Effects of abdominal aortic aneurysm appropriateness dashboard on clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery published abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) practice guidelines in 2003, 2009, and 2018 to improve the management and treatment of AAAs. In 2014, our vascular surgery department implemented a quarterly AAA dashboard (AAAdb) to record the perioperative outcomes and guideline compliance with a focus on intervention appropriateness and procedural follow-up, which supplemented our Vascular Quality Initiative data. From the available reported evidence and expert consensus opinions, nine additional criteria for the appropriate treatment of AAAs <5 cm in women and <5.5 cm in men were noted, when applicable. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of AAAdb implementation on adherence to society and institutional guidelines, documentation of treatment rationale, and the quality of follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of elective open and endovascular AAA repair at a single institution from 2010 to 2018. The AAAdb was implemented in the middle of this period in 2014. The patient demographics, aortic size, repair indication, repair type, 30-day mortality, and postoperative and 1-year follow-up imaging findings were analyzed. The primary outcome was adherence to intervention appropriateness and the follow-up guidelines. The categorical factors were summarized using frequencies and percentages and compared using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Continuous measures were summarized using the mean ± standard deviation and compared between study periods using two-sample t tests. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, 1549 patients had undergone elective AAA repair: 657 before and 892 after AAAdb implementation. No differences were found in AAA size after AAAdb (5.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 5.6 ± 1.1 cm; P = .88). However, the proportion of size-appropriate repairs increased (64.1% vs 71.3%; P = .003). The proportion of small AAA repairs with a documented rationale had increased (64.4% vs 80.5%; P < .001), with rapid disease progression cited most often. No difference was found in 30-day mortality (1.2% vs 1.5%; P = .69). Follow-up imaging after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair increased at <60 days postoperatively (76% vs 84%; P = .004) and at 1 year of follow-up (78% vs 86%; P = .0005). The proportion of patients with endoleak at <60 days postoperatively had increased in the post-AAAdb cohort (21% vs 29%; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: The AAAdb served as a centerpiece for improving the appropriateness of care and compliance with national and institutional guidelines, including treatment of small AAAs in special circumstances. Its implementation was associated with higher quality follow-up and surveillance in a high-volume, regional aortic center. Consideration should be given to adding additional criteria to the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines and Vascular Quality Initiative reporting.

A Novel Technique and Outcomes for Transcaval Endoleak Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Strategies for embolization of type 2 endoleaks include translumbar, transgraft, transarterial, and transcaval approaches. The transcaval approach is limited by an inconsistent ability to access the aortic sac and the risk of puncturing and damaging the endograft or adjacent structures. We describe a novel technique for caval to aortic aneurysm sac access and report early outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transcaval embolization (TCE) at a tertiary referral center. From March 2019 to June 2021, 12 patients were identified to have undergone a novel approach to transcaval aortic sac access using a 0.014″ heavy weight tip wire guide and continuous current electrocautery to create the connection between the inferior vena cava and aortic aneurysm sac. The endoleak outflow vessel is then selectively embolized with coils or liquid embolic agents. When selective embolization was not possible, the aneurysm sac was instilled with liquid embolic agents to induce thrombosis. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent transcaval embolization using this method over the 3-year period. The average patient age was 79.2 ± 6.2 years and 10/12 (83.3%) were male. A high rate of comorbidities was noted in the cohort. Transcaval access into the aortic sac was achieved in all patients, while selective cannulation of outflow vessels was accomplished in 2/12 (16%) target vessels. Of these, both cases had vessels embolized using detachable coils and liquid embolic agents. Nonselective embolization was performed using liquid embolic and thrombotic agents in the other 10/12 cases. There was one perioperative complication of minor bleeding (1/12, 8.3%). Two patients were observed in intensive care unit for back pain. A persistent endoleak was identified on postoperative imaging performed at 30 days in 4/12 (33.3%) patients. Sac enlargement > 5 mm following TCE was observed in 3/12 (25%) patients. Three patients underwent open conversion with endovascular aneurysm repair explant. One patient was explanted at 1 month after failure to embolize the endoleak flow channel using TCE. A second was explanted for persistent endoleak found to be a Type IIIb with aortic diameter growth > 5 mm at 15-month follow-up. The third explant was performed for aortic sac infection at 4 months postprocedure without endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: TCE is an adjunctive technique to treat endoleaks in patients who have either failed transarterial or translumbar access. An electrified 0.014″ chronic total occlusion wire technique for transcaval access to the aortic sac for endoleak embolization can be successful in all cases without significant acute morbidity or mortality. The transcaval approach is still limited by ability to steer catheters and microcatheters into the outflow vessels with a resultant persistent endoleak and eventual need for explant.

Value of Routine Troponin Measurement in Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period after major vascular surgery. Depending on the study population, up to 25% of patients have troponin elevation after noncardiac surgery, yet many do not meet the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Although outcomes of routine troponin elevation in patients undergoing mixed major vascular surgery have been evaluated, this has not been studied exclusively in elective, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAA), especially regarding perioperative and overall mortality. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of routine troponin surveillance for consecutive, oAAA from 2014 to 2019. A total of 319 patients were identified and analyzed for management patterns and interventions. The cohort was stratified into groups for comparison based on those in whom troponin was routinely checked (RC) as part of a care strategy during the study period, not routinely checked (NRC), elevated troponin (ET) >0.001 ng/mL, and not elevated. The median follow-up was 21.5 ± 23.8 months. Groups were compared on demographic data, cardiac comorbidities, 30-day and 3-year outcomes for MI and death using two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests when appropriate. RESULTS: Troponin was measured in 83.7% (267/319) of patients who underwent elective oAAA repair. Routine troponin checks were obtained in 79.9% (255/319) of patients. ET was identified in 16.5% of those with RC (42/255) and 4.7% of those with NRC (3/64). Of patients with ET, 37.8% (17/45) had a cardiology consultation, 4.4% (2/45) had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 4.4% (2/45) had another cardiac intervention. All 4 patients undergoing PCI or other cardiac intervention had received routine troponin checks. Patients with ET were older (71.2 vs. 68.6; P = 0.04), more likely to receive intraoperative blood products (P = 0.003), had longer operative times (P = 0.011), higher length of stay (9 vs. 7 days; P < 0.01), and higher 30-day MI rate (3 vs. 0; P = 0.04). They had neither longer aortic clamp times nor worse preoperative cardiac function, and the proximal clamp position during oAAA repair did not impact troponin detection. Additionally, 3-year overall mortality was increased in patients who had ET but there was not a significant difference in 3-year mortality between groups receiving routine troponin checks versus not. CONCLUSIONS: ET, identified after elective oAAA repair, was associated with a higher risk of 30-day MI and lower overall survival. However, it was not demonstrated that routine assessment of troponin levels postoperatively leads to decreased 3-year mortality in this setting.

Hypogastric artery luminal diameter predicts common-external iliac stent patency and major adverse limb events in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease.

OBJECTIVE: Hypogastric coverage may be required for occlusive disease at the iliac arterial bifurcation. In this study, we sought to determine patency rates of common-external iliac artery (C-EIA) bare metal stents (BMS) spanning the hypogastric origin in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). In addition, we sought to identify predictors of C-EIA BMS patency loss and major adverse limb events (MALE) in patients requiring hypogastric coverage. We hypothesized that worsening stenosis of the hypogastric origin would negatively influence C-EIA stent patency and freedom from MALE. METHODS: This is a single center, retrospective review of consecutive patients undergoing elective, endovascular treatment of aortoiliac disease (AIOD) between 2010 and 2018. Only patients with C-EIA BMS coverage of a patent IIA origin were included in the study. Hypogastric luminal diameter was determined from preoperative CT angiography. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, univariable and multivariable logistic regression, and receiver operator characteristics (ROC). RESULTS: There were 236 patients (318 limbs) who were included in the study. AIOD was TASC C/D in 236/318 (74.2%) of cases. C-EIA stent primary patency was 86.5% (95% confidence interval: 81.1, 91.9) at 2 years and 79.7% (72.8, 86.7) at 4 years. Freedom from ipsilateral MALE was 77.0% (71.1, 82.9) at 2 years and 68.7% (61.3, 76.2) at 4 years. Luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin was most strongly associated with loss of C-EIA BMS primary patency in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio: 0.81, p = .02). Insulin-dependent diabetes, Rutherford's class IV or above, and stenosis of the hypogastric origin were significantly predictive of MALE in both univariable and multivariable analyses. In ROC analysis, luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin was superior to chance in prediction of C-EIA primary patency loss and MALE. Hypogastric diameter >4.5 mm had a negative predictive value of 0.94 for C-EIA primary patency loss and 0.83 for MALE. CONCLUSIONS: Patency rates of C-EIA BMS are high. Hypogastric luminal diameter is an important and potentially modifiable predictor of C-EIA BMS patency and MALE in patients with AIOD.

Outcomes of Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis with internal iliac component versus Gore Viabahn VBX.

OBJECTIVE: The Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) is the only iliac branch device approved in the United States to preserve blood flow to the external and internal iliac arteries (IIAs). Some surgeons have used the Gore Viabahn VBX balloon expandable endoprosthesis (VBX; W.L. Gore & Associates) in the IIA rather than the self-expanding endograft designed for the IBE, the internal iliac component (IIC). The objective of the present study was to examine the outcomes for patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the IBE with either the IIC or VBX stent. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center review of patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the Gore IBE device, with either the IIC or VBX stent into the IIA, from February 2016 to March 2021. The patient demographics, procedure details, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and 6-month and 1-year outcomes and mortality were analyzed. The categorical factors are summarized using frequencies and proportions. Continuous measures are summarized as the mean ± standard deviation. A significance level of P = .05 was assumed for all test results. The analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (64 arteries) had undergone elective aortoiliac artery aneurysm repair with the IBE. The IIC was used exclusively in 35 cases (55%) and the VBX in 29 (45%). The patients who had received the VBX had had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .006). Upper extremity access was used for VBX delivery in 24.1% of the procedures. No return to the operating room was required in either group. No differences were found in technical success (IIC, 97.1%; VBX, 93.1%; P = .59), the presence of endoleak on completion (20.0% vs 6.9%; P = .17), readmission (97.1% vs 93.1%; P = .59), or mortality (1.6% vs 0%; P = .45) at 30 days. No differences were found in the requirement for any IBE reintervention after 30 days. No type Ia, Ib, or III endoleaks had occurred in either group at any follow-up point. No significant difference was found in internal iliac limb primary patency (IIC, 100%; VBX, 96.3%) between groups. A nonstatistically significant trend was found toward fewer trunk-ipsilateral leg type II endoleaks in the VBX group during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the VBX is a reasonable substitute for the IIC, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile. Given its inherent conformability, greater range of diameters, and longer working length, the VBX stent offers expanded IIA branch options with the IBE.

Natural history and growth rates of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The natural history of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) has not been well-studied. The optimal size threshold for elective repair of isolated CIAAs is also not well-defined. We sought to determine the natural history and growth rates of isolated CIAAs to justify a surveillance protocol and size for elective repair. METHODS: Isolated CIAAs (>2 cm) identified from January 1, 2008, through February 29, 2020, at a single center were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and details of CIAA operative repairs were retrospectively collected. All available duplex ultrasound and computed tomography scans were reviewed from time of CIAA identification through June 2020. RESULTS: There were 244 isolated CIAAs found in 167 patients. The cohort was 94% male with an average age of 68.1 ± 8.8 years at the time of CIAA detection. CIAAs were identified with ultrasound examination 69% of the time with a mean CIAA diameter of 2.3 cm. Operative repair of a CIAA was performed in 11.4% of the cohort at an average diameter of 3.30 ± 1.02 cm. The majority of these repairs were performed via an endovascular approach (73.7%; n = 14). There were no symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs. Concurrent aortic growth that led to an abdominal aortic aneurysm with diameter of at least 3 cm occurred in 10.6% (n = 26) of isolated CIAAs. The average length of time from CIAA diagnosis to repair was 65.7 ± 47.1 months. The overall CIAA growth rate was 0.4 mm/y. A subgroup analysis based on CIAA size demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y fore CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49 cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 1.3 mm/y for CIAAs 3.0 cm or larger. There were two CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm with extreme growth, which significantly impacted the CIAA growth rate on sensitivity analysis. After excluding those two CIAAs from the model, the overall CIAA growth rate was 0.3 mm/y. The subgroup analysis then demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y for CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 0.5 mm/y for CIAAs 3 cm or larger. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated CIAAs are typically slow growing aneurysms that expectedly grow faster as they enlarge. Given the rare occurrence of rapid isolated CIAA growth, we recommend surveillance at 3 years for 2.00 to 2.49 cm isolated CIAAs, 2 years for 2.50 to 2.99 cm isolated CIAAs, and yearly for isolated CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm. The lack of symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs in this study supports delaying elective repair until an isolated CIAA diameter reaches at least 3.5 cm. These recommendations should be considered for isolated CIAA practice guidelines.

Racial disparities in presentation and short-term outcomes for patients with acute type B aortic dissection.

OBJECTIVE: Racial disparities in cardiovascular risk factors and disease outcomes have been well documented. A knowledge gap exists regarding the role that health maintenance plays in the development and outcomes of type B aortic dissection (TBAD). In the present study, we evaluated the comparative presentation and short-term outcomes of patients with TBAD across race. METHODS: In the present single-center, retrospective study, TBAD patients who had been admitted to the intensive care unit from 2015 to 2020 were identified. Patients who had self-identified as Black (n = 57) or White (n = 123) were included. The demographics, socioeconomic status, and pre-event health maintenance were compared between the two groups. Socioeconomic disadvantage was quantified using the area deprivation index (ADI). Management strategies included nonoperative and surgical repair. The outcomes assessed included 30-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and the APACHE II (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) score. RESULTS: The present study included 180 consecutive patients with TBAD. TBAD included complicated (n = 42) and uncomplicated (n = 138) cases, of which 79 had had high-risk features. Black patients were younger than were White patients (58.9 vs 67.6 years; P < .01) and were more likely to have end-stage renal disease (8.8% vs 0.8%; P = .01) and to present with anemia (10.5% vs 2.4%; P = .03). The TBAD anatomic features and management were similar in both groups. The rate of surgical intervention during hospitalization was 40% and 46% for the Black and White patients, respectively (P = .4). Black patients were more likely to be taking three or more hypertension agents (42.2% vs 16.4%; P = .005) and were less likely to be adherent to taking the prescribed agents (27.1% vs 6.7%; P < .001). Also, Black patients had fewer primary care physician visits before TBAD (P = .03) and more emergency department usage before TBAD (57.9% vs 26.9%; P < .001). Black patients had also had higher ADI scores (86.0 ± 14.6 vs 64.4 ± 21.3; P < .001). The median APACHE II score was the same for both Black and White patients (9 [interquartile range (IQR), 6-12] and 9 [IQR, 7-13], respectively; P = .7). The median hospital length of stay was identical for both groups (7 days; IQR, 5-13 days). The readmission rate was 24.5% for Black patients vs 15.5% for White patients (P = .16), with the 30-day mortality similar between the two groups (Black, 7.0%; White, 5.7%; P = .7). CONCLUSIONS: Black patients had presented at a younger age but with similar dissection morphology, rate of anatomic high-risk features, and APACHE II scores. The fewer primary care physician visits, greater emergency department usage, and higher ADI scores suggested lower health maintenance for the Black patients. White patients with TBAD were also highly deprived of health maintenance compared with the national percentile, indicating that TBAD is a disease that affects vulnerable populations, regardless of race.

Outcomes and role of peripheral revascularization in type A aortic dissection presenting with acute lower extremity ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Limited data exists on management and outcomes of patients presenting with type A aortic dissection (TAAD) and acute lower extremity ischemia (ALI). The role of limb-related revascularization and optimal treatment strategy remains undefined. The objective of this study was to analyze dissection characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of patients undergoing proximal aortic repair for TAAD with ALI. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent proximal aortic repair for TAAD were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinical data, imaging, operative details, and outcomes of patients with TAAD and ALI were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate overall and amputation-free survival. Log-rank tests were used to compare overall curves. Predictors of revascularization and in-hospital mortality were determined using multivariable logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, 463 patients with TAAD underwent proximal aortic repair. A total of 81 patients (17%) presented with ALI; 48% (39/81) with isolated ALI, and 52% (42/81) with ALI and renovisceral malperfusion. Thirty percent (24/81) required revascularization in addition to proximal aortic repair. Revascularization strategies involved endovascular (46%; 11/24), open (33%; 8/24), and hybrid (21%; 5/24) interventions. The major amputation rate was 4% (3/81), and in-hospital mortality was 21% (17/81). Amputation-free survival was significantly lower in patients requiring revascularization compared with those who did not (log-rank P = .023). Overall survival did not significantly differ between the two groups (log-rank P = .095). Overall survival was significantly lower in patients with concomitant ALI and renovisceral malperfusion compared with those with isolated ALI (log-rank P = .0017). Distal extent of dissection flap into zone 11 (odds ratio [OR], 5.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-20.2; P = .008) and partial/complete thrombosis of any iliac artery (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.23-12.6; P = .021) were associated with increased risk of requiring an additional revascularization procedure. True lumen collapse at level of renovisceral aorta (OR, 8.84; 95% CI, 1.74-44.9; P = .0086) was associated with increased risk of in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSIONS: ALI resolves after proximal aortic repair of TAAD in most cases. Distal extent of aortic dissection into zone 11 and iliac thrombosis are risk factors for additional peripheral revascularization. True lumen collapse at the renovisceral aorta and TAAD with concomitant ALI and renovisceral malperfusion portends a poor prognosis. A multi-disciplinary team approach to manage these patients who present with ascending aortic dissection and distal malperfusion may improve outcomes in this complex population.

Optimal Timing of Surveillance Ultrasounds in Small Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) surveillance intervals remain controversial and difficult to standardize. Current Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines lack quality evidence. The objective of this study is to examine patients followed in a high volume non-invasive vascular laboratory, determine if the current guidelines are fitting in clinical practice, and attempt to further identify risk factors for accelerated aneurysm growth. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent at least two ultrasounds for AAA in the vascular laboratory during 2008 -2018 with baseline diameter less than 5.0 cm was conducted. Patient demographics were collected. Groups were then created for comparison using the size criteria according to SVS guidelines. In addition, we compared overall growth rates specifically evaluating rapid growth (rate of at least 1.0 cm/year and size change of at least 0.5 cm from previous imaging), expected growth (any growth below 1.0 cm/year and of at least 0.5 cm from baseline) and no growth. RESULTS: A total of 1581 patients (1232 male and 349 female) were identified with a total of 5945 ultrasound studies. The median age was 73 years and mean follow-up was 27.8 months. Baseline AAA size was 3.0 -3.9 cm in 986 patients and 4.0 -4.9 cm in 595 patients. The average maximum growth rate was 0.18 cm/year for AAAs 3.0 -3.9 cm and 0.36 cm/year for AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm (P <0.001). Patients with AAA 4.0 -4.9 cm at baseline were more likely to be white, male, hypertensive and have chronic kidney disease (P <0.05). 1078 patients (68.2%) demonstrated no growth over the observed time period with 342 patients (21.6%) demonstrating expected growth and 161 (10.2%) rapid growth. Male gender and baseline AAA size of 4.0 -4.9 cm were more likely to demonstrate rapid growth (P = 0.002) and eventual repair (P <0.001). Metformin use was more common in the AAA group with no growth (P <0.05). Freedom from rapid growth and repair indication at 2 years was significantly lower in those patients with baseline aneurysms 3.0 -3.9 cm (P <0.001). CONCLUSION: The overall low rate of events in small AAAs supports continued surveillance every 3 years for AAAs 3.0-3.9 cm and yearly for male patients with AAAs 4.0 -4.9 cm as recommended by the SVS Guidelines. Female gender may have less rapid growth than previously reported but likely merit more rigorous surveillance particularly as the AAAs approach 5.0 cm. Metformin use continues to demonstrate it may abrogate aneurysmal growth. Lastly, there is a subset of patients that exhibit more rapid growth of their small AAAs, and further study will be required to classify these patients.

Standardizing Methods of Reading CT Maximum Aortic Diameters Amongst Experts Reduces Variations and Discordance, Improving Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus on the method of obtaining abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) maximum diameters based on computed tomographic angiography, and the reproducibility and accuracy of different methods have recently been debated due to advancements in imaging. This study compared the two most common methods based on orthogonal planes and centerline of flow to determine the discordances and accuracy amongst experiences readers. METHODS: The computed tomographic angiography max diameters of 148 AAAs were measured by three experienced observers, including a vascular surgeon, a radiologist and an imaging cardiologist. Observers used two different methods with standardized protocols: multiplanar reformations based on orthogonal planes, and a software using 3D aortic reconstructions to create centerline flow lumen providing diameters based on cross sections perpendicular to this lumen. Agreements and reliability of measurement methods were assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient and Bland - Altman analysis. Discordances between measurements of the methods and the original reported measurement, as well as outside hospitals were compared. RESULTS: The average age of the cohort was 75 years and aortic diameters ranged from 3.8 to 9.6 cm. For orthogonal readings, there were agreements within 3 mm between 86% and 92% of the time, while centerline - reading agreement was between 88% and 94%, which was not statistically significant. The intra-class correlation coefficient was high between method type and between readers. Within methods, agreement was between 0.96 and 0.97, while within - reader agreement measures was between 0.96 and 0.98. In comparison to the original and the outside hospital reports, 10% ≥ of the original and 20% ≥ of the outside hospital reported measurements were discordant between the readers. CONCLUSION: Maximal AAA measurements can have substantial variability leading to clinical significance and change in patient management and outcomes. Based on the results, orthogonal and centerline measurement methods have equally high agreements and concordance within 3 mm and low variations at a high volume center. However, when compared to the official read reports, there is high discordance rates that can significantly alter patient outcomes. A standardized method of measurement maximum diameter can reduce variations and discordances among different methods.

Comparison of Aortobifemoral Bypass to Aortoiliac Stenting with Bifurcation Reconstruction for TASC II D Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: Long-segment stenting of the infrarenal aorta and bilateral iliac arteries, with or without femoral endarterectomy for diffuse disease, has been adopted for treatment of severe aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of this reconstruction, termed aortoiliac stenting with bifurcation reconstruction (AISBR), to aortobifemoral bypass (ABF) in patients with comparable TASC II D lesions. METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients treated with ABF or AISBR for comparable TASC II D lesions between 2010 and 2018. ABF patients were included only if they were deemed anatomic candidates also for AISBR after review of preoperative imaging. Patients treated for acute limb ischemia and bypass graft infection were excluded. Statistics included Fisher exact test, Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox proportional hazards regression. RESULTS: There were 24 ABF and 75 AISBR included in the study. The primary indication for treatment was claudication in 55 (55.6%) patients, rest pain in 28 (28.3%), and tissue loss in 16 (16.2%). Patients undergoing AISBR were more likely to be female. Femoral endarterectomies were performed in 37/75 (49.3%) AISBR and 14/24 (58.3%) ABF (P = 0.44). AISBR were performed percutaneously in 34/75 (45.1%). No AISBR required conversion to ABF. Intraoperative blood loss, procedure time and hospital length of stay (LOS) were significantly less for AISBR compared to ABF. Surgical site infections (SSI) were less common in patients undergoing AISBR (AISBR: 6/75 (8.0%) vs. ABF: 9/24 (37.5%), (P< 0.01). One AISBR and two 2 ABF developed late SSI >30 days postoperatively. The reductions in blood loss, LOS and SSI remained significant after excluding percutaneous AISBR from the analysis. Five-year primary patency was 50.8% (95% CI: 33.3, 68.4%) for AISBR and 88.1% (72.7, 100.0%) for ABF (P= 0.04). Five-year survival was 76.5% (95% CI: 63.6, 89.5) for AISBR and 100% (95% CI: 100.0, 100.0) for ABF (P = 0.07). Five-year primary assisted patency, secondary patency, freedom from reintervention and major adverse limb events did not differ significantly between groups. CONCLUSIONS: AISBR is a viable option for management of TASC II D AIOD, with lower morbidity and acceptable durability when compared to traditional ABF.

Visceral segment aortic thrombus is associated with proximal aortic degeneration after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: To identify predictors of aortic aneurysm formation at or above an infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: A total of 881 infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repairs were identified at a single institution from 2004 to 2008; 187 of the repairs were identified that had pre-operative and post-operative computed tomography imaging at least one year or greater to evaluate for aortic degeneration following repair. Aortic diameters at the celiac, superior mesenteric, and renal arteries were measured on all available computed tomographic scans. Aortic thrombus and calcification volumes in the visceral and infrarenal abdominal aortic segments were calculated. Multivariable modeling was used with log transformed variables to determine potential predictors of future aortic aneurysm development after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. RESULTS: Of the 187 patients in the cohort, 100 had an open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair while 87 were treated with endovascular repair. Proximal aortic aneurysms developed in 26% (n = 49) of the cohort during an average of 72 ± 34.2 months of follow-up. After multivariable modeling, visceral segment aortic thrombus on pre-operative computed tomography imaging increased the risk of aortic aneurysm development above the infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair within both the open abdominal aortic aneurysm (hazard ratio 2.04, p = 0.033) and endovascular repair (hazard ratio 3.31, p = 0.004) cohorts. Endovascular repair was independently associated with a higher risk of future aortic aneurysm development after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair when compared to open abdominal aortic aneurysm (hazard ratio 2.19, p = 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Visceral aortic thrombus present prior to abdominal aortic aneurysm repair and endovascular repair are both associated with an increased risk of future proximal aortic degeneration after infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. These factors may predict patients at higher risk of developing proximal aortic aneurysms that may require complex aortic repairs.

Improving clinical documentation of evaluation and management care and patient acuity improves reimbursement as well as quality metrics.

OBJECTIVE: Accurate documentation of patient care and acuity is essential to determine appropriate reimbursement as well as accuracy of key publicly reported quality metrics. We sought to investigate the impact of standardized note templates by inpatient advanced practice providers (APPs) on evaluation and management (E/M) charge capture, including outside of the global surgical package (GSP), and quality metrics including case mix index (CMI) and mortality index (MI). We hypothesized this clinical documentation initiative as well as improved coding of E/M services would result in increased reimbursement and quality metrics. METHODS: A documentation and coding initiative on the heart and vascular service line was initiated in 2016 with focus on improving inpatient E/M capture by APPs outside the GSP. Comprehensive training sessions and standardized documentation templates were created and implemented in the electronic medical record. Subsequent hospital care E/M (current procedural terminology codes 99231, 99232, 99233) from the years 2015 to 2017 were audited and analyzed for charge capture rates, collections, work relative value units (wRVUs), and billing complexity. Data were compared over time by standardizing CMS values and reimbursement rates. In addition, overall CMI and MI were calculated each year. RESULTS: One year following the documentation initiative, E/M charges on the vascular surgery service line increased by 78.5% with a corresponding increase in APP charges from 0.4% of billable E/M services to 70.4% when compared with pre-initiative data. The charge capture of E/M services among all inpatients rose from 21.4% to 37.9%. Additionally, reimbursement from CMS increased by 65% as total work relative value units generated from E/M services rose by 78.4% (797 to 1422). The MI decreased over the study period by 25.4%. Additionally, there was a corresponding 5.6% increase in the cohort CMI. Distribution of E/M encounter charges did not vary significantly. Meanwhile, the prevalence of 14 clinical comorbidities in our cohort as well as length of stay (P = .88) remained non-statistically different throughout the study period. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate clinical documentation of E/M care and ultimately inpatient acuity is critical in determining quality metrics that serve as important measures of overall hospital quality for CMS value-based payments and rankings. A system-based documentation initiative and expanded role of inpatient APPs on vascular surgery teams significantly improved charge capture and reimbursement outside the GSP as well as CMI and MI in a consistently complex patient population.

Spinal drainage complications after aortic surgery.

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Spinal drain (SD) placement is an adjunct used in open and endovascular aortic surgery to mitigate the risk of spinal cord injury. SD placement can lead to subdural hematoma and intracranial hemorrhage (SDH/ICH). Previous studies have highlighted a correlation between incidence of SDH/ICH and amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drained. We have two philosophies of SD management in our institution. One protocol allows fluid removal for pressure >10 cm H2O with no volume restriction. A second, similar protocol restricts CSF drainage to <25 mL/h. We examined SD complications and the influence of volume restriction. METHODS: Patients were identified according to the Current Procedure Terminology codes for SD placement, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair, endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and open thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. Patients' demographics included age, gender, race, body mass index, and comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorder, and connective tissue disorders. Management protocol was classified as volume independent (VI) or volume dependent (VD) by physician order. Postoperative complications related to the SD were noted. RESULTS: We identified 948 patients who had an SD placed during the study period; 473 were done before aortic surgeries. A total of 364 patients (77%) underwent endovascular aortic surgery. The mean age at the time of procedure was 67.2 years, and 66% of patients were male. Thirty-nine patients (8.3%) were noted to have connective tissue disorders. Bloody SD placement occurred in 14 patients (3.1%) requiring rescheduling of the operation. SDH/ICH occurred in 11 patients (2.3%), postoperative blood tinged SD output in 94 patients (19.9 %), and 22 patients (4.7 %) had a CSF leak after SD removal. The incidence of SDH/ICH was not affected by the management protocol (2.6% VI vs 2.0% VD, P = .66), whereas the incidence of postoperative blood tinged SD output was significantly higher in the VI group (25.1% VI vs 15.0% VD, P = .006). Perioperative low-dose aspirin (81 mg) and prophylactic subcutaneous heparin did not increase the incidence of SDH/ICH. Postoperative thrombocytopenia was found to be associated with higher incidence of SDH/ICH (median 86,000 vs 113,000, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Severe complications of SD placement (SDH/ICH) occur in 2.3% of SD patients undergoing aortic surgery, and the risk is higher in the setting of postoperative thrombocytopenia. SD volume limitation, blood tinged drainage, antiplatelet medication, and low-dose heparin do not affect the risk of SDH/ICH. The risks of spinal drains for aortic surgery should be balanced against potential benefits.

Carotid endarterectomy remains safe in high-risk patients.

OBJECTIVE: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a proven intervention for stroke risk reduction in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. High-risk patients are often offered carotid stenting to minimize the risk and optimize the outcomes. As a referral center for high-risk patients, we evaluated and analyzed our experience with high-risk CEA patients. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had undergone CEA at a tertiary referral center. The demographics, indications for surgery, physiologic and anatomic risk factors, intraoperative surgical management, perioperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. The high-risk physiologic factors identified included an ejection fraction <30%, positive preoperative stress test results, and compromised pulmonary function test results. The high-risk patients included those requiring home oxygen, those with a partial pressure of oxygen of <60 mm Hg, and patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of <30%. The high-risk anatomic factors identified included previous head and/or neck radiation, a history of ipsilateral neck surgery, contralateral nerve palsy, redo CEA, previous ipsilateral stenting, contralateral occlusion, contralateral CEA, nasotracheal intubation, and digastric muscle division. After propensity score matching, patients with and without high-risk physiologic and anatomic factors were compared. The primary outcomes were a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were cranial injury and surgical site infection. RESULTS: During a 10-year period, 1347 patients had undergone CEA at the Cleveland Clinic main campus. Of the 1347 patients, 1152 met the criteria for analysis. Propensity score matching found adequate matches for 424 high-risk patients, with 173 patients having at least one physiologic high-risk factor and 293 at least one anatomic high-risk factor. No significant differences were found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Overall, the stroke rate for the standard-risk and high-risk patients was 1.9% and 1.4%, respectively. The high-risk patients were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, although most were temporary. When patients with one or multiple risk factors were analyzed, no significant difference was found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Patients with two or more risk factors were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, with most being temporary. CONCLUSIONS: In our large series, CEA remained a viable and safe surgical solution for patients with high-risk anatomic and physiologic risk factors, with acceptable stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality rates.

Decreased transfusion requirements with use of acute normovolemic hemodilution in open aortic aneurysm repair.

OBJECTIVE: Acute normovolemic hemodilution (ANH) is an operative blood conservation technique involving the removal and storage of patient blood after the induction of anesthesia, with maintenance of normovolemia by crystalloid and/or colloid replacement. Developed and used predominately in cardiac surgery, ANH has been applied to the vascular surgery population. However, data regarding the effects on transfusion requirements in this population are limited. The objective of the present study was to compare the transfusion requirements and coagulopathy for patients who had undergone open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAAR) using ANH to those for patients who had received only product replacements, as clinically indicated. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who had undergone elective oAAAR at a quaternary aortic referral center from 2017 to 2019. Those eligible for ANH, with no active cardiac ischemia, no valvular disease, normal left ventricular and right ventricular function, chronic kidney disease stage <3, hematocrit >38%, and a normal coagulation profile were included in the present study. Patient demographics and characteristics and operative variables, including aneurysm extent, clamp site, visceral and renal ischemia time, operative time, and transfusion requirements, were collected. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, and length of stay were analyzed. The patients with and without ANH were matched and compared. Continuous measures were analyzed using Wilcoxon rank sum tests and t tests. RESULTS: During the study period, 209 oAAARs had been performed. Of the 209 patients, 76 had met the inclusion criteria. Of these 76 patients, 27 had undergone ANH and 49 had not. The patients with ANH had required fewer PRBC transfusions intraoperatively (median, 0 U; interquartile range [IQR], 0-1 U; median, 1 U; IQR, 0-2 U; P = .02), at 24 hours (median, 0 U; IQR, 0-1 U; vs median, 1 U; IQR, 0-2 U; P = .008), at 48 hours (median, 0 U; IQR, 0-1 U; vs median, 1 U; IQR, 0-2; P = .007), and throughout the admission (median, 0 U; IQR, 0-1 U; vs median, 2 U; IQR, 0-2 U; P = .011). No difference was found in the number of intraoperative platelet or cryoprecipitate transfusions. At 48 hours, the ANH group had had significantly greater platelet counts (142 ± 35.8 × 103/µL vs 124 ± 37.6 × 103/µL; P = .044), lower partial thromboplastin time, and lower international normalized ratio. No difference in myocardial infarction, return to the operating room, or mortality (one death overall). The ANH patients had a shorter length of stay (7.0 ± 2.7 vs 8.8 ± 4.8 days; P = .041). CONCLUSIONS: The use of ANH during oAAAR resulted in fewer intraoperative and postoperative PRBC transfusions with improved coagulation parameters and a shorter hospital length of stay.

Current status of patient-reported outcome measures in vascular surgery.

A previously published review focused on generic and disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) relevant to vascular surgery but limited to arterial conditions. The objective of this project was to identify all available PROMs relevant to diseases treated by vascular surgeons and to evaluate vascular surgeon perceptions, barriers to widespread implementation, and concerns regarding PROMs. We provide an overview of what a PROM is and how they are developed, and summarize currently available PROMs specific to vascular surgeons. We also report results from a survey of 78 Society for Vascular Surgery members serving on committees within the Policy and Advocacy Council addressing the barriers and facilitators to using PROMs in clinical practice. Finally, we report the qualitative results of two focus groups conducted to assess granular perceptions of PROMS and preparedness of vascular surgeons for widespread implementation of PROMs. These focus groups identified a lack of awareness of existing PROMs, knowledge of how PROMs are developed and validated, and clarity around how PROMs should be used by the clinician as main subthemes for barriers to PROM implementation in clinical practice.

Outcomes of Hypogastric Coverage and Occlusion during Endovascular Treatment of Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

BACKGROUND: The risk of hypogastric occlusion (HO) following bare-metal stent (BMS) coverage of the hypogastric origin during endovascular treatment of aortoiliac occlusive disease (AIOD) is unclear. This study sought to determine the rate and clinical significance of HO following BMS coverage during iliac stenting for complex AIOD. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing elective iliac stenting for AIOD from 2010-2018 at Cleveland Clinic were reviewed. Patients with BMS coverage of a patent hypogastric origin were included. Rate of HO were determined by review of intraoperative angiography and follow up imaging. Predictors of HO were identified by univariable and multivariable logistic regression. Outcomes were compared between those who did and did not develop HO. RESULTS: There were 251 patients (338 limbs) with BMS coverage of the hypogastric origin during treatment of AIOD. Lesion severity was classified as TASC C/D in 249/338 (73.7%) of cases. Bilateral hypogastric coverage occurred in 93/251 (37.1%) patients. Hypogastric patency was 78.1% at 24-months following coverage. Recanalization of an ipsilateral external iliac artery (EIA) occlusion was predictive of HO (HR 3.12, 95% CI: 1.33, 7.34; P= 0.009). Increased luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin protected against HO (HR 0.64; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.88; P= 0.006). Perioperative outcomes were no different between patients with and without HO. There were no cases of gluteal necrosis, spinal cord ischemia, or pelvic organ ischemia. Four-year mortality and limb salvage were not affected by HO. HO was associated with decreased primary patency of ipsilateral iliac stents and increased risk of ipsilateral reintervention (HR 5.49; 95% CI: 1.82, 16.58; P= 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: HO is relatively infrequent following BMS coverage during treatment of AIOD. Luminal diameter of the hypogastric origin and ipsilateral EIA occlusion are associated with occlusion. HO is well tolerated in AIOD, though it is potentially associated with increased risk iliac stent occlusion and reintervention.

Concomitant ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy and stenting is an effective treatment for tandem carotid artery lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Data regarding the treatment of tandem carotid artery lesions at the bifurcation and ipsilateral, proximal common carotid artery (CCA) are limited. It has been suggested that concomitant treatment with carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and proximal ipsilateral carotid artery stenting confers a high risk of stroke and death. The objective of this study was to evaluate the technique and outcomes of this hybrid procedure at a single institution. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed including patients who underwent CEA + ipsilateral carotid artery stenting for treatment of atherosclerotic carotid artery disease between December 2007 and April 2017. Primary endpoints were postoperative myocardial infarction, neurologic event, and perioperative mortality. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients (15 male [68%]) underwent CEA + ipsilateral carotid artery stenting with a mean follow-up of 67 ± 77 months. The mean age was 70.0 ± 6.1 years old, all with a prior smoking history (eight current smokers [64%]). Twelve patients (55%) were treated for symptomatic disease and three had a prior ipsilateral CEA (one also with CAS). Computed tomographic angiography imaging was performed preoperatively in 21 patients (95%). CEA was performed first in 18 patients (82%) followed by ipsilateral carotid artery stenting. CEA was performed with a patch in 20 and eversion endarterectomy in two patients. Ipsilateral CCA was stented in 21 patients (96%) and one innominate was stented in a patient with a right CEA. Additional endovascular interventions were performed in three patients: 1 innominate stent, 1 distal ipsilateral internal carotid artery stent, and 1 right subclavian artery stent. All proximal stents were placed with sheath access through the endarterectomy patch in 12 (55%), CCA in 7 (32%), and through the arteriotomy before patching in 3 (14%). Distal internal carotid artery clamping was performed in 18 (90%, available 20) of patients before ipsilateral carotid artery stenting. All proximal lesions were successfully treated endovascularly with no open conversion. One dissection was created and treated effectively with stenting. One perioperative stroke (4.5%) occurred in a patient treated for symptomatic disease, 1 postoperative myocardial infarction (4.5%), and 2 patients (9.1%) with cranial nerve injuries. There was one patient who expired within 30 days, shortly after discharge for unknown reasons. The mean length of stay was 2.6 ± 2.0 days. CONCLUSIONS: In appropriately selected patients, concomitant CEA and ipsilateral carotid artery stenting can be safely performed in high-risk patients with a low risk of myocardial infarction, neurologic events, and perioperative mortality when careful surgical technique is used, using direct carotid access, and distal carotid clamping for cerebral protection before stenting.

Impact of posthospital syndrome on outcomes of elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Posthospital syndrome (PHS) is an acquired, transient period of health vulnerability after a hospital admission for acute illness. It is characterized by physiologic deconditioning secondary to stressors from disruption in circadian rhythm, depletion of nutritional and physiologic reserve as well as the pain and discomfort associated with hospitalization. PHS is reported as an independent risk factor for readmission and adverse postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study is to investigate whether preoperative hospitalization affects outcomes of elective endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR). METHODS: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient Database for California (2009-2011) were queried using International Classification of Disease Codes, Ninth Edition, codes of 441.4 (abdominal aneurysm without mention of rupture), 397.1 (EVAR with graft), and 397.8 (EVAR with branching or fenestrated graft). PHS exposure is defined as any inpatient admission 30 or fewer days before elective EVAR. Primary outcomes are all-cause mortality and overall complications. Secondary outcomes include length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and hospital charge. RESULTS: A total of 6155 patients were identified. of which 327 patients (5.6%) had more than one episode of hospital admission 30 days or less before elective EVAR. In-hospital mortality was comparable after PHS exposure (P = .09). However, PHS exposure was associated with increased 30-day readmission (9.5% vs 18.4%; P < .001), LOS (3.0 vs 4.5 days; P < .001), and overall complications (14.8% vs 24.5%; P < .001). Risk adjustment was made based on age, sex, race, baseline comorbidities, and reason for preoperative admission. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that PHS exposure was a predictor for longer LOS (odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-3.2; P < .001), higher incidence of 30-day readmission (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.4-2.6; P < .001), and overall complications (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.3-2.2; P < .001). Additional cost associated with increased 30-day readmission attributable to PHS exposure was estimated at $448,302 per 100 cases. CONCLUSIONS: PHS is an independent risk-adjusted predictor for increased LOS, 30-day readmission, and overall complications after elective EVAR. Recent hospital admission should be assessed carefully before elective EVAR. Medical optimization with an attempt to delay elective surgery by up to 30 days may help to improve surgical outcomes and decrease unnecessary health care expenditures.