Phenotypic subtypes of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis identified by machine learning consensus clustering analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (f-HP) have varied clinical and radiologic presentations whose associated phenotypic outcomes have not been previously described. We conducted a study to evaluate mortality and lung transplant (LT) outcomes among clinical clusters of f-HP as characterized by an unsupervised machine learning approach. METHODS: Consensus cluster analysis was performed on a retrospective cohort of f-HP patients diagnosed according to recent international guideline. Demographics, antigen exposure, radiologic, histopathologic, and pulmonary function findings along with comorbidities were included in the cluster analysis. Cox proportional-hazards regression was used to assess mortality or LT risk as a combined outcome for each cluster. RESULTS: Three distinct clusters were identified among 336 f-HP patients. Cluster 1 (n = 158, 47%) was characterized by mild restriction on pulmonary function testing (PFT). Cluster 2 (n = 46, 14%) was characterized by younger age, lower BMI, and a higher proportion of identifiable causative antigens with baseline obstructive physiology. Cluster 3 (n = 132, 39%) was characterized by moderate to severe restriction. When compared to cluster 1, mortality or LT risk was lower in cluster 2 (hazard ratio (HR) of 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.82; P = 0.01) and higher in cluster 3 (HR of 1.76; 95% CI, 1.24-2.48; P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three distinct phenotypes of f-HP with unique mortality or transplant outcomes were found using unsupervised cluster analysis, highlighting improved mortality in fibrotic patients with obstructive physiology and identifiable antigens.

Clinical Characteristics of Anti-Synthetase Syndrome and Variables Associated with Interstitial Lung Disease and Mortality: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Anti-synthetase syndrome (ASS) is a rare autoimmune disease. Since the knowledge of ASS remains limited, we conducted the retrospective study aiming to describe clinical characteristics and identify variables associated with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and mortality among patients with ASS. Patients diagnosed with ASS from January 2013 to October 2022 were included. Patient demographics, clinical manifestations, myositis auto-antibody profiles, HRCT findings, and laboratory tests were collected. Variables associated with mortality risk and ILD were evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards model and the logistic regression model, respectively. A total of 82 patients with ASS were included. Clinical manifestations included arthritis (57%), Raynaud's phenomenon (32%), mechanic's hands (29%), fever (26%), and myositis (17%). The myositis auto-antibody profiles included anti-PL-7 (29%), anti-Jo-1 (27%), anti-EJ (17%), anti-PL-12 (16%), and anti-OJ (11%). ILD was observed in 64 patients (78%). Among patients with ILD, 21 initially presented with ILD before developing other ASS clinical manifestations, 29 simultaneously presented with ILD and other symptoms, and 14 had isolated ILD throughout follow-up. Overall, 6 patients presented with rapid-progressive ILD. With a median follow-up time of 2.5 years, mortality was observed in 10 patients (12.2%). Factors associated with mortality included increased lymphocyte counts (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.61-0.91; p < 0.01), isolated ILD (adjusted HR, 9.59; 95% CI, 1.52-60.61; p = 0.02) and the presence of anti-Ro52 antibodies (adjusted HR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.02-0.93; p = 0.04). Factors associated with ILD included age (adjusted OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.18; p = 0.01), presence of anti-Ro52 antibodies (adjusted OR, 17.92; 95% CI, 2.13-138.68; p = 0.01), and presence of arthritis (adjusted OR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.01-0.75; p = 0.03). Our study demonstrated a favorable overall mortality rate among ASS patients.

Diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis in tuberculosis endemic area-a narrative review.

Background and Objective: Pulmonary sarcoidosis and tuberculosis (TB) are the most frequent tissue-confirmed granulomatous diseases. Due to its unknown etiology, pulmonary sarcoidosis is diagnosed by ruling out other granulomatous diseases and necessitating clinical, radiological, and pathological evidence. There are many factors that contribute to the diagnostic dilemma between these two diseases. Even though some aspects of both diseases, such as their pathological evidence and abnormal X-ray findings, are quite similar, the treatment options for each are entirely different. The standard treatment for sarcoidosis is immunosuppressive agents such as glucocorticoids, which can exacerbate TB. Consequently, the overlap between clinical and radiological features constitutes a significant challenge for many physicians in selecting the optimal treatment for each patient. Therefore, the exclusion of pulmonary TB is a mandatory step for the diagnosis of pulmonary sarcoidosis. This article reviews and summarizes basic science and clinical research on distinguishing these two disorders. Methods: A systematic search of the MEDLINE and PubMed databases focusing on studies published within the last 35 years was conducted. The last search date is February 4, 2023. The authors used the following combinations of terms: tuberculosis, sarcoidosis, diagnosis, bronchoscopy, biomarkers, and radiography. All studies were reviewed, and 69 references from 1990 to 2023 were found to be relevant. Key Content and Findings: Innovative laboratory tests are essential for distinguishing between pulmonary sarcoidosis and TB. The Xpert MTB/RIF assay diagnoses TB with 98% sensitivity and 89% specificity. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) and simultaneous amplification and testing method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis rRNA (SAT-TB) are also highly sensitive and specific for TB diagnosis. Several novel tests, such as the difference of immune complexes for the ESAT-6/SFP-10 antigen in vitro with dynamic light scattering (DLS), lung tissue-based molecular markers, and the blood transcriptome, are promising for differentiating TB from sarcoidosis. Conclusions: Recent advancements in laboratory investigations, non-invasive procedures, and invasive procedures play an important role in the diagnosis of sarcoidosis in TB-endemic areas. However, further study is needed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of all tests in terms of their competency in distinguishing between TB and sarcoidosis.