RESUMO
PURPOSE: To evaluate oncological outcomes in patient with positive surgical margin (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled the data of patients who underwent PN between 2008 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were a definite diagnosis of kidney tumor who underwent PN with at least one year follow up. RESULTS: From the 450 patients who underwent PN, The PSM was found in 35 (22 male/13 female) patients. 18/237 (7.6%) and 17/213 (7.9%) of them were in open and laparoscopic group, respectively. Clear cell RCC was the most prevalent pathology (18 patients) in the PSM patients. The mean time of follow up was 46 ± 2.02 months. Recurrence was developed in 5 (14.2%) patients. There was no correlation between recurrence and sex (p=1.00), surgery type (p = 0.658), age (p = 0.869), tumor size (p = 0.069), pathology (p = 0.258) and stage (p = 0.744) in PSM patients. Recurrence free survival was similar between the open and laparoscopy groups in PSM patients (p = 0.619). CONCLUSION: Beside numerous advantages of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic approach would be comparable to conventional open partial nephrectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes. The rate of recurrence following partial nephrectomy in PSM patients is considerable and closely monitoring is mandatory.
Assuntos
Carcinoma de Células Renais , Neoplasias Renais , Laparoscopia , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Carcinoma de Células Renais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Margens de Excisão , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Renais/cirurgia , Neoplasias Renais/patologia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Laparoscopia/métodosRESUMO
PURPOSE: Data registries are organized systems that facilitate collection, storage, and analysis of data related to a specific disease in a defined population. Here we introduce a data registry system which was designed to cover the four most common urologic cancers (prostate, bladder, renal and testis). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All contributing centers can enter data into the system after logging in with their unique usernames and passwords. In this system, the information of each individual patient will be entered in several structured forms covering various steps of management of the patients. RESULTS: Our proposed registry is an interactive, web-based database designed to collect complete data of patients with common urological cancers. We devised a council that functions as the central committee that will initiate, supervise, and monitor all steps of the projects including data collection, data audit, as well as data analysis and publication. To facilitate manuscript publication, the system will provide assistance and support throughout all the steps of statistical analysis and manuscript preparation. CONCLUSION: This proposed registry can have a national target and is designed to provide evidence-based information that could support strategic planning and national multi-centric studies.
Assuntos
Neoplasias Urológicas , Humanos , Irã (Geográfico)/epidemiologia , Masculino , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias Urológicas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Urológicas/terapiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate oncological outcomes in patient with positive surgical margin (PSM) following partial nephrectomy (PN). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, we enrolled the data of patients who underwent PN between 2008 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were a definite diagnosis of kidney tumor who underwent PN with at least one year follow up. RESULTS: From the 450 patients who underwent PN, The PSM was found in 35 (22 male/13 female) patients. 18/237 (7.6%) and 17/213 (7.9%) of them were in open and laparoscopic group, respectively. Clear cell RCC was the most prevalent pathology (18 patients) in the PSM patients. The mean time of follow up was 46±2.02 months. Recurrence was developed in 5 (14.2%) patients. There was no correlation between recurrence and sex (p=1.00), surgery type (p=0.658), age (p=0.869), tumor size (p= 0.069), pathology (p=0.258) and stage (p=0.744) in PSM patients. Recurrence free survival was similar between the open and laparoscopy groups in PSM patients (p=0.619). CONCLUSION: Beside numerous advantages of minimally invasive techniques, laparoscopic approach would be comparable to conventional open partial nephrectomy in terms of oncologic outcomes. The rate of recurrence following partial nephrectomy in PSM patients is considerable and closely monitoring is mandatory.