RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the effectiveness of medications for the treatment of opioid use disorder (OUD) and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). DATA SOURCES: Literature search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, and Google Scholar was performed for studies published from inception to October 25, 2022. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Studies were included if patients were diagnosed with OUD and ADHD and had pharmacotherapy for either condition. Abstracts, commentaries, reviews, case reports, case series, non-English articles, and animal studies were omitted. DATA SYNTHESIS: This review found 18 studies. Treatment of ADHD was evaluated for impact on ADHD and OUD outcomes, while treatment of OUD was evaluated for OUD-related outcomes. Outcomes assessed included markers for symptom intensity, adherence, and treatment failure. While results were mixed, treatment of ADHD was largely associated with improvements in ADHD severity and retention in OUD treatment programs. ADHD severity was associated with higher rates of illicit substance abuse and worse OUD-related outcomes. It could not be determined which medications for treatment of OUD should be prioritized. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review summarized key findings from studies that treated ADHD or OUD among dually diagnosed patients and highlighted methodological considerations for future research. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of ADHD is warranted among patients with OUD and ADHD to improve retention in OUD treatment programs and reduce illicit substance abuse. Pharmacotherapy for the treatment of ADHD or OUD should continue to be determined based on patients' characteristics and the capabilities of the treatment program.
Assuntos
Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade , Buprenorfina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Transtorno do Deficit de Atenção com Hiperatividade/tratamento farmacológico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Tratamento de Substituição de Opiáceos/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Data regarding medication adherence in older adults with asthma before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate medication adherence and determine factors associated with adherence in Medicare-enrolled older adults with asthma before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of Medicare-enrolled patients with asthma. Medication adherence was measured using rates of proportion of days covered for dates January to July 2019 and January to July 2020. Patients less than 65 years of age, with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Paired t tests assessed change in adherence between 2019 and 2020. Logistic regression evaluated association of age, sex, depression, moderate or severe asthma, use of a 90-day supply, having 3 or more albuterol fills, number of medications, medication-related problems, prescribers, pharmacies, controller medication classes, and systemic corticosteroid fills with high adherence (proportion of days covered ≥ 80%). RESULTS: Mean adherence to asthma controller medications ranged from 75% to 90%, in 2019. Adherence significantly decreased (P < .001) from 51% to 70% for all controller medications, except theophylline in 2020. Similar results were observed among patients with moderate or severe asthma. In 2019 and 2020, number of controller medications, 3 or more albuterol fills, and having a 90-day supply were associated with high adherence (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Adherence to asthma controller medications decreased considerably during the COVID-19 pandemic among Medicare-enrolled patients with asthma. Patients with markers for more severe asthma, overuse of albuterol, and a 90-day supply of controller medications were more likely to have high adherence. These findings can be used to identify opportunities to improve adherence and prescribing among adult patients with asthma.
Assuntos
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Idoso , Albuterol/uso terapêutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma/tratamento farmacológico , Asma/epidemiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Humanos , Medicare , Adesão à Medicação , Pandemias , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) experience pain from inflammation, joint destruction, and neuropathy. Antidepressants may play a role among patients with RA and depression, fibromyalgia, or neuropathy to achieve desired outcomes. This commentary evaluated evidence for medications individually and identified important variables for future research. While we await the results of well-designed studies, a trial of duloxetine or milnacipran may be considered for patients with remnant pain and RA remission. Research is needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants in patients with RA and associated comorbid conditions.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos , Artrite Reumatoide , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Artrite Reumatoide/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Milnaciprano/uso terapêutico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriately prescribed medications (PIPMs) among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) may vary among clinical settings. Rates of PIPM are unknown among Medicare-enrolled Medication Therapy Management (MTM) eligible patients. OBJECTIVES: Determine prevalence of PIPM among patients with CKD and evaluate characteristics of patients and providers associated with PIPM. DESIGN: An observational cross-sectional investigation of a Medicare insurance plan for the year 2018. PATIENTS: Medicare-enrolled MTM eligible patients with stage 3-5 CKD. MAIN MEASURES: PIPM was identified utilizing a tertiary database. Logistic regression assessed relationship between patient characteristics and PIPM. KEY RESULTS: Investigation included 3624 CKD patients: 2856 (79%), 548 (15%), and 220 (6%) patients with stage 3, 4, and 5 CKD, respectively. Among patients with stage 3, stage 4, and stage 5 CKD, 618, 430, and 151 were with at least one PIPM, respectively. Logistic regression revealed patients with stage 4 or 5 CKD had 7-14 times the odds of having a PIPM in comparison to patients with stage 3 disease (p < 0.001). Regression also found PIPM was associated with increasing number of years qualified for MTM (odds ratio (OR) 1.46-1.74, p ≤ 0.005), female gender (OR 1.25, p = 0.008), and increasing polypharmacy (OR 1.30-1.57, p ≤ 0.01). Approximately 14% of all medications (2879/21093) were considered PIPM. Majority of PIPMs (62%) were prescribed by physician primary care providers (PCPs). Medications with the greatest percentage of PIPM were spironolactone, canagliflozin, sitagliptin, levetiracetam, alendronate, pregabalin, pravastatin, fenofibrate, metformin, gabapentin, famotidine, celecoxib, naproxen, meloxicam, rosuvastatin, diclofenac, and ibuprofen. CONCLUSION: Over one-third of Medicare MTM eligible patients with CKD presented with at least one PIPM. Worsening renal function, length of MTM eligibility, female gender, and polypharmacy were associated with having PIPM. Majority of PIPMs were prescribed by PCPs. Clinical decision support tools may be considered to potentially reduce PIPM among Medicare MTM-enrolled patients with CKD.
Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Insuficiência Renal Crônica , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Polimedicação , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe telehealth interventions and determine their effect on medication adherence for patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia. DATA SOURCES: PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL Plus, PsycINFO, Academic Search Ultimate, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Scopus, Web of Science, WHO Global Index Medicus, association websites, and gray literature were searched from January 1, 1998, to December 31, 2019. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Eligible studies reported eHealth, mobile health, and telehealth interventions for adult patients prescribed medications for chronic condition management (eg, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia). Studies were required to evaluate medication adherence outcomes (eg, medication possession ratio [MPR], proportion of days covered (PDC)]. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and controlled before-and-after studies were included. Multiple reviewers independently extracted data and evaluated risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of 8693 studies identified, 13 reported either an MPR or PDC and were included in the systematic review. The systematic review demonstrated that electronic health (eHealth) and telehealth interventions were successful at improving medication adherence, whereas mobile health interventions did not improve medication adherence. RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE: This systematic review highlighted the available research and findings of studies assessing interventions to improve medication nonadherence among patients with type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and/or dyslipidemia. The evaluated findings lend support to the need for targeted medication adherence interventions based on patient population and practice settings. CONCLUSIONS: Telehealth modalities include telephonic outreach and specialized tools designed to increase health literacy. eHealth and telehealth medication adherence interventions were associated with improved MPR and/or PDC rates.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Hipertensão/tratamento farmacológico , Adesão à Medicação , Telemedicina/métodos , Doença Crônica , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiologia , Dislipidemias/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hipertensão/epidemiologia , Telemedicina/tendênciasRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Background:Finding ways to reduce prescribing of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among patients with dementia is necessary. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate an automated targeted medication review (TMR) service to reduce PIM prescribing among patients with dementia. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational analysis of patients in a Medication Therapy Management (MTM) program for year 2017. Patients included if Medicare enrolled, MTM eligible, had dementia, and with PIM prescribing. Descriptive statistics described reduced PIM prescribing. Odds ratios (ORs) assessed prescriber relationship with PIM prescribing. Regression evaluated relationship between patient characteristics and discontinued PIMs. RESULTS: A total of 33 696 TMRs were triggered for 17 933 patients. Four months later, 11 608 TMRs led to a discontinued PIM among 8002 patients. Medications with the largest discontinuations were antihistamines (56%), muscle relaxants (53%), antiemetics (53%), and typical antipsychotics (40%). Physician primary care providers (PCPs) were more likely than nonphysician PCPs (OR = 4.54; 95% CI = 4.15-4.97; P < 0.001), psychiatrists (OR = 1.64; 95%CI = 1.44-1.86; P < 0.001), and neurologists (OR = 4.48; 95% CI = 4.07-4.93; P < 0.001) to prescribe medications to treat dementia and PIMs. Regression showed that younger age, female gender, higher poverty level, and a greater number of pharmacies, medications, and prescribers were associated with discontinued PIMs. Conclusions and Relevance: TMRs were effective in reducing PIM prescribing. Younger patients, individuals living in higher poverty levels, and patients with multiple prescribers or pharmacies may benefit most from this service. TMRs in primary care offices may reduce PIM prescribing.
Assuntos
Demência/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrição Inadequada/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/estatística & dados numéricos , Lista de Medicamentos Potencialmente Inapropriados/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Registros Eletrônicos de Saúde , Feminino , Humanos , Prescrição Inadequada/tendências , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso/tendências , Razão de Chances , Farmácias/estatística & dados numéricos , Médicos de Atenção Primária/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between patient characteristics and completion of telehealth comprehensive medication reviews (CMRs). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of a national telehealth medication therapy management program. A negative binomial regression assessed the relationship between number of phone calls to complete a CMR and age, sex, number of medications, poverty level, geographic region, limited English proficiency (LEP), years eligible for CMR services, and if a caregiver completed the CMR. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Patients included in the analysis were Medicare enrolled, medication therapy management eligible, and completed a CMR in 2017. Patients excluded if they were younger than 65 years, they had incomplete data, they had participated in an employer-sponsored plan, or completed a CMR with their provider. OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of phone calls reflected number of outgoing phone calls needed to complete a CMR. RESULTS: Analysis included 222,163 patients. Females needed 9% more calls to complete a CMR than males (incident rate ratio 1.09 [95% CI 1.08-1.10]). Adults older than 75 years compared with patients between age 65 and 74 years needed 7% fewer calls (0.93 [0.92-0.94]). Patients needing a caregiver to complete the CMR required 33% more calls than individuals who did not (1.33 [1.31-1.35]). Patients eligible for CMR services longer than 1 year required 12%-45% fewer calls to complete a CMR than recently eligible patients. A statistically significant interaction was detected between LEP and poverty quintile. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that poverty level inversely affected the number of phone calls to complete a CMR between those considered LEP and English language-speakers. Female sex and caregiver presence were associated with number of phone calls needed to complete a CMR. Older age and length of CMR eligibility were inversely associated with the number of phone calls needed. Future research is warranted to evaluate whether targeted approaches may improve CMR completion rates.
Assuntos
Medicare Part D , Telemedicina , Idoso , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Conduta do Tratamento Medicamentoso , Estados UnidosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of targeted telepharmacist mental health adherence interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective review involved the analysis of a telepharmacist-led mental health intervention. The subjects included: patients aged 18 years or more with type 2 diabetes, enrolled in an adherence service and who had been prescribed psychotropics. Psychotropic medication adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) 6 months before and after the telepharmacist-led medication intervention. RESULTS: A total of 8167 patients (67% women), with a mean age of 63 ± 11 years, were included in the study. Most alerts for psychotropics were for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (53%, n = 4334), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (22%, n = 1775), second-generation antipsychotics (11%, n = 909), and bupropion (10%, n = 782). Alerts with the greatest volume of PDCs (above 85%) at postintervention follow up included SSRIs (51%, n = 2228), SNRIs (50%, n = 884), and second-generation antipsychotics (47%, n = 424). Before the alert, the mean PDC was 66% ± 12% across all medications studied. Post intervention, the mean PDC rose to 79% ± 19. A paired t-test revealed statistically significant improvement in adherence overall, with the greatest change observed in these alert groups: SSRIs (P < 0.001), alpha-2 antagonist (P < 0.001), SNRIs (P < 0.001), and bupropion (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective review showed that pharmacist-led targeted, adherence interventions greatly improved psychotropic medication adherence in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Future work is warranted to investigate the impact on type 2 diabetes medication adherence and health markers (e.g., HbA1c values) in larger and more diverse populations of patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and a mental health condition.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of targeted telepharmacist mental health adherence interventions for patients with type 2 diabetes. METHODS: This retrospective review involved the analysis of a telepharmacist-led mental health intervention. The subjects included: patients aged 18 years or more with type 2 diabetes, enrolled in an adherence service and who had been prescribed psychotropics. Psychotropic medication adherence was measured using the proportion of days covered (PDC) 6 months before and after the telepharmacist-led medication intervention. RESULTS: A total of 8167 patients (67% women), with a mean age of 63 ± 11 years, were included in the study. Most alerts for psychotropics were for selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (53%, n = 4334), selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) (22%, n = 1775), second-generation antipsychotics (11%, n = 909), and bupropion (10%, n = 782). Alerts with the greatest volume of PDCs (above 85%) at postintervention follow up included SSRIs (51%, n = 2228), SNRIs (50%, n = 884), and second-generation antipsychotics (47%, n = 424). Before the alert, the mean PDC was 66% ± 12% across all medications studied. Post intervention, the mean PDC rose to 79% ± 19. A paired t-test revealed statistically significant improvement in adherence overall, with the greatest change observed in these alert groups: SSRIs (P < 0.001), alpha-2 antagonist (P < 0.001), SNRIs (P < 0.001), and bupropion (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective review showed that pharmacist-led targeted, adherence interventions greatly improved psychotropic medication adherence in adult patients with type 2 diabetes. Future work is warranted to investigate the impact on type 2 diabetes medication adherence and health markers (e.g., HbA1c values) in larger and more diverse populations of patients with comorbid type 2 diabetes and a mental health condition.
Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Farmacêuticos , Adulto , Idoso , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Adesão à Medicação , Saúde Mental , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
Deprescribing is the intentional dose reduction or discontinuation of a medication. The development of deprescribing interventions should take into consideration important organizational, interprofessional, and patient-specific barriers that can be further complicated by the presence of multiple prescribers involved in a patient's care. Patients who receive care from an increasing number of prescribers may experience disruptions in the timely transfer of relevant healthcare information, increasing the risk of exposure to drug-drug interactions and other medication-related problems. Furthermore, the fragmentation of healthcare information across health systems can contribute to the refilling of discontinued medications, reducing the effectiveness of deprescribing interventions. Thus, deprescribing interventions must carefully consider the unique characteristics of patients and their prescribers to ensure interventions are successfully implemented. In this special article, an international working group of physicians, pharmacists, nurses, epidemiologists, and researchers from the United States Deprescribing Research Network (USDeN) developed a socioecological model to understand how multiple prescribers may influence the implementation of a deprescribing intervention at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, and societal level. This manuscript also includes a description of the concept of multiple prescribers and outlines a research agenda for future investigations to consider. The information contained in this manuscript should be used as a framework for future deprescribing interventions to carefully consider how multiple prescribers can influence the successful implementation of the service and ensure the intervention is as effective as possible.
Assuntos
Desprescrições , Médicos , Humanos , Farmacêuticos , Interações Medicamentosas , PolimedicaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies have analyzed prescribing among Medicare-enrolled adults at risk for opioid overdoses. The objectives of this study were to evaluate prescribing for naloxone and central nervous system (CNS) active medications and to determine the relationships of patient characteristics with exposure to these medications. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a Medicare-enrolled medication therapy management eligible cohort. Patients were stratified into two cohorts, individuals with a mean daily morphine milligram equivalent (MME) dose <50 and individuals with MME ≥50. Medications assessed included benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants (SMR), hypnotics, gabapentanoids, selective-serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRI), tricyclic antidepressants (TCA), antipsychotics, barbiturates, other antiepileptics, hydroxyzine, and naloxone. Chi-square with odds ratios and logistic regressions determined the relationships of medications and patient characteristics with mean daily MME ≥50. Relationship between medications and opioid dose was adjusted for age and sex. RESULTS: There were 3452 patients with a daily MME <50 and 1116 with a daily MME ≥50. After adjusting for age and sex, patients with a daily MME ≥50 were more likely to be prescribed hypnotics (OR: 1.41, 95% CI 1.17-1.70), SNRIs (OR: 1.39, 95% CI 1.17-1.64), and naloxone (OR: 3.21, 95% CI 2.49-4.12) (p < 0.001). Nine percent of eligible patients received naloxone. Age groups of persons <85 years of age had 1.58-4.04 (p ≤ 0.004) times the odds of being prescribed a mean daily MME ≥50. CONCLUSION: Nearly one-fourth of patients were prescribed a mean daily opioid therapy of MME ≥50. These patients were more likely to be prescribed hypnotics, SNRIs, and naloxone. Patients receiving chronic high-dose opioid therapy were more likely to be in age groups of persons <85 years. Naloxone may be underprescribed among eligible adults. Targeted medication services may ensure optimal prescribing among Medicare patients with chronic opioid therapies.
Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Humanos , Idoso , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Naloxona/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Transversais , Medicare , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Fármacos do Sistema Nervoso Central , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/uso terapêutico , Sistema Nervoso Central , Padrões de Prática MédicaRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Sodium glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists are recommended for patients with type two diabetes (T2D) and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) or heart failure (HF) to reduce cardiovascular-related mortality. The objective of this study was to evaluate a telehealth targeted medication review (TMR) program to identify patients for uptake of these evidence-based medications. METHODS: This was an observational descriptive study of a TMR program for Medicare-enrolled, Medication Therapy Management-eligible patients in one insurance plan. Prescription claims and patient interviews identified individuals who would benefit from SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 agonists. Facsimiles were sent to providers of patients with educational information about the targeted medications. Descriptive statistics described characteristics and proportion of patients prescribed targeted medications after 120 days. Bivariate statistical tests evaluated associations between age, sex, number of medications, number of providers, and poverty level with adoption of targeted medications. RESULTS: A total of 1106 of 1127 had a facsimile sent to their provider after a conversation with the patient. Among patients with a provider facsimile, 69 (6%) patients filled a prescription for a targeted medication after 120 days. There was a significant difference in age between individuals who started a targeted medication (67 ± 10 years) compared with patients who did not (71 ± 10 years) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: A TMR efficiently identified patients with T2D and ASCVD or HF who would benefit from evidence-based medications. Although younger patients were more likely to receive these medications, the overall uptake of these medications within four months of the intervention was lower than expected.
Assuntos
Aterosclerose , Doenças Cardiovasculares , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Insuficiência Cardíaca , Telemedicina , Idoso , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aterosclerose/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Cardiovasculares/induzido quimicamente , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Peptídeo 1 Semelhante ao Glucagon , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Hipoglicemiantes/uso terapêutico , Medicare , Estados Unidos , Idoso de 80 Anos ou maisRESUMO
Background: Medication adherence in Medicare-enrolled older adults with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is unknown. Objectives: To evaluate medication adherence and determinants of high adherence before and during the COVID-19 pandemic in this population. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Methods: The proportion of days covered (PDC) reflected medication adherence from January to July 2019 and from January to July 2020. Patients <65 years of age, with COPD or asthma alone, or with cystic fibrosis were excluded. Paired t tests were used to assess adherence changes. Logistic regression explored association of age, sex, diagnosis of depression, number of medications, medication-related problems, prescribers, pharmacies, controller medication classes, albuterol rescue inhaler fills, oral corticosteroid fills, and having a 90-day supply with high adherence (PDC ⩾ 80%). Results: This analysis included 989 patients. In this cohort, 61.2% of patients received oral corticosteroids. Over 60% of patients had ⩾3 rescue fills in both 2019 and 2020. Medication adherence to controller medications significantly decreased for all controller medications (p < 0.001) in 2020. In 2019 and 2020, number of controller medication classes and having a 90-day supply were associated with high adherence (p < 0.001). In 2019, variables associated with high adherence also included number of medication-related problems and having ⩾3 albuterol rescue inhalers (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Medication adherence to controllers significantly decreased during the pandemic among older adults with asthma and COPD. Patients with multiple controller classes and a 90-day supply were more likely to be highly adherent. A 90-day supply of medications should be used to facilitate access to medication during the pandemic. Healthcare professionals should assess medication adherence, resolve the barriers of adherence and medication-related problems to achieve desired clinical outcomes among older adults with both asthma and COPD.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: Longer retention in medication treatment (MT) of addiction is associated with improved health outcomes among adults with opioid use disorder. MT remains underutilized among adolescents and young adults (AYA); factors associated with MT retention are not well-defined and effect of retention on treatment outcomes is unknown. This study examined patient characteristics associated with retention in an office-based opioid treatment program for AYA patients and determined the impact of retention time on emergency department (ED) utilization. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of AYA patients from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2020. Retention time was the difference between first and last appointment, analyzing follow-up periods of one and two years. Linear regression assessed factors associated with retention. Negative binomial regression showed effect of retention on ED utilization. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients were included. Factors positively associated with retention were diagnosis of anxiety, depression, and nicotine use disorder, White race, private insurance, and Medicaid insurance; however, stimulant/cocaine use disorder was negatively associated (one-year follow-up, p ≤ .028; two-year follow-up, p ≤ .017). Longer retention was associated with reduced risk of ED utilization at one-year (incident rate ratio = 0.84, 95% confidence interval: 0.72-0.99; p = .03) and two-year follow-ups (incident rate ratio = 0.86 95% confidence interval: 0.77-0.96; p = .008). DISCUSSION: Diagnosis of anxiety, depression, nicotine use disorder, and stimulant/cocaine use disorder, and insurance and race can influence retention in MT. Longer retention in MT was associated with lower ED visits, decreasing health care utilization. MT programs should evaluate various interventions to optimize opportunities for increasing retention among their patient cohorts.
Assuntos
Cocaína , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Tabagismo , Estados Unidos , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Cocaína/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
PURPOSE: Urine drug testing (UDT) is an important feature of outpatient treatment for opioid use disorder, but associations with patient characteristics among adolescent and young adult patients are unknown. This study assessed UDT results in office-based opioid treatment and characteristics associated with treatment compliance. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adolescent and young adult patients enrolled in office-based opioid treatment between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2020. UDT results were described as positive results or expected and unexpected results. Expected results were negative UDTs for opioids, marijuana (THC [tetrahydrocannabinol]), or cocaine/methamphetamine, or a positive UDT for buprenorphine. Unexpected results were positive UDTs for opioids, THC, or cocaine/methamphetamine, or a negative UDT for buprenorphine. Treatment compliance was defined as ≥75% of UDTs provided being expected results. Counts and percentages described UDT results. Regressions evaluated associations between patient characteristics (retention time, age, sex, race/ethnicity, insurance, and comorbid mental health diagnoses) with treatment compliance, and assessed change of positivity rates for UDTs over time. RESULTS: A total of 407 patients were included. Overall, 305 patients (74.9%) demonstrated treatment compliance. Rates of expected UDT results increased with longer retention time (p <.001), except for methamphetamine. Buprenorphine expected results ranged from 77.0% to 96.5%. Diagnosis of stimulant use disorder was associated with decreased compliance (p = .04), while diagnoses of depression, anxiety, nicotine use disorder, and post-traumatic stress disorder were associated with increased compliance (p ≤.04). DISCUSSION: Proportion of expected UDT results increased with retention time. Diagnosis of specific mental health conditions affected treatment compliance. Further research regarding long-term health outcomes is needed.
Assuntos
Buprenorfina , Cocaína , Metanfetamina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Humanos , Adulto Jovem , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pacientes Ambulatoriais , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/diagnóstico , Buprenorfina/uso terapêutico , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Cocaína/uso terapêutico , Cocaína/urinaRESUMO
Randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that noninsulin medications used to treat type 2 diabetes can improve health outcomes among patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D). This study assessed the effects of adjuvant diabetes medications on glycated hemoglobin (A1C), body mass index (BMI), or total daily insulin (TDI) among patients with T1D in a real-world setting. This was an analysis of the T1D Exchange Clinic Registry, using the study periods of 2010−2012, 2015−2016, and 2016−2017, to assess differences in A1C, BMI, and TDI between patients with and without adjuvant medications. The relationships between characteristics and A1C in 2015−2016 and 2016−2017 were determined. Analysis included 517 patients in the adjuvant medication cohort and 4968 in the insulin-only cohort. No significant improvement in A1C was observed. A significant difference in BMI and TDI between the insulin-only (median BMI: 25.5, 26.2, 26.4 and median TDI: 45, 44 units) and adjuvant medication cohorts (median BMI: 29.8, 30.5, 30.5 and median TDI: 51, 52 units) (p < 0.001) was observed. Patients with a continuous glucose monitor (CGM), higher education level, higher annual income, and older age were associated with lower A1C (p ≤ 0.001). Higher BMI and self-description as African American/Black were associated with higher A1C (p ≤ 0.01). Insulin pump use was associated with lower A1C (p < 0.01) in 2015−2016. Patients who used adjuvant medications did not demonstrate significant improvement in disease control. These data suggest that findings from well-designed research studies may not be consistently reproducible in real-world settings, due to patient-specific factors.
RESUMO
The management of multiple chronic health conditions often requires patients to be exposed to polypharmacy to improve their health and enhance their quality of life. However, exposure to polypharmacy has been associated with an increased risk for adverse effects, drug-drug interactions, inappropriate prescribing, medication nonadherence, increased healthcare utilization such as emergency department visits and hospitalizations, and costs. Medication-based risk scores have been utilized to identify patients who may benefit from deprescribing interventions and reduce rates of inappropriate prescribing. These risk scores may also be utilized to prompt targeted discussions between patients and providers regarding medications or medication classes contributing to an individual's risk for harm, eventually leading to the deprescribing of the offending medication(s). This opinion will describe existing medication-based risk scores in the literature, their utility in identifying patients at risk for specific adverse events, and how they may be incorporated in healthcare settings to reduce rates of potentially inappropriate polypharmacy and avoidable healthcare utilization and costs.
RESUMO
Heart failure (HF) is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, compromised quality of life and socioeconomic burden worldwide. This chronic condition is becoming an increasingly important concern given the increased prevalence of HF among aging populations. Significant contributors toward escalating health care costs are emergency room visits and hospitalizations associated with HF. An important strategy to improve health care outcomes and reduce unnecessary costs is to identify and reduce the prescribing of potentially harmful medications (PHMs) among adults with HF. Previous studies in patients with HF found roughly 10-50% of them were prescribed at least one PHM in ambulatory care and inpatient health care settings. This opinion highlights recent findings from studies assessing prevalence of PHMs, associations between PHM prescribing and characteristics, and what can be done to improve patient outcomes and reduce the use of PHMs and associated health care costs in adults with HF.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The unintentional prescribing of medications harmful for patients with heart failure (HF) remains an ongoing problem. The American Heart Association published a scientific statement detailing a list of medications that may worsen or exacerbate a patient's HF. The use of potentially harmful medications has not been studied in Medicare patients with HF. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of prescribing these harmful medications in a Medicare-enrolled medication therapy management (MTM)-eligible population with HF and to identify the characteristics associated with this potentially harmful prescribing. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis involved utilization of a national MTM provider's database for the 2018 calendar year. Eligible patients were included if they were Medicare enrolled, MTM eligible, and with International Classification of Disease 9/10 codes for HF. Counts and percentages were used to describe the prevalence of potentially harmful medication use and prescribing, by physician specialty. Exploratory logistic regression assessed the relationship between unique patient characteristics and potentially harmful prescribing. RESULTS: A total of 13,250 patients were included, of whom 7017 (53%) were prescribed at least one potentially harmful medication. The most frequently prescribed medications in this cohort were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs; 3357, 25%), dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitors (3117, 24%), and non-dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs; 936, 7%). A logistic regression found female sex, increasing polypharmacy, years qualified for MTM, higher poverty level, number of prescribers, and number of pharmacies were associated with potentially harmful medication prescribing. Of 17,548 potentially harmful medications encountered in a 4-month span, 9433 (54%) were prescribed by physician primary care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Over one-half of patients with HF were prescribed one or more potentially harmful medication(s). Automated monitoring of prescription claims and implementation of alerts in electronic health records in primary care is warranted to reduce potentially harmful medication use among Medicare MTM-eligible patients.