Community pharmacists' perspectives on assessing kidney function and medication dosing for patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: A qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

Background: The kidneys are responsible for the elimination of many drugs. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common, and medications may require adjustment to avoid adverse outcomes. Despite the availability of kidney drug dosing resources, people with CKD are at risk of inappropriate drug prescribing. Community pharmacists are in the ideal position to mitigate harm from inappropriate prescribing in this population. Methods: In this qualitative study, community pharmacists were interviewed on their perspective on kidney function assessment and dose adjustment in people with advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73 m2). The theoretical domains framework for targeting behavioural change was used to inform the interview guide and analysis. Purposeful sampling was employed until data saturation. Semistructured virtual interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim and uploaded into NVIVO 12 Pro to facilitate thematic analysis. Deductive and inductive iterative coding approaches were employed to determine categories and themes. Results: Twelve pharmacists were interviewed, with a mean age of 42 years and 16 years of experience. Four themes comprising 10 categories were identified to influence kidney function assessment and dosing, including resources (information access, technology, references), environment (pharmacy infrastructure, practice setting), reflection (triggers, experience and training, collaboration) and leadership and governance (pharmacist role, advocacy). Feedback on an optimal CKD tool was collected, and enabling themes (categories) for implementation included knowledge and skills (education, training) and reflection (role, support, integration). Conclusions: Findings will inform the interventions needed to improve implementation of kidney assessment and dosing of high-risk medications in people with kidney impairment into community pharmacy practice. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2023;156:xx-xx.

Effects of a Knowledge-Translation Intervention on Early Dialysis Initiation: A Cluster Randomized Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Initiating Dialysis Early and Late (IDEAL) trial, published in 2009, found no clinically measurable benefit with respect to risk of mortality or early complications with early dialysis initiation versus deferred dialysis start. After these findings, guidelines recommended an intent-to-defer approach to dialysis initiation, with the goal of deferring it until clinical symptoms arise. METHODS: To evaluate a four-component knowledge translation intervention aimed at promoting an intent-to-defer strategy for dialysis initiation, we conducted a cluster randomized trial in Canada between October 2014 and November 2015. We randomized 55 clinics, 27 to the intervention group and 28 to the control group. The educational intervention, using knowledge-translation tools, included telephone surveys from a knowledge-translation broker, a 1-year center-specific audit with feedback, delivery of a guidelines package, and an academic detailing visit. Participants included adults who had at least 3 months of predialysis care and who started dialysis in the first year after the intervention. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who initiated dialysis early (at eGFR >10.5 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients who initiated in the acute inpatient setting. RESULTS: The analysis included 3424 patients initiating dialysis in the 1-year follow-up period. Of these, 509 of 1592 (32.0%) in the intervention arm and 605 of 1832 (33.0%) in the control arm started dialysis early. There was no difference in the proportion of individuals initiating dialysis early or in the proportion of individuals initiating dialysis as an acute inpatient. CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted knowledge translation intervention failed to reduce the proportion of early dialysis starts in patients with CKD followed in multidisciplinary clinics. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02183987. Available at: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02183987.

Physician leadership development: Evidence-informed design tempered with real-life experience.

This article describes key considerations for creation of evidence-informed in-house physician leadership development. Ten elements extracted from a scan of the peer-reviewed and grey literature are presented, and key learnings at the Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, a quaternary academic health sciences centre in Halifax, Nova Scotia, are highlighted. Each element is briefly described with practical considerations and challenges to implementation outlined in the context of the former Capital District Health Authority, where the authors collaborated to create in-house physician leadership development prior to the consolidation of health districts in that province. The purpose of this article is to share how the authors used evidence to plan physician leadership development and to explore the additional situational and contextual factors and considerations needed for implementation.

Health state utilities associated with major clinical events in the context of secondary hyperparathyroidism and chronic kidney disease requiring dialysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) who require dialysis are at increased risk for cardiovascular events and bone fractures. To assist in economic evaluations, this study aimed to estimate the disutility of these events beyond the impact of CKD and SHPT. METHODS: A basic one-year health state was developed describing CKD and SHPT requiring dialysis. Further health states added acute events (cardiovascular events, fractures, and surgical procedures) or chronic post-event effects. Acute health states described a year including an event, and chronic health states described a year subsequent to an event. General population participants in Canada completed time trade-off interviews from which utilities were derived. Pairwise comparisons were made between the basic state and event, and between comparable health states. RESULTS: A total of 199 participants (54.8% female; mean age = 46.3 years) completed interviews. Each health state had ≥130 valuations. The mean (SD) utility of the basic health state was 0.60 (0.34). For acute events, mean utility differences versus the basic state were: myocardial infarction, -0.06; unstable angina, -0.05; peripheral vascular disease (PVD) with amputation, -0.33; PVD without amputation, -0.11; heart failure, -0.14; stroke, -0.30; hip fracture, -0.14; arm fracture, -0.04; parathyroidectomy, +0.02; kidney transplant, +0.06. Disutilities for chronic health states were: stable angina, -0.09; stroke, -0.27; PVD with amputation, -0.30; PVD without amputation, -0.12; heart failure, -0.14. CONCLUSIONS: Cardiovascular events and fractures were associated with lower utility scores, suggesting a perceived decrease in quality of life beyond the impact of CKD and SHPT.

Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example.

ABSTRACT: Research is critical for uncovering new and effective therapies for better health outcomes, yet there remains a significant lag between identifying evidence-based interventions and implementing them into practice. Research teams can often be experienced in evidence generation, but less so in evidence implementation, underscoring the need for more customized tools to support them in this latter step. The implementation stage can be especially challenging given how strategies must be tailored to the unique end users and contexts of a given intervention. Therefore, our patient-oriented kidney research network sought to create an "Implementation Toolkit" and "Pathway to Implementation" guide to help research teams and their operational and clinical partners in implementing their interventions. Importantly, the tools were created using input and feedback from diverse groups, including patient partners, implementation science experts, researchers, operational leaders, and policymakers, all of whom play role in supporting the implementation of health interventions. Our tools are widely applicable to diverse teams, regardless of the intervention or innovation being implemented. SPANISH ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A214.

Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on the 2012 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Anemia in CKD.

The KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes) 2012 clinical practice guideline for anemia management in patients with chronic kidney disease provides the structural and evidence base for the Canadian Society of Nephrology commentary on this guideline's relevancy and application to the Canadian health care system. While in general agreement, we provide commentary on 11 of the 61 KDIGO guideline statements. Specifically, we agreed that a therapeutic trial of iron is appropriate in cases in which a reduction in erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) dosage or avoidance of ESA and transfusion is desired, transferrin saturations are >30%, and ferritin concentrations are >500 µg/L. However, we concluded that there is insufficient evidence to support an upper target or threshold for ferritin and transferrin saturation levels. We agree with the initiation of ESA treatment when hemoglobin (Hb) level is 90-100 g/L; however, we specifically state that an acceptable range for Hb level is 95-115 g/L, with a target of 100-110 g/L, and add caution to individualization above this range due to concerns regarding the safety of ESAs. We agree that ESAs should be used with considerable caution in patients with active malignancy, history of stroke, or history of malignancy, and we suggest initiating ESA therapy at Hb level of 90 g/L and to aim for a Hb level in the range of 90-105 g/L. The reader is encouraged to note the level of evidence and review the entire KDIGO anemia guideline to interpret the guideline statements and commentary appropriately.

Oral sodium thiosulfate as maintenance therapy for calcific uremic arteriolopathy: a case series.

BACKGROUND: Calcific uremic arteriolopathy (CUA) is a rare but serious disorder affecting 4% of dialysis patients. Intravenous sodium thiosulfate (IV STS) has been shown as an effective treatment. In Canada, the average cost of IV STS is about CAD 12,000 per month, while the cost of compounded oral STS is CAD 45 per month. METHODS: Prospective cohort where all patients diagnosed with CUA during the year 2011 were included. They were treated initially with IV STS. Afterwards, each patient had a baseline bone scan and was started on oral STS for a total of 6 months followed by a repeat bone scan. A single radiologist, blinded to the dates of both scans for a given patient, read all scans. RESULTS: Four patients were studied. The intravenous dose used was 25 g three times a week for an average duration of 131 days. After the maintenance therapy, 2 patients developed further regression of the lesions, 1 had stable lesions, and 1 got worse; however, nonadherence to the drug was confirmed. The oral medication was well tolerated with no reported side effects. CONCLUSION: Oral STS, after IV STS, seems to stabilize, or even improve CUA lesions, and therefore could be useful as maintenance therapy, especially since its cost is much more reasonable than IV STS and due to the ongoing shortage of the IV formulation.

Management of Type 2 Diabetic Kidney Disease in 2022: A Narrative Review for Specialists and Primary Care.

Purpose of review: Kidney disease is present in almost half of Canadian patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), and it is also the most common first cardiorenal manifestation of T2D. Despite clear guidelines for testing, opportunities are being missed to identify kidney diseases, and many Canadians are therefore not receiving the best available treatments. This has become even more important given recent clinical trials demonstrating improvements in both kidney and cardiovascular (CV) endpoints with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone. The goal of this document is to provide a narrative review of the current evidence for the treatment of diabetic kidney disease (DKD) that supports this new standard of care and to provide practice points. Sources of information: An expert panel of Canadian clinicians was assembled, including 9 nephrologists, an endocrinologist, and a primary care practitioner. The information the authors used for this review consisted of published clinical trials and guidelines, selected by the authors based on their assessment of their relevance to the questions being answered. Methods: Panelists met virtually to discuss potential questions to be answered in the review and agreed on 10 key questions. Two panel members volunteered as co-leads to write the summaries and practice points for each of the identified questions. Summaries and practice points were distributed to the entire author list by email. Through 2 rounds of online voting, a second virtual meeting, and subsequent email correspondence, the authors reached consensus on the contents of the review, including all the practice points. Key findings: It is critical that DKD be identified as early as possible in the course of the disease to optimally prevent disease progression and associated complications. Patients with diabetes should be routinely screened for DKD with assessments of both urinary albumin and kidney function. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on the risks and benefits, patients' needs and preferences, medication access and cost, and the degree of glucose lowering needed. Patients with DKD should be treated to achieve targets for A1C and blood pressure. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade and treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors are also key components of the standard of care to reduce the risk of kidney and CV events for these patients. Finerenone should also be considered to further reduce the risk of CV events and chronic kidney disease progression. Education of patients with diabetes prescribed SGLT2 inhibitors and/or finerenone is an important component of treatment. Limitations: No formal guideline process was used. The practice points are not graded and are not intended to be viewed as having the weight of a clinical practice guideline or formal consensus statement. However, most practice points are well aligned with current clinical practice guidelines.

Justification: L'insuffisance rénale est présente chez près de la moitié des patients canadiens atteints de diabète de type 2 (DT2). Il s'agit également de la première manifestation cardiorénale la plus fréquente du DT2. Bien qu'il existe des lignes directrices claires pour son dépistage, des occasions de diagnostiquer l'insuffisance rénale sont manquées, ce qui fait en sorte que de nombreux Canadiens ne reçoivent pas les meilleurs traitements disponibles. Cette préoccupation a pris de l'importance puisque de récents essais cliniques ont démontré des améliorations dans les paramètres rénaux et cardiovasculaires (CV) avec la prise de finérénone, un antagoniste non stéroïdien des récepteurs minéralocorticoïdes (nsMRA), et d'inhibiteurs du cotransporteur de glucose de sodium 2 (SGLT2). L'objectif de cet article est de fournir une revue narrative des données probantes actuelles appuyant cette nouvelle norme de soins pour le traitement de l'insuffisance rénale diabétique (IRD), ainsi que des points de pratique. Sources de l'information: Un groupe d'experts composé de cliniciens canadiens, dont neuf néphrologues, un endocrinologue et un prestataire de soins primaires, a été formé. Les auteurs de cette revue ont utilisé des lignes directrices et des essais cliniques publiés comme sources; ceux-ci ont été choisis sur la base d'une évaluation de leur pertinence pour les questions auxquelles ils avaient répondu. Méthodologie: Les panélistes se sont réunis virtuellement pour discuter de potentielles questions à répondre dans le cadre de cette revue, et se sont entendus sur dix questions clés. Deux membres du panel se sont portés volontaires pour être co-responsables et rédiger les résumés et les points de pratique pour chacune des questions identifiées. Ces derniers ont été distribués par courriel à l'ensemble des auteurs. Après deux tours de vote en ligne, une deuxième réunion virtuelle et la correspondance électronique qui a suivi, les auteurs sont parvenus à un consensus sur le contenu de la revue narrative, y compris sur tous les points de pratique. Principaux résultats: Il est essentiel que l'IRD soit diagnostiquée le plus tôt possible afin de prévenir de façon optimale la progression de la maladie et les complications qui y sont associées. On devrait procéder au dépistage systématique de l'IRD chez les patients diabétiques par l'évaluation de l'albumine urinaire ET de la fonction rénale. Les décisions relatives au traitement devraient être individualisées en fonction des risques et des avantages pour le patient, de ses besoins et préférences, de l'accès aux médicaments et des coûts, ainsi que du degré nécessaire de réduction de la glycémie. Les patients atteints d'IRD devraient être traités pour atteindre les cibles d'A1c et de pression artérielle. Le blocage du SRAA et le traitement avec des inhibiteurs du SGLT2 sont également des composantes clés de la norme de soins visant à réduire le risque d'événements rénaux et CV pour ces patients. La finérénone devrait également être envisagée pour réduire encore davantage les risques d'événements CV et de progression vers l'IRC. L'éducation des patients diabétiques auxquels on prescrit des inhibiteurs du SGLT2 et/ou de la finérénone est un élément important du traitement. Limites: Aucun processus officiel de directives n'a été utilisé. Les points de pratique ne sont pas notés et ne sont pas destinés à être considérés comme ayant le poids d'une directive de pratique clinique ou d'une déclaration de consensus officielle. Cependant, la plupart des points de pratique sont bien alignés avec les lignes directrices actuelles de pratique clinique.

The impact of an "acute dialysis start" on the mortality attributed to the use of central venous catheters: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Central venous catheters (CVCs) are associated with early mortality in dialysis patients. However, some patients progress to end stage renal disease after an acute illness, prior to reaching an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at which one would expect to establish alternative access (fistula/peritoneal dialysis catheter). The purpose of this study was to determine if exclusion of this "acute start" patient group alters the association between CVCs and mortality. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 406 incident dialysis patients from 1 Jan 2006 to 31 Dec 2009. Patients were classified as acute starts if 1) the eGFR was >25 ml/min/1.73 m2, ≤ 3 months prior to dialysis initiation and declined after an acute event (n = 45), or 2) in those without prior eGFR measurements, there was no supporting evidence of chronic kidney disease on history or imaging (n = 12). Remaining patients were classified as chronic start (n = 349). RESULTS: 98 % and 52 % of acute and chronic starts initiated dialysis with a CVC. There were 148 deaths. The adjusted mortality hazard ratio (HR) for acute vs. chronic start patients was 1.84, (95 % CI [1.19-2.85]). The adjusted mortality HR for patients dialyzing with a CVC compared to alternative access was 1.19 (95 % CI [0.80-1.77]). After excluding acute start patients, the adjusted HR fell to 1.03 (95 % CI [0.67-1.57]). CONCLUSIONS: A significant proportion of early dialysis mortality occurs after an acute start. Exclusion of this population attenuates the mortality risk associated with CVCs.

Multifaceted Intervention to Increase the Use of Home Dialysis: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Home dialysis therapies (peritoneal and home hemodialysis) are less expensive and provide similar outcomes to in-center hemodialysis, but they are underutilized in most health systems. Given this, we designed a multifaceted intervention to increase the use of home dialysis. In this study, our objective was to evaluate the effect of this intervention on home dialysis use in CKD clinics across Canada. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial in 55 CKD clinic clusters in nine provinces in Canada between October 2014 and November 2015. Participants included all adult patients who initiated dialysis in the year following the intervention. We evaluated the implementation of a four-component intervention, which included phone surveys from a knowledge translation broker, a 1-year center-specific audit/feedback on home dialysis use, delivery of an educational package (including tools aimed at both providers and patients), and an academic detailing visit. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients using home dialysis at 180 days after dialysis initiation. RESULTS: A total of 55 clinics were randomized (27 in the intervention and 28 in the control), with 5312 patients initiating dialysis in the 1-year follow-up period. In the primary analysis, there was no difference in the use of home dialysis at 180 days in the intervention and control clusters (absolute risk difference, 4%; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 10%). Using a difference-in-difference comparison, the use of home dialysis at 180 days was similar before and after implementation of the intervention (difference of 0% in intervention clinics; 95% confidence interval, -2% to 3%; difference of 0.8% in control clinics; 95% confidence interval, -1% to 3%; P=0.84). CONCLUSIONS: A multifaceted intervention did not increase the use of home dialysis in adults initiating dialysis. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER: A Cluster Randomized Trial to Assess the Impact of Patient and Provider Education on Use of Home Dialysis, NCT02202018.

Interprovincial differences in the achievement of K/DOQI targets of mineral metabolism in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Abnormalities in mineral metabolism in chronic kidney disease are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical practice guidelines were established in 2003 to address issues in the management of mineral and bone metabolism. The goal of this study was to compare (i) mineral metabolism control among Canadian haemodialysis (HD) patients with K/DOQI-defined targets and Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study II (DOPPS II) data and (ii) the effect of different treatment strategies. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of 2215 HD patients was conducted. Phosphorus (P), calcium (Ca), intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) and calcium-phosphate product (CaXP) were analysed. In addition, management was compared between provinces with more or less restricted access to the phosphate binder sevelamer. RESULTS: K/DOQI targets for P, Ca, iPTH and CaXP K/DOQI targets were met by 59.7%, 58.6%, 29.7% and 83.3%, respectively. A greater proportion of patients were within target compared with those in DOPPS II (2002-2004). Targets were more likely to be reached by patients residing in provinces with formularies allowing less restricted access to sevelamer: P: 61.8% vs 55.7% (P = 0.01); CaXP: 85.5% vs 79.1% (P = 0.0006). As expected, patients in provinces with more restrictive formularies were more often receiving doses of elemental calcium > 1.5 g/day than those with more open listings (62.1% vs 14.0%, P < 0.0001) and were less likely to receive sevelamer (14.1% vs 42.4%, P = 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Mineral metabolism parameters were more frequently within the target range amongst (i) patients in the current study compared with those in the DOPPS II era and (ii) patients in provinces with less restricted access to sevelamer.

Macrocytosis may be associated with mortality in chronic hemodialysis patients: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Macrocytosis occurs in chronic hemodialysis (CHD) patients; however, its significance is unknown. The purpose of this study was to establish the prevalence and distribution of macrocytosis, to identify its clinical associations and to determine if macrocytosis is associated with mortality in stable, chronic hemodialysis patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-centre prospective cohort study of 150 stable, adult CHD patients followed for nine months. Macrocytosis was defined as a mean corpuscular volume (MCV) > 97 fl. We analyzed MCV as a continuous variable, in tertiles and using a cutoff point of 102 fl. RESULTS: The mean MCV was 99.1 ± 6.4 fl, (range 66-120 fl). MCV was normally distributed. 92 (61%) of patients had an MCV > 97 fl and 45 (30%) > 102 fl. Patients were not B12 or folate deficient in those with available data and three patients with an MCV > 102 fl had hypothyroidism. In a logistic regression analysis, an MCV > 102 fl was associated with a higher Charlson-Age Comorbidity Index (CACI) and higher ratios of darbepoetin alfa to hemoglobin (Hb), [(weekly darbepoetin alfa dose in micrograms per kg body weight / Hb in g/L)*1000]. There were 23 deaths at nine months in this study. Unadjusted MCV > 102 fl was associated with mortality (HR 3.24, 95% CI 1.42-7.39, P = 0.005). Adjusting for the CACI, an MCV > 102 fl was still associated with mortality (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.07-5.71, P = 0.035). CONCLUSIONS: Macrocytosis may be associated with mortality in stable, chronic hemodialysis patients. Future studies will need to be conducted to confirm this finding.

Defining the Scope of Knowledge Translation Within a National, Patient-Oriented Kidney Research Network.

PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: Integrated knowledge translation (IKT) is a collaborative approach whereby knowledge created through health research is utilized in ways that are relevant to the needs of all stakeholders. However, research teams have limited capacity and know-how for achieving IKT, resulting in a disconnect between the generation and application of knowledge. The goal of this report is to describe how IKT research was achieved across a large-scale, patient-oriented research network, Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD). SOURCES OF INFORMATION: Resources to facilitate knowledge translation (KT) planning across the network were developed by the Can-SOLVE CKD Knowledge User/Knowledge Translation Committee with reference to established Canadian KT and patient engagement tools and frameworks, review of the published and gray literature, and expertise of committee members. METHODS: The Can-SOLVE CKD Knowledge User/Knowledge Translation Committee consisting of patient partners, health care providers, policymakers, and researchers provided oversight of the development and implementation of the network's IKT initiatives. Guided by its strategic framework, the committee developed KT planning templates and review checklists to assist network projects with preparing for dissemination, implementation, and scale and spread of their interventions. The committee has acted in a consultative capacity to facilitate IKT across network initiatives and has supported capacity building through KT activities aimed at network membership and knowledge users more broadly. KEY FINDINGS: The Can-SOLVE CKD Knowledge User/Knowledge Translation Committee established a nation-wide strategy for KT infrastructure and capacity building. Acting as a knowledge intermediary, the committee has connected research teams with knowledge users across Canada to support practices and policies informed by evidence generated by the network. The committee has developed KT initiatives, including a Community of Practice, whereby participants across different regions and disciplines convene regularly to share health research knowledge and communications strategies relevant to the network. Critically, patients are engaged and contribute throughout the research process. Examples of IKT activities from select projects are provided, as well as ways for sustaining the network's KT platform. LIMITATIONS: The KT resources developed by the committee were adapted from other established resources to meet the needs of the network and have not undergone formal evaluation in this context. Given the broad scope of the network, resources to facilitate implementation and knowledge user engagement may not meet the needs of all initiatives and must be tailored accordingly. Knowledge barriers, including a lack of information and skills related to conceptual and practical aspects of KT, among network members provided a rationale for various KT capacity-building initiatives. IMPLICATIONS: The approach described here offers a practical method for achieving IKT, including how to plan, implement, and sustain initiatives across large-scale health research networks. Within the context of Can-SOLVE CKD, these efforts will shorten knowledge-practice gaps through producing and applying relevant research to improve the lives of people living with kidney disease.

OBJECTIF DU PROGRAMME: L'application intégrée des connaissances (AIC) est une approche collaborative à répondre aux besoins de tous les intervenants. Les équipes de recherche ont cependant une capacité et un savoir-faire limités pour réaliser l'AIC, ce qui entraîne un décalage entre la production et l'application des connaissances. L'objectif de cet article est de décrire comment la recherche sur l'AIC a été réalisée dans le cadre d'un vaste réseau de recherche axée sur le patient, le réseau CAN-SOLVE CKD (Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease). SOURCES: Les ressources visant à faciliter la planification de l'application des connaissances (AC) dans l'ensemble du réseau ont été élaborées par le Comité des utilisateurs/de l'application des connaissances (Knowledge User/Knowledge Translation Committee) de Can-SOLVE CKD en se référant à des outils et des cadres d'AC et de participation des patients établis au Canada, à l'examen de la documentation publiée et de la littérature grise et à l'expertise des membres du comité. MÉTHODOLOGIE: Le Comité des utilisateurs/de l'application des connaissances de CAN-SOLVE, constitué de partenaires patients, de fournisseurs de soins, de décideurs et de chercheurs, a supervisé le développement et la mise en œuvre des initiatives d'AIC du réseau. Guidé par son cadre stratégique, le comité a élaboré des modèles de planification pour l'AC et des listes de vérification pour aider les projets du réseau à se préparer à la diffusion et à la mise en œuvre de leurs interventions, de même qu'à leur élargissement et leur diffusion. Le comité a agi à titre consultatif pour faciliter l'AIC dans l'ensemble des initiatives du réseau, et a appuyé le renforcement des capacités par le biais d'activités d'AC destinées aux membres du réseau et, plus largement, aux utilisateurs des connaissances. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Le Comité des utilisateurs/de l'application des connaissances de CAN-SOLVE a établi une stratégie nationale pour l'infrastructure et le renforcement des capacités en matière d'AC. En tant qu'intermédiaire, le comité a mis en relation des équipes de recherche et des utilisateurs des connaissances partout au Canada afin d'appuyer les pratiques et les politiques fondées sur les données probantes produites par le réseau. Le comité a élaboré des initiatives d'AC, notamment une communauté de pratique où les participants des différentes régions et disciplines se réunissent sur une base régulière pour partager les connaissances générées en recherche et les stratégies de communication pertinentes pour le réseau. Il est essentiel que les patients s'engagent et contribuent tout au long du processus de recherche. Des exemples d'activités d'AIC tirés de projets sélectionnés sont fournis, de même que des moyens de maintenir la plateforme d'AC du réseau. LIMITES: Les ressources d'AC développées par le comité ont été adaptées à partir de ressources établies pour répondre aux besoins du réseau et, dans ce contexte, n'ont pas fait l'objet d'une évaluation officielle. Compte tenu de la vaste portée du réseau, les ressources destinées à faciliter la mise en œuvre et la participation des utilisateurs des connaissances pourraient ne pas répondre aux besoins de toutes les initiatives et devraient être adaptées en conséquence. Les freins à la connaissance parmi les membres du réseau, notamment le manque d'information et de compétences liées aux aspects conceptuels et pratiques de l'AC, ont servi de justification à diverses initiatives de renforcement des capacités en matière d'AC. CONCLUSION: L'approche décrite offre une méthode pratique pour parvenir à l'AIC, notamment dans la façon de planifier, de mettre en œuvre et d'appuyer des initiatives dans les réseaux de recherche d'envergure. Dans le contexte de CAN-SOLVE CKD, ces efforts permettront de réduire les écarts entre les connaissances et les pratiques, en produisant et en appliquant des recherches visant l'amélioration de la vie des personnes atteintes de néphropathies.

Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists COVID-19 Rapid Response: Guidelines for Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Children.

PURPOSE: This article provides guidance on managing acute kidney injury (AKI) and kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in pediatrics during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Canadian context. It is adapted from recently published rapid guidelines on the management of AKI and KRT in adults, from the Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN). The goal is to provide the best possible care for pediatric patients with kidney disease during the pandemic and ensure the health care team's safety. INFORMATION SOURCES: The Canadian Association of Paediatric Nephrologists (CAPN) COVID-19 Rapid Response team derived these rapid guidelines from the CSN consensus recommendations for adult patients with AKI. We have also consulted specific documents from other national and international agencies focused on pediatric kidney health. We identified additional information by reviewing the published academic literature relevant to pediatric AKI and KRT, including recent journal articles and preprints related to COVID-19 in children. Finally, our group also sought expert opinions from pediatric nephrologists across Canada. METHODS: The leadership of the CAPN, which is affiliated with the CSN, solicited a team of clinicians and researchers with expertise in pediatric AKI and acute KRT. The goal was to adapt the guidelines recently adopted for Canadian adult patients for pediatric-specific settings. These included specific COVID-19-related themes relevant to AKI and KRT in a Canadian setting, as determined by a group of kidney disease experts and leaders. An expert group of clinicians in pediatric AKI and acute KRT reviewed the revised pediatric guidelines. KEY FINDINGS: (1) Current Canadian data do not suggest an imminent threat of an increase in acute KRT needs in children because of COVID-19; however, close coordination between nephrology programs and critical care programs is crucial as the pandemic continues to evolve. (2) Pediatric centers should prepare to reallocate resources to adult centers as needed based on broader health care needs during the COVID-19 pandemic. (3) Specific suggestions pertinent to the optimal management of AKI and KRT in COVID-19 patients are provided. These suggestions include but are not limited to aspects of fluid management, KRT vascular access, and KRT modality choice. (4) Considerations to ensure adequate provision of KRT if resources become scarce during the COVID-19 pandemic. LIMITATIONS: We did not conduct a formal systematic review or meta-analysis. We did not evaluate our specific suggestions in the clinical environment. The local context, including how the provision of care for AKI and acute KRT is organized, may impede the implementation of many suggestions. As knowledge is advancing rapidly in the area of COVID-19, suggestions may become outdated quickly. Finally, most of the literature for AKI and KRT in COVID-19 comes from adult data, and there are few pediatric-specific studies. IMPLICATIONS: Given that most acute KRT related to COVID-19 is likely to be required in the pediatric intensive care unit initial setting, close collaboration and planning between critical care and pediatric nephrology programs are needed. Our group will update these suggestions with a supplement if necessary as newer evidence becomes available that may change or add to the recommendations provided.

Canadian Senior Renal Leaders Community of Practice: Vulnerable Populations With Chronic Kidney Disease-Evidence to Inform Policy.

PURPOSE: Low socioeconomic status, race, ethnicity, and rural/remote populations are all associated with disparities in access, care, and outcomes for chronic kidney disease (CKD). There have been different interventions supported by Canadian renal programs to address these disparities. This article reviews the evidence for impact of strategies to reduce inequities experienced by vulnerable populations living with or at risk of CKD and to collate and share interprovincial targeted interventions through the newly formed "Canadian Senior Renal Leaders Community of Practice" focused on translating evidence into clinical practice and policy. SOURCE OF INFORMATION: A literature search of Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, and Google Scholar from 2008 to 2018 identified 13 reports of processes and interventions that have been implemented in Australia, Canada, and the United States to reduce inequities in CKD care and can be categorized into 3 broad areas: (1) early screening and prevention, (2) disease management and dialysis, and (3) pretransplant. Web sites from each Canadian jurisdiction and from Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease (Can-SOLVE CKD) Network were used to assess the current state of Canadian initiatives. METHODS: Reviews were completed to gather information on renal initiatives for vulnerable populations, including (1) identification of populations that experience disparities in access to care or in outcomes in the context of CKD prevention and treatment and (2) interventions that have been implemented to reduce disparities in access, care, and outcomes for vulnerable populations with CKD. A current state summary of Canadian initiatives related to vulnerable populations was conducted through a review of publicly available information, including a review of renal program Web sites and a review of current projects related to vulnerable populations that are part of Can-SOLVE CKD. Can-SOLVE CKD is a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (CIHR-SPOR) funded research network to transform the care of people affected by kidney disease. KEY FINDINGS: Interventions to improve inequities in access to CKD screening, disease management, and care are successful when developed with community engagement, provided to the patient in their own environment, and tailored to specific populations. Many provincial renal programs have implemented initiatives to support vulnerable populations with or at risk of CKD. Current projects funded through CIHR SPOR focus on underserved populations and involve partnerships with Indigenous populations. Many renal programs in Canada had or were in the process of implementing interventions to support vulnerable populations with CKD; however, information about the initiatives were not readily available online despite a strong interest and opportunity to support interprovincial knowledge sharing. Despite this common interest, little information is systematically shared between Canadian jurisdictions to support interprovincial sharing to promote evidence-informed policy and program development. Efforts will be made through the newly formed Canadian Senior Renal Leaders Community of Practice to collaborate and share learnings to inform future program and policy development, implementation, and evaluation. LIMITATIONS: As this was not a systematic review, literature search only encompassed studies published in English between 2008 and 2018. It is possible that populations and interventions were overlooked during the search and through the screening process. Furthermore, the controversial definition of "vulnerable" and literature that only came from Canada, the United States, and Australia limits the generalizability of this review.

CONTEXTE ET OBJECTIFS: En contexte d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC), le faible statut socioéconomique du patient, sa race, son origine ethnique et le fait d'habiter une région rurale/éloignée sont associés à des iniquités dans l'accès et la qualité des soins et dans les résultats de santé. Ces disparités ont d'ailleurs fait l'objet de différentes interventions de la part des programmes rénaux canadiens. Cet article explore les données probantes sur l'effet de ces stratégies de réduction des inégalités subies par les populations vulnérables atteintes ou susceptibles de développer une néphropathie chronique. L'article vise également à colliger et à partager les interventions ciblées entre les provinces par le biais de la toute nouvelle « Communauté de pratique des hauts dirigeants en néphrologie au Canada ¼, laquelle est axée sur la transposition des données probantes en politiques et pratiques cliniques. SOURCES: Une recherche sur Medline, CINAHL, PubMed et Google Scholar de la littérature publiée entre 2008 et 2018 a permis de répertorier 13 rapports faisant état d'interventions mises en œuvre en Australie, au Canada et aux États-Unis pour réduire les iniquités de soins en IRC. Ces interventions ont été classées selon trois thèmes: 1) prévention et dépistage précoce, 2) prise en charge et dialyse, et 3) pré-transplantation. Les sites Web du réseau Can-SOLVE CKD (Canadians Seeking Solutions and Innovations to Overcome Chronic Kidney Disease) et de chaque province et territoire canadiens ont été consultés pour dresser l'état actuel des stratégies canadiennes. MÉTHODOLOGIE: La revue de la littérature a permis de recenser les populations subissant des inégalités quant à l'accès aux soins ou aux résultats en contexte de prévention et de traitement de l'IRC, et de recueillir de l'information sur les interventions mises en œuvre pour réduire ces inégalités pour les populations vulnérables atteintes d'IRC. Un résumé des stratégies canadiennes actuelles a été rédigé à partir des informations accessibles au public sur les sites Web des différents programmes rénaux et des projets de Can-SOLVE CKD visant les populations vulnérables. Can-SOLVE CKD est un réseau de recherche financé par la Stratégie de recherche axée sur le patient des Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada (SRAP-IRSC) dont l'objectif est de transformer les soins destinés aux personnes atteintes de néphropathie. PRINCIPAUX RÉSULTATS: Les interventions visant à réduire les iniquités dans l'accès au dépistage, à la prise en charge et aux soins en IRC sont efficaces lorsqu'elles sont élaborées avec la participation de la communauté, prodiguées au patient dans son milieu de vie et adaptées en fonction de la population visée. Plusieurs programmes rénaux provinciaux ont déployé des stratégies pour venir en aide aux populations vulnérables atteintes ou susceptibles de développer une IRC. Les projets actuels financés par la SRAP-IRSC se concentrent sur les populations mal desservies et impliquent des partenariats avec les communautés autochtones. Plusieurs programmes rénaux canadiens disposent ou s'affairent à implanter des stratégies pour aider les populations vulnérables atteintes d'IRC. Par contre, malgré un grand intérêt et la possibilité de soutenir un partage interprovincial des connaissances, l'information concernant ces initiatives demeure difficilement accessible en ligne. De même, malgré l'intérêt, peu d'information est partagée systématiquement entre les provinces canadiennes pour soutenir l'élaboration de politiques et de programmes fondés sur les données probantes. La toute nouvelle « Communauté de pratique des hauts dirigeants canadiens en néphrologie ¼ s'efforcera donc de collaborer et de partager l'information afin d'éclairer l'élaboration, la mise en œuvre et l'évaluation des futurs programmes et politiques. LIMITES: Cette étude n'est pas une revue systématique; elle ne visait que les articles publiés en anglais entre 2008 et 2018. Ainsi, certaines populations ou interventions pourraient avoir été mises de côté lors de la recherche et de la sélection des articles. De plus, la définition controversée du terme « vulnérable ¼ et le fait que les articles retenus ne provenaient que du Canada, des États-Unis et de l'Australie rendent nos résultats difficilement généralisables.

CSN COVID-19 Rapid Review Program: Management of Acute Kidney Injury.

PURPOSE: Severe acute kidney injury (AKI) is a potential complication of COVID-19-associated critical illness. This has implications for the management of COVID-19-associated AKI and the resulting increased need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in the intensive care unit (ICU) and elsewhere in the hospital. The Canadian Society of Nephrology COVID-19 Rapid Review Team has sought to collate and synthesize currently available resources to inform ethically justifiable decisions. The goal is the provision of the best possible care for the largest number of patients with kidney disease while considering how best to ensure the safety of the health care team. INFORMATION SOURCES: Local, provincial, national, and international guidance and planning documents related to the COVID-19 pandemic; guidance documents available from nephrology and critical care-related professional organizations; recent journal articles and preprints related to the COVID-19 pandemic; expert opinion from nephrologists from across Canada. METHODS: A working group of kidney specialist physicians was established with representation from across Canada. Kidney physician specialists met via teleconference and exchanged e-mails to refine and agree on the proposed suggestions in this document. KEY FINDINGS: (1) Nephrology programs should work with ICU programs to plan for the possibility that up to 30% or more of critically ill patients with COVID-19 admitted to ICU will require kidney replacement therapy (KRT). (2) Specific suggestions pertinent to the optimal management of AKI and KRT in patients with COVID-19. These suggestions include, but are not limited to, aspects of fluid management, KRT vascular access, and KRT modality choice. (3) We describe considerations related to ensuring adequate provision of KRT, should resources become scarce during the COVID-19 pandemic. LIMITATIONS: A systematic review or meta-analysis was not conducted. Our suggestions have not been specifically evaluated in the clinical environment. The local context, including how the provision of acute KRT is organized, may impede the implementation of many suggestions. Knowledge is advancing rapidly in the area of COVID-19 and suggestions may become outdated quickly. IMPLICATIONS: Given that most acute KRT related to COVID-19 is likely to be required initially in the ICU setting, close collaboration and planning between critical care and nephrology programs is required. Suggestions may be updated as newer evidence becomes available.

The CSN COVID-19 Rapid Response Program.

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic has created unprecedented challenges in caring for individuals living with kidney disease. In response to a growing call for up-to-date information and evidence-informed advice, the Canadian Society of Nephrology has established a COVID-19 Rapid Response Team that will leverage existing evidence and national expertise to inform kidney care practices in the COVID-19 era. Given limited published evidence and compressed timelines, formal clinical practice guidelines are not feasible, and we have adopted rapid review methods to instead provide interim guidance across identified priority areas. In this article, we describe the methodological approach that was applied in developing a first iteration of guidance documents addressing clinical and operational aspects of care for patients treated with in-center hemodialysis, home dialysis, those with advanced chronic kidney disease, those with glomerulonephritis, and those with acute kidney injury. We further describe strategies for maintaining ongoing engagement with the renal community to elicit emerging needs and perspectives as the situation unfolds.

Canadian Society of Nephrology Commentary on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: (1) To provide commentary on the 2017 update to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder (CKD-MBD); (2) to apply the evidence-based guideline update for implementation within the Canadian health care system; (3) to provide comment on the care of children with chronic kidney disease (CKD); and (4) to identify research priorities for Canadian patients. SOURCES OF INFORMATION: The KDIGO 2017 Clinical Practice Guideline Update for the Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention, and Treatment of CKD-MBD. METHODS: The commentary committee co-chairs selected potential members based on their knowledge of the Canadian kidney community, aiming for wide representation from relevant disciplines, academic and community centers, and different geographical regions. KEY FINDINGS: We agreed with many of the recommendations in the clinical practice guideline on the diagnosis, evaluation, prevention, and treatment of CKD-MBD. However, based on the uncommon occurrence of abnormalities in calcium and phosphate and the low likelihood of severe abnormalities in parathyroid hormone (PTH), we recommend against screening and monitoring levels of calcium, phosphate, PTH, and alkaline phosphatase in adults with CKD G3. We suggest and recommend monitoring these parameters in adults with CKD G4 and G5, respectively. In children, we agree that monitoring for CKD-MBD should begin in CKD G2, but we suggest measuring ionized calcium, rather than total calcium or calcium adjusted for albumin. With regard to vitamin D, we suggest against routine screening for vitamin D deficiency in adults with CKD G3-G5 and G1T-G5T and suggest following population health recommendations for adequate vitamin D intake. We recommend that the measurement and management of bone mineral density (BMD) be according to general population guidelines in CKD G3 and G3T, but we suggest against routine BMD testing in CKD G4-G5, CKD G4T-5T, and in children with CKD. Based on insufficient data, we also recommend against routine bone biopsy in clinical practice for adults with CKD or CKD-T, or in children with CKD, although we consider it an important research tool. LIMITATIONS: The committee relied on the evidence summaries produced by KDIGO. The CSN committee did not replicate or update the systematic reviews.

JUSTIFICATION: (1) Commenter les recommandations du KDIGO 2017 (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) sur les bonnes pratiques cliniques pour le diagnostic, l'évaluation et le traitement des troubles du métabolisme minéral osseux associés aux maladies rénales chroniques (TMO-MRC); (2) appliquer les lignes directrices actualisées et fondées sur les données probantes en vue de leur mise en œuvre dans le système de soins de santé canadien; (3) commenter les soins prodigués aux enfants atteints d'insuffisance rénale chronique (IRC) et (4) définir les priorités de recherche des patients Canadiens. SOURCES: Les recommandations du KDIGO 2017 (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes) sur les bonnes pratiques cliniques pour le diagnostic, l'évaluation et le traitement des troubles du métabolisme minéral osseux associés aux maladies rénales chroniques (TMO-MRC). MÉTHODOLOGIE: Les coprésidents du comité ont sélectionné les membres potentiels sur la base de leur connaissance du secteur de la santé rénale au Canada, tout en visant une bonne représentation de toutes les disciplines concernées, des centres universitaires et communautaires et des différentes régions géographiques. PRINCIPAUX COMMENTAIRES: Nous approuvons un grand nombre des recommandations du KDIGO. Cependant, compte tenu de la rareté des anomalies du calcium et du phosphate et de la faible probabilité d'anomalies graves de la PTH (hormone parathyroïde), nous déconseillons le dépistage et la surveillance des taux de calcium, de phosphate, de PTH et de phosphatase alcaline chez les adultes atteints d'IRC de stade G3. Nous suggérons de mesurer ces paramètres chez les adultes de stade G4 et nous le recommandons pour les patients de stade G5. Chez les enfants, nous appuyons la recommandation de commencer la surveillance des TMO-MRC dès le stade G2, mais nous suggérons de mesurer le calcium ionisé plutôt que les taux de calcium total ou de calcium corrigé en fonction de l'albumine. En ce qui concerne la vitamine D, nous déconseillons le dépistage de routine des carences chez les adultes atteints d'IRC de stade G3 à G5 et G1T à G5T; nous suggérons plutôt de suivre les recommandations visant la population générale pour un apport adéquat en vitamine D. Nous recommandons que la mesure et la prise en charge de la densité minérale osseuse (DMO) se fassent en suivant les recommandations pour la population générale chez les adultes atteints d'IRC de stade G3 et G3T, mais nous déconseillons les tests de DMO de routine chez les adultes de stades G4-G5 et G4T-G5T, de même que chez les enfants atteints d'IRC. En raison de données insuffisantes, nous déconseillons également la pratique systématique d'une biopsie osseuse chez les adultes atteints d'IRC ou d'IRC-TMO, ainsi que chez les enfants atteints d'IRC, bien que nous la considérions comme un important outil de recherche. LIMITES: Le comité s'est appuyé sur le résumé des preuves rédigé par le KDIGO. Le comité de la SCN n'a pas reproduit ou mis à jour les revues systématiques.

A prospective evaluation of renal replacement therapy modality eligibility.

BACKGROUND: Patient eligibility for renal replacement therapy (RRT) modalities is frequently debated, but little prospective data are available from large patient cohorts. METHODS: We prospectively evaluated medical and psychosocial eligibility for the three RRT modalities in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages III-V who were enrolled in an ongoing prospective cohort study conducted at seven North American nephrology practices. RESULTS: Ninety-eight percent of patients were considered medically eligible for haemodialysis (HD), 87% of patients were assessed as medically eligible for peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 54% of patients were judged medically eligible for transplant. Age was the leading cause of non-eligibility for both PD and transplant. Anatomical concerns (adhesions, hernias) were the second most frequent concern for PD eligibility followed by weight. Weight was also a concern for transplant eligibility. The proportion of patients medically eligible for RRT did not vary by CKD stage. There was, however, significant inter-centre variation in the proportion of patients medically eligible for PD and transplant. Ninety-five percent of patients were considered psychosocially eligible for HD, 83% of patients were assessed as psychosocially eligible for PD and 71% of patients were judged psychosocially eligible for transplant. The percentage of patients who were assessed as having neither medical nor psychosocial contraindications for RRT was 95% for HD, 78% for PD and 53% for transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Most CKD patients are considered by their medical care providers to be suitable for PD. Enhanced patient education, promotion of home dialysis for suitable patients and empowerment of patient choice are expected to augment growth of home dialysis modalities.