Rectal Evacuation Disorders are Associated With Poor Bowel Preparation in Patients With Chronic Constipation: Results From Two Centers.

INTRODUCTION: We evaluated factors that can predict the adequacy of bowel preparation in patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients with chronic constipation who underwent anorectal manometry and at least 1 colonoscopy at 2 tertiary referral centers from 2003 to 2019. We also identified a subgroup of patients who underwent colonic transit testing through radiopaque marker testing. We determined demographic, medical, and constipation-related factors associated with poor bowel preparation and their effect on standardized quality metrics using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: We identified 274 patients with chronic constipation who underwent anorectal manometry testing. Both outlet dysfunction (prolonged balloon expulsion) and slow-transit constipation were associated with suboptimal bowel preparation. Outlet dysfunction was also associated with decreased cecal intubation rates, adenoma detection rates, and sessile serrated polyp detection rates. In multivariable analyses controlling for demographics and known factors associated with poor bowel preparation, outlet dysfunction was associated with an almost 3-fold odds of suboptimal bowel preparation [odds ratio (OR): 2.9; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-5.1] and a 3-fold reduction in cecal intubation rates (OR: 0.3; 95% CI: 0.1-0.8). Among those with radiopaque marker colonic transit testing available, slow-transit constipation was associated with a >2-fold odds of suboptimal bowel preparation (OR: 2.2; 95% CI: 1.1-4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Among a cohort of patients with chronic constipation undergoing colonoscopy, outlet dysfunction was associated with suboptimal bowel preparation and other quality metrics. Constipated patients with a rectal evacuation disorder may represent a subgroup of patients that could benefit from individualized strategies for better bowel preparation.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Pediatric Neurogastroenterology Patients.

ABSTRACT: Recent reports document avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms among 13-40% of adults presenting to neurogastroenterology clinics, but ARFID in pediatrics is understudied. We conducted a retrospective review of charts from 129 consecutive referrals (ages 6-18 years; 57% female) for pediatric neurogastroenterology examination, from January 2016 through December 2018. Eleven cases (8%) met the full criteria for ARFID by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition and 19 cases (15%) had clinically significant avoidant/ restrictive eating behaviors with insufficient information for a definitive ARFID diagnosis. Of patients with ARFID symptoms (n = 30), 20 (67%) cited fear of gastrointestinal symptoms as motivation for their avoidant/ restrictive eating. Compared to patients without ARFID symptoms, patients with ARFID symptoms were older (P  < .001), more likely to be female (51% vs 79%, P  = 0.014), and more frequently presented with eating/weight-related complaints (15% vs 33%, P  = 0.026). This pilot retrospective study showed ARFID symptoms present in 23% of pediatric neurogastroenterology patients; further research is needed to understand risk and maintenance factors of ARFID in the neurogastroenterology setting.

Frequency of Eating Disorder Pathology Among Patients With Chronic Constipation and Contribution of Gastrointestinal-Specific Anxiety.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Individuals with eating disorders (EDs) frequently have constipation-related symptoms, although the mechanisms of this relationship are not clear. We examined the frequency of and relation between EDs and constipation in patients with chronic constipation referred for anorectal manometry. METHODS: We analyzed data from 279 patients with chronic constipation (79.2% female) evaluated at a tertiary center from June 2017 through September 2018. Participants completed a standardized psychometric assessment (patient assessment of constipation symptoms questionnaire and hospital anxiety and depression scale and visceral sensitivity index analyses) and anorectal manometry. A subset of patients completed colonic transit testing. Participants with clinically significant ED pathology were identified based on scores of 20 or higher on the Eating Attitudes Test-26. We performed a logistic regression analysis to examine factors associated with the likelihood of having ED pathology. Odds ratios were calculated based on continuous variables. We examined the contribution of anxiety to the relationship between severity of ED pathology and symptoms of constipation (such as abdominal pain) using a regression-based bootstrapping approach. RESULTS: Of the study participants, 53 (19.0%) had clinically significant ED pathology. The presence of ED pathology was associated with greater general anxiety scores, based on the hospital anxiety and depression scale (odds ratio, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.05-1.38), and greater gastrointestinal-specific anxiety scores, based on the visceral sensitivity index (odds ratio, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09). Gastrointestinal-specific anxiety fully mediated the relationship between the severity of ED pathology and constipation (standardized ß, 0.11-0.16; P = .026-.024). We found no differences in anorectal manometry or colonic transit between patients with vs without ED pathology. CONCLUSIONS: In an analysis of patients with chronic constipation, we found that 19% had clinically significant ED pathology. Our preliminary finding indicated that ED pathology might contribute to constipation via gastrointestinal-specific anxiety. Clinicians should consider screening patients with chronic constipation for EDs-especially patients who report symptoms such as bloating and abdominal pain.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder in Adult Neurogastroenterology Patients.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a feeding and eating disorder that is characterized by avoidant or restrictive eating not primarily motivated by body shape or weight concerns. We aimed to determine the frequency of ARFID symptoms and study its characteristics and associated gastrointestinal symptoms. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of charts from 410 consecutive referrals (ages, 18-90 y; 73.0% female) to a tertiary care center for neurogastroenterology examination, from January through December 2016. Blinded coders (n = 4) applied Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition, criteria for ARFID, with substantial diagnostic agreement (κ = 0.66). RESULTS: Twenty-six cases (6.3%) met the full criteria for ARFID and 71 cases (17.3%) had clinically significant avoidant or restrictive eating behaviors with insufficient information for a definitive diagnosis of ARFID. Of patients with ARFID symptoms (n = 97), 90 patients (92.8%) cited fear of gastrointestinal symptoms as motivation for their avoidant or restrictive eating. A series of binary logistic regressions showed that the likelihood of having ARFID symptoms increased significantly in patients with eating- or weight-related complaints (odds ratio [OR], 5.09; 95% CI, 2.54-10.21); with dyspepsia, nausea, or vomiting (OR, 3.59; 95% CI, 2.04-6.32); with abdominal pain (OR, 4.72; 95% CI, 1.87-11.81); or with lower GI diagnoses (OR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.34-4.32). CONCLUSIONS: In a retrospective study of patients undergoing neurogastroenterology examinations, we found ARFID symptoms to be related most frequently to fear of gastrointestinal symptoms. Patients undergoing neurogastroenterology or motility examinations should be evaluated for symptoms of ARFID, particularly when providers consider dietary interventions.

Gastrointestinal diagnoses in patients with eating disorders: A retrospective cohort study 2010-2020.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Gastrointestinal (GI) disorders are common in patients with eating disorders. However, the temporal relationship between GI and eating disorder symptoms has not been explored. We aimed to evaluate GI disorders among patients with eating disorders, their relative timing, and the relationship between GI diagnoses and eating disorder remission. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with an eating disorder diagnosis who had a GI encounter from 2010 to 2020. GI diagnoses and timing of eating disorder onset were abstracted from chart review. Coders applied DSM-5 criteria for eating disorders at the time of GI consult to determine eating disorder remission status. RESULTS: Of 344 patients with an eating disorder diagnosis and GI consult, the majority (255/344, 74.2%) were diagnosed with an eating disorder prior to GI consult (preexisting eating disorder). GI diagnoses categorized as functional/motility disorders were most common among the cohort (57.3%), particularly in those with preexisting eating disorders (62.5%). 113 (44.3%) patients with preexisting eating disorders were not in remission at GI consult, which was associated with being underweight (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.04-0.46, p < 0.001) and increasing number of GI diagnoses (OR 0.47 per diagnosis, 95% CI 0.26-0.85, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Eating disorder symptoms precede GI consult for most patients, particularly in functional/motility disorders. As almost half of eating disorder patients are not in remission at GI consult. GI providers have an important role in screening for eating disorders. Further prospective research is needed to understand the complex relationship between eating disorders and GI symptoms.

Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder symptoms are frequent in patients presenting for symptoms of gastroparesis.

INTRODUCTION: Patients with symptoms of gastroparesis/dyspepsia often avoid foods or restrict eating for symptom management. There is growing interest in understanding risk for feeding/eating disorders (FEDs) like avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Among patients presenting with gastroparesis/dyspepsia symptoms, we aimed to determine: (a) FED symptom frequency, and (b) relation of FED symptoms to gastrointestinal symptom severity and gastric retention abnormalities. METHODS: Adult patients (N = 288; 78% female) referred for gastroparesis/dyspepsia symptoms at two academic medical centers from January 2018-February 2019 completed self-report surveys for gastrointestinal symptom severity and FED symptoms. Gastric retention data were available for 210 patients, using 4-hour EggBeater gastric emptying scintigraphy (GES). RESULTS: Clinically significant FED symptoms were present in 158 patients (54.9%). Interestingly, 115 patients (39.9%) met conservative self-report cutoff for ARFID symptoms, with 67 (23.3%) patients having documented psychosocial/medical impairment. Of those with survey data for other FEDs (n = 239), only 28 patients (11.7%) had restrictive eating disorders (anorexia nervosa; unspecified FED). Likelihood of having FED symptoms was significantly associated with greater gastroparesis symptom severity (OR = 2.23, P < .001), but not GES. In addition, gastroparesis symptom severity was moderately and significantly associated with greater ARFID symptom severity (b = 0.45, P < .001), but neither GES nor other FED symptoms. DISCUSSION: In patients presenting with gastroparesis/dyspepsia symptoms, FED symptoms were frequent (55%), particularly ARFID, and were associated with greater gastrointestinal symptom severity, but not gastric retention. Gastroparesis/dyspepsia symptoms may mimic FEDs, particularly ARFID. Clinicians should be cautious about diagnosing ARFID in gastroparesis/dyspepsia patients, and screening for ARFID could assist behavioral treatment referral.