Healthcare professionals' experiences of eHealth in palliative care for older people: challenges, compromises and the price of dignity.

PURPOSE: To explore whether and how eHealth solutions support the dignity of healthcare professionals and patients in palliative care contexts. METHOD: This qualitative study used phenomenographic analysis involving four focus group interviews, with healthcare professionals who provide palliative care to older people. RESULTS: Analysis revealed four categories of views on working with eHealth in hierarchical order: Safeguarding the patient by documenting-eHealth is a grain of support, Treated as less worthy by authorities-double standards, Distrust in the eHealth solution-when the "solution" presents a danger; and Patient first-personal contact with patients endows more dignity than eHealth. The ability to have up-to-date patient information was considered crucial when caring for vulnerable, dying patients. eHealth solutions were perceived as essential technological support, but also as unreliable, even dangerous, lacking patient information, with critical information potentially missing or overlooked. This caused distrust in eHealth, introduced unease at work, and challenged healthcare professionals' identities, leading to embodied discomfort and feeling of a lack of dignity. CONCLUSION: The healthcare professionals perceived work with eHealth solutions as challenging their sense of dignity, and therefore affecting their ability to provide dignified care for the patients. However, healthcare professionals managed to provide dignified palliative care by focusing on patient first.

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding antibiotic use among the population of the Republic of Serbia - A cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance presents one of the most significant threats to public health. This study aimed to examine antibiotic usage within the general population in the Republic of Serbia and their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior concerning this topic. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional study over two weeks in December 2022, on a sample of 1014 respondents, representative of the Republic of Serbia's population. Predictors of the Antibiotic Knowledge Score (composed of four questions) were analyzed by multivariate ordinal logistic regression. RESULTS: In 2022, 76.8% of the participants from the Serbian population had taken antibiotics, mostly upon a medical prescription, with the most common reasons being upper respiratory tract infections. Only 31.3% of all respondents received any kind of advice about the rational use of antibiotics and half of them changed their opinions on using antibiotics after receiving this information. The average Antibiotic Knowledge Score was 2.6 out of 4, with 32.5% of respondents answering all knowledge questions correctly. The multivariate ordinal logistic regression analysis showed that female gender, higher education level, and the willingness to change opinions regarding the usage of antibiotics after receiving information about the rational use of antibiotics from any available source were significant predictors of better knowledge about antibiotics use. Respondents who were open to changing their opinion after receiving information about the rational use of antibiotics had 28% higher odds of higher antibiotic knowledge scores. CONCLUSION: This is the first population-level study on public knowledge, attitudes, and practices about antibiotic use in Serbia and therefore the baseline for future research and measuring the impact of potential interventions. Our findings underline the importance of taking into account specific population characteristics, knowledge levels, and attitudes when designing educational and intervention strategies for antibiotic use. Policymakers can leverage these findings to target specific groups and enhance the population's knowledge and practices regarding rational antibiotic usage.