a wide variety of malignant and inflammatory disorders, was found to be significant risk-factor for PJP. Increased awareness of possible PJP infection in this patient population is warranted.