Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Neurooncol Pract ; 10(2): 203-213, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36970176

RESUMO

Background: The Brain Tumor Registry of Canada was established in 2016 to enhance infrastructure for surveillance and clinical research on Central Nervous System (CNS) tumors. We present information on primary CNS tumors diagnosed among residents of Canada from 2010 to 2015. Methods: Data from 4 provincial cancer registries were analyzed representing approximately 67% of the Canadian population. Age-standardized incidence rates (ASIR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the 2011 Canadian population age distribution. Net survival was estimated using the Pohar-Perme method. Results: A total of 31 644 primary tumors were identified for an ASIR of 22.8 per 100 000 person-years. Nonmalignant tumors made up 47.1% of all classified tumors, with mixed behaviors present in over half of histology groupings. Unclassified were 19.5% of all tumors. The most common histological subtypes are meningiomas (ASIR = 5.5 per 100 000 person-years); followed by glioblastomas (ASIR 4.0 per 100 000 person-years). The overall 5-year net survival rate for CNS tumors was 65.5%; females 70.2% and males 60.4%. GBMs continue to be the most lethal CNS tumors for all sex and age groups. Conclusions: The low annual frequency of most CNS tumor subtypes emphasizes the value of population-based data on all primary CNS tumors diagnosed among Canadians. The large number of histological categories including mixed behaviors and the proportion of unclassified tumors emphasizes the need for complete reporting. Variation in incidence and survival across histological groups by sex and age highlights the need for comprehensive and histology-specific reporting. These data can be used to better inform research and health system planning.

2.
Can J Public Health ; 111(4): 555-561, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32016920

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Universal prenatal screening in the Canadian province of Alberta employs an 'opt-out' HIV screening strategy. We examined all women giving birth in the province and determined the frequency and characteristics of women having and not having HIV screening. METHODS: All livebirths in Alberta from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2014 were compiled from the Vital Statistics database and linked to HIV screening data to determine maternal demographic and prenatal care characteristics. Correlates associated with prenatal HIV screening, opting out of HIV screening, and not having any prenatal communicable disease screening were determined by multivariable statistics. RESULTS: Of the 256,280 live births, 94.2% had prenatal HIV screening, 1.9% declined prenatal HIV screening, and 3.9% had no record of any prenatal communicable disease testing. Compared with those who had HIV screening, those who opted out of prenatal HIV screening were more likely to be over 40 years of age (adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.83 [2.12-3.78]) and less likely to be single (AOR, 0.67 [0.62-0.73]) and First Nations (AOR, 0.67 [0.56-0.82]). Those who received no prenatal communicable disease screening were less likely to be over 40 years of age (AOR, 0.81 [0.69-0.95]) and more likely to be single (AOR, 1.27 [1.21-1.33]) and have received no prenatal care (AOR, 6.78 [6.40-7.19]). Both the HIV decliners and prenatal non-testers were more likely to have used a midwife (AOR, 4.52 [3.83-5.35] and AOR, 2.44 [2.03-2.92], respectively). CONCLUSION: Demographic and prenatal care characteristics differ by a pregnant woman's prenatal screening status. Policies to improve HIV screening coverage should take these variations into account.


Assuntos
Infecções por HIV , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Alberta , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Humanos , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA