Osmotic stress inhibits leaf growth of Arabidopsis thaliana by enhancing ARF-mediated auxin responses.

We investigated the interaction between osmotic stress and auxin signaling in leaf growth regulation. Therefore, we grew Arabidopsis thaliana seedlings on agar media supplemented with mannitol to impose osmotic stress and 1-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA), a synthetic auxin. We performed kinematic analysis and flow-cytometry to quantify the effects on cell division and expansion in the first leaf pair, determined the effects on auxin homeostasis and response (DR5::ß-glucuronidase), performed a next-generation sequencing transcriptome analysis and investigated the response of auxin-related mutants. Mannitol inhibited cell division and expansion. NAA increased the effect of mannitol on cell division, but ameliorated its effect on expansion. In proliferating cells, NAA and mannitol increased free IAA concentrations at the cost of conjugated IAA and stimulated DR5 promotor activity. Transcriptome analysis shows a large overlap between NAA and osmotic stress-induced changes, including upregulation of auxin synthesis, conjugation, transport and TRANSPORT INHIBITOR RESPONSE1 (TIR1) and AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR (ARF) response genes, but downregulation of Aux/IAA response inhibitors. Consistently, arf7/19 double mutant lack the growth response to auxin and show a significantly reduced sensitivity to osmotic stress. Our results show that osmotic stress inhibits cell division during leaf growth of A. thaliana at least partly by inducing the auxin transcriptional response.

Multiple mechanisms explain how reduced KRP expression increases leaf size of Arabidopsis thaliana.

Although cell number generally correlates with organ size, the role of cell cycle control in growth regulation is still largely unsolved. We studied kip related protein (krp) 4, 6 and 7 single, double and triple mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana to understand the role of cell cycle inhibitory proteins in leaf development. We performed leaf growth and seed size analysis, kinematic analysis, flow cytometery, transcriptome analysis and mathematical modeling of G1/S and G2/M checkpoint progression of the mitotic and endoreplication cycle. Double and triple mutants progressively increased mature leaf size, because of elevated expression of cell cycle and DNA replication genes stimulating progression through the division and endoreplication cycle. However, cell number was also already increased before leaf emergence, as a result of an increased cell number in the embryo. We show that increased embryo and seed size in krp4/6/7 results from seed abortion, presumably reducing resource competition, and that seed size differences contribute to the phenotype of several large-leaf mutants. Our results provide a new mechanistic understanding of the role of cell cycle regulation in leaf development and highlight the contribution of the embryo to the development of leaves after germination in general.

Functional Conservation in the SIAMESE-RELATED Family of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors in Land Plants.

The best-characterized members of the plant-specific SIAMESE-RELATED (SMR) family of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors regulate the transition from the mitotic cell cycle to endoreplication, also known as endoreduplication, an altered version of the cell cycle in which DNA is replicated without cell division. Some other family members are implicated in cell cycle responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, the functions of most SMRs remain unknown, and the specific cyclin-dependent kinase complexes inhibited by SMRs are unclear. Here, we demonstrate that a diverse group of SMRs, including an SMR from the bryophyte Physcomitrella patens, can complement an Arabidopsis thaliana siamese (sim) mutant and that both Arabidopsis SIM and P. patens SMR can inhibit CDK activity in vitro. Furthermore, we show that Arabidopsis SIM can bind to and inhibit both CDKA;1 and CDKB1;1. Finally, we show that SMR2 acts to restrict cell proliferation during leaf growth in Arabidopsis and that SIM, SMR1/LGO, and SMR2 play overlapping roles in controlling the transition from cell division to endoreplication during leaf development. These results indicate that differences in SMR function in plant growth and development are primarily due to differences in transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation, rather than to differences in fundamental biochemical function.