Efficacy and safety of fibrinogen concentrate for perioperative prophylaxis of bleeding in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency: FORMA-02 and FORMA-04 clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Congenital fibrinogen deficiency (CFD) is a rare coagulation disorder placing patients at increased bleeding risk. Human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) represents current standard of care for fibrinogen replacement in CFD, however, limited data are available on HFC for prophylactic administration before/during surgery. Here, we report results and dosing considerations for HFC treatment in perioperative bleeding management in adult, adolescent, and pediatric patients with CFD. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: FORMA-02/FORMA-04 were multinational, prospective, open-label, uncontrolled Phase 3 HFC efficacy/safety studies for surgical bleeding prophylaxis in adult/adolescent (≥12 years) and pediatric patients (<12 years) respectively. HFC dosing was calculated to achieve pre-established target fibrinogen plasma levels. Overall hemostatic efficacy was assessed as success/failure by an Independent Data Monitoring and Endpoint Adjudication Committee (IDMEAC) according to objective criteria. RESULTS: Twelve patients (≥12 years, N = 9; <12 years, N = 3) received HFC for surgical prophylaxis (15 surgeries; 13 minor, 2 major). Eleven minor surgeries in patients aged ≥12 years required a median of 1 infusion (range; 1-5), with a mean (±SD) dose of 93.50 mg/kg [±41.43] and two minor surgeries in patients <12 years required 1 infusion (91.55 mg/kg [±23.40]). The major surgery in an adult patient required eight infusions (225.3 mg/kg total dose). The major surgery in a pediatric patient required six infusions (450.4 mg/kg). All surgeries were rated successful by the IDMEAC. DISCUSSION: In adults/adolescents and pediatric patients with fibrinogen deficiency, HFC treatment for hemostatic management during/after minor and major surgery was successful, with efficacy comparable across the different age groups.

Analysis of fibrinogen concentrate pharmacokinetics and dosing for bleeds and surgery in adults, adolescents, and children with congenital afibrinogenaemia and hypofibrinogenaemia.

INTRODUCTION: Congenital afibrinogenaemia and hypofibrinogenaemia are rare coagulation disorders where clotting is impaired due to a lack of fibrinogen. Consequent bleeding episodes (BEs) are treated using human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC). AIM: This post-hoc analysis compared HFC pharmacokinetics (PK) and dosing between patient age groups and defined the in vivo recovery (IVR) for children with a- and hypofibrinogenaemia. METHODS: The analysis used data from the FORMA-01 (Phase 2), FORMA-02 and FORMA-04 (Phase 3) multinational, prospective, open-label studies in patients with a- and hypofibrinogenaemia. HFC PK in adults/adolescents (≥12 years; FORMA-01) and children (<12 years; FORMA-04) was examined. Haemostatic efficacy in BE treatment and perioperative prophylaxis was examined in FORMA-02 and FORMA-04 using an objective 4-point scale, with success defined as excellent/good. RESULTS: Median (range) age was 23 years for FORMA-01 (12-53; n = 22), 26.5 years for FORMA-02 (12-54; n = 25), and 6 years for FORMA-04 (1-10; n = 13). Mean PK parameters were lower for children (AUC, Cmax , IVR; p = .02), while clearance was higher. Median (range) total dose of HFC for all BEs was 59.41 mg/kg (32.12-273.80) in adults/adolescents and was 24% higher (ns) in children at 73.91 mg/kg (47.45-262.50). Treatment was successful in 98.9% of the 89 BEs in adults/adolescents and in 100% of the 10 BEs in children, with comparable results for perioperative prophylaxis. CONCLUSION: As expected, HFC PK differed between adults/adolescents and children. However, with the higher doses given to children, HFC showed similar efficacy across age groups. Dose adaptation based on age groups appears recommendable.

Efficacy and safety of fibrinogen concentrate for on-demand treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis in paediatric patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Congenital fibrinogen deficiency (CFD) is a rare, inherited disorder affecting normal blood clotting function, where patients can experience severe and/or frequent bleeding episodes (BEs). Treatment with human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) can prevent/arrest bleeding. There is a need for more data on the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of HFC treatment in paediatric patients with CFD. METHODS: Haemostatic efficacy of HFC (Fibryga® , Octapharma AG) for on-demand treatment of bleeding and surgical prophylaxis in patients <12 years old was assessed by investigators and an Independent Data Monitoring and Endpoint Adjudication Committee (IDMEAC) based on an objective 4-point efficacy scale. Maximum clot firmness (MCF; surrogate marker of haemostatic efficacy), single-dose PK and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 14 patients receiving HFC (median [range] age 6.0 years [1.0-10.0]), eight received HFC for 10 BEs, three for surgical prophylaxis and 13 for PK. The IDMEAC rated haemostatic efficacy as 100% successful for on-demand BE treatment (95% CI 69.15-100.00) and surgical prophylaxis (95% CI 29.24-100.00). After a mean first dose of 70.78 mg/kg for BEs, mean (±SD) MCF significantly increased from pre-treatment to 1-hour post-infusion (3.3 mm [±1.77]; P = 0.0002), coinciding with haemostatic efficacy. PK parameters were favourable. Two possibly related adverse events occurred, including one serious (portal vein thrombosis). No allergic/hypersensitivity reactions or deaths were observed. CONCLUSION: HFC treatment for on-demand treatment of BEs and surgical prophylaxis was efficacious for this ultra-rare paediatric population with congenital afibrinogenaemia and showed a favourable PK and safety profile.

Efficacy and safety of a new human fibrinogen concentrate in patients with congenital fibrinogen deficiency: an interim analysis of a Phase III trial.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen concentrate is the preferred choice for fibrinogen replacement in congenital fibrinogen deficiency. This study investigated hemostatic efficacy of a new plasma-derived, double virus-inactivated (using two dedicated virus inactivation/elimination steps) human fibrinogen concentrate for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) and surgical prophylaxis. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: In this planned interim analysis of a prospective, multinational Phase III study (NCT02267226), 13 patients with afibrinogenemia (≥12 years) received fibrinogen concentrate (FIBRYGA, Octapharma AG). Hemostatic efficacy was assessed by investigators and an independent data monitoring and endpoint adjudication committee (IDMEAC) using objective four-point criteria and by thromboelastometry maximum clot firmness (MCF). RESULTS: Fibrinogen concentrate was used on-demand to treat 23 BEs in 11 patients, with 21 (91.3%) requiring a single infusion only. Treatment success was 95.7% (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.81-1.00; assessment missing for one BE) by investigators and 100% (90% CI, 0.88-1.00) by IDMEAC. Mean MCF increased significantly from 0.0 to 6.5 mm (95% CI, 5.65-7.40; p < 0.0001) at 1 hour postinfusion of a median (range) dose of 58.8 (33.9-101.7) mg/kg per BE. Four patients received fibrinogen concentrate as surgical prophylaxis, with intraoperative and postoperative treatment success rated 100% (90% CI, 0.50-1.00) by investigators and IDMEAC (median [range] dose per surgery 93.5 [34.1-225.4] mg/kg). No additional hemostatic interventions were required. No deaths, thromboses, or seroconversions were reported. CONCLUSION: These data showed that the new fibrinogen concentrate was efficacious for on-demand treatment of acute bleeding and surgical prophylaxis in congenital afibrinogenemia patients.

Biochemical characterization, stability, and pathogen safety of a new fibrinogen concentrate (fibryga®).

Fibryga® is a new lyophilized fibrinogen concentrate for intravenous use for the treatment of congenital fibrinogen deficiency. fibryga® is produced from pooled human plasma and the final product is characterized by high purity, integrity, and pathogen safety. Functional activity of fibrinogen was demonstrated by cross-linking studies and thromboelastometry; integrity of the fibrinogen molecule was demonstrated by size exclusion chromatography and the detection of only trace amounts of activation markers in the final product. Pathogen safety of fibryga® was proved by downscaling studies for the two dedicated pathogen inactivation/removal steps, i.e. solvent detergent treatment and nanofiltration. Fibryga® is stable for at least three years when stored at room temperature. In conclusion, the performed studies demonstrated that fibryga® meets the requirements for a state-of-the-art fibrinogen concentrate, such as a satisfactory activity profile combined with a favorable pathogen safety profile and stability.

Is viscoelastic coagulation monitoring with ROTEM or TEG validated?

Recent years have seen increasing worldwide interest in the use of viscoelastic coagulation monitoring tests, performed using devices such as ROTEM and TEG. The use of such tests to guide haemostatic therapy may help reduce transfusion of allogeneic blood products in bleeding patients and is supported in European guidelines for managing trauma and severe perioperative bleeding. In addition, viscoelastic tests form the basis of numerous published treatment algorithms. However, some publications have stated that viscoelastic tests are not validated. A specific definition of the term validation is lacking and regulatory requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) have been fulfilled by ROTEM and TEG assays. Viscoelastic tests have been used in pivotal clinical trials, and they are approved for use in most of the world's countries. Provided that locally approved indications are adhered to, the regulatory framework for clinicians to use viscoelastic tests in routine clinical practice is in place.

Commentary on Reconstituting Fibrinogen Concentrate to Maintain Blinding in a Double-blind, Randomized Trial in an Emergency Setting.

BACKGROUND: The gold standard of trial design is the double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. Intravenous medication, which needs reconstitution by the attending clinician in an emergency situation, can be challenging to incorporate into a suitably blinded study. DISCUSSION: We have developed a method of blindly reconstituting and administering fibrinogen concentrate (presented as a lyophilized powder), where the placebo is normal saline. Fibrinogen concentrate is increasingly being used early in the treatment of major hemorrhage. Our methodology was designed for a multicenter study investigating the role of fibrinogen concentrate in the treatment of the coagulopathy associated with major obstetric hemorrhage. The method has been verified by a stand-alone pharmaceutical manufacturing unit with an investigational medicinal products license, and to date has successfully been applied 45 times in four study centers. There have been no difficulties in reconstitution and no related adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: We feel our method is simple to perform and maintains blinding throughout, making it potentially suitable for use in other trials conducted in psychologically high-pressure environments. Although fibrinogen concentrate was the focus of our study, it is likely that the method is applicable to other lyophilized medication with limited shelf life (e.g., antibiotics).

Safety of Factor XIII Concentrate: Analysis of More than 20 Years of Pharmacovigilance Data.

BACKGROUND: Plasma-derived factor XIII (FXIII) concentrate is an effective treatment for FXIII deficiency. We describe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) reported during pharmacovigilance monitoring of Fibrogammin®/Corifact® and review published safety data. METHODS: Postmarketing safety reports recorded by CSL Behring from June 1993 to September 2013 were analyzed. Clinical studies published during the same period were also reviewed. RESULTS: Commercial data indicated that 1,653,450,333 IU FXIII concentrate were distributed over the review period, equivalent to 1,181,036 doses for a 70 kg patient. 75 cases were reported (one/15,700 standard doses or 22,046,000 IU). Reports of special interest included 12 cases of possible hypersensitivity reactions (one/98,400 doses or 137,787,500 IU), 7 with possible thromboembolic events (one/168,700 doses or 236,207,200 IU), 5 of possible inhibitor development (one/236,200 doses or 330,690,100 IU), and 20 of possible pathogen transmission (one/59,100 doses or 82,672,500 IU). 19 pathogen transmission cases involved viral infection; 4 could not be analyzed due to insufficient data, but for all others a causal relationship to the product was assessed as unlikely. A review of published literature revealed a similar safety profile. CONCLUSION: Assessment of ADRs demonstrated that FXIII concentrate carries a low risk of ADRs across various clinical situations, suggesting a favorable safety profile.

Can the Viscoelastic Parameter α-Angle Distinguish Fibrinogen from Platelet Deficiency and Guide Fibrinogen Supplementation?

Viscoelastic tests such as thrombelastography (TEG, Haemoscope Inc., Niles, IL) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM, Tem International GmbH, Munich, Germany), performed in whole blood, are increasingly used at the point-of-care to characterize coagulopathic states and guide hemostatic therapy. An algorithm, based on a mono-analysis (kaolin-activated assay) approach, was proposed in the TEG patent (issued in 2004) where the α-angle and the maximum amplitude parameters are used to guide fibrinogen supplementation and platelet administration, respectively. Although multiple assays for both the TEG and ROTEM devices are now available, algorithms based on TEG mono-analysis are still used in many institutions. In light of more recent findings, we discuss here the limitations and inaccuracies of the mono-analysis approach. Research shows that both α-angle and maximum amplitude parameters reflect the combined contribution of fibrinogen and platelets to clot strength. Therefore, although TEG mono-analysis is useful for identifying a coagulopathic state, it cannot be used to discriminate between fibrin/fibrinogen and/or platelet deficits, respectively. Conversely, the use of viscoelastic methods where 2 assays can be run simultaneously, one with platelet inhibitors and one without, can effectively allow for the identification of specific coagulopathic states, such as insufficient fibrin formation or an insufficient contribution of platelets to clot strength. Such information is critical for making the appropriate choice of hemostatic therapy.

Assessing the Methodology for Calculating Platelet Contribution to Clot Strength (Platelet Component) in Thromboelastometry and Thrombelastography.

The viscoelastic properties of blood clot have been studied most commonly using thrombelastography (TEG) and thromboelastometry (ROTEM). ROTEM-based bleeding treatment algorithms recommend administering platelets to patients with low EXTEM clot strength (e.g., clot amplitude at 10 minutes [A10] <40 mm) once clot strength of the ROTEM® fibrin-based test (FIBTEM) is corrected. Algorithms based on TEG typically use a low value of maximum amplitude (e.g., <50 mm) as a trigger for administering platelets. However, this parameter reflects the contributions of various blood components to the clot, including platelets and fibrin/fibrinogen. The platelet component of clot strength may provide a more sensitive indication of platelet deficiency than clot amplitude from a whole blood TEG or ROTEM® assay. The platelet component of the formed clot is derived from the results of TEG/ROTEM® tests performed with and without platelet inhibition. In this article, we review the basis for why this calculation should be based on clot elasticity (e.g., the E parameter with TEG and the CE parameter with ROTEM®) as opposed to clot amplitude (e.g., the A parameter with TEG or ROTEM®). This is because clot elasticity, unlike clot amplitude, reflects the force with which the blood clot resists rotation within the device, and the relationship between clot amplitude (variable X) and clot elasticity (variable Y) is nonlinear. A specific increment of X (ΔX) will be associated with different increments of Y (ΔY), depending on the initial value of X. When calculated correctly, using clot elasticity data, the platelet component of the clot can provide a valuable insight into platelet deficiency in emergency bleeding.

Comparison of fibrin-based clot elasticity parameters measured by free oscillation rheometry (ReoRox ®) versus thromboelastometry (ROTEM ®).

BACKGROUND: Whole blood viscoelastic tests such as the fibrin-based thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) test FIBTEM are increasingly used in the perioperative setting to quickly identify deficits in fibrin quality, and to guide hemostatic therapy. The recently developed FibScreen2 test of the ReoRox(®) method, based on free oscillation rheometry, also provides an evaluation of fibrin clot quality. To date, little information is available on the performance of this test in hemodiluted blood, by comparison to FIBTEM. METHODS: Whole blood samples from eight healthy volunteers were analyzed using FIBTEM and Fibscreen2. Native and diluted (to 33% and 50% using saline, gelatin or hydroxyethyl starch [HES]) samples were analyzed. Clot strength parameters, including FIBTEM maximum clot firmness (MCF), FIBTEM maximum clot elasticity (MCE) and Fibscreen2 maximum elasticity (G'max), were measured. RESULTS: In repeatedly measured samples from two volunteers, FIBTEM MCF and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5.3 vs. 16.3% and 5.6 vs. 31.7% for each volunteer, respectively. Hemodilution decreased clot strength. Both Fibscreen2 G'max and FIBTEM parameters decreased proportionally to the dilution ratio when saline was used. The observed reductions in FIBTEM and Fibscreen2 parameters were more severe in samples diluted with gelatin and HES, compared to saline. Finally, a regression analysis between FIBTEM MCE and Fibscreen2 G'max revealed a poor goodness of fit (r(2) = 0.37, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: ReoRox(®) Fibscreen2 test has a high coefficient of variation, and its application in various hemodilution conditions showed limited comparability with the ROTEM(®) FIBTEM test.

Analysis of the safety and pharmacodynamics of human fibrinogen concentrate in animals.

Fibrinogen, a soluble 340kDa plasma glycoprotein, is critical in achieving and maintaining hemostasis. Reduced fibrinogen levels are associated with an increased risk of bleeding and recent research has investigated the efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate for controlling perioperative bleeding. European guidelines on the management of perioperative bleeding recommend the use of fibrinogen concentrate if significant bleeding is accompanied by plasma fibrinogen levels less than 1.5-2.0g/l. Plasma-derived human fibrinogen concentrate has been available for therapeutic use since 1956. The overall aim of the comprehensive series of non-clinical investigations presented was to evaluate i) the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics and ii) the safety and tolerability profile of human fibrinogen concentrate Haemocomplettan P® (RiaSTAP®). Pharmacodynamic characteristics were assessed in rabbits, pharmacokinetic parameters were determined in rabbits and rats and a safety pharmacology study was performed in beagle dogs. Additional toxicology tests included: single-dose toxicity tests in mice and rats; local tolerance tests in rabbits; and neoantigenicity tests in rabbits and guinea pigs following the introduction of pasteurization in the manufacturing process. Human fibrinogen concentrate was shown to be pharmacodynamically active in rabbits and dogs and well tolerated, with no adverse events and no influence on circulation, respiration or hematological parameters in rabbits, mice, rats and dogs. In these non-clinical investigations, human fibrinogen concentrate showed a good safety profile. This data adds to the safety information available to date, strengthening the current body of knowledge regarding this hemostatic agent.

Fibrinogen recovery and changes in fibrin-based clot firmness after cryoprecipitate administration in patients undergoing aortic surgery involving deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

BACKGROUND: Cryoprecipitate may be used to treat bleeding in cardiac surgery. Its effects on plasma fibrinogen and fibrin clotting in this setting are poorly defined. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients undergoing on-pump aortic surgery with deep hypothermic circulatory arrest (DHCA) were recruited prospectively. After protamine reversal, cryoprecipitate was administered to patients with bleeding, and fibrin deficit was indicated by thromboelastometry (ROTEM)-based FIBTEM test. Coagulation was assessed using ROTEM-based tests and standard laboratory tests before and after cryoprecipitate. RESULTS: Thirteen patients were included. Cryoprecipitate significantly elevated EXTEM A10 from (mean ± standard deviation) 29.4 ± 5.8 to 34.8 ± 5.9 mm (p = 0.01), FIBTEM A10 from 3.5 ± 0.9 to 5.8 ± 1.7 mm (p = 0.04), and plasma fibrinogen concentration from 154.2 ± 25.6 to 193.4 ± 30.5 mg/dL (p = 0.01). EXTEM clot elasticity at 10 minutes (CE10) increased from 42.5 ± 12.0 to 54.7 ± 14.9 mm after cryoprecipitate (30.0% increase). FIBTEM CE10 increased from 3.7 ± 0.9 to 6.2 ± 2.0 mm (53.0% increase). A fibrinogen dose of 13.2 ± 5.2 mg/kg was required to increase FIBTEM A10 by 1 mm. In vivo recovery of fibrinogen was 61.6 ± 31.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Cryoprecipitate increased plasma fibrinogen levels and fibrin-based clotting in bleeding patients undergoing aortic surgery with DHCA. In vivo recovery of fibrinogen was considerably below 100% and fibrinogen content varied between cryoprecipitate units. Trials are needed to assess whether cryoprecipitate impacts clinical outcomes and to evaluate its safety.

The effectiveness of different functional fibrinogen polymerization assays in eliminating platelet contribution to clot strength in thromboelastometry.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests such as functional fibrinogen polymerization assays (FFPAs) in thrombelastography (TEG®) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) measure clot elasticity under platelet inhibition. Incomplete platelet inhibition influences maximum clot firmness (MCF) of FFPAs. We compared the ability of existing and newly developed FFPAs to eliminate the platelet contribution to clot strength. METHODS: MCF of whole blood (WB), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and platelet-poor plasma samples was recorded using a ROTEM device with different FFPAs, including the TEG functional fibrinogen test (FFTEG) and different ROTEM-based assays: the standard fib-tem reagent (FIBTEM), a lyophilized single-portion reagent fib-tem S (FIBTEM-S), a newly developed reagent FIBTEM PLUS, as well as FIBTEM or the standard extrinsic activation reagent ex-tem® (EXTEM) combined with 10-µg abciximab (FIBTEM-ABC/EXTEM-ABC). RESULTS: In WB (platelet count [mean ± SD], 183 ± 37 × 10/µL; plasma fibrinogen concentration, 2.49 ± 0.58 g/L), FFTEG and EXTEM-ABC showed higher MCF (15.7 ± 2.8 mm) than FIBTEM or FIBTEM-S (11.4 ± 3.3 mm, P < 0.001), whereas FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS resulted in lower MCF (9.3 ± 2.8 mm, P < 0.001). In 2 different PRP samples, with platelet counts of 407 ± 80 × 10/µL and 609 ± 127 × 10/µL, FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS reduced platelet contribution to clot strength within 95% confidence interval limits of -1.4 to 0.1 mm and -1.2 to 0.4 mm, respectively. Using all FFPAs it was observed that the Pearson correlation coefficient between plasma fibrinogen concentration and WB MCF was high (range, 0.75-0.93) and significant, regardless of the underlying platelet inhibiting component. Evaluating differences in the interception of regression lines by using analysis of covariance, we compared platelet-poor plasma and both PRP samples within the same assays and found that in contrast to the FIBTEM-ABC and FIBTEM PLUS assays, the FFTEG, EXTEM-ABC, FIBTEM, and FIBTEM-S methods still detected residual platelet activity and grossly overestimated fibrin clot strength in samples with high platelet counts. CONCLUSIONS: FFPAs based solely on glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibition, such as FFTEG or EXTEM-ABC, are less effective than cytochalasin D-based assays, such as FIBTEM or FIBTEM-S, at inhibiting the platelet component of clot strength. The FIBTEM PLUS assay, and the combination of FIBTEM and abciximab, sufficiently inhibits platelet contribution to clot elasticity. The combination of a glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa receptor blocker and cytochalasin D allows evaluation of functional fibrinogen polymerization without platelet "noise." In a clinical setting, the significance of potent platelet inhibition ensures a more accurate assessment of MCF and therefore the need for fibrinogen supplementation therapy. Further studies are necessary to investigate the application and impact of these tests in a clinical situation.

Effects of fibrinogen concentrate as first-line therapy during major aortic replacement surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Fibrinogen is suggested to play an important role in managing major bleeding. However, clinical evidence regarding the effect of fibrinogen concentrate (derived from human plasma) on transfusion is limited. The authors assessed whether fibrinogen concentrate can reduce blood transfusion when given as intraoperative, targeted, first-line hemostatic therapy in bleeding patients undergoing aortic replacement surgery. METHODS: In this single-center, prospective, placebo-controlled, double-blind study, patients aged 18 yr or older undergoing elective thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic replacement surgery involving cardiopulmonary bypass were randomized to fibrinogen concentrate or placebo, administered intraoperatively. Study medication was given if patients had clinically relevant coagulopathic bleeding immediately after removal from cardiopulmonary bypass and completion of surgical hemostasis. Dosing was individualized using the fibrin-based thromboelastometry test. If bleeding continued, a standardized transfusion protocol was followed. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group and 32 patients in the placebo group were eligible for the efficacy analysis. During the first 24 h after the administration of study medication, patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group received fewer allogeneic blood components than did patients in the placebo group (median, 2 vs. 13 U; P < 0.001; primary endpoint). Total avoidance of transfusion was achieved in 13 (45%) of 29 patients in the fibrinogen concentrate group, whereas 32 (100%) of 32 patients in the placebo group received transfusion (P < 0.001). There was no observed safety concern with using fibrinogen concentrate during aortic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Hemostatic therapy with fibrinogen concentrate in patients undergoing aortic surgery significantly reduced the transfusion of allogeneic blood products. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to confirm the role of fibrinogen concentrate in the management of perioperative bleeding in patients with life-threatening coagulopathy.

FIBTEM PLUS provides an improved thromboelastometry test for measurement of fibrin-based clot quality in cardiac surgery patients.

BACKGROUND: The viscoelastic functional fibrinogen (FF) and FIBTEM assays measure the contribution of fibrin to clot strength. Inhibition of platelet function is a necessary precondition for these tests to work. We investigated a novel test for measuring fibrin-based clotting, FIBTEM PLUS, in cardiac surgery and compared it with FF and FIBTEM. METHODS: A prospective, observational study was performed which included 30 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Blood samples were drawn at the beginning of surgery (pre-CPB), approximately 20 minutes before weaning from CPB and 5 minutes after heparin neutralization. FF, FIBTEM, and FIBTEM PLUS tests were performed in duplicate for all blood samples. Additional coagulation parameters, including platelet count, plasma fibrinogen levels, factor XIII activity, and heparin concentration, were also recorded for each sample. RESULTS: At all time points, the lowest mean maximum clot firmness (MCF) was observed with FIBTEM PLUS, although a statistically significant difference between FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS was observed only at baseline (mean values 22 vs 19 mm, P = 0.01; FF value for comparison: 27.7 mm). FF maximum amplitude (MA) values were significantly higher than FIBTEM MCF and FIBTEM PLUS MCF pre-CPB, during CPB and after heparin neutralization (P ≤ 0.001 for FF MA versus FIBTEM MCF and for FF MA versus FIBTEM PLUS MCF at all time points). The difference between FIBTEM MCF and FIBTEM PLUS MCF correlated with platelet count (r = 0.46;P < 0.001), whereas differences between FF MA and FIBTEM MCF, or FF MA and FIBTEM PLUS MCF did not (r = -0.07, P = 0.51; r = 0.16, P = 0.12, respectively). Differences between the assays were unrelated to heparin levels, which decreased considerably after protamine administration compared with heparin levels recorded before weaning from CPB (decrease from 2.1 to 0.1 U/mL and from 2.8 to 0.2 U/mL for anti-factor IIa and anti-factor Xa, respectively). Agreement between duplicate measurements was similar with FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS assays and lower with FF. Significant positive correlations were found between MCF or MA and fibrinogen concentration (all P < 0.001); the highest correlation was with FIBTEM PLUS MCF (r = 0.70). CONCLUSION: The FIBTEM PLUS assay produces precise results. At baseline, it provides greater inhibition of platelets than FIBTEM, but there is no meaningful difference between FIBTEM PLUS and FIBTEM in patients with low platelet counts.

Thromboelastometric maximum clot firmness in platelet-free plasma is influenced by the assay used.

BACKGROUND: Viscoelastic tests such as functional fibrinogen polymerization assays (FFPAs) in thrombelastography (TEG(®)) or thromboelastometry (ROTEM(®)) measure the elasticity of extrinsically activated clotting under conditions of platelet inhibition. There are no reports on whether components of the FFPAs have any effects on fibrin polymerization, aside from the effects of platelet inhibition. METHODS: Using various platelet-free plasma (PFP) preparations, we compared the extrinsically activated EXTEM thromboelastometric assay with 3 FFPAs: FIBTEM, FIBTEM PLUS, and the Functional Fibrinogen Test(®) (FFTEG). These FFPAs activate coagulation extrinsically but additionally inhibit platelet function. We used calibration plasma (Instrumentation Laboratory and Siemens), pooled fresh-frozen plasma (Octaplas) and freshly prepared PFP from a healthy volunteer. EXTEM and all FFPAs were run in parallel on a ROTEM device. RESULTS: Median (interquartile range) maximum clot firmness (MCF) values for all plasma preparations were: 20.5 mm (17.25-22.0 mm) in EXTEM, 23.0 mm (18.5-24.0 mm) in FIBTEM, 23.0 mm (18.25-24.75 mm) in FIBTEM PLUS, and 18.0 mm (16.0-19.0 mm) in FFTEG. Compared with EXTEM, FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS (P < 0.01) showed increased MCF values whereas FFTEG (P < 0.001) showed decreased MCF values. Further experiments in PFP showed that the platelet inhibitors used in the FFPAs (cytochalasin D or the glycoprotein-IIb/IIIa inhibitor abciximab) were not causing these alterations in MCF. However, reducing the activating tissue factor concentration (by diluting the extrinsic assay) decreased the MCF. CONCLUSIONS: We speculate that FIBTEM and FIBTEM PLUS may contain stabilizing agents that enhance fibrin polymerization whereas FFTEG might contain less tissue factor than the ROTEM assays.

Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology.

The aims of severe perioperative bleeding management are three-fold. First, preoperative identification by anamesis and laboratory testing of those patients for whom the perioperative bleeding risk may be increased. Second, implementation of strategies for correcting preoperative anaemia and stabilisation of the macro- and microcirculations in order to optimise the patient's tolerance to bleeding. Third, targeted procoagulant interventions to reduce the amount of bleeding, morbidity, mortality and costs. The purpose of these guidelines is to provide an overview of current knowledge on the subject with an assessment of the quality of the evidence in order to allow anaesthetists throughout Europe to integrate this knowledge into daily patient care wherever possible. The Guidelines Committee of the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) formed a task force with members of scientific subcommittees and individual expert members of the ESA. Electronic databases were searched without language restrictions from the year 2000 until 2012. These searches produced 20 664 abstracts. Relevant systematic reviews with meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional surveys were selected. At the suggestion of the ESA Guideline Committee, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) grading system was initially used to assess the level of evidence and to grade recommendations. During the process of guideline development, the official position of the ESA changed to favour the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. This report includes general recommendations as well as specific recommendations in various fields of surgical interventions. The final draft guideline was posted on the ESA website for four weeks and the link was sent to all ESA members. Comments were collated and the guidelines amended as appropriate. When the final draft was complete, the Guidelines Committee and ESA Board ratified the guidelines.

Comparison of coagulation parameters associated with fibrinogen concentrate and cryoprecipitate for treatment of bleeding in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei: Subanalysis from a randomized, controlled phase 2 study.

Background and Aims: The FORMA-05 study compared the efficacy and safety of human fibrinogen concentrate (HFC) versus cryoprecipitate for hemostasis in bleeding patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery for pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). This subanalysis explores coagulation parameters in the FORMA-05 patients, with a focus on the seven patients who developed thromboembolic events (TEEs). Methods: FORMA-05 was a prospective, randomized, controlled phase 2 study in which patients with predicted blood loss ≥2 L received HFC (4 g) or cryoprecipitate (two pools of five units), repeated as needed. Plasma fibrinogen, platelet count, factor (F) XIII, FVIII, von Willebrand Factor (VWF) antigen and ristocetin cofactor activity levels, EXTEM A20, FIBTEM A20, and endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) were measured perioperatively. Results: Fibrinogen, platelet count, EXTEM and FIBTEM A20, FXIII, FVIII, VWF levels, and ETP were maintained throughout surgery in both the HFC group (N = 21) and the cryoprecipitate group (N = 23). Seven TEEs were observed in the cryoprecipitate group. The two patients developing deep vein thromboses (DVT) appeared to have a procoagulant status preoperatively, with distinctively higher fibrinogen level, FIBTEM A20, and platelet levels, all of which persisted perioperatively. The five patients developing pulmonary embolism (PE) had slightly higher VWF levels preoperatively, with a disproportionate increase intraoperatively (postcryoprecipitate administration) and postoperatively. Conclusions: Patients treated with HFC versus cryoprecipitate showed broad overlaps in coagulation parameters. Patients with PE experienced a disproportionate VWF rise following cryoprecipitate administration, whereas patients developing DVT displayed a procoagulant status before and following surgery. Preoperative testing may allow these patients to be identified.

Mobile Laboratory Unit: a disruptor solution for hemostasis management during major surgery. Usage in the context of face transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The management of surgical bleeding during a face transplant in a patient diagnosed with bilateral neurofibromatosis is quite complex. With the actual methods and technology for hemostasis management, it may not always be possible to give the clinician the support needed to manage operative associated bleeding. Bedside hemostasis monitors are needed urgently to assist clinicians in making the correct diagnosis in a timely manner. METHODS: Our Mobile Laboratory Unit is a disruptive solution for hemostasis management during major surgery as it allows real-time monitoring, the predominant mechanism of bleeding and goal-direct coagulation therapy. The unit is an autonomous mobile platform that can be moved immediately to anywhere its service is needed and offers a complete flexible laboratory test which includes biochemistry, hematology and coagulation studies as standard equipment. RESULTS: In our case the test performed by the unit allowed us to identify the reason for our patient's bleeding at the bedside. Severely decreased clot firmness of the fibrin-based clot and a less impaired firmness of the whole blood clot, suggested an acceptable contribution of platelets to the clot quality, but decreased polymerization of fibrinogen into fibrin. CONCLUSIONS: In our opinion new insights into the pathophysiology of coagulopathy, the availability of technology such as our Mobile Laboratory Unit, and awareness of side effects of intravenous fluids should encourage the idea that perhaps it is time to change hemostasis management in operation-related bleeding.