Hypermobile Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Can Be Effectively Treated Utilizing Hip Arthroscopy With Periportal Capsulotomy Closure: A Matched Cohort Analysis Compared to Patients Without Joint Hypermobility.

PURPOSE: To assess the 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic treatment with periportal capsulotomy closure for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in patients with generalized ligamentous laxity (GLL). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from a prospectively collected database of FAIS patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. FAIS patients with GLL were identified as having Beighton score ≥4. FAIS patients with GLL were treated with arthroscopic labral repair, osteochondroplasty, via periportal capsulotomy with subsequent capsular closure. These patients were matched by age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) with a cohort of FAIS patients without GLL who underwent the same procedure via periportal capsulotomy without capsular closure. Preoperatively, and 2 years postoperatively, patients completed patient-reported outcomes (PRO) scores, including the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), 12-item Short-Form survey (SF-12) and the visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Forty patients (5 male, 35 female) with FAIS and GLL were included (age: 29.7 ± 9.0; BMI: 23.3 ± 4.1). FAIS patients with GLL demonstrated similar significant PRO score improvements compared to a matched cohort of FAIS patients without GLL at 2 years after surgery (VAS Pain: (-)2.5 ± 3.0, (-)2.7 ± 2.7; SF-12 PCS: 17.7 ± 14.2, 16.7 ± 15.0; HOOS-Symptoms: 26.3 ± 24.0, 20.6 ± 18.1; HOOS-Pain: 29.8 ± 20.4, 24.4 ± 9.0; HOOS-ADL: 24.9 ± 18.4, 22.0 ± 19.9; HOOS-Sports: 43.6 ± 26.1, 33.1 ± 29.8; and HOOS-QOL: 44.2 ± 27.6, 41.7 ± 27.1, respectively). Both cohorts achieved minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for each HOOS subscore at equivalent high rates (70-88%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with GLL in the setting of FAIS can be effectively treated with arthroscopy via periportal capsulotomy and capsular closure. These patients demonstrate significant improvements in PRO scores at 2 years, similar to normal laxity FAIS patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment via periportal capsulotomy without capsular closure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative therapeutic trial.

New Injury Patterns in Pediatric Supracondylar Fractures During COVID-19: Beds Are the New Monkey Bars.

BACKGROUND: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic drastically altered children's activity patterns. Our goal was to investigate how COVID-19 affected demographics, injury characteristics, treatment patterns, follow-up, and outcomes in pediatric supracondylar humerus (SCH) fractures. METHODS: This was an Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective analysis of patients undergoing surgery for a SCH fracture from May to November 2019 (pre-COVID-19) and from May to November 2020 (during COVID-19) at 2 tertiary children's hospitals. Demographic information, injury characteristics, hospital course, and follow-up data were collected and compared. RESULTS: SCH fractures decreased by >50% from 2019 (149) to 2020 (72). Children in the 2020 cohort were younger (mean 5.2 y old) compared with 2019 (6.0 y old) ( P =0.019). Mechanism of injury was significantly different in 2020 ( P <0.001), as the proportion of trampoline and furniture fractures increased from 8% and 17% to 15% and 33%, respectively. The proportion of playground and monkey bar fractures decreased from 20% and 17% to 3% and 4%, respectively. Distribution of Gartland type and neurovascular injury rates were similar in 2019 and 2020 ( P =0.411 and 0.538). Time from emergency department admission to the operating room and duration of hospital admission were both unchanged from 2019 to 2020 ( P =0.864 and 0.363). The duration of postoperative follow-up in 2019 was 94.5 days compared with 72.8 days in 2020 ( P =0.122), as more pandemic patients were lost to follow up (22.5% vs. 35.2%, P =0.049). CONCLUSIONS: The demographics, mechanism of injury, and follow-up practices of pediatric SCH fractures changed significantly during the pandemic, likely because of school closures and lock-downs changing activity patterns. Different mechanisms of injury affected younger patients and reflected the new ways children played. Trampoline-related and furniture-related injuries overtook the classic playground falls as primary mechanism of injury. Despite the need for COVID-19 testing, there was no delay in time to the operating room. Hospitalization duration did not change, yet postoperative follow-up was shorter, and more patients were lost to follow up. Despite these stressors, outcomes remained excellent in most children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective comparative study.

Patient-Reported Outcome Surveys for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Demonstrate Strong Correlations, High Minimum Clinically Important Difference Agreement and Large Ceiling Effects.

PURPOSE: To determine the correlation between different patient-reported outcome (PRO) measurements used to assess outcomes after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) in a single cohort of patients. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS (without dysplasia, arthritis, or joint hypermobility) were retrospectively analyzed from a prospectively collected cohort. PROs collected before surgery and at 2-year follow-up included the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (HOOS) with subscales for symptoms, pain, activities of daily living (ADL), sport, and quality of life (QoL), and the physical and mental components of the Short Form-12 (SF-12 PCS and SF-12 MCS). RESULTS: Three hundred patients with 2 years' follow-up (mean age 35.1 ± 11.3, BMI 24.7 ± 3.8, 52.7% female, median Tönnis grade 1) were identified. All patients underwent femoroplasty and labral repair. There was a strong correlation among nearly all the PRO surveys at 2-year follow-up, with the highest correlations identified between mHHS and HOOS-Pain (r = .86, P < .001) and mHHS and HOOS-ADL (r = .85, P < .001). Preoperative scores and the change from preoperative to postoperative scores demonstrated an overall moderate correlation between surveys. There was a consistently weak correlation between the SF-12 MCS and all other PROs. There were strong agreements (67%-77%) in the patients achieving minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for each PRO survey. All surveys except the SF-12 demonstrated a ceiling effect after surgery, with 13% to 43% of patients achieving the maximum score. CONCLUSIONS: PRO surveys used for FAIS demonstrate strong correlations, especially in the evaluation of patients during the postoperative period. MCID for VAS, mHHS, and HOOS demonstrate strong agreement, whereas large ceiling effects were seen with the mHHS and HOOS. The results support a more efficient use of PRO scores while being able to accurately capture patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Treatment of Labral Calcification in the Setting of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome With Arthroscopic Calcification Excision, Labral Repair, and Osteoplasty Improves Outcomes.

PURPOSE: To describe the diagnosis and 2-year outcomes of arthroscopic treatment for labral calcification in the setting of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed from a prospectively collected database of patients with FAIS undergoing hip arthroscopy. Patients with FAIS with labral calcification were differentiated radiographically from patients with other paralabral radiopaque densities such as os acetabuli, acetabular rim fractures, and labral ossification. Patients with FAIS with labral calcification were treated with arthroscopic calcification excision, labral repair, and osteoplasty and matched by age, sex, and body mass index with a cohort of patients with FAIS without labral calcifications who underwent labral repair and osteoplasty. Pre- and 2 years postoperatively, patients completed patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores including the modified Harris Hip Score, Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), 12-item Short-Form survey, and visual analog scale. RESULTS: In total, 40 hips (21 male, 19 female) with FAIS and labral calcification were included (age 36.8 ± 8.1, body mass index, 25.9 ± 4.5). Patients with FAIS with labral calcification demonstrated similar significant PRO score improvements compared with a matched cohort of patients with FAIS without labral calcification at 2 years after surgery (visual analog scale: (-)2.3 ± 0.4, (-)2.7 ± 0.5, modified Harris Hip Score: 16.1 ± 2.6, 17.1 ± 3.2; HOOS symptoms: 21.9 ± 3.7, 18.6 ± 3.6; HOOS pain: 22.1 ± 3.0, 25.0 ± 3.5; HOOS activities of daily living: 20.2 ± 2.8, 23.8 ± 3.3; HOOS sport: 35.6 ± 5.0, 35.6 ± 4.1; HOOS quality of life: 36.9 ± 4.5, 37.5 ± 4.4; 12-item Short-Form survey physical component summary: 15.5 ± 2.3, 20.1 ± 2.1, respectively). Both cohorts achieved minimal clinically important differences at equivalent rates (60%-82.5%) for all PRO scores. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with labral calcification in the setting of FAIS can be effectively treated with arthroscopic calcification excision, labral repair, and osteoplasty. These patients demonstrate significant improvements in patient-reported outcomes and achievement of minimal clinically important differences at 2 years similar to patients undergoing arthroscopic treatment for FAIS without labral calcification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, matched cohort study.

Hip Arthroscopy Volume and Reoperations in a Large Cross-Sectional Population: High Rate of Subsequent Revision Hip Arthroscopy in Young Patients and Total Hip Arthroplasty in Older Patients.

PURPOSE: To report contemporary trends in hip arthroscopy case volume in the United States using a large cross-sectional cohort with accurate laterality tracking for assessment of revision surgery and rates of conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA). METHODS: Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, we queried the Mariner PearlDiver dataset for patients who underwent hip arthroscopy from 2010 to 2017. Patient demographics were recorded and subsequent hip arthroscopy procedures and THA conversion within 2 years after surgery were tracked using International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision codes to accurately identify laterality. Emergency department and hospital admission within 30 days after surgery were queried. RESULTS: Of the 53,103 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy procedures, hip arthroscopy case volume increased 2-fold from 2010 to 2014 but remained relatively unchanged from 2014 to 2017. The most common age group undergoing surgery was 40 to 49 years, and female patients represented 70% of cases. Two-year subsequent surgery rate was 19%, with 15.1% undergoing a revision arthroscopy and 3.9% converting to THA. The most common revision arthroscopy procedures were femoroplasty (9.5%), labral repair (8.5%), and acetabuloplasty (4.3%). Younger patients were more likely to undergo revision arthroscopy (18% age 10-19 years; 15% age 20-29 years). Older patients had a significant risk for conversion to THA within 2 years (36% age 60-69 years; 28% age 50-59 years). Female patients also demonstrated a slightly greater rate of conversion to THA (4.1% female, 3.5% male, P <.0001). Patients 20 to 29 years had the greatest risk of emergency department admission (5.4%) and hospital admission (0.8%) within 30 days of surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The rise in hip arthroscopy procedures may be starting to plateau in the United States. Cross-sectional data also indicate that there is a greater than previously reported rate of revision hip arthroscopy in patients younger than 30 years of age and conversion to THA in patients older than 50 years of age. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, cross-sectional study.

Effect of Institution and COVID-19 on Access to Adult Arthroplasty Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although insurance status is important to patients' ability to access care, it varies significantly by race, age, and socioeconomic status. Novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) negatively impacted access to care, while simultaneously widening pre-existing health-care disparities. The purpose of the present study was to document this phenomena within orthopedics. METHODS: Patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty at two medical centers in San Francisco, California, were evaluated. One cohort came from the University of California San Francisco (UCSF), a tertiary center, and the other from Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital (ZSFGH), a safety-net hospital. Patients who underwent arthroplasty before the pandemic (March 2020) and those after pandemic declaration were evaluated. Patient demographics, surgical wait times, and operative volumes were compared. RESULTS: Two-hundred sixty-nine (pre-COVID, 184; post-COVID, 85) cases at UCSF and 63 (pre-COVID, 47; post-COVID, 16) cases at ZSFGH met inclusion criteria. Patients at ZSFGH had a significantly higher body mass index, were more often racial minorities, and were less likely to speak English. Patients at ZSFGH were less likely to have private insurance. A comparison of case volumes showed a larger decrease at ZSFGH than at UCSF after COVID. Wait times between the two sites before and after COVID showed a larger increase in wait times at ZSFGH. Notably, wait times at ZSFGH before COVID were more than double the wait times at UCSF after COVID. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 worsened access to primary hip and knee arthroplasties at two academic medical centers in San Francisco. The pandemic also worsened pre-existing disparities. Racial minorities, non-English speakers, and those with nonprivate insurance were affected the most.

Correlating Biomechanical Gait Analysis With Patient-Reported Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Background: Postoperative biomechanics after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are an outcome of interest, but correlation with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) remains unclear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between changes in hip biomechanics in FAIS patients after hip arthroscopy and changes in PRO scores. We hypothesized that gait analysis would demonstrate significant correlations between pre- and postoperative changes in biomechanics and changes in PRO scores. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: FAIS patients without dysplasia or arthritis who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for labral repair and femoroplasty underwent preoperative and 1-year postoperative 3-dimensional motion tracking and biomechanical testing during normal gait. Joint kinematics calculated included flexion/extension (sagittal plane), abduction/adduction (frontal plane), and internal/external rotation (transverse plane). Peak hip angles and moments were compared between baseline and 1-year postoperative measures. At baseline, 1-year, and 2-year postoperatively, patients completed the following PRO surveys: 12-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS). Joint kinematics that significantly improved 1 year after surgery were assessed for correlations with PRO scores. Results: A total of 10 patients (12 hips) were enrolled prospectively. PROs significantly improved at 1 and 2 years postoperatively compared with baseline values for HOOS, mHHS, and SF-12 Physical Component Score, with all patients achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the HOOS Sport/Recreation and Quality of Life subscales. From preoperatively to 1-year postoperatively, significant improvements were seen in peak hip abduction angle (from -2.3° ± 1.8° to -4.6° ± 1.8°; P = .0058) and peak hip extension moment (from -1.03 ± 0.19 to -0.85 ± 0.20 N·m/kg; P = .014); however, there were no significant correlations between these changes and the pre- to postoperative changes on any PRO scores. Conclusion: Gait analysis of FAIS patients after hip arthroscopy demonstrated small, albeit significant, changes in postoperative hip kinetics and kinematics; however, these changes did not correlate with the large, clinically significant improvements in PROs at 1 year after surgery. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that the degree of improvement in short-term PROs after hip arthroscopy for FAIS may not be related to small changes in biomechanics postoperatively.

Contemporary Practice Patterns for the Treatment of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears in the United States.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of research investigating current practice trends in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears as well as common concomitant procedures and reoperations associated with ACL reconstruction (ACLR). PURPOSE: To analyze current practice patterns for ACLR as well as the frequency of concomitant and revision procedures with respect to patient characteristics in a cross-sectional population of the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Patient data between 2010 and 2017 were queried using the Mariner PearlDiver database. International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (in 2010-2014) and Tenth Revision (ICD-10; in 2015-2017), diagnosis codes were used to identify ACL tears, and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify ACLR and concomitant surgical procedures. Patient characteristics were stratified by sex and age. Cases of subsequent knee surgery and conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) within 2 years after ACLR were tracked using ICD-10 codes between 2015 and 2017 to ensure ipsilateral laterality. RESULTS: Of 229,295 patients identified with an ACL tear diagnosis during the study period, 75% underwent ACLR. In patients aged 10 to 39 years, 84% to 92% underwent ACLR, while patients aged 50 to 59 (50%) and 60 to 69 (28%) years were less likely to have surgery after an ACL tear. Female and male patients underwent ACLR at a similar rate (75%). Within the patients who underwent ACLR, 44% underwent concomitant meniscal debridement as compared with 11% with concomitant meniscal repair. Male patients were more likely to undergo meniscal debridement (48% vs 40%; P < .0001). The frequency of meniscal repair increased from 9% in 2010 to 14% in 2017, while the frequency of meniscal debridement decreased from 47% to 41% (P < .0001). Within 2 years of ACLR, 6% of patients underwent revision ACLR; 4%, subsequent meniscal debridement; 1%, meniscal repair; and 1%, conversion to TKA. CONCLUSION: The frequency of ACLR for ACL tears has remained relatively stable in recent years and was similar between female and male patients in this cross-sectional population. The majority of patients aged 10 to 39 years underwent ACLR, while less than half of patients >50 years underwent surgery.