Factors that influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of total edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants: A systematic review.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The direct digitalization of completely edentulous arches rehabilitated with multiple implants still represents a limitation regarding obtaining accurate images for prosthetic purposes. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to present the factors that may influence the accuracy of intraoral scanning of completely edentulous arches. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This review was carried out according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria and registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42020171021). Three examiners performed an electronic search in the Medline/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for articles published up to January 2021. RESULTS: The electronic search resulted in 11 498 studies. After removing duplicates, 11 347 studies remained. Twelve studies were selected (10 in vitro and 2 in vivo) according to the eligibility criteria. Several factors were found to influence the performance of intraoral scanners (Carestream Dental and TRIOS, 3Shape presented the best results), the intraoral scanning technique (Promoting physical paths that join the digitization bodies can increase the accuracy of transferring the position of the implants), environmental conditions (temperature: 20 °C to 21 °C, air pressure: 750 to 760 ±5 mmHg, air humidity: 45%, angle and distance between the implants: up to 15 degrees and 16 to 22 mm, and the material of the scan body: PEEK more accurate). CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of the intraoral scanning of completely edentulous arches is affected by factors such as the type of intraoral scanner, scanning technique, environmental conditions, angle and distance between implants, and material of the scan bodies.

Mechanical properties and accuracy of removable partial denture frameworks fabricated by digital and conventional techniques: A systematic review.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Providing a removable partial denture (RPD) can be a complex, time-consuming, and error-prone procedure. Computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD-CAM) techniques have shown promising clinical outcomes; however, the influence of manufacturing techniques on the properties of RPD components is unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review was to determine the accuracy and mechanical properties of RPD components fabricated with conventional and digital methods. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study followed the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and was registered on the international prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) database (CRD42022353993). An electronic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library in August 2022. Only in vitro studies comparing the digital with the lost-wax casting technique were included. The quality of the studies was assessed by using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies (MINORS) scale. RESULTS: Of the 17 selected studies, 5 evaluated the accuracy of RPD components as well as the mechanical properties, 5 studies evaluated only the component accuracy, and another 7 evaluated only the mechanical properties. The accuracy was similar regardless of the technique, with discrepancies within clinically acceptable values (50 to 426.3 µm). The surface roughness was higher for 3D-printed clasps and lower for milled clasps (P<.05). The metal alloy significantly influenced the porosity, with the highest number of pores obtained by casting for Ti clasps and by rapid prototyping for Co-Cr clasps. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro studies showed that the digital technique provided similar accuracy to that of the conventional technique within a clinically acceptable range. The manufacturing technique influenced the mechanical properties of RPD components.

Accuracy of models of partially edentulous arches obtained by three-dimensional printing: An in vitro study.

Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of models of partially edentulous arches obtained by three-dimensional (3D) printing. Settings and Design: This was an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: Fifteen partially edentulous models were evaluated, using two methods of measuring dimensions: virtual, using the Standard Tessellation Language files of the models and software (control group), and physical, through printing the models and digital caliper (test group). For both methods, measurements were made regarding the dimensions of the teeth (width and length - buccal/lingual or palatal/occlusal) and distances between the teeth. Statistical Analysis Used: For the variable of linear measurements (width and length) and distances between teeth of the same hemiarch, the Wilcoxon test was used, while for the variable between opposite hemiarches, the paired t-test was used. Results: In the evaluation of the linear measurements, a significant difference was observed only when the width of the molar tooth was analyzed (P = 0.014). When the buccal length was measured, all teeth had linear measurements provided by the virtual method that was lower than the physical (P = 0.000), as well as the lingual/palatal length in incisors (P = 0.003) and molars (P = 0.009) and in total (P = 0.001). As for the analyses between teeth, no difference was identified between the measurements provided by the virtual method compared to the physical one. Conclusions: The 3D printer used to print partially edentulous models provided linear distortions in the teeth but without changes in the distances between teeth of the same hemiarch and between teeth of opposite hemiarches.