Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin compared with continuous intravenous unfractionated heparin in the treatment of proximal deep vein thrombosis.

BACKGROUND: A low-molecular-weight heparin, enoxaparin sodium, has been shown to be effective and safe in preventing deep vein thrombosis both in general surgery and in high-risk orthopedic surgery. We conducted a controlled, randomized trial with enoxaparin in the treatment of established deep vein thrombosis. METHODS: In a multicenter trial, we compared fixed-dose subcutaneous enoxaparin, given twice daily, with adjusted-dose intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) given by continuous intravenous infusion for the initial 10 days of treatment of patients with proximal vein thrombosis. The primary efficacy outcome was the change of the size of the thrombus assessed by repeated venograms between day 0 and day 10. The primary analysis of safety was based on the incidence of major bleeding during 10 days of treatment. RESULTS: There were 67 patients in each group. Venographic assessment of clot size evolution between day 0 and day 10 showed a statistically significant superiority (P < .002) of enoxaparin over the reference treatment with UFH. Moreover, the incidence of overall recurrent thromboembolic events during 10 days of treatment was significantly higher (P < .002) in the UFH group (seven of 67) than in the enoxaparin group (one of 67). There were no serious bleeding complications in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Enoxaparin is at least as effective and safe as UFH under the conditions of this study. Moreover, it is more comfortable for patients and less time-consuming for nurses and laboratories. Thus, our study confirmed, with the use of enoxaparin, other observations that low-molecular-weight heparin provides a real therapeutic advance in the treatment of deep vein thrombosis.

A randomised controlled trial of a low-molecular-weight heparin (Enoxaparin) to prevent deep-vein thrombosis in patients undergoing vascular surgery.

The incidence of postoperative deep vein thrombosis (PDVT) after aortic surgery and lower limb revascularisation has not been assessed by a large prospective study. In a prospective randomised trial the effect of a low-molecular-weight heparin fragment, Enoxaparin (ENX) 4200 anti factor Xa IU once daily was compared to that of unfractionated heparin (UFH) 7500 IU twice daily. Two hundred and thirty-three consecutive patients were classified into three groups, aortic or aortoiliac and aneurysmectomy (n = 75), aorto-femoral bypass for atherosclerotic disease (n = 71), and femoropopliteal or femorodistal bypass (n = 87). Patients were analysed for development of deep vein thrombosis by Duplex scanning and, if positive, by venography between the seventh and tenth postoperative day. PDVT was present in 10 patients in the ENX group and in four patients in the UFH group (8.2 and 3.6% respectively, NS). The incidence of PDVT was 8% after aortic or aortoiliac aneurysmectomy, 7% after aortofemoral revascularisation, and 3.4% after femoropopliteal or femorodistal bypass. The overall incidence of PDVT after aortic surgery was 7.5% (95% CI 5.4-9.7). There was no pulmonary embolism. Intra-operative blood loss and postoperative bleeding events did not differ significantly between the ENX and UFH groups. After 1 month follow-up, no clinical event or death could be related to PDVT or pulmonary embolism. In conclusion, in vascular surgery ENX is as safe and effective in the prevention of PDVT as is UFH.