Pharmacokinetics and toxicity of two schedules of high dose epirubicin.

Epirubicin, a stereoisomer of doxorubicin, is reported to have equal antitumor activity with lower cardiac and systemic toxicity. Recently the maximum tolerated dose of this drug has been revised upwards with reported increased response rates. However, the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin at high doses have never been reported. Accordingly, this study was designed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of epirubicin when administered as either a 15-min i.v. bolus or a 6-h i.v. infusion in a phase I study at high doses. Nineteen patients with a variety of malignancies were given a total of 52 cycles of epirubicin at doses of 90 to 150 mg/m2 given once every 3 weeks. The maximum tolerated dose was 150 mg/m2 epirubicin given either as a bolus or as an infusion. The major dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia. Interpatient variation occurred in the pharmacokinetics at each dose level but overall there were dose-dependent pharmacokinetics. This was manifested as a disproportionate increase in plasma levels and areas under the curve as the epirubicin dose was increased from 90 to 150 mg/m2. The pharmacokinetics of epirubicin could best be described by an open two-compartment model. Peak plasma concentrations were attained at a median of 12 min following the bolus injection and concentrations approached the steady state within a median of 55 min following the start of the 6-h infusion. Administration of the 150 mg/m2 dose over the 6 h compared to the bolus administration was associated with a 92% decrease in peak concentration from 3088 +/- 1503 to 234 +/- 126 ng/ml. This was not associated with an appreciable change in hematological or nonhematological toxicities. The median distribution half-life was 10 min and the median elimination half-life was 42.0 h. The cumulative renal excretion of the parent compound accounted for less than 2% of the administered dose. The major metabolites in both plasma and urine samples were 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-4'-epidoxorubicin, 13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin, and 4'-O-beta-D-glucuronyl-13-S-dihydro-4'-epidoxorubicin. This study demonstrates that a 135 mg/m2 bolus infusion given on a 3-weekly schedule is an appropriate initial dose for further clinical studies.

Comparative study of the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of high-dose epirubicin with or without dexrazoxane in patients with advanced malignancy.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of the combination of dexrazoxane with epirubicin at dexrazoxane/epirubicin dose ratios of 5 to 9:1 in a controlled, crossover phase I study in patients with advanced malignancy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with a variety of malignancies were enrolled. Assessable patients received two cycles of chemotherapy consisting of epirubicin alone and in combination with dexrazoxane. Comparisons were made between the toxicity and pharmacokinetics of epirubicin in the two treatment arms, using each patient as his or her own control. Dexrazoxane and epirubicin were delivered at dose levels of 600/120 mg/m2, 900/120 mg/m2, 900/135 mg/m2, 900/150 mg/m2, and 1,200/135 mg/m2, respectively. Twenty-six patients completed two cycles of chemotherapy and were therefore assessable. RESULTS: The maximum-tolerated doses (MTDs) of dexrazoxane/epirubicin were 1,200/135 mg/m2, with the dose-limiting toxicities being neutropenia, infection, and stomatitis. There was no difference in the nadir neutrophil or platelet counts between single-agent and combination treatment at any of the dose levels. Severe vomiting and stomatitis occurred less frequently following administration of epirubicin and dexrazoxane when compared with epirubicin alone (P = .01 and .02, respectively). Prior administration of higher doses (900 mg/m2 and 1,200 mg/m2) of dexrazoxane increased the systemic clearance of epirubicin, resulting in a decrease in the area under the curve (AUC). Elimination half-life, maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), and apparent volume of distribution of epirubicin were not significantly affected by dexrazoxane. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) decreased by greater than 10% in two patients, but neither developed clinical or radiologic evidence of cardiac failure. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that dexrazoxane can be safely combined with escalating doses of epirubicin at dose ratios of 5 to 9:1 without having an adverse impact on toxicity. Studies are need to determine the optimal dose ratio for cardioprotection and to explore further the pharmacokinetic interactions of the two drugs at increasing doses of epirubicin supported by hematopoietic growth factors.

In vitro evidence for direct complexation of ADR-529/ICRF-187 [(+)-1,2-bis-(3,5-dioxo-piperazin-1-yl)propane] onto an existing ferric-anthracycline complex.

ADR-529 protects against anthracycline cardiotoxicity, possibly by preventing free radical induction. We hypothesize that this occurs by ADR-529 forming a ternary anthracycline-iron-ADR-529 complex. This study used 200-MHz Fourier-transformed NMR to demonstrate the ability of ADR-529 to do this. Peak assignments were by proton-correlated spectroscopy and proton-carbon heteronuclear-correlated spectroscopy. Ga3+ served as a probe for Fe3+, and D2O was the system solvent. Doxorubicin and epirubicin were the studied drugs. Proton spectra of multiple combinations (including pure standards as controls) were obtained. Both Ga3+ plus ADR-529 and Ga3+ plus doxorubicin showed evidence of complexation, as seen by appropriate peak shifts and changes in the associated coupling constants. Ga3+ plus ADR-529 plus epirubicin showed complexation different from that of Ga3+ plus ADR-529 or Ga3+ plus doxorubicin and consistent with the proposed structure. We conclude that ADR-529 would be able to form a ternary complex with an existing anthracycline-Fe3+ complex in an isolated aqueous environment.