Kidney and pancreas transplant recipients undergoing cholecystectomy experience superior outcomes in transplant centers.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective analysis aims to identify differences in surgical outcomes between pancreas and/or kidney transplant recipients and the general population undergoing cholecystectomy. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression and linear regression tests computed odds ratios (OR) and coefficients of the linear regression by analyzing weighted data from the NIS database between 2005 and 2014 to identify differences in mortality, morbidity, length of stay (LOS) and costs amongst KTx, PTx, PKTx, and non-Tx undergoing cholecystectomy in all centers and transplant centers. RESULTS: Overall 6007 KTx, 164 PTx, 535 PKTx, and 4,207,241 non-Tx met the inclusion criteria. Mortality from cholecystectomy was 1.0%. Transplant recipients did not experience a significant increase in mortality. However KTx and PTx suffered increased morbidity risks (KTx OR1.244 p < 0.01; PTx OR2.165 p < 0.01) compared to non-Tx. However transplant recipients did not incur an increased morbidity risk in transplant centers. CONCLUSION: Transplant recipients undergoing cholecystectomy should be counseled about their increased complication risks. Surgeons should consider transferring KTx and PTx to transplant centers for their cholecystectomy procedure to mitigate these risks.

Disparities in DCD organ procurement policy from a national OPO survey: A call for standardization.

INTRODUCTION: Procurement practices across organ procurement organizations (OPOs) for donation after cardiac death (DCD) transplants have not been evaluated. METHODS: A national telephone survey of all 58 OPOs inquiring about their procurement practices of DCD organs was conducted. Policies concerning maximum donor body mass index (BMI), location of care withdrawal, pre-mortem heparin administration, vasodilator use, wait times after declaration of death before incisions, inclinations between rapid laparotomy and pre-mortem cannulation, and maximum time before aborting DCD procurement were queried. RESULTS: The survey revealed substantial differences across OPOs. Donor BMI restriction was considered by 36 of 58 OPOs, and 23 sites preferred OR for donor withdrawal of care. Pre-mortem heparin was utilized by 53 OPOs. Only 2 recommended vasodilators. Minimum wait time of 5-minutes was implemented by 41 OPOs. Rapid laparotomy was preferred by 57 organizations. 28 OPOs had a 90-minute limit before aborting DCD procurement. CONCLUSION: There are substantial variations across OPO protocols for procuring DCD organs. Current practices do not conform to ASTS guidelines for DCD procurement. Further investigations are needed to quantify the impact of OPO policies on transplant outcomes.

A comparison of portal venous versus systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The decision to utilize portal or systemic venous drainage in pancreas transplantation is surgeon- and center-dependent. Information regarding the superior method is based on single-center reports and animal models. METHODS: UNOS data on adults receiving pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants from 1987 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 29 078). The groups analyzed were: systemic venous pancreas graft drainage (SVD, n = 24 512) or portal venous pancreas graft drainage (PVD, n = 4566). A Cox proportional hazard model compared patient and allograft survival between groups. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed for patient and allograft survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, or 15 years post-transplant at each time interval and cumulatively (patient - HR:1.041; 95% CI:0.989-1.095; allograft - HR:0.951; 95% CI:0.881-1.027). PVD reduced the risk of death by 22.0% (P = 0.017) compared to SVD for patients undergoing pancreas after kidney transplant (PAK); no statistically significant difference was found for patients undergoing other types of transplants. CONCLUSION: There is no significant clinical difference in patient or allograft survival between PVD and SVD in pancreas transplantation for the majority of patients. For the subgroup of PAK, PVD was associated with decreased mortality. For individual surgeons, center and patient scenarios should dictate which technique is performed.

Successful pancreas transplantation alone is associated with excellent self-identified health score and glucose control: A retrospective study from a high-volume center in the United States.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of pancreas transplantation are often difficult to measure. Here, we sought to determine the difference in quality of life for diabetic patients with and without a functional pancreas transplant alone (PTA). METHODS: Pancreas transplant alone cases from 1993 to 2015 were considered. An IRB-approved survey inclusive of 15 questions spanning four domains was employed. Chi-square, Fisher's exact, and the T test were used where appropriate. RESULTS: A total of 137 PTAs were performed during the study period. Of those reached (n = 32), 94% responded to the survey. Self-reported health scores were better (2.1 vs 3.0) for those with functioning pancreata (n = 18) vs those with a non-functional pancreas (n = 14), respectively (P = .036). Those with a functional pancreas had a HgbA1c of 5.3, vs 7.7 for a non-functional pancreas (P = .016). Significant hypoglycemia was reported in two of 18 with a functional transplant vs nine of 14 patients with a failed transplant (P = .003). Daily frustration with blood sugar affecting quality of life was significantly higher for patients with non-functional pancreas grafts (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pancreas transplantation alone is associated with better glucose control than insulin. In addition, recipients of functional PTAs have improved quality of life and better overall health scores than those with failed grafts.

Survival outcomes in liver transplant recipients with Model for End-stage Liver Disease scores of 40 or higher: a decade-long experience.

BACKGROUND: The Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) has been used as a prognostic tool since 2002 to predict pre-transplant mortality. Increasing proportions of transplant candidates with higher MELD scores, combined with improvements in transplant outcomes, mandate the need to study surgical outcomes in patients with MELD scores of ≥40. METHODS: A retrospective longitudinal analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data on all liver transplantations performed between February 2002 and June 2011 (n = 33,398) stratified by MELD score (<30, 30-39, ≥40) was conducted. The primary outcomes of interest were short- and longterm graft and patient survival. A Kaplan-Meier product limit method and Cox regression were used. A subanalysis using a futile population was performed to determine futility predictors. RESULTS: Of the 33,398 transplant recipients analysed, 74% scored <30, 18% scored 30-39, and 8% scored ≥40 at transplantation. Recipients with MELD scores of ≥40 were more likely to be younger (P < 0.001), non-White and to have shorter waitlist times (P < 0.001). Overall patient survival correlated inversely with increasing MELD score; this trend was consistent for both short-term (30 days and 90 days) and longterm (1, 3 and 5 years) graft and patient survival. In multivariate analysis, increasing age, African-American ethnicity, donor obesity and diabetes were negative predictors of survival. Futility predictors included patient age of >60 years, obesity, peri-transplantation intensive care unit hospitalization with ventilation, and multiple comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplantation in recipients with MELD scores of ≥40 offers acceptable longterm survival outcomes. Futility predictors indicate the need for prospective follow-up studies to define the population to gain the highest benefit from this precious resource.

The use of venous jump grafts in pancreatic transplantation - no difference in patient or allograft outcomes - an update of the UNOS database.

Venous jump grafts are used in pancreas transplantation to salvage a pancreas with a short portal vein or to facilitate an easier anastomosis. There have been no large studies evaluating the safety of venous jump grafts in pancreas transplantation. We analyzed the UNOS database to determine whether venous jump grafts are associated with graft loss or patient death. Data from UNOS on all adult pancreas transplant recipients 1996-2012 were analyzed. Venous extension grafts were used in 2657 cases; they were not in 18 124. Kaplan-Meier/product-limit estimates analysis demonstrated similar patient survival (p < 0.641) and death-censored graft survival (p < 0.351) at one, three, five,10, and 15 yr between subjects with and without venous jump grafts. There was a statistically significant difference in one-yr unadjusted patient survival between the venous extension graft (94.9%) and the no-venous extension graft (95.8%) groups (p < 0.045) and a borderline difference in one-yr graft survival between the venous extension graft (84.1%) and the no-venous extension graft (82.6%) groups (p < 0.055). There was no significant difference in patient survival or allograft survival at the three-, five-, 10-, and 15-yr intervals. The use of venous jump grafts is not associated with increased graft loss or mortality.

An analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings--an update of the UNOS database.

INTRODUCTION: Previously, increasing age has been a part of the exclusion criteria used when determining eligibility for a pancreas transplant. However, the analysis of pancreas transplantation outcomes based on age groupings has largely been based on single-center reports. METHODS: A UNOS database review of all adult pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 was performed. Patients were divided into groups based on age categories: 18-29 (n = 1823), 30-39 (n = 7624), 40-49 (n = 7967), 50-59 (n = 3160), and ≥60 (n = 280). We compared survival outcomes and demographic variables between each age grouping. RESULTS: Of the 20 854 pancreas transplants, 3440 of the recipients were 50 yr of age or above. Graft survival was consistently the greatest in adults 40-49 yr of age. Graft survival was least in adults age 18-29 at one-, three-, and five-yr intervals. At 10- and 15-yr intervals, graft survival was the poorest in adults >60 yr old. Patient survival and age were found to be inversely proportional; as the patient population's age increased, survival decreased. CONCLUSION: Pancreas transplants performed in patients of increasing age demonstrate decreased patient and graft survival when compared to pancreas transplants in patients <50 yr of age.

Significance of elevated transplant renal artery velocities in the postoperative renal transplant patient.

INTRODUCTION: Non-invasive imaging studies can provide visualization of allograft perfusion in the postoperative evaluation of newly transplanted renal allografts. AIM: The purpose of our study was to evaluate the significance of elevated renal artery velocities in the immediate postoperative period. METHODS: Peak systolic velocities (PSVs) were obtained in the transplanted renal artery of 128 patients immediately after transplantation. Repeat allograft Doppler ultrasonography was performed on patients with elevated values. RESULTS: Of the 128 patients, 57 (44.5%) had severely elevated Doppler velocities >400 cm/s on the initial studies. Three patients within this category had persistently elevated values of >400 cm/s, warranting angiographic visualization of the renal vessels. Stent placement within the transplanted renal artery was required in two of these patients. There was normalization of the PSV in the remaining patients. CONCLUSIONS: Routine allograft Doppler ultrasonography in the immediate postoperative period allows for visualization of allograft perfusion. Elevated renal artery velocities in the immediate postoperative period do not necessarily represent stenosis requiring intervention. Failure of the PSV to normalize may require further intervention, and angiography continues to be the gold standard.

Forty-eight hour kidney transplant admissions.

Forty-eight hour kidney transplantation admissions are a feasible option in selected recipients of live-donor allografts through the use of standardized post-operative protocols, multidisciplinary team patient care, and intensive follow-up at outpatient centers. Age, gender, and pre-transplant dialysis status did not impact the ability to achieve 48-hour admissions. We did not identify any other pre-operative risk factors that contributed to increased length of stay. Although ABO and highly sensitized recipients had longer lengths of stay, the subgroup was too small to achieve statistical significance. We did not encounter any readmissions within the first seven post-operative days. Further improvements in clinical management will enhance the potential to shorten the length of hospital stay for all kidney transplant recipients.

The Use of Vasopressors During Deceased Donor Pancreas Procurement Decreases the Risk of Pancreas Transplant Graft Failure.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to identify the effect of various vasopressors on pancreas graft failure and patient survival. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing database was performed between 2000 and 2019. Patient and graft survival rates were analyzed up to 5 years posttransplant. RESULTS: The data included 17,348 pancreas transplant recipients: 12,857 simultaneous pancreas-kidney, 1440 pancreas transplant alone, and 3051 pancreas-after-kidney transplant recipients. Use of dopamine during deceased donor procurement increased graft failure by 18% (hazard ratio [HR], 1.18; P < 0.001). Absence of vasopressor caused graft failure to rise by 8% (HR, 1.08; P = 0.09). Dopamine increased the mortality rate by 37% (HR, 1.37; P < 0.001) and the absence of vasopressor increased the mortality rate by 14% (HR, 1.14; P = 0.02). Phenylephrine and norepinephrine reduced the mortality rate by 10% (HR, 0.90; P = 0.05) and 11% (HR, 0.89; P = 0.10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The absence of vasopressor use or the use of dopamine is associated with a higher risk of both pancreas transplant graft failure and recipient mortality. The use of phenylephrine and norepinephrine reduces the risk of mortality. This information should guide deceased donor hemodynamic support management in anticipation of pancreas procurement for future transplantation.

Use of Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Inhibitors for Pancreas Transplant Immunosuppression Is Associated With Improved Allograft Survival and Improved Early Patient Survival.

OBJECTIVES: Mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) are considered second-line immunosuppression agents because of associated increases in rejection and impaired wound healing. Recent reports indicate mTORi have been linked to improved survival, decreased inflammatory response in pancreatitis, and antiproliferative and antiangiogenic activity. Mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors have not been extensively analyzed in pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: Adults with pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants from 1987 to 2016 in the United Network for Organ Sharing database were analyzed (N = 25,837). Subjects were stratified into 2 groups: use of mTORi (n = 4174) and use of non-mTORi-based immunosuppression (n = 21,663). The log-rank test compared survival rates. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses assessed patient and graft survival. RESULTS: Mammalian targets of rapamycin inhibitors were associated with a 7% risk reduction in allograft failure (hazard ratio, 0.931; P = 0.006). Allograft survival rates were significantly different between mTORi versus non-mTORi (P < 0.0001).The mTORi group showed a significantly higher patient survival rate 1, 3, 5, and 10 years posttransplant compared. Patient survival at 15 years was not significantly different. CONCLUSIONS: The use of mTORi for immunosuppression in pancreas transplant is associated with improved allograft survival and early patient survival posttransplant (up to 10 years).

Bladder Versus Enteric Drainage of Exocrine Secretions in Pancreas Transplantation: A Retrospective Analysis of the United Network for Organ Sharing Database.

OBJECTIVES: The method for drainage of exocrine secretions in pancreas transplantation remains a matter of debate. Different methods have evolved over time. Most data on these methods are from single-center studies with small sample sizes. Larger studies have yielded conflicting results. METHODS: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on all adult subjects who received pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 were analyzed (n = 19,934). Subjects were divided into 3 groups: enteric drainage with Roux-en-Y (n = 4308), enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y (n = 11,145), and bladder drainage (n = 4481). Primary end points were patient and graft survival at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years. RESULTS: There was a patient and graft survival advantage with enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y reconstruction compared with the other methods. This was consistent at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated increased graft and patient survival when comparing enteric drainage of the transplanted pancreas without Roux-en-Y reconstruction to enteric drainage with Roux-en-Y and bladder drainage at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years. Based on this study, we recommend enteric drainage without Roux-en-Y reconstruction as the method of choice in pancreas transplantation.

Simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation is Associated With Inferior Long-Term Outcomes in African Americans.

OBJECTIVES: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK) is the most effective treatment for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and renal failure. However, the effect of ethnicity on SPK outcomes is not well understood. METHODS: We studied the influence of recipient ethnicity on SPK using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. A retrospective review of 20,196 SPK patients from 1989 to 2014 was performed. The recipients were divided into 4 groups: 15,833 whites (78.40%), 2708 African Americans (AA) (14.39%), 1456 Hispanics (7.21%), and 199 Asians (0.99%). RESULTS: Hispanics and Asians experienced the best overall graft and patient outcomes. Both groups demonstrated significantly superior graft and patient survival rates compared with whites at 1, 3, 5, 10, and 15 years (all P < 0.0001). African Americans experienced significantly superior 1- and 3-year patient survival compared with whites (both P < 0.0001). African Americans also experienced significantly superior 1-year kidney and pancreas graft survival compared with whites (P < 0.0001). However, AA experienced significantly inferior patient and allograft outcomes for all other time points compared with whites. CONCLUSIONS: Based on United Network for Organ Sharing data from 1989 to 2014, AA have worse long-term patient and graft survival rates compared with whites, Hispanics, and Asians undergoing SPK.

Postoperative Elevated Resistive Indices Do Not Predict Hepatic Artery Thrombosis in Extended Criteria Donor Livers.

Postoperative transplant liver ultrasounds were analyzed in standard criteria donor (SCD), extended criteria donor (ECD), and donation after cardiac death (DCD) liver allografts to determine if elevated resistive indices (RIs) are consistently present and if they are pathological. Postoperative transplant liver ultrasounds were reviewed from 115 consecutive patients. Hepatic arterial RIs were stratified based on the type of donor: DCD, macrosteatosis (>30%), or standard criteria. In all patients with elevated RI, subsequent ultrasounds were reviewed to demonstrate RI normalization. The mean RI for all 115 patients was 0.64, DCD was 0.67, macrosteatosis was 0.81, and SCD was 0.61 ( p = 0.033). The RI on subsequent liver ultrasounds for DCD and macrosteatosis normalized without any intervention. There were no incidences of early hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) observed in the cohort. Hepatic arterial RI in ECDs and DCDs are elevated in the immediate postoperative period but are not predictive of HAT. It represents interparenchymal graft stiffness and overall graft edema rather than an impending technical complication. The results of our study do not support the routine use of anticoagulation or routine investigation with computed tomography angiography for elevated RIs as these findings are self-limiting and normalize over a short period of time. We hope that this information helps guide the clinical management of liver transplant patients from expanded criteria donors.

Type VI Choledochal Cyst-An Unusual Presentation of Jaundice.

Choledochal cysts involving the cystic duct are extremely rare, and are usually associated with cystic dilatations of the extrahepatic biliary tract. We describe a patient who presented with jaundice and was found to have a dilatation of the common bile duct on computed tomographic imaging, consistent with a choledochal cyst. He underwent a laparoscopic-converted-to-open cholecystectomy with excision of the choledochal cyst which was found to involve the cystic duct. Choledochal cysts involving the cystic duct are notably missing from the Todani classification. Although exceedingly rare, new cases of these types of cysts are being reported, in part due to advancement of diagnostic imaging modalities. We discuss the current classification scheme for choledochal cysts and we propose an expansion of this scheme.

Recipient Criteria Predictive of Graft Failure in Kidney Transplantation.

Several classifications systems have been developed to predict outcomes of kidney transplantation based on donor variables. This study aims to identify kidney transplant recipient variables that would predict graft outcome irrespective of donor characteristics. All U.S. kidney transplant recipients between October 25,1999 and January 1, 2007 were reviewed. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to model time until graft failure. Death-censored and nondeath-censored graft survival models were generated for recipients of live and deceased donor organs. Recipient age, gender, body mass index (BMI), presence of cardiac risk factors, peripheral vascular disease, pulmonary disease, diabetes, cerebrovascular disease, history of malignancy, hepatitis B core antibody, hepatitis C infection, dialysis status, panel-reactive antibodies (PRA), geographic region, educational level, and prior kidney transplant were evaluated in all kidney transplant recipients. Among the 88,284 adult transplant recipients the following groups had increased risk of graft failure: younger and older recipients, increasing PRA (hazard ratio [HR],1.03-1.06], increasing BMI (HR, 1.04-1.62), previous kidney transplant (HR, 1.17-1.26), dialysis at the time of transplantation (HR, 1.39-1.51), hepatitis C infection (HR, 1.41-1.63), and educational level (HR, 1.05-1.42). Predictive criteria based on recipient characteristics could guide organ allocation, risk stratification, and patient expectations in planning kidney transplantation.

Pancreatic retransplantation is associated with poor allograft survival: an update of the United Network for Organ Sharing database.

UNLABELLED: The aim of the study was to assess outcomes of pancreas retransplantation versus primary pancreas transplantation. METHODS: Data from the United Network for Organ Sharing database on all adult (age, ≥18 years) subjects who received pancreas and kidney-pancreas transplants between 1996 and 2012 were analyzed (n = 20,854). The subjects were analyzed in the following 2 groups: retransplant (n = 1149) and primary transplant (n = 19,705). RESULTS: Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly different patient survival (P < 0.0001) and death-censored graft survival (P < 0.0001) between the primary transplant versus retransplant subjects. Allograft survival was significantly poorer in the retransplantation group. Patient survival was greater in the retransplant group. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study differ from previous studies, which showed similar allograft survival in primary and secondary pancreas transplants. Further studies may elucidate specific patients who will benefit from retransplantation. At the present time, it would appear that pancreas retransplantation is associated with poor graft survival and that retransplantation should not be considered for all patients with primary pancreatic allograft failure.

Poor outcome of bilateral lower extremity morel-lavallee lesions: a case report.

The Morel-Lavallee lesion is a closed, internal degloving injury that results when a strong, shearing force is applied parallel to the plane of injury, as is common in vehicular trauma. It is an underdiagnosed entity that is often missed during the initial trauma workup as symptoms can be subtle. There are few reports of lesions occurring below the knee. Most cases affect the proximal thigh and trochanter, as these tend to be dependent areas in high velocity trauma. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first literature report of bilateral lower extremity Morel-Lavallee lesions.

Pancreas transplantation from donors after cardiac death: an update of the UNOS database.

OBJECTIVE: There is reluctance to use donation after cardiac death (DCD) organs for fear of worse outcomes due to increased warm ischemia time. Extensive evidence to confirm the quality of DCD pancreas transplants is not manifest. METHODS: A united network for organ sharing database review of pancreas transplants performed between 1996 and 2012 was conducted. We compared outcomes and all demographic variables between donors after cardiac death and donors after brain death in pancreas transplantation. RESULTS: There were 320 DCD pancreas transplants and 20,448 donation after brain death pancreas transplants performed in the United States between 1996 and 2012. There was no statistically significant difference in graft survival or patient survival in pancreas transplantation in DCD versus donation after brain death donors measured at 1-year, 3-year, 5-year, 10-year, and 15-year intervals. There was no significant difference between donor and recipient age, race, sex, and body mass index (BMI) between the groups. There was no significant difference between the recipient ethnicity or time on wait list between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pancreata procured by DCD have comparable outcomes to those procured after brain death. Donation after cardiac death pancreas transplant is a viable method of increasing the donor pool, decreasing wait list mortality, and improving the quality of life for type 1 diabetic patients.