The Effectiveness of "Push-to-Web" as an Option for a Survey of New Mothers.

INTRODUCTION: With shifting demographics and declining response rates, state and national health surveys are considering mixed mode approaches. Most states field the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) surveillance project, but few have studied the effect of encouraging online responses. METHODS: Like PRAMS, the 2016 Ohio Pregnancy Assessment Survey interviewed new mothers 2-4 months after delivery (n = 3382). Fielding included a traditional mailed paper questionnaire with telephone follow-up protocol and two experiments: a rotating web invitation added a web survey link at different points during the mail protocol, and a push-to-web protocol asked women to complete the survey online before mailing a questionnaire. This analysis examined the responses rates and tested for unweighted demographic differences using Pearson's chi-square. RESULTS: The unweighted response rate was highest with the traditional contact protocol (30.0%) and slightly lower among the rotating web invite (27.4%) and the push-to-web (25.5%) groups. Nearly two-thirds (64%) of push-to-web protocol respondents completed the survey online, with 70% of those web surveys submitted before the first paper questionnaire was mailed. Women who responded to the web versus mail surveys were similar on most characteristics, although in both experimental groups, women who completed the web version were more likely to be college educated. Among the push-to-web group, 60% of web and 36% of mail respondents had a 4-year college degree (p < .001). DISCUSSION: Given the potential for push-to-web to shift respondents to an online survey without greatly impacting response rates, researchers should continue to examine the utility of incorporating a web mode in surveys of new mothers.

A Medicaid Statewide Hypertension Quality Improvement Project: Initial Results.

Background Hypertension control is critical to reducing cardiovascular disease, challenging to achieve, and exacerbated by socioeconomic inequities. Few states have established statewide quality improvement (QI) infrastructures to improve blood pressure (BP) control across economically disadvantaged populations. In this study, we aimed to improve BP control by 15% for all Medicaid recipients and by 20% for non-Hispanic Black participants. Methodology This QI study used repeated cross-sections of electronic health record data and, for Medicaid enrollees, linked Medicaid claims data for 17,672 adults with hypertension seen at one of eight high-volume Medicaid primary care practices in Ohio from 2017 to 2019. Evidence-based strategies included (1) accurate BP measurement; (2) timely follow-up; (3) outreach; (4) a standardized treatment algorithm; and (5) effective communication. Payers focused on a 90-day supply (vs. 30-day) of BP medications, home BP monitor access, and outreach. Implementation efforts included an in-person kick-off followed by monthly QI coaching and monthly webinars. Weighted generalized estimating equations were used to estimate the baseline, one-year, and two-year implementation change in the proportion of visits with BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) stratified by race/ethnicity. Results For all practices, the percentage of participants with controlled BP increased from 52% in 2017 to 60% in 2019. Among non-Hispanic Whites, the odds of achieving BP control in year one and year two were 1.24 times (95% confidence interval: 1.14, 1.34) and 1.50 times (1.38, 1.63) higher relative to baseline, respectively. Among non-Hispanic Blacks, the odds for years one and two were 1.18 times (1.10, 1.27) and 1.34 times (1.24, 1.45) higher relative to baseline, respectively. Conclusions A hypertension QI project as part of establishing a statewide QI infrastructure improved BP control in practices with a high volume of disadvantaged patients. Future efforts should investigate ways to reduce inequities in BP control and further explore factors associated with greater BP improvements and sustainability.