RESUMO
Background: Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are common fractures especially in the elderly, with most fractures being managed nonoperatively. Traditional biomedical factors such as radiological alignment have not been able to meaningfully predict comfort and capability after PHFs. Conversely, recent literature has increasingly recognized the role of psychological factors in determining comfort and capability after PHFs. Nonetheless, less is known about the impact of social factors. Additional study of these potentially modifiable social factors as targets for enhancing recovery from injury is merited. Among people recovering from a nonoperatively- treated proximal humerus fracture (PHF) we studied the social factors associated with patient-reported outcomes at 6 months and 1 year. Methods: One hundred seventy-one patients who received nonoperative management of a PHF completed baseline measures of sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, race, employment status, household income, educational level, presence of domestic workers, housing type, and smoking status). Six and 12 months after fracture, participants completed the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) and EuroQol-5-Dimensions (EQ5D) measures of comfort and capability. The relationship between capability and social factors was assessed using linear regression modelling, accounting for potential confounding from age, fracture severity assessed using Neer classification, premorbid comorbidities measured by Charlson Comorbidity Index, and premorbid functional status measured by Parker Mobility Index and Barthel Index. Results: Lower capability (higher QuickDASH scores) 6 months and 1 year after fracture were associated with being unemployed (coef: -5.02 [95% CI: -9.96 to -0.07]; P = .047) and having domestic workers at home (coef: 8.63 [95% CI: 1.39 to 15.86]; P = .020), but not with Neer classification. Both greater shoulder discomfort and magnitude of incapability (lower OSS scores) and worse general quality of life (lower EQ5D scores) were associated with having domestic workers (coef: -4.07 [95% CI: -6.62 to -1.53]; P = .002 and coef: -0.18 [95% CI: -0.29 to -0.07]; P = .001 respectively) or living in an assisted care facility (coef: -14.82 [95% CI: -22.24 to -7.39]; P < .001 and coef: -0.59 [95% CI: -0.90 to -0.29] P < .001). Conclusions: The finding that people recovering from PHF experience less incapability in proportion to their social independence (employment, absence of a caregiver such as domestic workers at home and living outside care facilities) emphasizes the important associations of social factors to musculoskeletal health, and the utility of accounting for social factors in the development and assessment of care strategies.
RESUMO
There have been increasing reports of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a rare but debilitating neurological disease, occurring post-COVID-19 vaccination. However, the outcomes and relationships between patient demographics and clinical outcomes of post-COVID-19 vaccination GBS remain unclear. To bridge this gap, our study investigates the outcomes and clinical factors associated with poorer GBS outcomes following COVID-19 vaccination. We conducted a review and pooled analysis of detailed data extracted from 57 published cases with the relevant search strategies and criteria. The groups compared included male versus female patients, 1st dose versus 2nd dose and early onset versus late onset of GBS. Multivariate regression analysis was performed to compare the vaccine type, clinical severity and post-treatment outcomes between these groups of patients. Our results highlight for the first time that females were significantly more likely to have severe clinical presentation and poorer outcomes compared to males. Additionally, viral vector vaccines were the predominant vaccine type administered in early-onset post-COVID-19-vaccination GBS and GBS occurring after the 1st vaccination dose. It was also shown that reported cases of post-vaccination GBS generally displayed a positive response to conventional treatment and had favourable post-treatment outcomes. Through this study, we have established important links and provided assuring evidence for treatment response and post-treatment outcomes of GBS occurring post-COVID-19 vaccination. While the COVID-19 vaccination brings about much greater benefits than risks, our findings provide further impetus for greater vigilance in certain patient groups and more studies to explore the mechanisms behind these links.