Evaluation of the New South Wales ambulance T1 major trauma transport protocol: A state-wide data linkage study.

INTRODUCTION: Prehospital triage and transport protocols are critical components of the trauma systems. Still, there have been limited studies evaluating the performance of trauma protocols in New South Wales, such as the NSW ambulance major Trauma transport protocol (T1). OBJECTIVES: Determine the performance of a major trauma transport protocol in a cohort of ambulance road transports METHODS: A data-linkage study using routine ambulance and hospital datasets across New South Wales Australia. Adult patients (age > 16 years) where any trauma protocol was indicated by paramedic crews and transported to any emergency department in the state were included. Major injury outcome was defined as an Injury Severity Score >8 based on coded in-patient diagnoses, or admission to intensive care unit or death within 30 days due to injury. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine ambulance predictors of major injury outcome. RESULTS: There were 168,452 linked ambulance transports analysed. Of the 9,012 T1 protocol activations, 2,443 cases had major injury [positive predictive value (PPV) = 27.1%]. There were 16,823 major injuries in total giving a sensitivity of the T1 protocol of 2,443/16,823 (14.5%), specificity of 145,060/151,629 (95.7%) and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 145,060/159,440 (91%). Overtriage rate associated with T1 protocol was 5,697/9,012 (63.2%) and undertriage rate was 5,509/159,440 (3.5%). The most important predictor of major injury was the activation of more than one trauma protocol by ambulance paramedics. DISCUSSION: Overall, the T1 was associated with low undertriage and high specificity. The protocol may be improved by considering age and the number of trauma protocols activated by paramedics for any given patient.

Guidelines for the management of haemodynamically stable patients with stab wounds to the anterior abdomen.

Clinical practice guidelines have been shown to improve the delivery of care. Anterior abdominal stab wounds, although uncommon, pose a challenge in both rural and urban trauma care. A multidisciplinary working party was established to assist in the development of evidence-based guidelines to answer three key clinical questions: (i) What is the ideal prehospital management of anterior abdominal stab wounds? (ii) What is the ideal management of anterior abdominal stab wounds in a rural or urban hospital without an on-call surgeon? (iii) What is the ideal emergency management of stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds when surgical service is available? A systematic review, using Cochrane method, was undertaken. The data were graded by level of evidence as outlined by the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council. Stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds should be transported to the hospital without delay. Any interventions deemed necessary in prehospital care should be undertaken en route to hospital. In rural hospitals with no on-call surgeon, local wound exploration (LWE) may be undertaken by a general practitioner if confident in this procedure. Otherwise or in the presence of obvious fascial penetration, such as evisceration, the patient should be transferred to the nearest main trauma service for further management. In urban hospitals the patient with omental or bowel evisceration or generalized peritonitis should undergo urgent exploratory laparotomy. Stable patients may be screened using LWE. Abdominal computed tomography scan and plain radiographs are not indicated. Obese and/or uncooperative patients require a general anaesthetic for laparoscopy. If there is fascial penetration on LWE or peritoneal penetration on laparoscopy, then an urgent laparotomy should be undertaken. The developed evidence-based guidelines for stable patients with anterior abdominal stab wounds may help minimize unnecessary diagnostic tests and non-therapeutic laparotomy rates.

An evaluation of compliance with practice guidelines on interhospital trauma transfer.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate compliance with current interhospital trauma transfer guidelines in South West Sydney, before and after an implementation programme was instituted. METHODS: A scoring system was developed to assess compliance with the 11 main components of the guideline. Baseline compliance was measured during an initial 3-month period (pre), followed by an implementation programme to alert staff at referring hospitals to the presence of the guidelines. Following this, compliance was again measured over 3 months (post). RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were transferred during the pre-implementation phase and 35 patients during the post-phase. Overall compliance with the guidelines increased from 62 to 67%. Mean pre-hospital compliance rose from 75 to 95%, and referring hospital compliance rose from 59 to 63%. While there was an improvement in compliance with the use of the dedicated trauma hotline (86-97%), the use of a transfer checklist (41-53%), and appropriateness of transfer (95-100%), none of these reached statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Practice guidelines have been developed to optimise the process of interhospital trauma transfers. An implementation programme met with limited success in improving compliance with the guidelines. Further work is needed to ensure awareness of these guidelines, with ongoing monitoring to ensure best practice and optimal patient outcome.