Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 36(6): 727-733, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31998002

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data indicate significant differences in atopic dermatitis (AD) prevalence between countries. AIM: The purpose of this study is to (i) analyse the recorded prevalence of atopic dermatitis (diagnoses of AD reported to the Polish National Health Fund (NHF)) and to (ii) estimate direct costs of medical care for AD incurred by the NHF. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was based on data reported to the database of the public payer (NHF). The prevalence rates were calculated using the NHF data and population estimates were obtained from the Central Statistical Office of Poland (GUS). RESULTS: In 2017, the annual prevalence rate of AD in the Polish population was 32.5 per 10,000 inhabitants (34.7/10,000 for women and 30.1/10,000 for men). The highest prevalence was observed in the youngest age groups (300/10,000 in children up to 4 years of age and 141/10,000 in 5-9-year-olds). The prevalence rate decreased with age and AD was the least prevalent in patients over 85 years of age (4/10,000). In 2008-2017, NHF expenditure on AD treatment varied between PLN 19.9 million (EUR 5.6 million) in 2008 and PLN 28.4 million (EUR 6.5 million) in 2016. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence rates of AD in Poland estimated on the basis of NHF data are significantly lower than those reported in previous epidemiological studies conducted in Poland and worldwide. This may indicate that the prevalence of AD in the Polish population is underestimated or that there are no adequate disease control measures in patients with a confirmed diagnosis.

2.
Med Sci Monit ; 24: 9204-9212, 2018 Dec 18.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30562336

RESUMO

BACKGROUND Little has been reported regarding the epidemiology of eating disorders (EDs) in type 2 diabetes (T2DM). We examined the Polish National Health Fund-NFZ database estimates of all medical visits from 2008 to 2017 to determine the trend and the epidemiology of EDs in T2DM patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS The NFZ database were used. We defined the T2DM group diagnosed with both T2DM and EDs according to the ICD-10 codes. Demographic data were collected from the webpage of Statistics Poland (GUS). The annual prevalence of EDs was estimated according to the T2DM diagnosis status, and the age groups were stratified into 8 groups. RESULTS The prevalence of EDs in T2DM patients in the whole patient population with diagnosed T2DM ranged from 0.059% (in 2017) to 0.086% patients (in 2010). Differences in subcategories of EDs were noted. In the case of anorexia nervosa, a decreasing trend of coexistence with T2DM was noted. However, in the case of atypical anorexia nervosa, an increasing trend was observed. Both in the case of bulimia nervosa and atypical bulimia nervosa, an increasing trend of coexistence with T2DM was noted. As patients with T2DM age, the prevalence of EDs in T2DM decreased. CONCLUSIONS A relatively stable trend of prevalence of EDs in T2DM patients benefiting from state medical care indicated the need to develop effective screening methods and adequate procedures for therapeutic interventions with this group of patients using a multidisciplinary therapeutic team.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/psicologia , Transtornos da Alimentação e da Ingestão de Alimentos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Anorexia Nervosa/epidemiologia , Bulimia Nervosa/epidemiologia , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polônia , Prevalência , Fatores Sexuais
3.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol ; 34(6): 573-579, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29422823

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Epidemiological data on anaphylaxis have been underestimated both in Poland and worldwide. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of anaphylaxis in Poland, including a classification by gender, age and residential region. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data used in the analysis were derived from two sources, the National Health Fund records of healthcare services for 2008-2015 (official statistics) and a questionnaire-based survey conducted in 2015 on a sample of 305 allergists practicing in different regions of Poland. RESULTS: In 2015, 3144 people received treatment for anaphylactic shock (T78.0, T78.2, T80.5, T88.6) with an estimated prevalence rate of anaphylaxis of 8.2 per 100,000 (8.4 for females and 7.9 for males). The highest prevalence rate was found for women aged 50-54 years (14.5 per 100,000). There was a very large difference in the prevalence of anaphylaxis between rural and urban areas (13.1 vs. 0.8 per 100,000). In 2015, the Polish NHF spent PLN 3.5 million (EUR 835,000) on the management of anaphylaxis. Of the allergists surveyed, 73% had been currently managing patients who had experienced anaphylactic shock. The most common causes of anaphylaxis included insect venom (41.4%), food (29.8%) and drugs (17.4%). CONCLUSIONS: A central anaphylaxis registry should be established in Poland. This is the only approach that would allow collecting a wide range of reliable information on the cases, management and consequences of anaphylaxis. Ongoing management of patients who have experienced anaphylactic shock should be improved.

4.
Arch Med Sci ; 14(3): 569-571, 2018 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29765444

RESUMO

Approximately 1% of the population suffers from rheumatoid arthritis (RA) worldwide (0.45% in Poland). The therapy consists of the use of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Biologics are used in the form of the drug programme. Analysis of the NHF database demonstrated the sequence of conversion between drugs and time spent in a single treatment. In 2009, the patients would start the following treatments: adalimumab 5.8%; etanercept 14.4%; infliximab 23.1%; leflunomide 53.6%; rituximab 3%. After the first year 16% of patients changed therapy or abstained, and in the second year this situation affected 65% of patients. The following percentages maintained the same treatment in the last 6 years: infliximab 4%; adalimumab 15%; etanercept 21%; leflunomide on prescription was continued by 70%. Patients remain too long on the same therapy when it is inefficient. Achieving remission or low disease activity (DAS28 < 2.6) should take place within 6 months of starting therapy.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA