Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 49(7): e282-e294, 2019 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30637854

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Uterine fibroids are a common benign tumor and can be symptomatic, necessitating resection. Surgical myomectomy is an effective treatment option with a risk of disseminating occult uterine leiomyosarcoma (LMS), creating a need for an effective presurgical screening protocol. Clinical collaboration with contrast-enhanced MRI including T2 and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can be utilized as a screening exam. PURPOSE: To review the accuracy and feasibility of an interdisciplinary prospective contrast-enhanced MRI pelvis with DWI screening system for LMS prior to fibroid resection. STUDY TYPE: Retrospective cohort study. POPULATION: In all, 1960 adult female patients aged 18-87 undergoing screening MRI pelvis prior to uterine fibroid resection. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: T1 and T2 -weighted imaging, DWI, and contrast-enhanced images were acquired at 1.5 T and 3.0 T. ASSESSMENT: Each radiologist at the time of clinical study prospectively designated a confidence level of presence of LMS in the impression, which was reviewed retrospectively. A separate retrospective evaluation of the histologically proven LMS and the false positives was performed for the presence of five MRI features of LMS including low ADC values, intermediate/high T2 signal intensity, irregular margins, hemorrhage, and necrosis. A preliminary cost-effectiveness analysis was performed, comparing the costs of treatment of uterine fibroids with vs. without a collaborative screening protocol using MRI. STATISTICAL TESTS: Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were obtained from the prospective evaluations. Student's t-tests were used to compare demographics and apparent diffusion coefficient values between LMS and false-positive results. RESULTS: We prospectively identified LMS patients with 100% sensitivity and 97% specificity. Preliminary cost analysis demonstrated that the MR screening protocol increased life expectancy by 0.04 years at a cost of $12,937 per life-year gained. DATA CONCLUSION: MRI is an effective and potentially economic screening test, especially with standardized reporting and coordination with clinicians. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy Stage: 2 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.


Assuntos
Leiomioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Leiomiossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Meios de Contraste , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
2.
J Endourol ; 24(10): 1645-50, 2010 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20818988

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To demonstrate a novel technique of self-cinching anastomosis using a barbed and looped suture during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a feasibility study of 50 consecutive patients who underwent this novel self-cinching anastomotic technique using a V-Loc™ 180 absorbable barbed suture after RARP for clinically localized prostate cancer. The results were then compared with 50 consecutive patients who underwent RARP by the same surgeon before this new technique. We examined whether this novel technique had any effects on posterior reconstruction time, vesicourethral anastomosis time, and thus total reconstruction and operative time by inference. RESULTS: The V-Loc 180 group had significantly shorter posterior reconstruction (40 seconds vs 60 seconds; P ≤ 0.001) and vesicourethral anastomotic times (7 min vs 12 min; P ≤ 0.001). By inference, this meant that total reconstruction and operative times were also significantly less (8 minutes vs 13.5 min; P ≤ 0.001 and 106 min vs 114.5 minutes; P ≤ 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: We have shown that this technique is feasible and improves posterior reconstruction and anastomotic times. Further follow-up will determine any benefits of this technique on anastomotic urinary leak rates, continence, and catheter removal times.


Assuntos
Prostatectomia/métodos , Robótica , Suturas , Uretra/cirurgia , Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Desenho de Equipamento , Estudos de Viabilidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA