Reported consent processes and demographics: a substudy of the INSIGHT Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Treatment (START) trial.

OBJECTIVES: Efforts are needed to improve informed consent of participants in research. The Strategic Timing of AntiRetroviral Therapy (START) study provides a unique opportunity to study the effect of length and complexity of informed consent documents on understanding and satisfaction among geographically diverse participants. METHODS: Interested START sites were randomized to use either the standard consent form or the concise consent form for all of the site's participants. RESULTS: A total of 4473 HIV-positive participants at 154 sites world-wide took part in the Informed Consent Substudy, with consent given in 11 primary languages. Most sites sent written information to potential participants in advance of clinic visits, usually including the consent form. At about half the sites, staff reported spending less than an hour per participant in the consent process. The vast majority of sites assessed participant understanding using informal nonspecific questions or clinical judgment. CONCLUSIONS: These data reflect the interest of START research staff in evaluating the consent process and improving informed consent. The START Informed Consent Substudy is by far the largest study of informed consent intervention ever conducted. Its results have the potential to impact how consent forms are written around the world.

Beating the Odds: Successful Establishment of a Phase II/III Clinical Research Trial in Resource-Poor Liberia during the Largest-Ever Ebola Outbreak.

It has been argued that a country such as Liberia, not fully recovered from the devastation of decades of civil unrest, lacked the appropriate ethical and regulatory framework, basic human and health care services, and infrastructure to carry out clinical trials according to international standards of quality during a public health emergency. However, as Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea were being ravaged by the largest and most devastating Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak ever recorded, the topic of conducting clinical trials of experimental vaccine and treatment candidates in these resource-poor countries generated the keen interest and concern of scientists, researchers, physicians, bioethicists, philanthropists, and even politicians. Decisive action on behalf of the Liberian government, and a timely positive and supportive response from the United States (U.S.) government, led to the formation of PREVAIL (Partnership for Research on Ebola Vaccines in Liberia) - a clinical research partnership between the two governments. Within a span of 12 weeks, this partnership accomplished the unimaginable: the successful initiation of a Phase II/III vaccine clinical trial for EVD in Liberia. This paper will discuss the dynamics of the research collaboration, barriers encountered, breakthroughs realized, key elements of success, and lessons learned in the process.

Comparative safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of amphotericin B lipid complex and amphotericin B desoxycholate in healthy male volunteers.

Amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC), a lipid complex formulation of amphotericin B, and amphotericin B desoxycholate (AB) were compared for safety, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics in two groups of eight healthy male volunteers. After a 1-mg test dose, study drug was infused at 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mg/kg; the 0.5-mg/kg dose was not given to subjects receiving AB. ABLC caused few acute adverse effects except for mild somnolence (drowsiness) in six volunteers. In addition, three of eight ABLC recipient had asymptomatic, transient serum transaminase elevations that resolved spontaneously. The AB recipients experienced more acute side effects, but only one had a mild shaking chill: three of eight also experienced sleepiness. No significant changes in vital signs, electrocardiogram, oximetry, pulmonary function, or clinical status were observed in either group. Due to its increased estimate volume of distribution and estimated clearance. ABLC yielded decreased amphotericin B levels and area under the serum concentration versus time curve relative to AB.

Pooled analysis of 3 randomized, controlled trials of interleukin-2 therapy in adult human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease.

We collected human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease progression, survival, most recent CD4 cell count, and plasma HIV RNA levels from patients (n=157) who participated in randomized clinical trials of interleukin (IL)-2 that commenced before 1995. Data were available for 155 (99%) patients. Statistical analyses were based on the intention-to-treat principle. Median follow-up was 28 months and 30 months for control and IL-2 patients, respectively. Twenty-five (16%) patients developed AIDS or died during follow-up (16 control patients vs. 9 IL-2 patients; R2=0.57; P=.22). Mean change from baseline CD4 cell count was significantly higher in patients randomized to receive IL-2 (368 vs. 153 cells/microL; P=.003). Mean change from baseline plasma HIV RNA was significantly lower in patients randomized to receive IL-2 (-0.98 vs. -0.63 log copies/mL; P=.004). Significant improvements in CD4 cell count and plasma HIV RNA in recipients of IL-2 relative to control patients were associated with a nonsignificant trend toward improved clinical outcome.

Immune-globulin prophylaxis of respiratory syncytial virus infection in patients undergoing stem-cell transplantation.

Thirty-two patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation were given respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immune globulin (RSVIG) at the time of transplantation and again 3 weeks later. Antibody titers to RSV, human parainfluenza virus 3, measles, and influenza H1N1, H3N2, and B were measured prior to administration of RSVIG and 6 more times over the course of the subsequent 6 weeks. Baseline antiviral titers and increases in antibody after administration of RSVIG were extremely variable for all the viruses. In 18 patients in whom the baseline titers of antibody titers to RSV-F protein were 1:640-1:2048, there was a 7.7-fold initial increase in these titers after the first dose of RSVIG, compared with a 2.1-fold increase in 14 patients with baseline titers of 1:4096-1:20,840; increases in titers of antibody against the other viruses after the first dose of RSVIG reflected similar variability. The subset of patients with the lowest titers appear to receive the greatest benefit from administration of RSVIG.