Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Decreases Passive Anterior Tibial Subluxation Compared With Isolated Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Despite Similar Rotational Stability and Clinical Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effect of augmenting a hamstring autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with an anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) on a primary outcome of passive anterior tibial subluxation (PATS) and a secondary outcome of the clinical outcomes. METHODS: ACL-injured patients who underwent primary ACLR between March 2014 and February 2020 at our center were enrolled. Patients who underwent combined procedures (ACLR + ALLR) were matched in a 1:1 propensity ratio to patients who underwent ACLR only. We evaluated PATS, knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after the procedure and documented complications. RESULTS: From an initial cohort of 252 patients with a minimum follow-up period of 2 years (48.4 ± 16.6 months), 35 matched pairs were included, and 17 patients (48.6%) in each group underwent second-look arthroscopy. The combined ACLR + ALLR group showed significantly better improvement of PATS in the lateral compartments than the isolated ACLR group (P = .034). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding knee stability (side-to-side laxity difference, pivot-shift test), PROMs, complications, and second-look arthroscopic findings (all P > .05). Moreover, the proportions of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference in PROMs were not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: The combined ACLR + ALLR procedure was associated with a mean improvement in anterior tibial subluxation for the lateral compartment that was 1.2 mm better than an isolated ACLR procedure, despite its lack of clinical significance. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, cohort study.

Preoperative Bone Marrow Edema Negatively Impacts 10-Year Outcomes After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between the extent of subchondral bone marrow edema (BME), as classified by magnetic resonance imaging, and intermediate to long-term outcomes after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) for medial compartment osteoarthritis. METHODS: We enrolled 150 knees (144 patients) that underwent fixed-bearing UKA between April 2003 and December 2014 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years; the mean overall follow-up duration was 10 years (range, 5-18 years). We divided the patients into 2 groups based on the presence or absence of preoperative BME. Patients were also subdivided into 4 groups according to their BME scores determined by the magnetic resonance imaging Osteoarthritis Knee Score method. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) and the Forgotten Joint Score. Furthermore, survival rates and relevant risk factors that affect joint survivorship were analyzed. RESULTS: The groups with BME demonstrated significantly worse postoperative WOMAC pain and Forgotten Joint Scores at the final follow-up than the group without BME (all P < .05). We also found significant differences among the scores of groups with different BME grades (all P < .05). Post hoc analysis demonstrated differences between groups 1 and 2, 1 and 3, 1 and 4, and 2 and 4 (all P < .05) with a significant correlation between postoperative clinical outcomes and the extent of BME (r = 0.430 [WOMAC pain], r = -0.342 [Forgotten Joint Score]; P < .05). The survival rate was 95.4% for a mean period of 10 years for the UKAs, and the UKA survival was not associated with the presence of BME (P = .232; log-rank test). CONCLUSION: At a mean of 10 years, preoperative BME negatively impacted the clinical outcomes, especially pain, after UKA. However, UKA contributed to excellent survival rates for the same duration of follow-up, regardless of BME severity. Although this study does not provide any evidence that preoperative BME should be identified as a contraindication, evaluation of BME can provide crucial information about the expected outcomes.

Allogenic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell implantation was superior to bone marrow aspirate concentrate augmentation for cartilage regeneration despite similar clinical outcomes.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and second-look arthroscopic outcomes between bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation and human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stromal cell (hUCB-MSC) implantation in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for medial compartmental knee osteoarthritis and identify the relationship between articular cartilage regeneration and HTO outcomes. METHODS: A total of 176 patients who underwent HTO combined with a BMAC or hUCB-MSC procedure for medial compartment osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 3) between June 2014 and September 2018 with a minimum follow-up of 2 years were reviewed. After HTO, multiple holes were drilled at cartilage defect sites of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), and then prepared BMAC or hUCB-MSCs in combination with scaffolds were implanted in the MFC lesions. After propensity score matching based on sex, age, body mass index, and lesion size, 55 patients in each of the BMAC and hUCB-MSC groups were successfully matched. Second-look arthroscopic findings were assessed according to the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) Cartilage Repair Assessment (CRA) grading system and Koshino staging system. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Short-Form 36 (SF-36), and Tegner activity scores. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 33 months, clinical outcomes including IKDC, KOOS, SF-36, and Tegner activity scores were significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.001); however, there were no differences between the two groups. Second-look arthroscopy showed better healing of regenerated cartilage in the hUCB-MSC group (Grade I [4 cases, 9.1%]; Grade II [30 cases, 68.2%]; Grade III [11 cases, 22.7%]) than in the BMAC group (Grade I [1 case, 2.7%]; Grade II [20 cases, 54.1%]; Grade III [11 cases, 29.7%]; Grade IV [5 cases, 13.5%]) according to the ICRS CRA grading system (p = 0.040). There was no significant intergroup difference in terms of defect coverage based on the Koshino staging system (p = 0.057). Moreover, ICRS CRA grades at second-look arthroscopy were significantly correlated with clinical outcomes (r = - 0.337; p = 0.002). CONCLUSION: There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes between the two groups. Both treatments provided similar, reliable outcomes in terms of pain relief, functional scores, and quality of life at a mean follow-up of 33 months. However, hUCB-MSC implantation was more effective than BMAC augmentation for articular cartilage regeneration.

Does meniscectomy have any advantage over conservative treatment in middle-aged patients with degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear?

BACKGROUND: The best treatment for degenerative medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of arthroscopic meniscectomy and conservative treatment for degenerative MMPRT. METHODS: From January 2007 to December 2014, 146 patients (Meniscectomy group, 90; Conservative group, 56) were evaluated. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale, International Knee Documentation Committee subjective scoring scale, Tegner activity scale, and Lysholm knee scoring scale at the final follow-up. Radiologic outcomes evaluated the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) according to the Kellgren-Lawrence (K-L) classification. We compared the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKAA), medial proximal tibial angle, tibial posterior slope angle, and width of medial joint space. After an average follow-up of 6.3 years, the survivorship was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: All clinical outcomes were significantly improved in both groups after treatment, with no significant differences between the two groups at the final follow-up. The progression of OA according to the K-L classification, HKAA and width of medial joint space was significantly advanced in the meniscectomy group (p = 0.03, 0.04, 0.03, respectively). The 10-year survival rates in the meniscectomy and conservative groups were 87 and 88%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that both conservative treatment and meniscectomy provided symptomatic relief. However, it was confirmed that OA progression was more severe in the meniscectomy. We conclude that arthroscopic meniscectomy had no advantage over conservative treatment in terms of clinical outcomes and OA progression in middle-aged patients with MMPRT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III; retrospective comparative study.

Allogenic Human Umbilical Cord Blood-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells Are More Effective Than Bone Marrow Aspiration Concentrate for Cartilage Regeneration After High Tibial Osteotomy in Medial Unicompartmental Osteoarthritis of Knee.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of cartilage regeneration between bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) augmentation and allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hUCB-MSCs) transplantation in high tibial osteotomy (HTO) with microfracture (MFX) for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in the young and active patient. METHODS: Between January 2015 and December 2019, the patients who underwent HTO and arthroscopy with MFX combined with BMAC or allogeneic hUCB-MSCs procedure for medial unicompartmental OA with kissing lesion, which was shown full-thickness cartilage defect (≥ International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grade 3B) in medial femoral cartilage and medial tibial cartilage, were include in this study. Retrospectively we compared clinical outcomes, including Hospital for Special Surgery score, Knee Society Score (KSS) pain and function, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score between BMAC and hUCB-MSCs group at minimum of 1-year follow-up. Also, second-look arthroscopy was performed simultaneously with removal of the plate after complete bone union. Cartilage regeneration was graded by the ICRS grading system at second-look arthroscopy. Radiological measurement including hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, posterior tibial slope angle, and correction angle were assessed. RESULTS: Of 150 cases that underwent HTO with MFX combined with BMAC or allogeneic hUCB-MSCs procedure for medial unicompartmental OA, 123 cases underwent plate removal and second-look arthroscopy after a minimum of 1 year after the HTO surgery. Seventy-four cases were kissing lesion in medial femoral cartilage and medial tibial cartilage during initial HTO surgery. Finally, the BMAC group composed of 42 cases and hUCB-MSCs group composed of 32 cases were retrospectively identified in patients who had kissing lesions and second-look arthroscopies with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. At the final follow-up of mean 18.7 months (standard deviation = 4.6 months), clinical outcomes in both groups had improved. However, there were no significant differences between the IKDC, WOMAC, or KSS pain and function scores in the 2 groups (P > .05). At second-look arthroscopy, the ICRS grade was significantly better in the hUCB-MSC group than in the BMAC group in both medial femoral and medial tibial cartilage (P = .001 for both). The average ICRS grade of the BMAC group improved from 3.9 before surgery to 2.8 after surgery. The average ICRS grade of the hUBC-MSC group improved from 3.9 before surgery to 2.0 after surgery. Radiological findings comparing postoperative HKA angle, posterior tibial slope angle, and correction angle showed no significant differences between the groups (P > .05). Therefore it was found that the postoperative correction amount did not affect the postoperative cartilage regeneration results. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the hUCB-MSC procedure was more effective than the BMAC procedure for cartilage regeneration in medial unicompartmental knee OA even though the clinical outcomes improved regardless of which treatment was administered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Increased joint obliquity after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy induces pain in the lateral compartment: a comparative analysis of the minimum 4-year follow-up outcomes using propensity score matching.

PURPOSE: To analyze the effects of increased medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) on the clinical outcomes and cartilage deterioration in the lateral compartment after a mean follow-up period of 4 years following open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) using propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. METHODS: Among 376 knees treated with OWHTO for medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis with varus deformity, 36 knees with MPTA increase of > 95° and 108 knees with MPTA increase of < 95° at the final follow-up were included. The baseline prognostic factors [age, sex, preoperative hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, body mass index, and preoperative knee range of motion] were equalized between the 2 groups using PSM; consequently, 31 pairs of patients were compared. The radiographic and clinical outcomes, including lateral compartment pain, were assessed. For 18 patients in each group, second-look arthroscopy and cartilage status assessment were performed. RESULTS: The preoperative demographics were similar between the groups. At the final follow-up, the HKA angle and joint line obliquity were significantly higher in the increased MPTA group. No significant differences were observed in the clinical outcomes between the groups. On second-look arthroscopy, significant cartilage deterioration of the lateral compartment was not observed in either group. Pain in the lateral compartment was experienced significantly more frequently in the increased MPTA group (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although excessively increased MPTA after HTO had no significant effects on the clinical outcomes and cartilage deterioration in the lateral compartment at the minimum 4-year follow-up, lateral compartment pain was experienced significantly more frequently in the increased MPTA group.

Comparison of Long-Term Survival Analysis Between Open-Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: To compare unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) and open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) in a long-term follow-up propensity score matching analysis. METHODS: Patients who underwent UKA or OWHTO for unilateral medial unicompartmental osteoarthritis (OA) between 2004 and 2010 were included. The ROM, HSS score, KS score, WOMAC score, forgotten joint score, OA progression in patellofemoral and lateral compartments, and survivorship were compared within ten years of follow-up between 67 UKA and 67 OWHTO patients after propensity score matching for age, gender, body mass index, range of motion, and osteoarthritis (OA) grade. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, there were no significant differences between the two groups in clinical outcomes, but the WOMAC score showed better results after UKA (13.1 in UKA vs 18.9 in OWHTO, P = .011). The OA progression also showed no significant difference between the two groups. After a 10-year follow-up, the survival rate was higher in UKA patients (96.2%) than in OWHTO patients (87.7%), with no statistical difference (P = .06). CONCLUSION: UKA showed better clinical outcomes and OA progressions than OWHTO. The survival rate presented a superiority of 8.5% for the UKA group in the 10-year follow-up, without significant difference.

Allogeneic umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells combined with high tibial osteotomy: a retrospective study on safety and early results.

BACKGROUND: Cartilage repair performed as a single-stage procedure is an important advancement in the treatment of full-thickness cartilage injury and has potential for widespread clinical use. PURPOSE: To investigate the short-term outcomes and cartilage regeneration after implantation of allogeneic human umbilical cord blood-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hUCB-MSCs) in patients who received high tibial osteotomy (HTO) for symptomatic medial knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Patients underwent treatment of full-thickness chondral injury in the osteoarthritic knee with HTO and implantation of hUCB-MSCs and were followed prospectively for a minimum of one year. Ninety-three patients were followed for a mean 1.7 years (range, 1.0-3.5). Median cartilage lesion size was 6.5 cm2 (range, 2.0-12.8). Clinical outcomes were examined with patient-reported scoring instruments that consisted of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, Knee Society Score (KSS), and Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score. Cartilage regeneration was evaluated using the International Cartilage Repair Society (ICRS) cartilage repair assessment grading (CRA) system and the Koshino regeneration staging system in 49 patients who underwent second look arthroscopic assessment when their HTO plates were removed. RESULTS: At final follow-up, the median IKDC subjective score had significantly improved from 39.0 to 71.3; the WOMAC score from 44.5 to 11.0; the KSS pain and function scores from 29.8 to 43.2 and 61.0 to 81.2, respectively; and the HSS from 61.6 to 82.7 (p < 0.05). Pre-operative examination showed ICRS grade IV cartilage injury in all knees, and cartilage regeneration at 2nd look arthroscopy showed improvements (8.2% of patients improved to ICRS grade I, 69.3% to grade II, and 22.5% to grade III). Moreover, Koshino stage was B in 24.5% and C in 75.5% of patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Allogeneic hUCB-MSC implantation combined with HTO for medial knee osteoarthritis was safe and showed signs of cartilage status improvement. Furthermore, randomized controlled studies with a control group are necessary to determine the real effectiveness and indications of this new combined procedure for patients with osteoarthritis.

Survival and Risk Factor Analysis of Medial Open Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy for Unicompartment Knee Osteoarthritis.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this retrospective study was to evaluate the survival rates and analyze the factors that affect survival rate after primary treatment with medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy (MOWHTO) for medial unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis. METHODS: Clinical evaluation using Knee Society Score (KSS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score and radiographic evaluation, including mechanical axis, were done before and after surgery. The main failure criteria for survival included the conversion to total knee arthroplasty or KSS of <60 points. Furthermore, risk factors that affected the survival after MOWHTO were analyzed. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-nine knees were included after a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Their mean age was 56 years, and mean follow-up duration was 9.6 years. The mean KSS and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores were significantly improved after surgery (87.3 and 18.5 points at 5 years and 81.7 and 23.6 points at 10 years). The mean hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle was corrected from 7.2° varus to 3.4° valgus 1 year after surgery, which was maintained until 10 years after surgery (2.9° valgus at 5 years and 2.3° valgus at 10 years, P > .05). Using Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, the probability of survival for MOWHTO was 96.8% at 5 years, 87.1% at 10 years, and 85.3% at 13 years. The multivariate regression analysis revealed that age ≥65 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.34, P = .046), medial compartment cartilage damage International Cartilage Repair Society grade ≥4 (HR = 2.46, I = .045), lateral compartment cartilage damage International Cartilage Repair Society grade≥2 (HR = 3.38, P = .006), postoperative HKA angle <0° (HR = 4.69, P < .001) were associated with failure. CONCLUSION: MOWHTO seems to be a good treatment option for young and active patients with medial knee osteoarthrosis and varus alignment, with acceptable survival rates and satisfactory outcomes. Age ≥65 years, grade 4 cartilage damage in medial compartment, grade ≥2 cartilage damage in lateral compartment, and undercorrection of HKA angle appear to be significant risk factors associated with failure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: retrospective case series.

Comparison of Posterior Cruciate-Retaining and High-Flexion Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty Design.

BACKGROUND: High-flexion prostheses have been developed to achieve deep flexion after total knee arthroplasty. The purpose of this study is to compare standard NexGen (CR, cruciate-retaining) and high-flexion NexGen (CR-flex) total knee prostheses in terms of range of motion, clinical and radiologic outcomes, rates of complications, and survivorship in long-term follow-up. METHODS: From January 2000 to December 2008, 423 consecutive knees underwent total knee arthroplasty using standard CR or CR-flex prostheses. Fifty-three patients were lost to follow-up or declined to participate and 54 died, leaving 290 knees. The minimum duration of follow-up was 8 years (mean 10.1 years). Physical examination and knee scoring of patients were assessed preoperatively, at 6 months and 1 year after surgery, and annually thereafter. Supine anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and standing anteroposterior hip-to-ankle radiographs were obtained preoperatively and at each follow-up. RESULTS: Mean postoperative range of motions in the standard CR group and the CR-flex group were similar, showing no significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .853). At the time of the final follow-up, mean total Hospital for Special Surgery scores were similar between the 2 groups (P = .118). Mean Knee Society pain (P = .325) and function scores (P = .659) were also comparable between the 2 groups. Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score showed no intergroup difference either (P = .586). The mean hip-knee-ankle angle at the final follow-up was approximately the same (P = .940). Mean coronal angles of femoral and tibial component at final follow-up were also similar (P = .211 and P = .764, respectively). The prevalence of the radiolucent line was 0.6% in the standard CR group and 0.9% in the CR-flex group. Estimated survival rate according to Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was 97.2% in the standard CR group and 95.6% in the CR-flex group at mean follow-up of 10.1 years. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes could be achieved with both standard and high-flexion CR total knee designs. High-flexion CR prosthesis did not show any advantages over the standard design.

Comparison of Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes and Second-Look Arthroscopic Findings After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Fixed and Adjustable Loop Cortical Suspension Devices.

PURPOSE: To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, including tunnel widening, and to evaluate graft status by second-look arthroscopy after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using 2 different femoral cortical suspension devices (fixed and adjustable loop). METHODS: Seventy-nine patients were included for this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups, 41 patients of fixed loop group (EndoButton) and 38 patients of adjustable loop group (TightRope). The Tegner activity, Lysholm knee score, Lachman test, and pivot-shift test were compared between the 2 groups. Anterior stress radiographs and femoral tunnel widening on plain radiographs were also compared. Twenty-seven patients (66%) in the EndoButton group and 21 patients (55%) in the TightRope group underwent the second-look arthroscopy. RESULTS: At the final follow-up, the mean Tegner activity, Lysholm, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores were improved in both groups and there were no statistically significant differences (5.1 ± 1.6 and 5.5 ± 2.1, P = .312; 90.4 ± 7.8 and 91.0 ± 6.5, P = .525; and 87.4 ± 6.7 and 88.7 ± 5.3, P = .127, respectively). There were no statistical significances in the both groups in terms of Lachman test and pivot-shift tests (P = .392, .559) as well as anterior stress radiographs (mean 3.2 ± 1.4 mm and 2.9 ± 1.1 mm, P = .343). Moreover, radiologic measurements comparing femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal half also showed no significant differences (P = .540 and .412 on anteroposterior view; P = .254 and .437 on lateral view). In the second-look arthroscopy findings for graft tear and synovial coverage, there were no significant differences (P = .784 and .897). CONCLUSIONS: Both fixed loop and adjustable loop devices in ACL reconstruction provided good clinical and radiological outcomes. In patients with both devices, femoral tunnel widening at proximal and distal portion have no significant differences after ACL reconstruction. Moreover, second-look arthroscopy revealed no significant differences in terms of synovial coverage and rupture of the graft. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, prospective comparative study.

No difference in outcomes and gait analysis between mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods using robotic total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and perform gait analysis during walking to identify differences in kinematic and kinetic parameters between two alignment methods in robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (TKA). METHODS: Sixty patients were randomly assigned to undergo robotic-assisted TKA using either mechanical (30 patients) or kinematic (30 patients) alignment method. Clinical outcomes including varus and valgus laxities, range of motion (ROM), Hospital for Specific Surgery (HSS), Knee Society Score (KSS), and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) scores and radiological outcomes were evaluated. Gait analysis of 3D spatiotemporal, kinetic, and kinematic parameters during walking was then performed for 10 age and gender matched patients of each group to determine differences between the two alignment methods. RESULTS: The median follow-up duration of the mechanical method group was 8.7 (range 8.1-9.4) years and that of the kinematic method group was 8.4 (range 8.0-9.1) years. Clinical outcomes between the two groups showed no significant difference in HSS, WOMAC, ROM, KS pain, or function score at the last follow-up. No significant difference in varus and valgus laxity assessment, mechanical alignment of the lower limb, or perioperative complications was shown between the two groups. In gait analysis, no significant difference in kinematic or kinetic parameters was found except for varus angle (p < 0.05) and mediolateral ground reaction force (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Results of this study show that mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods provide comparable clinical and radiological outcomes after robotic total knee arthroplasty with an average follow-up of 8 years. There were no functional difference during walking between the two alignment methods either. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Correction to: No difference in outcomes and gait analysis between mechanical and kinematic knee alignment methods using robotic total knee arthroplasty.

The authors wish to acknowledge a confusion in alignment definition in the published paper.

Robotic versus conventional primary total knee arthroplasty: clinical and radiological long-term results with a minimum follow-up of ten years.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was (1) to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of robotic and conventional total knee arthroplasty with a minimum follow-up of ten years, (2) to evaluate the survival rate, (3) and to estimate the accuracy of the two techniques by analyzing the outliers of the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. METHODS: We evaluated 351 patients (390 knees), 155 patients undergoing robotic TKA, and 196 patients treated with conventional TKA with a mean follow-up of 11.0 years. HSS, KSS, WOMAC, and SF-12 questionnaires were used for clinical evaluation. Mechanical alignment, implant radiological measurements, and outliers were analyzed for radiological results. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed for survival rate. RESULTS: All clinical assessments showed excellent improvements in both groups (all p < 0.05), without any significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The conventional TKA group showed a significantly higher number of outliers compared with the robotic TKA group (0 < 0.05). The cumulative survival rate was 98.8% in the robotic TKA group and 98.5% in the conventional TKA group with excellent survival (p = 0.563). CONCLUSION: Our study showed excellent survival with both robotic and conventional TKA and similar clinical outcomes at long-term follow-up. And, in terms of radiological outcome, robotic TKA showed better accuracy and consistency with fewer outliers compared with conventional TKA. With longer follow-up and larger cohort, the accuracy and effectiveness of robotic TKA on implant survival rate can be elucidated in the future.

Outcomes of simultaneous high tibial osteotomy and anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee with osteoarthritis.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to evaluate clinical and radiological results after simultaneous open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (HTO) and anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in patients with ACL deficiency combined with medial uni-compartmental osteoarthritis (OA) and varus deformity. METHODS: This retrospective study was performed using data collected from 2005 to 2011 on a total of 24 patients who were diagnosed with ACL injury and medial unicompartmental OA with varus deformity, and who subsequently underwent simultaneous open-wedge HTO and arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The mean follow-up duration was 5.2 years. For clinical outcomes, we evaluated Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, range of motion, Lachmann test, and pivot-shift test, and for radiological outcomes, we evaluated the degree of varus deformity, progression of medial OA, tibial posterior slope, anterior instability, and postoperative complication. RESULTS: There were no limitations in range of motion found in any cases. Three patients showed progressive osteoarthritis on the medial compartment. The mechanical femorotibial angle was significantly corrected from varus 7.0 degrees to valgus 1.2 degrees, and the tibial posterior slope was not significantly changed. The Lysholm and Tegner activity scores were significantly improved after surgery (from 58 to 94 points on the Lysholm scale and from 4.0 to 5.3 points on the Tegner activity scale). Although the Lachman test and the pivot-shift test showed significant improvements after surgery, instability greater than Gr II was observed in three patients on the Lachman test and in four patients on the pivot-shift test. The side-to-side difference improved from 9.6 mm to 4.2 mm postoperatively as assessed using a Telos® arthrometer. There were no cases of nonunion or fixation loss. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous open-wedge HTO and ACL reconstruction in patients with ACL injury with medial compartmental OA showed satisfactory functional outcomes and postoperative activity level scores. However, some patients showed residual instability and progression of OA.

Objective quantification of ligament balancing using VERASENSE in measured resection and modified gap balance total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Soft tissue balancing which is above all most important factor of total knee arthroplasty, has been performed by subjective methods. Recently objective orthosensor has been developed for compartment pressure measurement. The purpose of this study was: (1) to quantify the compartment pressure of the joint throughout the range of motion during TKA using orthosensor, (2) to determine the usefulness of orthosensor by analyzing correlation between the pressure in both compartment with initial trial and after final implantation, and (3) to evaluate the types and effectiveness of additional ligament balancing procedures to compartment pressure. METHODS: Eighty-four patients underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using VERASENSE Knee System. TKA was performed by measured resection and modified gap balance technique. Compartment pressure was recorded on full extension, 30°, 60°, 90° and full flexion at initial (INI), after each additional procedure, and after final (FIN) implantation. "Balanced" knees were defined as when the compartment pressure difference was less than 15 pounds. RESULTS: Thirty patients (35.7%) showed balanced knee initially and 79 patients (94.0%) showed balance after final implantation. The proportion of balanced knee after initial bony resection, modified gap balancing TKAs showed significantly higher proportion than measured resection TKAs (P = 0.004) On both compartment, the pressure was generally decreased throughout the range of motion. Linear correlation on both compartment showed statistically significant throughout the range on motion, with higher correlation value on the lateral compartment. Total 66 additional ligament balancing procedures were performed. CONCLUSION: Using orthosensor, we could obtain 94% quantified balance knee, consequently. And between the techniques, measured resection TKA showed less balanced knee and also required more additional procedures compared to modified gap balancing TKA. Furthermore, with the acquired quantified data during appropriate ligament balancing, the surgeon could eventually reduce the complications associated with soft tissue imbalance in the future.

No difference in graft healing or clinical outcome between trans-portal and outside-in techniques after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare femoral tunnel geometry including tunnel position, length, and graft bending angle between trans-portal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and discover whether such differences in tunnel geometry could influence graft healing or clinical outcome. METHODS: Sixty-four patients with anatomical single-bundle ACL reconstruction performed with either trans-portal technique (32 patients, one centre) or outside-in technique (32 patients, the other centre) were included in this retrospective study. Femoral tunnel location and length, and graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel were analysed on 3D CT knee model. The location and length of the femoral tunnel and graft bending angle were compared between the two techniques. All patients underwent MRI scans at around 1 year following ACL reconstruction. It was found that all patients had intact ACL graft on MRI images. On oblique axial image taken after ACL reconstruction to determine graft healing at femoral and tibial tunnels and the intra-articular portion, graft signal intensity ratio was calculated by dividing signal intensity (SI) of the reconstructed ACL by that of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in the region of interest selected with Marosis software. Clinical outcomes regarding Tegner activity scores, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation scores, Lachman test, and pivot shift test results were also compared between the two groups. RESULTS: While the location of femoral tunnel was similar to each other in both groups, the femoral tunnel length was longer in the outside-in technique (37.0 vs. 32.4 mm, p = .02). Meanwhile, the outside-in technique showed significantly more acute graft tunnel angle than the trans-portal technique (106.7° vs. 113.8°, p = .01). However, signal intensity ratios of grafts (compared with SI of PCL) were similar in femoral and tibial tunnels and intra-articular portions. Moreover, there were no statistically significant differences in terms of IKDC scores (89.4 vs. 90.5, n.s.) or Tegner activity scores (6.2 vs. 6.4, n.s.) between the two groups. There was no significant difference in measurement of Lachman or Pivot shift test either between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Even though the outside-in technique in ACL reconstruction created a more acute femoral graft bending angle and a longer femoral tunnel length than the trans-portal technique, these had no negative effect on graft healing. In addition, trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction showed similar femoral tunnel positions and clinical outcomes. Acceptable graft healing and clinical outcomes can be obtained for both trans-portal and outside-in techniques in ACL reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

High tibial osteotomy accelerates lateral compartment osteoarthritis in discoid meniscus patients.

PURPOSE: The valgus high tibial osteotomy (HTO) in patients with medial osteoarthritis and discoid lateral meniscus can result in increased load on the lateral compartment and hence a higher chances of tear. This may accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis on lateral compartment. We, therefore, carried out the case control study with a hypothesis that an HTO would accelerate the progression of osteoarthritis (OA) on lateral compartment in patients with complete discoid meniscus. METHODS: The records of all patients with open wedge HTO from 2008 to 2012 were evaluated for complete lateral discoid meniscus. The patient who had a valgus HTO with or without partial meniscectomy for medial compartmental OA was included for this study. Cases to control were chosen to match age, body mass index (BMI), pre-operative osteoarthritis grade, and deformity angles in ratio 1:2. Patient's records were studied for demographic data, clinical examination records, and pre-operative knee functional scores and radiological scores and were compared with post-operative data. RESULTS: Thirty-six patients out of 674 patients, who underwent an HTO, consisted of discoid meniscus group. 72 patients were chosen as control group. Four patients showed progression of OA on the lateral compartment in discoid group compared to none in control group. Although control groups showed a little bit better functional outcomes, there were no statistical differences between two groups (n.s.). CONCLUSION: The high tibial osteotomy could result in accelerated lateral compartment osteoarthritis in patients with complete discoid meniscus, and the procedure should be used with caution in such patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Correction to: Biomechanical comparisons of current suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

The original publication of this paper contains mistakes. The first author name "Jin Cheng" is changed to "Cheng Jin ".

Biomechanical comparisons of current suspensory fixation devices for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Cortical suspensory devices are routinely used for femoral side fixation of soft tissue graft in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of a new adjustable loop device (GraftMax®) compared with established devices (EndoButton® and TightRope®) in ACL reconstruction and to investigate whether knotting the free end of TightRope could improve biomechanical properties. METHODS: The three cortical suspensory devices (GraftMax® Button; Conmed, EndoButton® CL; Smith & Nephew, and TightRope® RT; Arthrex) were tested under cyclic load (50-250 N for 1000 cycles) and pull-to-failure conditions at 50 mm/h in a device-only setup using a tensile testing machine. The TightRope was additionally tested with its free suture ends knotted. The statistical analyses were done with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post hoc Tukey HSD tests. RESULTS: There are significant differences in the load-to-failure among the devices. The EndoButton showed the highest mean failure load at 1204.7 N compared to other devices (GraftMax (914.2 N), knotted TightRope (868.1 N) and TightRope (800.1 N) (p < 0.001). The mean total displacement after 1000 cycles was 0.76 mm, 2.11 mm, 1.56 mm and 1.38 mm for the EndoButton, GraftMax, TightRope, and knotted TightRope, respectively. The EndoButton showed significantly better properties than both the GraftMax (p = 0.000) and the TightRope (p = 0.020) but not the knotted TightRope (p = n.s.) in total displacement. However, there was no significant difference between the TightRope and GraftMax (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: The fixed loop (EndoButton) showed significantly better mechanical properties in failure load and displacement than TightRope or GraftMax in this biomechanical study. However, the mechanical properties of the GraftMax is comparable to the TightRope. Moreover, the knotting of TightRope improved mechanical properties in total displacement more than TightRope, but not in failure load. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The biomechanical properties of the GraftMax are comparable to the TightRope. The TightRope, when knotted, shows an improvement both in load to failure and cyclic displacement, though the differences are not significant.