Pain in primary Sjögren's syndrome: the role of catastrophizing and negative illness perceptions.

OBJECTIVES: Pain is a major factor in health quality in Sjögren's syndrome (SS), but little is known about the factors that contribute to pain severity. Because pain perception has been linked to catastrophizing in other diseases, we assessed subjects with primary SS (pSS) to explore a possible link between pain, illness appraisal, and catastrophizing. METHOD: A total of 92 subjects who met American-European consensus criteria for the diagnosis of pSS completed a questionnaire that included health history, medication use, illness perceptions, pain severity, mood, fatigue, pain anxiety, and pain catastrophizing. Linear regression was used to test the effect of each variable on pain severity. Multivariate models were constructed using backwards elimination to assess the significant predictors of pain severity. RESULTS: From linear regression analysis, catastrophizing was more strongly predictive of pain severity than age, fatigue, depression, or anxiety in both seropositive and seronegative pSS patients. In the multivariate model identified using backwards selection, four variables (pain catastrophizing, fibromyalgia status, serological status, and the conviction that illness would have severe consequences) predicted 55% of the variance in pain severity. CONCLUSIONS: Pain catastrophizing was a significant predictor of pain severity in both seropositive and seronegative pSS patients. This study suggests that behavioural interventions designed to reduce pain catastrophizing and negative appraisal of illness could be of benefit in pSS patients. Research is needed to test the effect of psycho-educational therapies on key patient-reported outcomes, particularly pain, depression, and fatigue, in pSS.

Epoetin use and Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative hemoglobin targets in patients returning to dialysis with failed renal transplants.

Patients with failed renal transplants represent an increasing proportion of the current dialysis population. Although their risk of anemia might be expected to be high, whether these patients receive adequate anemia therapy after returning to dialysis is unknown. We studied intravenous iron use, epoetin doses, and hemoglobin levels in patients with and without failed renal transplants who survived for 6 months after initiation of dialysis in the United States between 1996 and 2001. Of the study population (n=220 557), 9922 (4.5%) had failed renal transplants. In spite of a greater likelihood of receiving intravenous iron therapy (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.47, P<0.0001) and epoetin (AOR 1.57, P<0.0001), patients with failed transplants were more anemic and had higher epoetin doses in each month of follow-up. During month 6, patients with failed transplants were more likely to have hemoglobin levels below 11 g/dl (AOR 1.50, P<0.0001) and to have epoetin-to-hemoglobin ratios above the population median of 1030 U/week per g/dl (AOR 1.73, P<0.0001). Patients who return to dialysis with failed transplants are at a higher risk of anemia than other patients who start dialysis; the pattern of lower hemoglobin levels and higher ratios of epoetin-to-hemoglobin suggests that relative epoetin resistance may be contributory.