Design and Retrospective Application of a Spine Trauma DVT Prophylaxis Protocol on Level 1 Trauma Center Patient Database.

STUDY DESIGN: Systematic literature review. OBJECTIVES: The impact of thromboembolic disease on the morbidity and mortality of patients with acute spinal cord injury is well documented, with rates as high as 67%-100% among untreated patients. The efficacy of mechanical prophylaxis as a stand-alone measure has been questioned, so we sought to determine a safe perioperative window for chemical anticoagulation use after spine surgery. Many surgeons have concerns anticoagulants may cause post-operative hematoma. METHODS: A systematic literature review was performed, ultimately yielding 13 articles. Based on the existing literature and input from our multidisciplinary institutional trauma committee, a Spine Trauma DVT Prophylaxis Protocol was developed. RESULTS: Effort was placed to identify cases within our institution in which patients suffered vertebral column fractures and/or spinal cord injuries. Of these 466 vertebral column fractures and/or spinal cord injuries, 4 patients were identified and diagnosed with DVTs while admitted. CONCLUSIONS: Of these patients, there is a clear dilemma with regard to safety of chemoprophylaxis use versus risk of developing a DVT. Though none of the patients developed a PE, utilizing the protocol would have led to earlier IVC filter placement or initiation of a VTE surveillance protocol in 2 of the patients. Initiation of enoxaparin before surgery in one patient (despite delay of surgical timing) may have avoided his subsequent LUE DVT. Though not appropriate for all clinical scenarios, we are confident that our treatment algorithm will prove beneficial for patient care in avoiding DVTs and helping trauma surgeons with evidence-based clinical decision making.

Return to Play Following Isolated and Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: 25+ Years of Experience Treating National Football League Athletes.

BACKGROUND: The first case series to report on return to play (RTP) in National Football League (NFL) players after primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) published an RTP rate of 63%. Other studies that have attempted to estimate RTP after ACLR in these elite athletes have been largely based on secondary sources. This study is the second to report the authors' own results in treating ACL injuries in NFL players spanning a study period of 25+ years. PURPOSE: To report the senior authors' experience treating ACL injuries in NFL players as well as revisit the concept of RTP as it is currently used to measure successful surgical outcomes in professional athletes. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: A total of 47 NFL players were treated at our institution for knee injuries that included a complete tear of the ACL; of these, 41 were primary ACLR and 6 were revision ACLR. Of the primary ACLRs, 6 were classified as ACL plus additional ligament and 3 were classified as multiligament. Return to game play (RTGP) was defined as returning to play in a regular-season game. Successful return to previous participation (RTPP) was defined as return to a level of participation equal to the level the player had reached before injury. Multivariate analysis was used to assess predictors of successful RTPP. RESULTS: Using the RTGP criteria proposed by prior authors, the RTGP after primary ACLR was 73%. Using our proposed RTPP criteria, 87.8% of players successfully returned to the same level of participation after primary ACLR. RTGP percentage for all NFL players after ACLR (including multiligament injuries) was 67.6%, and the overall RTPP for those patients was 87.8%. In multivariate analysis, age ≤25 years was predictive of successful RTPP. High draft picks and offensive players played more seasons after primary ACLR. ACL graft rupture occurred in 4.3% of this cohort. Contralateral ACL tear occurred in 8.5%. CONCLUSION: Regardless of which definition is used to measure a successful outcome after ACLR surgery, the findings of this study suggest that successful return after primary ACLR in NFL athletes is higher than previously reported. While concomitant reconstruction of a single collateral ligament did not affect RTPP, revision ACLR or bicruciate plus collateral ligament reconstruction was associated with a lower RTPP rate. Age ≤25 years predicted successful RTPP. The risk of a future ACL tear of either knee after index reconstruction was approximately 13%.

Psychological morbidity and functional impairment following traumatic pelvic injury.

Pelvic injuries often result from high-energy trauma and lead to significant functional impairment. While the physical outcomes of these injuries have been widely studied, the psychological consequences remain largely unexplored. The purpose of this study was to examine psychosocial and functional outcomes of patients with pelvic trauma in the year after injury. The sample (N = 32) consisted of adult patients with traumatic pelvic injures, as defined by ICD-9 codes, who were admitted to a Level I Trauma Center for at least 24 h. Participants were primarily female (53%) with a mean age of 48.7 years (SD = 17.9). Demographic, injury-related, and psychosocial data (e.g., posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, alcohol use, quality of life, pain, return to work) were gathered at the time of hospitalization as well as at 3-, 6-, and 12 month follow-ups. Mixed regression models were used to examine the outcome variables over time. There were significant decreases in pain and alcohol use at each follow-up compared to baseline. However, despite the decrease, the levels of pain and alcohol use remained high. Physical and mental health also decreased significantly, indicating worsened functioning and lowered quality of life. Neither PTSD nor depression changed significantly over time, indicating that participants' symptoms were not likely to improve. These data suggest that sustaining a traumatic pelvic injury increases the risk of diminished quality of life, both mentally and physically. Even one-year post-injury, participants experienced moderate physical pain and higher levels of PTSD, depression, and problematic alcohol use than would be expected in the general population. These findings highlight the need for an interdisciplinary approach to treating patients with pelvic injuries, including psychological screening and intervention in acute care and throughout recovery.

Prospective Evaluation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Depression in Orthopaedic Injury Patients With and Without Concomitant Traumatic Brain Injury.

OBJECTIVES: Psychological morbidities after injury [eg, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and depression] are increasingly recognized as a significant determinant of overall outcome. Traumatic brain injury (TBI) negatively impacts outcomes of patients with orthopaedic injury, but the association of concurrent TBI, orthopaedic injury, and symptoms of PTSD and depression has not been examined. This study's objective was to examine symptoms of PTSD and depression in patients with orthopaedic trauma with and without TBI. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective cohort study. SETTING: Urban Level I Trauma Center in the Southwest United States. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Orthopaedic trauma patients older than 18 years admitted for ≥24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Questionnaires examining demographics, injury-related variables, PTSD, and depression were administered during hospitalization and 3, 6, and 12 months later. Orthopaedic injury and TBI were determined based on ICD-9 codes. Generalized linear models determined whether PTSD and depression at follow-up were associated with TBI. RESULTS: Of the total sample (N = 214), 44 (21%) sustained a TBI. Those with TBI had higher rates of PTSD symptoms, 12 months postinjury (P = 0.04). The TBI group also had higher rates of depressive symptoms, 6 months postinjury (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: Having a TBI in addition to orthopaedic injury was associated with significantly higher rates of PTSD at 12 months and depression at 6 months postinjury. This suggests that sustaining a TBI in addition to orthopaedic injury places patients at a higher risk for negative psychological outcomes. The findings of this study may help clinicians to identify patients who are in need for psychological screening and could potentially benefit from intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Prospective Evaluation of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder in Injured Patients With and Without Orthopaedic Injury.

OBJECTIVES: The study purposes were to prospectively evaluate occurrence of posttraumatic stress (PTS) symptoms at hospital admission and 6 months later in patients with orthopaedic injury; to explore differences in PTS symptoms in those with and without orthopaedic injury; and to determine whether PTS symptoms are influenced by orthopaedic injury type. DESIGN: Prospective, longitudinal observational study. SETTING: Level 1 Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-nine participants admitted for at least 24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The Primary Care Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Screen (PC-PTSD) measured PTSD symptoms during hospitalization. The PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-C) measured PTS symptoms at 6 months. RESULTS: In orthopaedic patients, 28% had PTS at 6 months, compared with 34% of nonorthopaedic patients. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated to determine the influence of pain, physical and mental function, depression, and work status. At 6 months, if the pain score was 5 or higher, the odds of PTS symptoms increased to 8.38 (3.55, 19.8) (P < 0.0001). Those scoring below average in physical function were significantly more likely to have PTS symptoms [OR = 7.60 (2.99, 19.32), P < 0.0001]. The same held true for mental functioning and PTS [OR = 11.4 (4.16, 30.9), P < 0.0001]. Participants who screened positive for depression had a 38.9 (14.5, 104) greater odds (P < 0.0001). Participants who did not return to work after injury at 6 months were significantly more likely to have PTS [OR = 16.5 (1.87, 146), P = 0.012]. CONCLUSIONS: PTSD is common in patients after injury, including those with orthopaedic trauma. At 6 months, pain of 5 or greater, poor physical and mental function, depression, and/or not returning to work seem to be predictive of PTSD. Orthopaedic surgeons should identify and refer for PTSD treatment given the high incidence postinjury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.