RESUMO
Objective: To document Grenadian women's knowledge about cervical cancer and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, as well as their attitudes towards primary cervical cancer screening methods. Methods: In this qualitative study, we used focus groups in Grenada to gather information concerning women's knowledge about, attitudes towards and perceptions of screening for cervical cancer and general knowledge about HPV. Ten focus groups comprising 73 participants representing 5 of the 6 parishes in Grenada were conducted with women aged 19-59. Participants were asked about pelvic exams, Pap smears, HPV, reasons for seeking or avoiding cervical cancer screening and how different modalities of testing might affect their decision-making. Responses were then coded and organized into common themes. Results: While many respondents had heard of HPV, far fewer knew about its causative role in cervical cancer, how to prevent HPV infection or testing for the high-risk HPV types that cause almost all cases of cervical cancer. Many participants were aware that cervical cancer screening was beneficial, but numerous barriers to obtaining that screening were noted, including concerns about privacy and stigma, potential discomfort, and the cost and inconvenience involved. Conclusions: Our findings have implications for future cervical cancer screening efforts in Grenada. Central to these efforts should be a focus on educating Grenadians about the role of HPV infection in cervical cancer and the importance of early detection through screening. In addition, addressing issues of stigma and privacy are key to eliminating cervical cancer in Grenada.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: The PubMed Clinical Study Category filters are subdivided into "Broad" and "Narrow" versions that are designed to maximize either sensitivity or specificity by using two different sets of keywords and Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). A searcher might assume that all items retrieved by Narrow would also be found by Broad, but there are occasions when some [Filter name]/Narrow citations are missed when using [Filter name]/Broad alone. This study quantifies the size of this effect. METHODS: For each of the five Clinical Study Categories, PubMed was searched for citations matching the query Filter/Narrow NOT Filter/Broad. This number was compared with that for Filter/Broad to compute the number of Narrow citations missed per 1,000 Broad. This process was repeated for the MeSH terms for "Medicine" and "Diseases," as well as for a set of individual test searches. RESULTS: The Clinical Study Category filters for Etiology, Clinical Prediction Guides, Diagnosis, and Prognosis all showed notable numbers of Filter/Narrow citations that were missed when searching Filter/Broad alone. This was particularly true for Prognosis, where a searcher could easily miss one Prognosis/Narrow citation for every ten Prognosis/Broad citations retrieved. CONCLUSIONS: Users of the Clinical Study Category filters (except for Therapy) should consider combining Filter/Narrow together with Filter/Broad in their search strategy. This is particularly true when using Prognosis/Broad, as otherwise there is a substantial risk of missing potentially relevant citations.
Assuntos
Coleta de Dados/métodos , Armazenamento e Recuperação da Informação/métodos , Medical Subject Headings , PubMed , Ferramenta de Busca/normas , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , HumanosRESUMO
Gender gaps in academic performance have been reported at a variety of educational levels including several national standardized exams for medical education, with men scoring higher than women. These gaps potentially impact medical school acceptance and residency matching and may be influenced by curricular design. Performance data for our 4-year integrated hybrid curriculum, which features a large proportion of active learning, revealed a gender gap with men performing better early in the curriculum and on the first national standardized exam. This gap in performance almost entirely disappeared for years 2-4 of the curriculum and the second national standardized exam.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: In recent years, there has been a growing desire to address issues related to menstruation, particularly for adolescent girls. In low-income and middle-income countries, prior literature review of the adolescent menstrual experience suggests the need for further research into the impact and efficacy of interventions with this population. There is evidence to suggest the need for initiatives and research in higher-income countries like the USA. To date, the body of research on adolescent menstrual experience in the USA remains uncharacterised. Therefore, we propose a scoping review of the literature on this subject to better inform on areas for future primary study. METHODS AND ANALYSES: Using the framework proposed by Arksey and O'Malley and expounded on by Levac et al and the Joanna Briggs Institute, we will search electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Web of Science, ProQuest Public Health Database, Social Science Citation Index, Social Services Abstracts and SocINDEX) and grey literature for relevant studies in consultation with experienced librarians. The abstracts and full-text from each reference will be screened by two independent reviewers for inclusion. Bibliographic data, study characteristics and themes will be extracted from studies selected for inclusion using a rubric created by the research team. Findings will be summarised and a list of subject areas for future primary research will be generated in consultation with stakeholders. The review will be conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items from Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Formal ethics training for this study is not required, as the research team will review publicly available studies. Stakeholders working in adolescent and menstrual health were consulted in designing this review. We will share key findings with stakeholders and in scholarly journals at the conclusion of the review.
Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Menstruação , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Grupos Populacionais , Pobreza , Projetos de Pesquisa , Literatura de Revisão como Assunto , Estados UnidosRESUMO
ABSTRACT Objective. To document Grenadian women's knowledge about cervical cancer and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, as well as their attitudes towards primary cervical cancer screening methods. Methods. In this qualitative study, we used focus groups in Grenada to gather information concerning women's knowledge about, attitudes towards and perceptions of screening for cervical cancer and general knowledge about HPV. Ten focus groups comprising 73 participants representing 5 of the 6 parishes in Grenada were conducted with women aged 19-59. Participants were asked about pelvic exams, Pap smears, HPV, reasons for seeking or avoiding cervical cancer screening and how different modalities of testing might affect their decision-making. Responses were then coded and organized into common themes. Results. While many respondents had heard of HPV, far fewer knew about its causative role in cervical cancer, how to prevent HPV infection or testing for the high-risk HPV types that cause almost all cases of cervical cancer. Many participants were aware that cervical cancer screening was beneficial, but numerous barriers to obtaining that screening were noted, including concerns about privacy and stigma, potential discomfort, and the cost and inconvenience involved. Conclusions. Our findings have implications for future cervical cancer screening efforts in Grenada. Central to these efforts should be a focus on educating Grenadians about the role of HPV infection in cervical cancer and the importance of early detection through screening. In addition, addressing issues of stigma and privacy are key to eliminating cervical cancer in Grenada.
RESUMEN Objetivo. Documentar los conocimientos de las mujeres granadinas sobre el cáncer cervicouterino y la infección por el virus de los papilomas humanos (VPH), así como sus actitudes hacia los métodos primarios de detección del cáncer cervicouterino. Métodos. En este estudio cualitativo, se han empleado grupos focales en Granada para recopilar información sobre los conocimientos, las actitudes y las percepciones de las mujeres sobre la detección del cáncer cervicouterino y nociones generales sobre el VPH. Participaron 73 mujeres de 19 a 59 años de edad, representantes de 5 de las 6 parroquias de Granada. Se formaron diez grupos focales, a los que se les preguntó sobre los exámenes pélvicos, las pruebas de Papanicolaou, el VPH, las razones para buscar o evitar la detección del cáncer cervicouterino y cómo las diferentes modalidades de examen podrían afectar sus decisiones. Luego se codificaron las respuestas y se organizaron en temas comunes. Resultados. Si bien muchas participantes habían oído hablar del VPH, un número considerablemente menor conocía su relación causal con el cáncer cervicouterino, cómo prevenir la infección por VPH o los exámenes de detección de los tipos del VPH de alto riesgo que causan casi todos los casos de cáncer cervicouterino. Muchas participantes sabían que los exámenes de detección del cáncer de cuello uterino eran convenientes, pero mencionaron numerosos obstáculos para obtenerlos, como las preocupaciones sobre la privacidad y la estigmatización, posibles molestias, así como el costo y los inconvenientes relacionados. Conclusiones. Nuestros hallazgos tienen implicaciones para la futura labor de detección del cáncer cervicouterino en Granada. En esta labor debería ser esencial adoptar un enfoque dirigido a educar a las granadinas sobre la relación de la infección por VPH con el cáncer cervicouterino y la importancia de la detección temprana mediante exámenes. Además, combatir los problemas de estigmatización y privacidad es clave para eliminar el cáncer cervicouterino en Granada.
RESUMO Objetivo. Documentar o conhecimento das mulheres de Granada sobre o câncer do colo do útero e a infecção por papilomavírus humano (HPV), bem como suas atitudes em relação aos métodos de rastreamento de câncer do colo do útero primário. Métodos. Neste estudo qualitativo, usamos grupos focais em Granada para coletar informações sobre conhecimentos, atitudes e percepções das mulheres sobre o rastreamento de câncer do colo do útero e conhecimentos gerais sobre HPV. Foram conduzidos dez grupos focais, incluindo 73 participantes e representando 5 das 6 paróquias de Granada, com mulheres de 19 a 59 anos de idade. As participantes responderam perguntas sobre exames ginecológicos, Papanicolau, HPV, razões para procurar ou evitar o rastreamento de câncer do colo do útero e como diferentes modalidades de testes podem afetar sua tomada de decisão. As respostas foram codificadas e organizadas por temas comuns. Resultados. Muitas participantes já tinham ouvido falar do HPV, mas um número muito menor conhecia sua relação causal com o câncer do colo do útero, formas de prevenir a infecção por HPV ou os testes para os tipos de HPV de alto risco, que causam quase todos os casos de câncer do colo do útero. Muitas participantes sabiam que o rastreamento de câncer do colo do útero era benéfico, mas várias barreiras para o rastreamento foram indicadas, incluindo preocupações relacionadas à privacidade e ao estigma, o potencial desconforto e o custo e inconveniência envolvidos. Conclusões. Nossos achados têm implicações para as futuras iniciativas de rastreamento de câncer do colo do útero em Granada. Essas iniciativas devem se focar em educar a população de Granada sobre o papel da infecção por HPV no câncer do colo do útero e a importância da detecção precoce por meio do rastreamento. Além disso, é fundamental abordar questões de estigma e privacidade para eliminar o câncer do colo do útero em Granada.
Assuntos
Humanos , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/virologia , Grupos Focais , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Granada , Pesquisa QualitativaRESUMO
Changes in the structure of commercial scholarly publishing have led to spiraling subscription prices. This has resulted in a "serials crisis" that has eroded library budgets and threatened the system of scientific communication. Open access represents one possible solution, and librarians are working to help make it a reality.