Mobile-Bearing has no Benefit Over Fixed-Bearing Total Knee Arthroplasty in Joint Awareness and Crepitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Given higher component conformity, rotational availability of polyethylene insert, and more physiologic patellofemoral tracking, mobile-bearing (MB) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is supposed to offer advantages in joint perception and crepitus. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether MB TKA offers superior outcomes over fixed-bearing (FB) TKA in terms of joint awareness and crepitus. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, controlled trial included 49 FB and 49 MB TKAs that shared the same posterior-stabilized femoral component. Primary outcomes included joint awareness assessed with the Forgotten Joint Score and crepitus graded according to severity and sound at 3 years postoperatively. Secondary outcomes were the range of motion, the Knee Society Score, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, component position, and joint line level on radiographs. RESULTS: The Forgotten Joint Score showed no significant difference between the FB (67 points; range, 0-100) and MB groups (63 points; range, 13-100) (P = .440). For crepitus, no significant differences were found in the overall incidence rate (FB group, 18%; MB group, 12%; P = .386) and grade (grade 1, 6 versus 5; grade 2, 2 versus 1; grade 3, 1 versus 0, respectively). There were no significant differences in range of motion, Knee Society Score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, as well as radiographic outcomes between the two groups (all, P > .05). CONCLUSION: MB TKA offers no benefits in terms of joint awareness and crepitus compared with FB TKA at mean 3 years postoperatively. The theoretical advantages of MB TKA have yet to be demonstrated in practice, leaving the selection of bearing type to the surgeon's judgment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

No Blood Loss Increase in Cementless vs. Cemented Fixation Following Bilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score Matching Study.

Background and Objectives: Recent advancements in three-dimensional printing technology have enhanced the biologic fixation of cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA), therefore increasing the utilization of newer-generation cementless implants. However, the lack of sealing and tamponade effect of cement on the resected bone surface after cementless TKA raises concerns regarding the potential for greater blood loss compared to cemented TKA. The aim of this study was to (1) compare blood loss and transfusion rates between cementless and cemented TKAs and (2) identify the risk factor for higher blood loss in patients who underwent 1-week-interval staggered bilateral (SB) TKA. Materials and Methods: This retrospective, propensity-matched study included 54 cementless and 53 cemented SB TKAs performed by a single surgeon from 2019 to 2023 with a single implant that has similar design features in both cementless and cemented implants. All patients underwent 1-week-interval SB TKA and received the same patient blood management (PBM) and rehabilitation protocol. The estimated total blood loss (TBL), transfusion rate, and total hemoglobin drop were assessed. Patients were categorized according to TBL into average TBL and higher TBL groups. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for higher blood loss. Results: There was no difference in TBL between cementless and cemented TKA groups (1233 ± 299 and 1282 ± 309 mL, respectively; p > 0.05). In addition, no between-group differences in the transfusion rate and mean total hemoglobin drop were observed. The logistic regression analyses revealed that whether TKA was cementless or cemented was not associated with higher blood loss; rather, the only identified risk factor was the pre-TKA patient blood volume (odd ratio 1.001, 95% confidence interval 1.000-1002, p = 0.026). Conclusions: Contemporary cementless fixation does not increase blood loss or transfusion rates compared to cemented fixation in patients undergoing 1-week-interval staggered bilateral TKA.

Risk factors and preventive strategy for excessive coronal inclination of tibial plateau following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy.

PURPOSE: To investigate risk factors and suggest preventive strategy for excessive coronal inclination of tibial plateau following medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). METHODS: A total of 133 consecutive patients who underwent MOWHTO were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on postoperative medial proximal tibial angle (post-MPTA) of 95°: control group (n = 111, 83.5%) with post-MPTA less than 95° and excessive MPTA group (n = 22, 16.5%) with post-MPTA 95° or more. Demographics, radiographic parameters [mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), MPTA, posterior tibial slope, joint line obliquity (JLO), hip-knee-ankle angle, joint line convergence angle (JLCA), weight bearing line ratio, and correction angle], and clinical outcomes of patients were compared. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to determine risk factors for post-MPTA 95° or more. RESULTS: Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative JLO ≥ 3° [odds ratio (OR) 6.940, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.373-20.296, p < 0.001] and preoperative JLCA ≥ 5° (OR 5.723, 95% CI 1.833-17.865, p = 0.008) were statistically significant risk factors for post-MPTA ≥ 95°. Incidences of excessive MPTA following MOWHTO in patients with none, one, and two risk factors preoperatively were 3.7%, 26.7%, and 77.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Preoperative JLO ≥ 3° and JLCA ≥ 5° were two significant risk factors for excessive MPTA following MOWHTO. Thus, surgeon should consider other types of osteotomy if these two risk factors are present together preoperatively in MOWHTO candidates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

How Does Preoperative Central Sensitization Affect Quality of Life Following Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND: Central sensitization (CS) has been recently identified as a significant risk factor for persistent pain and patient dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, it remains unclear as to whether the preoperative CS persists after the elimination of a nociceptive pain source by TKA, or how CS affects the quality of life after TKA. METHODS: A total of 222 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA were enrolled in the study. All patients were preoperatively screened for CS using the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) and categorized into either a CS (n = 55; CSI ≥ 40) or non-CS group (n = 167; CSI < 40). CSI, pain visual analog scale (VAS), Knee Society Score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and satisfaction were recorded at postoperative 2 years. RESULTS: Two years after TKA, preoperative CS remained unchanged; there was no difference between preoperative and postoperative CSI scores, and both preoperative and postoperative CSI severity levels were similar (P > .1). The CS group showed worse pain VAS, KSS, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores than did the non-CS group (P < .01) and more patients in the CS group were dissatisfied with all activities (P < .01). However, a similar percentage of the CS group achieved the previously documented minimal clinically important difference in pain VAS and KSS, compared with the non-CS group. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that preoperative CSI scores were associated with dissatisfaction at postoperative 2 years. CONCLUSION: Preoperative CS was persistent at 2 years after TKA. Although CS patients achieved comparable clinical improvement following TKA, CS patients had worse quality of life, functional disability, and dissatisfaction than non-CS patients.

What Factors Predict Patient Dissatisfaction After Contemporary Medial Opening-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy?

BACKGROUND: Although current advances in surgical techniques have improved outcomes of the medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO), the factors associated with patient dissatisfaction remain unclear. Thus, the purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for patient dissatisfaction following contemporary MOWHTO. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed prospectively collected data on 140 consecutive MOWHTO patients using an anatomical locking plate with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patient demographics, pain Visual Analogue Scale, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) grade, activity level, articular cartilage and meniscal status, hip-knee-ankle angle, change in alignment, and postoperative weight-bearing line ratio were recorded. Patients were categorized using the New Knee Society Score into satisfied (satisfaction score ≥20) or dissatisfied (satisfaction score <20) groups. Patient and surgical factors were compared between the groups by the identified predictors. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors, including K-L grade IV medial osteoarthritis (OA), preoperative pain Visual Analogue Scale, total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, postoperative hip-knee-ankle angle, change in alignment, and partial meniscectomy. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients, 24 (17.1%) were dissatisfied with their results. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that only K-L grade IV medial OA was statistically associated with patient dissatisfaction following MOWHTO (odds ratio 4.911, 95% confidence interval 1.820-13.256, P < .01). CONCLUSION: Severe medial OA was an independent risk factor for dissatisfaction following contemporary MOWHTO using a rigid locking plate. Surgeons should take this into consideration when counseling and choosing surgical options in MOWHTO candidates with severe medial OA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Femoral offset guide facilitates accurate and precise femoral tunnel placement for single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and precision of femoral tunnel placement by expert and novice surgeons using an offset guide for single-bundle ACL reconstruction via the anteromedial (AM) portal. METHODS: Twenty-five single-bundle ACL reconstructions performed by a novice surgeon were matched with 25 ACL reconstructions performed by an expert surgeon, based on one-to-one propensity score matching. The same technique was used by both groups for femoral tunnel placement using a 7-mm offset guide through the AM portal. Using the Bernard and Hertel grid method for postoperative three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography, the accuracy and precision of various tunnel positions were compared. RESULTS: No differences were found between the proximal-distal and anterior-posterior femoral tunnel placements by the two groups (proximal-distal; 30.5% involving experts, and 32.5% by novices, n.s) (anterior-posterior; 32.6% involving experts, and 31.6% by novice, n.s). The accuracy of the femoral tunnel positions, based on the average distance from the tunnel center to the center of ACL direct insertion, was similar between the two groups (n.s). No differences were found between the groups in terms of precision of femoral tunnel positions (n.s). CONCLUSION: Novice surgeons can achieve accuracy and precision comparable to experts in creating femoral tunnels via single-bundle ACL reconstruction through the AM portal using a femoral offset guide. We recommend the use of a femoral offset guide for ACL reconstruction during the learning phase of a novice surgeon for effective tunnel placement to reduce the learning curve required to perform accurate and reproducible ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Case-control study, Level III.

Patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty using a contemporary patella-friendly implant are unaware of any differences due to patellar resurfacing.

PURPOSE: Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often unexplained, spurring ongoing debates on the need for patellar resurfacing. It was hypothesized that a contemporary patella-friendly implant would restore patellofemoral kinematics more physiologically than outdated implants and that there would be no perceived or clinically demonstrable differences due to resurfacing of patella (RP). METHODS: This prospective bilateral randomized study was undertaken in 49 patients scheduled for the same-day bilateral TKAs. One knee was subjected at random to RP while withholding RP on the opposing side (non-RP). A recently approved single-radius femoral prosthesis featuring a deep, elongate trochlear groove with lateral tilt and a high lateral flange was implanted bilaterally in all patients. Mean follow-up duration was 5 years. Group comparisons were based on patient-reported outcomes [anterior knee pain, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), and side preference], physician-rated results [Feller patellofemoral (PF) score], radiographic patellar position, patella-related complications, and need for reoperation. RESULTS: There were no differences in midterm rates of anterior knee pain (RP 8%; non-RP 4%; n.s.), FJS (all n.s.), or side preference (RP 47%; non-RP 45%; n.s.), nor did the groups differ by Feller PF score (all n.s.) or radiographic patellar position (all n.s.). No secondary resurfacings of non-RP or RP revisions were required. CONCLUSIONS: Patients were incapable of distinguishing whether RP was done, casting doubt on its benefits. Surgeons may thus forego RP during TKA when using contemporary patella-friendly TKA implants. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic study, Level I.

Comparison of Anterior-Stabilized and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty in the Same Patients: A Prospective Randomized Study.

BACKGROUND: A highly conforming, anterior-stabilized (AS) insert is designed to provide anteroposterior (AP) stability of the posterior-stabilized (PS) insert without a post. The purpose of this study was to compare the static and dynamic stability and function of AS and PS total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the same patients. METHODS: A prospective, randomized controlled trial was performed in 45 patients scheduled to undergo same-day bilateral TKA. One knee was randomly assigned to receive an AS TKA, and the other knee was scheduled for a PS TKA from the same knee system. At 2 years postoperatively, the static AP stability was compared using anterior and posterior drawer stress radiographs at 90° knee flexion. Dynamic AP stability was evaluated using one-leg standing lateral fluoroscopic images throughout the range of motion. Knee function was compared using the Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score. RESULTS: At 2 years postoperatively, there was a significant difference in knee AP laxity at 90° of flexion between the two groups (7.6 ± 3.9 mm in the AS group vs 2.2 ± 2.3 in the PS group, P < .001). However, there were no differences in dynamic AP stability under one-leg standing fluoroscopic lateral images at 30°, 60°, and 90° knee flexion (P = .732, P = .764, and P = .679, respectively). The Knee Society Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were not significantly different between the two groups (P = .641 and P = .582, respectively). CONCLUSION: Despite the fact that the AS TKA group showed significantly more static posterior displacement than the PS TKA group at 90° of knee flexion, both the AS and PS TKA groups showed similar dynamic stability under weight-bearing conditions and knee function at 2 years postoperatively.

Central Sensitization Is a Risk Factor for Persistent Postoperative Pain and Dissatisfaction in Patients Undergoing Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to investigate whether central sensitization (CS) was associated with patient dissatisfaction after revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Between 2012 and 2016, 68 cases (68 patients) of revision TKA performed by a single surgeon were included in this study with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Patients were categorized into 2 groups by 40-point preoperative Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI) scores. The control group consisted of 48 patients (48 knees) with CSI scores of less than 40 points, while the CS group consisted of 20 patients (20 knees) with CSI scores of 40 points or more. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using an 11-point visual analog scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores. Patient satisfaction was evaluated using the satisfaction items of the new Knee Society Scores, where scores ≥20 indicated satisfaction. RESULTS: Higher preoperative pain VAS scores in the CS group were maintained 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively (all P < .05). The CS group showed significantly worse pain, function subscores, and total scores of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. Forty-four (91.7%) patients in the control group and 3 (15.0%) patients in the CS group were satisfied with their revision TKAs (P < .001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the odds of dissatisfaction after revision TKAs were increased 39.081 times (95% confidence interval 6.926-220.504, P < .001) in patients with CSI scores ≥40. Higher VAS intensity 2 years postoperatively also predicted dissatisfaction following revision TKA (odds ratio 1.864, 95% confidence interval 1.086-3.199, P = .024). CONCLUSION: CS is a risk factor for persistent postoperative pain and dissatisfaction in patients undergoing revision TKAs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty is superior to high tibial osteotomy in post-operative recovery and participation in recreational and sports activities.

PURPOSE: To compare (1) the recovery pattern of post-operative physical activity and function in the early post-operative period and (2) the difference of participation in recreational and sports activities pre- and post-operatively following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and high tibial osteotomy (HTO). METHODS: In this prospective comparative study, 49 HTOs (49 patients) and 42 UKAs (42 patients) performed to treat medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis (OA) were included. The pain visual analog scale (VAS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score (WOMAC), Tegner activity score, Lysholm knee score, and the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were evaluated pre-operatively and post-operatively at three, six, 12, and 24 months. Participation in recreational and sports activities was also assessed pre-operatively and 24 months post-operatively. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, although there were no differences in VAS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores between the two groups, the UKA group had inferior Tegner and UCLA scores (p < 0.05). At post-operative three and six months, the UKA group showed superior VAS, WOMAC, and Lysholm scores (p < 0.05 for all). However, at 12 and 24 months post-operatively, both groups had similar outcome scores (p > 0.05 for all). When all the baseline scores were adjusted for the mean changes, the UKA group showed a significantly better UCLA score than the HTO group until 12 months after the operation (p = 0.008). The rate of return to sports activity was 94.1% in the UKA group and 75.0% in the HTO group at 24 months post-operatively (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that UKA had better short-term functional outcomes and return to recreational and sports activities than did HTO in patients with medial OA.

Does non-contact or delayed contact of an adjustable-loop femoral button affect knee stability following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction?

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate whether cortical non-contact or delayed contact of an adjustable-loop button for femoral fixation could affect knee stability following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. METHODS: Eighty subjects who underwent single-bundle ACL reconstruction using an adjustable-loop femoral cortical button were retrospectively reviewed regarding patient demographics, graft size, combined surgery, and postoperative 2-year results of knee stability, functional scores, and radiographic tunnel widening. We compared the contact and the non-contact groups determined by position of the button observed in immediate postoperative radiographs. According to 2-year postoperative radiographs, the non-contact group was further divided into two subgroups (delayed contact and persisting non-contact subgroups) and results were compared. RESULTS: The contact group had 46 patients and the non-contact group had 34 patients. The average gap distance in the non-contact group was 1.9 ± 0.6 (1.1-3.4) mm. There were no significant differences in KT-1000 arthrometric knee stability (p = .667) or Lysholm score (p = .198), or International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (p = .091) between the two groups. No significant differences in tunnel widening were found at femoral and tibial tunnels on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs (p > .1, all tunnels). In addition, delayed contact subgroup and persisting non-contact subgroup showed similar radiographic and clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Surgeons should strive to obtain cortical contact of the adjustable-loop femoral button. Nevertheless, cortical non-contact with less than 3 mm of gap distance did not affect knee stability, radiographic outcomes, or clinical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Bone Bruises and Concomitant Meniscus and Cartilage Damage in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

(1) Background: Bone bruises in acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are closely linked to the occurrence of simultaneous meniscal and cartilage damage. Despite the frequent occurrence of associated injuries including bone bruises, meniscus, and cartilage damage in patients with ACL injuries, a systematic review of the relationships between the presence of bone bruises and the extent of meniscus and cartilage injuries has yet to be conducted. (2) Methods: Multiple comprehensive databases, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library, were searched for studies that evaluated the relationship between bone bruises and meniscus or cartilage injuries following ACL injuries. Study selection, data extraction, and meta-analysis were performed. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) was used for quality assessments, and Review Manager 5.3 was used for data analysis. (3) Results: Data were extracted from 22 studies encompassing a total of 2891 patients with ACL injuries. Among the included studies, six studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and medial meniscus (MM) or lateral meniscus (LM) injuries, while three studies investigated the relationships between bone bruises and cartilage injuries. There were no significant correlations between the presence of bone bruises and MM injuries (relative risk (RR) = 1.32; p = 0.61). A quantitative analysis indicated that individuals with bone bruises had a 2.71-fold higher likelihood of sustaining LM injuries than those without bone bruises (RR = 2.71; p = 0.0003). The analysis confirmed a significant relationship between bone bruises and cartilage injuries (RR = 6.18; p = 0.003). (4) Conclusions: Bone bruises occur most frequently in the lateral compartment. Bone bruises resulting from ACL injuries are related to accompanying LM injuries and cartilage injuries. Knowing these associations and the frequency of injuries may allow orthopedic surgeons to promptly address ACL-related meniscus and cartilage injuries on MRI results and in future clinical practice.

A Systematic Review of Bone Bruise Patterns following Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears: Insights into the Mechanism of Injury.

(1) Background: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the prevalence of bone bruises in patients with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and the location of the bruises relative to the tibia and femur. Understanding the relative positions of these bone bruises could enhance our comprehension of the knee loading patterns that occur during an ACL injury. (2) Methods: The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies that evaluated the presence of bone bruises following ACL injuries. Study selection, data extraction, and a systematic review were performed. (3) Results: Bone bruises were observed in 3207 cases (82.8%) at the lateral tibia plateau (LTP), 1608 cases (41.5%) at the medial tibia plateau (MTP), 2765 cases (71.4%) at the lateral femoral condyle (LFC), and 1257 cases (32.4%) at the medial femoral condyle (MFC). Of the 30 studies, 11 were able to assess the anterior to posterior direction. The posterior LTP and center LFC were the most common areas of bone bruises. Among the 30 studies, 14 documented bone bruises across all four sites (LTP, MTP, LFC, and MFC). The most common pattern was bone bruises appearing at the LTP and LFC. (4) Conclusions: The most frequently observed pattern of bone bruises was restricted to the lateral aspects of both the tibia and femur. In cases where bone bruises were present on both the lateral and medial sides, those on the lateral side exhibited greater severity. The positioning of bone bruises along the front-back axis indicated a forward shift of the tibia in relation to the femur during ACL injuries.

Atelocollagen Scaffold Enhances Cartilage Regeneration in Osteochondral Defects: A Study in Rabbits.

BACKGROUND: To enhance articular cartilage healing, microfractures (Mfx) and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) are commonly used, and some form of scaffold is often used together to increase its efficacy. Herein, we compared the efficacy of atelocollagen scaffold to that of collagen scaffold when used with Mfx or BMAC on osteochondral defect of animal. METHODS: This experiment was designed in two stages, and therapeutic effects of Mfx and BMAC were respectively evaluated when used with atelocollagen or collagen scaffold. Femoral condyle defects were artificially created in male New Zealand White rabbits, and in each stage, 12 rabbits were randomly allocated into three treatment groups: test group with additional atelocollagen scaffold, the positive control group with collagen scaffold, and the negative control group. Then, for 12 weeks, macroscopic and histological evaluations were performed. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, defects in the test group were fully regenerated with normal cartilage-like tissue, and were well integrated with the surrounding cartilage at both stages experiment, whereas defects in the control groups were not fully filled with regenerated tissue, and the tissue appeared as fibrous tissue. Histologically, the regenerated tissue in the test group showed a statistically significant improvement compared to the positive and negative control groups, achieving a similar structure as normal articular cartilage. CONCLUSION: The results showed that implantation of the atelocollagen scaffold enhanced cartilage regeneration following osteochondral defects in rabbits. This suggests that the atelocollagen scaffold can be used with Mfx or BMAC for effective regeneration of osteochondral defects.

Is the patient aware of the difference between resurfaced and nonresurfaced patella after bilateral total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review of simultaneous bilateral randomized trials.

PURPOSE: The optimal practice of patellar management in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains controversial. This systematic review was conducted to compare patella-related (1) patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), (2) clinical outcomes, and (3) reoperation rates after TKA with patellar resurfacing (PR) and nonresurfacing (NPR) in single patients undergoing bilateral patellar procedures during simultaneous bilateral TKA. METHODS: This review included prospective bilateral randomized trials investigating patella-related PROMs, clinical outcomes, and reoperation (secondary resurfacing and patellar component revision) and other patella-related complications in single patients undergoing randomly assigned PR and NPR during bilateral TKA. RESULTS: Six studies were included. There was no difference in PROMs between PR and NPR in five studies, whereas PR was found to be superior to NPR in one study. Five studies reported similar functional outcomes and complication rates between PR and NPR, while one study found better clinical outcomes and a lower complication rate in PR. Between-group secondary resurfacing and patellar revision rates were similar in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients who underwent bilateral patellar procedures could not tell the difference between PR and NPR following bilateral TKA. There were no differences in clinical outcomes or reoperation and complication rates between PR and NPR. No evidence was found to support routine PR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level 1.

Confirmation of Femoral Button Deployment Under Direct Visualization During ACL Reconstruction Is Not Beneficial.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether direct visualization of adjustable-loop cortical suspensory button deployment onto the lateral femur increases the cortical contact rate of the button, thereby improving clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Sixty-five single-bundle anteromedial portal ACL reconstructions using an adjustable-loop button were retrospectively divided into 2 groups according to use of the blind pulling technique (control group; 32 patients) or the direct visualization technique (visualization group; 33 patients) when confirming deployment of the button. Cortical contact rate of the button on immediate and 2-year postoperative radiographs, knee stability measured using a KT-1000 arthrometer, and functional scores (Lysholm score and International Knee Documentation Committee score) at 2 years postoperative were compared between the groups. There was no significant difference in femoral cortical contact rate between the groups immediately (56% control group vs 55% visualization group; P=1.000) and at 2 years postoperative (78% control group vs 82% visualization group; P=.764). At 2 years postoperative, there was no difference between the groups regarding knee stability (1.3±0.9 mm vs 1.5±0.8 mm, respectively; P=.404), Lysholm score (P=.436), and International Knee Documentation Committee score (P=.507). Confirmation of adjustable-loop button deployment under direct visualization during anteromedial portal ACL reconstruction neither increased cortical contact rate nor improved clinical outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(5);270-276.].

Modified hybrid cementing technique reduces stem tip pain and improves patient's satisfaction after revision total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: There have been no studies comparing patient-reported outcome measures including end-of-stem tip pain and patient satisfaction based on the use of cementing techniques in revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare end-of-stem tip pain and PROMs with hybrid and modified hybrid cementing techniques in revision TKAs. METHOD: Sixty-two cases of revision TKA performed by a single surgeon were divided into two groups based on the cementing technique with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Two types of cementing technique for femoral and tibial stems were used as follows: (1) a hybrid cementing technique (33 cases), in which cement was applied immediately distal to the modular junction of the stem and the component while the distal stem was press-fitted into the diaphysis without using cement; and (2) a modified hybrid cementing technique (29 cases), in which cement was applied to the tip of femoral and tibial stems. The thigh and shin were assessed for the end-of-stem tip pain. Patient satisfaction was evaluated based on the satisfaction items of New Knee Society Score. RESULTS: Modified hybrid cementing significantly lowered the percentage of patients manifesting shin pain (3.4% vs. 24.2%, p = 0.029). Patients treated with the modified hybrid cementing technique showed a higher satisfaction rate (p = 0.003). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed an increase in the odds of satisfaction 32.686-fold (p = 0.004) in patients without pain at the end-of-stem tip in the shin and 9.261-fold (p = 0.027) in patients treated with the modified hybrid cementing technique. CONCLUSION: The modified hybrid cementing technique for fixation of long-stem in revision TKAs reduced the end-of-stem tip pain in the shin, leading to significantly higher satisfaction compared with the hybrid cementing technique after revision TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Degree of Preoperative Subchondral Bone Marrow Lesion Is Associated With Postoperative Outcome After Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: In osteoarthritis of the knee, subchondral bone marrow lesion (BML) is known to be significantly associated with the severity of pain. However, little is known about the influence of preoperative BML on postoperative outcomes after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO). PURPOSE: To compare patient-reported outcomes for those who underwent MOWHTO according to the severity of BML based on magnetic resonance imaging. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 136 patients who underwent MOWHTO between June 2011 and May 2016 with clinical and radiologic assessments before and after surgery were retrospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the presence or absence of BMLs. They were then subdivided into 4 or 3 groups based on the sum of BML scores of the medial femoral condyle and tibial plateau according to MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) Osteoarthritis Knee Score or Filardo classification, respectively. Associations between the severity of BML and postoperative 1- and 2-year Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) subscores were evaluated through linear regression analysis. At postoperative 2 years, the rate of patients having a WOMAC score improvement of 15 points based on minimum clinically important difference and patient satisfaction were compared between groups. RESULTS: BMLs were present in 96 (70.6%) of 136 cases. There were no significant differences in demographics or radiographic variables between groups according to the presence/absence or severity of BMLs (all P > .05). There was a significant association between preoperative or 1-year postoperative WOMAC pain/function score and the extent or intensity of BMLs (all P < .05). After adjusting for age, body mass index, osteoarthritis grade, and hip-knee-ankle angle, the significance persisted in the association between the extent or intensity of BMLs and WOMAC pain/function score at 1 year after surgery (all P < .05). However, a significant association was not found at postoperative 2 years (all P > .05). All groups showed similar rates of WOMAC score showing 15 points of improvement and satisfaction after MOWHTO (all P > .05). At 2 years after surgery, 82.5% of patients with BMLs were satisfied with their operation, as compared with 84.4% of those without BMLs (P = .801). CONCLUSION: Although worse clinical outcomes were associated with severe BML during the recovery period, MOWHTO provided a high degree of clinical improvement on patient-reported outcomes regardless of the severity of BML at 2 years postoperatively.

Predictive factors for satisfaction after contemporary unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and high tibial osteotomy in isolated medial femorotibial osteoarthritis.

INTRODUCTION: Both high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are viable treatment options for early osteoarthritis (OA). Although a substantial proportion of the patient selection criteria for HTO and UKA are now shared, the factors related to satisfaction following each procedure remain unclear. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesized that patient factors associated with satisfaction following contemporary HTO and UKA would be different. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of consecutively enrolled medial opening-wedge HTOs (n=123) and Oxford mobile-bearing UKAs (n=118) with satisfactory postoperative alignment. Preoperative demographics, physical activity levels, varus deformity status, and degree of OA were recorded. Postoperative radiographs, frequency of combined procedures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) including pain, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score, and patient satisfaction were assessed. RESULTS: Severe OA (p<0.01) was associated with an increased risk of dissatisfaction following HTO, whereas young age (p<0.01) and severe varus deformity (p=0.045) were related to dissatisfaction after UKA. In addition, patient satisfaction following UKA was higher than that following HTO in individuals with highly physically demanding activity. All UKA PROs were superior to those of the HTO group, except pain level. CONCLUSION: Despite the shared patient selection criteria for contemporary HTO and UKA, severe OA was associated with dissatisfaction following HTO, whereas young age and varus deformity were associated with dissatisfaction following UKA. Age, varus deformity and OA severity should be considered when deciding whether to perform HTO or UKA. TYPE OF STUDY AND LEVEL OF PROOF: Retrospective cohort study, Level III.

Duloxetine Reduces Pain and Improves Quality of Recovery Following Total Knee Arthroplasty in Centrally Sensitized Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Study.

BACKGROUND: Unexplained postoperative pain is one of the most feared complications of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A persistent noxious peripheral stimulus, such as the pain of chronic knee osteoarthritis, can cause central sensitization in which the central nervous system becomes hyperexcitable, resulting in hypersensitivity to both noxious and non-noxious stimuli. Patients with central sensitization may be more susceptible to unexplained pain after TKA. Duloxetine, a selective serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), can ameliorate the pain associated with central sensitization, and we aimed to determine whether it could reduce postoperative pain and improve quality of recovery after TKA in patients with central sensitization. METHODS: Patients undergoing TKA were screened for central sensitization preoperatively with use of the Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI). Among 464 patients with primary osteoarthritis who were scheduled for primary unilateral TKA, 80 were identified as being centrally sensitized and were included in the study. Forty patients were randomly assigned to the duloxetine group (30 mg 1 day before surgery and for 6 weeks after surgery), and 40 were randomized to the control group (no duloxetine). Pain and quality of recovery were assessed with use of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Measure of Intermittent and Constant Osteoarthritis Pain (ICOAP), and the Hamilton Depression Scale. The prevalence of adverse medication effects was also noted. RESULTS: The patients in the duloxetine group had better performance across pain metrics during the initial 2 to 12-week postoperative period (p < 0.05). The duloxetine group also had a superior quality of recovery 2 weeks after TKA, as indicated by emotional and physical functioning (all p < 0.05). There was no difference between groups in the prevalence of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial number of patients are centrally sensitized before TKA. Surgeons should consider selective incorporation of duloxetine into the multimodal postoperative analgesic protocol, according to the severity of central sensitization, to minimize the possibility of persistent pain following TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.