Reduced Cognitive Burden and Increased Focus: A Mixed-methods Study Exploring How Implementing Scribes Impacted Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Understanding how medical scribes impact care delivery can inform decision-makers who must balance the cost of hiring scribes with their contribution to alleviating clinician burden. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to understand how scribes impacted provider efficiency and satisfaction. DESIGN: This was mixed-methods study. PARTICIPANTS: Internal and family medicine clinicians were included. MEASURES: We administered structured surveys and conducted unstructured interviews with clinicians who adopted scribes. We collected average days to close charts and quantity of after-hours clinical work in the 6 months before and after implementation using electronic health record data. We conducted a difference in difference (DID) analysis using a multilevel Poisson regression. RESULTS: Three themes emerged from the interviews: (1) charting time is less after training; (2) clinicians wanted to continue working with scribes; and (3) scribes did not reduce the overall inbox burden. In the 6-month survey, 76% of clinicians endorsed that working with a scribe improved work satisfaction versus 50% at 1 month. After implementation, days to chart closure decreased [DID=0.38 fewer days; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.61, -0.15] the average minutes worked after hours on clinic days decreased (DID=-11.5 min/d; 95% CI: -13.1, -9.9) as did minutes worked on nonclinical days (DID=-24.9 min/d; 95% CI: -28.1, -21.7). CONCLUSIONS: Working with scribes was associated with reduced time to close charts and reduced time using the electronic health record, markers of efficiency. Increased satisfaction accrued once scribes had experience.

Update on nonhormonal approaches to menopausal management.

The risk-benefit evaluation for managing vasomotor symptoms and other menopause-related health issues should be tailored to each individual woman, taking into account her own assessment of the most bothersome symptom(s) and her personal weighting of risks versus quality of life. For most symptomatic menopausal women, hormone therapy (HT) remains the best treatment, but various nonhormonal options are available for treating menopausal symptoms and bone loss in women who are unable or unwilling to take HT. Low doses of local vaginal estrogen remain an option for treatment of vaginal atrophy in these women. This article reviews alternatives to systemic HT for treating menopausal symptoms and related health issues.

Secondary osteoporosis: are we recognizing it?

BACKGROUND: As a growing percentage of Americans will be reaching their elderly years in the next decade, the prevalence of osteoporosis and its effects will have an even greater impact on the healthcare system. Advancements in bone research and development of newer treatments have allowed for the establishment of more refined guidelines and a growing awareness of the need to prevent, screen, and diagnose osteoporosis. Thus, more women are now being screened with dual x-ray absorptiometry scans (DXA) than ever before. The importance of a true understanding of the test results obtained from such screening is paramount. In our institution, recommendations to consider a secondary evaluation are made by the DXA interpreters when the Z-score is low. Few, if any, studies have evaluated the rates of physician and patient adherence with specific recommendations provided on the bone density report. METHODS: To assess compliance with such recommendations provided in DXA interpretations, we investigated the number of ordering providers who actually pursued these advisements. RESULTS: We found that among providers ordering DXAs, primary care providers did not pursue recommendations to pursue a secondary workup as often as their subspecialty counterparts. We also found a significant amount of vitamin D deficiency/insufficiency and primary hyperparathyroidism in the population evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care providers should be further educated on treatable secondary causes of osteoporosis as opposed to an often reflexive response of prescribing a pharmacological antiresportive agent without other consideration.

Teaching while learning while practicing: reframing faculty development for the patient-centered medical home.

Soaring costs of health care, patients living longer with chronic illnesses, and continued attrition of interest in primary care contribute to the urgency of developing an improved model of health care delivery. Out of this need, the concept of the team-based, patient-centered medical home (PCMH) has developed. Amidst implementation in academic settings, clinical teachers face complex challenges not previously encountered: teaching while simultaneously learning about the PCMH model, redesigning clinical delivery systems while simultaneously delivering care within them, and working more closely in expanded interprofessional teams.To address these challenges, the authors reviewed three existing faculty development models and recommended four important adaptations for preparing clinical teachers for their roles as system change agents and facilitators of learning in these new settings. First, many faculty find themselves in the awkward position of teaching concepts they have yet to master themselves. Professional development programs must recognize that, at least initially, health professions learners and faculty will be learning system redesign content and skills together while practicing in the evolving workplace. Second, all care delivery team members influence learning in the workplace. Thus, the definition of faculty must expand to include nurses, pharmacists, social workers, medical assistants, patients, and others. These team members will need to accept their roles as educators. Third, learning to deliver health care in teams will require support of both interprofessional collaboration and intraprofessional identity development. Fourth, learning to manage change and uncertainty should be part of the core content of any faculty development program within the PCMH.

An observational study on the adherence to treatment guidelines of osteopenia.

BACKGROUND: Osteopenia/low bone mineral density (BMD) can lead to osteoporosis and is far more prevalent than osteoporosis. The National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) has recommendations for prevention and treatment of low BMD; however, the condition remains underrecognized and undertreated. We assessed practice patterns between physician knowledge of low BMD and prescribing of additional pharmacological therapies as defined by the NOF guidelines. METHODS: This is a retrospective, observational chart review of electronic medical records of 99 postmenopausal women aged > or =60 years with T-scores between -1.0 and -2.5 on baseline BMD done in 2003 at the Cleveland Clinic Women's Health Center. Counseling, advisement of weightbearing exercise, recommendation of calcium and vitamin D supplementation, and adequate pharmacological therapy in the form of bisphosphonates, hormone therapy, or selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) were assessed. The management of bone specialists credentialed both by the International Society of Clinical Densitometry and the North American Menopause Society and non-bone specialists was also compared. RESULTS: Bone specialists were more likely than non-bone specialists to offer counseling in the form of letters, phone encounters, and follow-up office visits and recommend weightbearing exercises. Most physicians recommended calcium and vitamin D supplementation regardless of specialty. There is no significant difference in the prescribing of pharmacological agents vs. conservative measures for osteopenic postmenopausal women by non-bone specialists vs. bone specialists as defined by the NOF guidelines, such that non-bone specialists did not treat these women any less aggressively than did bone specialists. CONCLUSIONS: Osteopenia is adequately managed in our institution regardless of physician group. However, non-bone specialists should consider more direct counseling about bone health and consider advisement of weightbearing exercise.