The evolution and impact of the Society for Vascular Surgery Resident and Student Program.

OBJECTIVE: There is an ongoing national shortage in the vascular surgery (VS) workforce. To increase interest in the specialty, the Society for Vascular Surgery (SVS) Resident and Student Outreach Committee (RSOC) developed a dedicated general surgery (GS) resident and medical student (MS) program at the Vascular Annual Meeting (VAM) and invested in a scholarship program to help reduce attendee expenses. This study assesses the program's effectiveness, correlating recipient feedback with the likelihood of matching into a VS training program. METHODS: Records related to the SVS VAM GS resident and MS program from 2013 to 2023 were reviewed, focusing on attendee evaluations of the program. The program included a simulation session from 2013 to 2019. VS training program match rates among scholarship recipients were determined. The annual average match rate in VS was used to divide the survey responses into two groups: below average (BA) and above average (AA) match rate groups. Survey responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale and allowed for comments. Responses were divided into high value, strongly favoring the activity (scores 4-5), and low value (scores 1-3) categories. The survey responses from the group of years with AA match rates were compared with the group of years with BA rates. RESULTS: The SVS awarded 1040 GS resident and MS travel scholarships over the 10 years assessed. Overall, applicants had a 43% success rate in receiving a scholarship. During the study period, the annual number of applicants increased, whereas the number of scholarships and match success rates significantly decreased. The average match rate into VS among scholarship recipients was 50.2%. The survey response rate was 33%. During AA match rate years, evaluations for simulation allotted time and lectures were significantly more likely to be high value compared with BA years. Simulation content and the residency fair consistently had the most favorable evaluations (>90% high value), and overall, the program had a consistently positive impact on recipients' interest in VS (>90% high value). Trainees in the AA group were significantly more likely to provide positive comments (73% vs 55%; P < .001). Numerous recipients commented on the need for a dedicated space to interact with faculty and mentors and highlighted simulation as the standout aspect of the program. CONCLUSIONS: The SVS VAM RSOC program is positively correlated with attendee interest in VS, with approximately 50% of scholarship recipients matching into the field. The quality of the program and the number of scholarships correlate with VS match rates. Additional investments in similar programs could help close the workforce gap.

Socioeconomic factors predict successful supervised exercise therapy completion.

OBJECTIVE: Supervised exercise therapy (SET) for patients with intermittent claudication (IC) can lower the risk of progression to chronic limb-threatening ischemia and amputation, while preserving and restoring functional status. Despite supporting evidence, it remains underutilized, and among those who initiate programs, attrition rates are extremely high. We hypothesize that socioeconomic factors may represent significant barriers to SET completion. METHODS: Patients with IC referred to SET at a multi-hospital, single-institution health care system (2018-2022) from a prospectively maintained database were retrospectively analyzed. Our primary endpoint was SET program completion and graduation, defined as completion of 36 sessions. Our secondary endpoints were vascular intervention within 1 year of referral and change in ankle-brachial index (ABI). Baseline demographics were assessed using standard statistical methods. Predictors of SET graduation were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression generating adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Change in ABI was analyzed using t-test between subgroups. Reasons for attrition were tabulated. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), metabolic equivalent level, Vascular QOL, Duke Activity Status, and ABI were analyzed using paired t-tests across the entire cohort. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients met inclusion criteria: mean age 67.85 ± 10.69 years, 19 females (36.54%), mean baseline ABI of 0.77 ± 0.16. The co-pays for 100% of patients were fully covered by primary and secondary insurance plans. Twenty-one patients (40.38%) completed SET. On multivariable analysis, residence in a ZIP code with median household income <$47,000 (aOR, 0.10; 95% CI, 0.01-0.76; P = .03) and higher body mass index (aOR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.67-0.99; P = .04) were significant barriers to SET graduation. There were no differences in ABI change or vascular intervention within 1 year between graduates and non-graduates. Non-graduates reported transportation challenges (25.00%), lack of motivation (20.83%), and illness/functional limitation (20.83%) as primary reasons for SET attrition. Metabolic Equivalent Level (P ≤ .01) and Duke Activity Status scores (P = .04) were significantly greater after participating in a SET program. CONCLUSIONS: Although SET participation improves lower extremity and functionality outcomes, only 40% of referred patients completed therapy in our cohort. Our findings suggest that both socioeconomic and functional factors influence the odds of completing SET programs, indicating a need for holistic pre-referral assessment to facilitate enhanced program accessibility for these populations.

Percutaneous thrombectomy for acute limb ischemia is associated with equivalent limb and mortality outcomes compared with open thrombectomy.

BACKGROUND: Acute limb ischemia (ALI) carries a 15% to 20% risk of combined death or amputation at 30 days and 50% to 60% at 1 year. Percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PT) is an emerging minimally invasive alternative to open thrombectomy (OT). However, ALI thrombectomy cases are omitted from most quality databases, limiting comparisons of limb and survival outcomes between PT and OT. Therefore, our aim was to compare in-hospital outcomes between PT and OT using the National Inpatient Sample. METHODS: We analyzed survey-weighted National Inpatient Sample data (2015-2020) to include emergent admissions of aged adults (50+ years) with a primary diagnosis of lower extremity ALI undergoing index procedures within 2 days of hospitalization. We excluded hospitalizations with concurrent trauma or dissection diagnoses and index procedures using catheter-directed thrombolysis. Our primary outcome was composite in-hospital major amputation or death. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital major amputation, death, in-hospital reintervention (including angioplasty/stent, thrombolysis, PT, OT, or bypass), and extended length of stay (eLOS; defined as LOS >75th percentile). Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were generated by multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for demographics, frailty (Risk Analysis Index), secondary diagnoses including atrial fibrillation and peripheral artery disease, hospital characteristics, and index procedure data including the anatomic thrombectomy level and fasciotomy. A priori subgroup analyses were performed using interaction terms. RESULTS: We included 23,795 survey-weighted ALI hospitalizations (mean age: 72.2 years, 50.4% female, 79.2% White, and 22.3% frail), with 7335 (30.8%) undergoing PT. Hospitalization characteristics for PT vs OT differed by atrial fibrillation (28.7% vs 36.5%, P < .0001), frequency of intervention at the femoropopliteal level (86.2% vs 88.8%, P = .009), and fasciotomy (4.8% vs 6.9%, P = .006). In total, 2530 (10.6%) underwent major amputation or died. Unadjusted (10.1% vs 10.9%, P = .43) and adjusted (aOR = 0.96 [95% CI, 0.77-1.20], P = .74) risk did not differ between the groups. PT was associated with increased odds of reintervention (aOR = 2.10 [95% CI, 1.72-2.56], P < .0001) when compared with OT, but this was not seen in the tibial subgroup (aOR = 1.31 [95% CI, 0.86-2.01], P = .21, Pinteraction < .0001). Further, 79.1% of PT hospitalizations undergoing reintervention were salvaged with endovascular therapy. Lastly, PT was associated with significantly decreased odds of eLOS (aOR = 0.80 [95% CI, 0.69-0.94], P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: PT was associated with comparable in-hospital limb salvage and mortality rates compared with OT. Despite an increased risk of reintervention, most PT reinterventions avoided open surgery, and PT was associated with a decreased risk of eLOS. Thus, PT may be an appropriate alternative to OT in appropriately selected patients.

Midterm Outcomes and Predictors of Failure of Lower Extremity Bypass to Para-Malleolar and Pedal Targets.

BACKGROUND: The frequency of distal lower extremity bypass (LEB) for infrapopliteal critical limb threatening ischemia (IP-CLTI) has significantly decreased. Our goal was to analyze the contemporary outcomes and factors associated with failure of LEB to para-malleolar and pedal targets. METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative infrainguinal database from 2003 to 2021 to identify LEB to para-malleolar or pedal/plantar targets. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events [vascular reintervention, above ankle amputation] (MALE), and amputation-free survival at 2 years. Standard statistical methods were utilized. RESULTS: We identified 2331 LEB procedures (1,265 anterior tibial at ankle/dorsalis pedis, 783 posterior tibial at ankle, 283 tarsal/plantar). The prevalence of LEB bypasses to distal targets has significantly decreased from 13.37% of all LEB procedures in 2003-3.51% in 2021 (P < 0.001). The majority of cases presented with tissue loss (81.25. Common postoperative complications included major adverse cardiac events (8.9%) and surgical site infections (3.6%). Major amputations occurred in 16.8% of patients at 1 year. Postoperative mortality at 1 year was 10%. On unadjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis at 2 years, primary patency was 50.56% ± 3.6%, MALE was 63.49% ± 3.27%, and amputation-free survival was 71.71% ± 0.98%. In adjusted analyses [adjusted for comorbidities, indication, conduit type, urgency, prior vascular interventions, graft inflow vessel (femoral/popliteal), concomitant inflow procedures, surgeon and center volume] conduits other than great saphenous vein (P < 0.001) were associated with loss of primary patency and increased MALE. High center volume (>5 procedures/year) was associated with improved primary patency (P = 0.015), and lower MALE (P = 0.021) at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite decreased utilization, open surgical bypass to distal targets at the ankle remains a viable option for treatment of IP-CLTI with acceptable patency and amputation-free survival rates at 2 years. Bypasses to distal targets should be performed at high volume centers to optimize graft patency and limb salvage and minimize reinterventions.

Stenting performs better than drug-coated balloon angioplasty in popliteal lesions.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) is a common and highly morbid disease. Although there have been recent advancements in the endovascular modalities to treat PAD, comparisons of these strategies, especially in the popliteal region, remain underinvestigated. The objective of this study was to compare midterm outcomes in patients with PAD undergoing treatment with both novel and SS compared with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty. METHODS: All patients at a multi-institution health system treated for PAD in the popliteal region from 2011 to 2019 were identified. Presenting features, operative details, and outcomes were included in the analysis. Patients who underwent popliteal revascularization with stents were compared with DCB. SS were compared separately with novel dedicated stents. Two-year primary patency was the primary outcome. RESULTS: We included 408 patients (72.7 ± 11.8 years old; 57.1% men) in the analysis. There were 221 (54.7%) patients who underwent popliteal stenting and 187 (45.3%) who underwent popliteal DCB. There were high rates of tissue loss in both groups (57.9% vs 50.8%; P = .14). Stented patients had longer lesions (112.4 ± 3.2 vs 100.2 ± 5.8 mm; P = .03) and higher rates of concomitant superficial femoral artery treatment (88.2% vs 39.6%; P < .01). Chronic total occlusions accounted for the majority of lesions treated (stent 62.4%, DCB 64.2%). Perioperative complications were similar between groups. Primary patency for the stented group was higher at two years than the DCB group (61.0% vs 46.1%; P = .03). When evaluating stented patients only, SS had higher 2-year patency than novel stents in the popliteal segment (69.6% vs 51.4%; P = .04). On multivariable analysis, stenosis, as opposed to chronic total occlusion, was associated with improved patency (hazard ratio, 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.25-0.96; P = .04), whereas novel stents were associated with worse primary patency (hazard ratio, 2.01; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-3.73; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: In a population of patients with severe vascular disease, stents do not have inferior patency and limb salvage rates compared with DCB angioplasty when treating the popliteal region. For patients with advanced vascular disease, and especially tissue loss, stents and DCB are both beneficial when treating popliteal lesions.

Improved outpatient medical visit compliance with sociodemographic discrepancies in vascular telehealth evaluations.

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has led to a rapid expansion in the use of telemedicine across all medical fields but has also exposed telehealth care disparities with differing access to technology across racial and ethnic groups. The objective of our study was to investigate the effects of telehealth on vascular visit compliance and to explore the effects of sociodemographic factors on vascular surgery outpatient telehealth usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Consecutive patients who had undergone an outpatient vascular surgery evaluation between February 24, 2020 (the launch of our telemedicine program) and December 31, 2020, were reviewed. The baseline demographic and outcomes were obtained from the electronic medical records. Telehealth and in-person evaluations were defined according to the patient's index visit during the study period. Medical visit compliance was established on completion of the telehealth or in-person encounter. We used χ2 tests and logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: A total of 23,553 outpatient visits had been scheduled for 10,587 patients during the study period. Of the outpatient visits, 1559 had been scheduled telehealth encounters compared with 21,994 scheduled in-person encounters. Of the scheduled outpatient encounters, 13,900 medical visits (59.0%) had been completed: 1183 telehealth visits and 12,717 in-person visits. The mean travel distance saved for the telehealth visits was 22.1 ± 27.1 miles, and the mean travel time saved was 46.3 ± 41.47 minutes. We noted no sociodemographic differences between the patients scheduled for telehealth vs in-person visits. We found a trend toward a lower proportion of African-American patients in the telehealth group vs the in-person group (7.8% vs 10.6%; P = .116), without statistical significance. A significantly higher rate of medical visit completion was found for the telehealth group compared with the in-person group (79.5% vs 59.4%; P < .001). Among the patients scheduled for an outpatient medical visit, a scheduled telemedicine evaluation (vs in-person) was associated with 2.3 times the odds of completing the medical visit (odds ratio, 2.31; 95% confidence interval, 2.05-2.61), adjusting for age, sex, race, ethnicity, language, and the distance between the patient's home zip code and the outpatient vascular center's zip code. Selecting for scheduled telemedicine visits, African-American race was associated with a decreased odds of telemedicine usage (odds ratio, 0.73; 95% confidence interval, 0.59-0.90) after adjusting for age, sex, ethnicity, language, and visit type. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the vascular surgery outpatient telehealth evaluation appeared to improve medical visit completion in our region with apparent sociodemographic disparities. Further studies are needed to confirm whether telemedicine expansion has improved access to care in other geographic areas.

COVID-associated acute limb ischemia during the Delta surge and the effect of vaccines.

OBJECTIVE: Hypercoagulability is common in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and has been associated with arterial thrombosis leading to acute limb ischemia (ALI). Our objective was to determine the outcomes of concurrent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection and ALI, particularly during the Delta variant surge and the impact of vaccination status. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of patients treated at a single health care system between March 2020 and December 2021 for ALI and recent (<14 days) COVID-19 infection or who developed ALI during hospitalization for the same disease. Patients were grouped by year as well as by pre and post Delta variant emergence in 2021 based on the World Health Organization timeline (January to May vs June to December). Baseline demographics, imaging, interventions, and outcomes were evaluated. A control cohort of all patients with ALI requiring surgical intervention for a 2-year period prior to the pandemic was used for comparison. Primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and amputation-free survival. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox proportional hazards analysis were performed. RESULTS: Forty acutely ischemic limbs were identified in 36 patients with COVID-19, the majority during the Delta surge (52.8%) and after the wide availability of vaccines. The rate of COVID-19-associated ALI, although low overall, nearly doubled during the Delta surge (0.37% vs 0.20%; P = .09). Intervention (open or endovascular revascularization vs primary amputation) was performed on 31 limbs in 28 individuals, with the remaining eight treated with systemic anti-coagulation. Postoperative mortality was 48%, and overall mortality was 50%. Major amputation following revascularization was significantly higher with COVID-19 ALI (25% vs 3%; P = .006) compared with the pre-pandemic group. Thirty-day amputation-free survival was significantly lower (log-rank P < .001). COVID-19 infection (adjusted hazard ratio, 6.2; P < .001) and age (hazard ratio, 1.1; P = .006) were associated with 30-day amputation in multivariate analysis. Severity of COVID-19 infection, defined as vasopressor usage, was not associated with post-revascularization amputation. There was a higher incidence of re-thrombosis in the latter half of 2021 with the Delta surge, as reintervention for recurrent ischemia of the same limb was more common than our previous experience (21% vs 0%; P = .55). COVID-19-associated limb ischemia occurred almost exclusively in non-vaccinated patients (92%). CONCLUSIONS: ALI observed with Delta appears more resistant to standard therapy. Unvaccinated status correlated highly with ALI occurrence in the setting of COVID-19 infection. Information of limb loss as a COVID-19 complication among non-vaccinated patients may help to increase compliance.

Cost Burden and Cost Influencers of Inferior Vena Cava Filter Placement and Retrieval among Medicare Beneficiaries with Acute Venous Thromboembolism.

PURPOSE: To examine the frequency, costs, and cost influencers of inferior vena cava filters (IVCFs) placements and retrievals among a national sample of patients using Medicare data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the U.S. Medicare 100% database, a nationally representative sample of all U.S. patients aged ≥65 years, from 2014 through 2020. Procedures and clinical characteristics were identified from the diagnosis and procedure codes on Medicare claims. Beneficiaries aged ≥65 years with newly diagnosed venous thromboembolism (VTE) were identified and followed to obtain data on IVCF placements and retrievals. Data on the costs of the index IVCF procedures and any subsequent IVCF placements and retrievals were obtained. Multivariate models were used to estimate the impact of patient and clinical characteristics on costs. RESULTS: Among 501,216 patients with newly diagnosed VTE, 4,995 (1%) received an IVCF placement; of these, 1,215 (24.3%) had a retrieval procedure. Beneficiaries with IVCF placements and retrievals differed from a demographic and clinical perspective than from those without. Costs varied by the site of service, VTE acuity, and VTE type. Cost influencers included age, race, census region, service location, and VTE type. CONCLUSIONS: IVCF placement costs were driven by baseline patient characteristics (age, race, geographic residence, acute VTE diagnosis, and inpatient site of service), whereas retrieval costs were driven by age and deep vein thrombosis diagnosis. Strategies to mitigate the retrieval costs or the need to retrieve IVCFs may reduce the overall cost burden of IVCFs.

Selective Publication within Vascular Surgery: Characteristics of Discontinued and Unpublished Randomized Clinical Trials.

BACKGROUND: Discontinued and unpublished randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are common resulting in biased publication and loss of potential knowledge. The magnitude of selective publication within vascular surgery remains unknown. METHODS: RCT relevant to vascular surgery registered (01/01/2010-10/31/2019) on ClinicalTrials.gov were included. Trials ending normally with conclusion of participant treatment and examination were considered completed whereas discontinued trials stopped early. Publications were identified through automatically indexed PubMed citations on ClinicalTrials.gov or manually identified on PubMed or Google Scholar >30 months after the completion date, the date the final participant was examined, allowing time for publication. RESULTS: Of 108 RCT (n = 37, 837), 22.2% (24/108) were discontinued, including 16.7% (4/24) stopped prior to and 83.3% (20/24) after starting enrollment. Only 28.4% of estimated enrollment was achieved for all discontinued RCT. Nineteen (79.2%) investigators provided a reason for discontinuation, which most commonly included poor enrollment (45.8%), inadequate supplies or funding (12.5%), and trial design concerns (8.3%). Of the 20 trials terminated following enrollment, 20.0% (4/20) were published in peer-reviewed journals and 80.0% (16/20) failed to reach publication. Of the 77.8% trials completed, 75.0% (63/84) were published and 25.0% (21/84) remain unpublished. In a multivariate regression of completed trials, industry funding was significantly associated with decreased likelihood of peer-reviewed publication (OR = 0.18, (95% CI 0.05-0.71), P = 0.01). Of the discontinued and completed trials remaining unpublished, 62.5% and 61.9% failed to report results on ClinicalTrials.gov, respectively, encompassing a total of 4,788 enrollees without publicly available results. CONCLUSIONS: Nearly 25% of registered vascular RCT were discontinued. Of completed RCT, 25% remain unpublished with industry funding associated with decreased likelihood of publication. This study identifies opportunities to report all findings for completed and discontinued vascular surgery RCT, whether industry sponsored, or investigator initiated.

A systematic review of cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy in asymptomatic patients.

OBJECTIVE: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis has been associated with a progressive decline in neurocognitive function. However, the effect of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) on this process is poorly understood. We aimed to evaluate preoperative and postoperative cognitive function changes in asymptomatic patients after CEA. METHODS: A systematic review of the existing reports in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochran databases was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis statement recommendations. All original retrospective or prospective studies (including cohort, cross-sectional, case-control, pilot studies, etc) and clinical trials that compared pre and postoperative neurocognitive function in asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis after CEA, which were published from January 2000 to April 2021 were identified and considered eligible for inclusion in the study. RESULTS: Thirteen studies (502 CEAs) comparing cognitive function changes before and after CEA were identified. In 7 studies with a total 272 patients, a mean age range of 67.3 ± 4.8 to 76.35 years old, and follow-up ranging between 1 and 12 months, overall cognitive function improved after CEA. However, in 6 studies with a total sample of 230, a mean age range of 68.6 ± 6.9 to 74.4 ± 6.1 years, and follow-up ranged from 24 hours to 3 years, showed no change or decline in overall cognitive function after procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The lack of standardization of specific cognitive tests and cognitive function assessment timing after CEA does not allow for definite conclusions to be made. However, improving brain perfusion with a combination of CEA and statin therapy may be a protective strategy against cognitive function decline.

Carotid endarterectomy remains cost-effective for the surgical management of carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Transcarotid arterial revascularization (TCAR) has gained popularity as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS), potentially combining the benefits of a minimally invasive approach with a lower risk of procedural stroke compared with TFCAS. Emerging evidence shows TCAR to have excellent perioperative outcomes. However, the cost-effectiveness of TCAR is not well-understood. METHODS: Incorporating data from Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy vs Stenting Trial (CREST), the Vascular Quality Initiative Surveillance Project, and local cost data, we compared the cost-effectiveness of these three treatment modalities (TFCAS, CEA, and TCAR) for both symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis using a Markov state-transition model to quantify lifetime costs in United States dollars and effectiveness in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). We accounted for perioperative stroke and myocardial infarction, as well as long-term risks of stroke and restenosis. Based on CREST, we assumed a start age of 69 years and a cost-effectiveness acceptability threshold of $100,000/QALYs gained. Sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In the base-case scenario, TCAR cost $160,642/QALY gained compared with CEA, greater than the frequently cited $100,000/QALY gained threshold. TFCAS was more expensive and less effective than other strategies, largely due to a greater periprocedural stroke risk. In one-way sensitivity analysis, if TCAR stroke risk was <0.9% (base-case risk, 1.4%), than it was economically favorable compared with CEA at its current procedural cost. Alternatively, if TCAR procedural costs were reduced by approximately $2000 (base-case cost, $15,182), it would also become economically favorable. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, varying all parameters simultaneously over distributions, CEA was favored in 80% of model iterations at $100,000/QALY, with TCAR favored in 19%. CONCLUSIONS: At current cost and outcomes, TCAR does not meet a traditional cost-effectiveness threshold to replace CEA as the primary treatment modality for carotid stenosis. TFCAS is the least cost-effective strategy for carotid revascularization. Given these observations, TCAR should be limited to select patients, specifically those at high physiologic and anatomic risk from CEA. However, TCAR can become cost-effective if its cost is reduced. Given the current outcomes and cost, CEA remains the most cost-effective treatment for carotid revascularization.

Hospital-based delays to revascularization increase risk of postoperative mortality and short bowel syndrome in acute mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency for which delays in treatment have been closely associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although the duration of ischemia as a determinant of outcomes for AMI is well known, the objective of this study was to identify hospital-based determinants of delayed revascularization and their effects on postoperative morbidity and mortality in AMI. METHODS: All patients who underwent any surgery for AMI from a multi-center hospital system between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two groups based on timeliness of mesenteric revascularization after presentation. Early revascularization (ER) was defined as having both vascular consultation ≤12 hours of presentation and vascular surgery performed at the patient's initial operation. Delayed revascularization (DR) was defined as having either delays to vascular consultation or vascular surgery. A retrospective review of demographic and postoperative data was performed. The effect of DR on major postoperative outcomes, including 30-day and 2-year mortality, total length of bowel resection, and development of short bowel syndrome, were analyzed. Effects of delayed vascular consultation alone, delayed vascular surgery alone, no revascularization during admission, and admitting service on outcomes were also examined on subgroup analyses. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients were analyzed. Ninety-nine patients received ER, whereas the remaining 113 patients experienced a DR after hospital presentation. Among the DR group, 55 patients (25.9%) had delayed vascular consultation, whereas vascular surgery was deferred until after the initial operation in 37 patients (17.4%). Fifty-one patients (24.0%) were never revascularized during admission. DR was a significant predictor of 30-day (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4-4.9; P = .03) and 2-year mortality (hazard ratio, 1.55, 95% CI, 1.0-2.3; P = .04). DR was also independently associated with increased bowel resection length (OR, 7.47; P < .01) and postoperative short bowel syndrome (OR, 2.4; P = .03) on multivariate analyses. When examined separately on subgroup analysis, both delayed vascular consultation (OR, 3.38; P = .03) and vascular surgery (OR, 4.31; P < .01) independently increased risk of 30-day mortality. Hospital discharge after AMI without mesenteric revascularization was associated with increased risk of short bowel syndrome (OR, 2.94; P < .01) and late mortality (hazard ratio, 1.60; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Delayed vascular consultation and vascular surgery are both significant hospital-based determinants of postoperative mortality and short bowel syndrome in patients with AMI. Timing-based management protocols that emphasize routine evaluation by a vascular surgeon and early, definitive mesenteric revascularization should be established and widely adopted for all patients with clinically suspected AMI at presentation.

Alternative autologous and biologic conduits have worse outcomes than prosthetic grafts for infrainguinal bypass in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Single segment great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit in infrainguinal bypass. Alternative autologous conduits (AAC) and nonautologous biologic conduits (NABC) are thought to be a better alternative to traditional prosthetic conduits (PC) in the absence of GSV. In this study we analyzed the outcomes of these alternative conduits in lower extremity bypasses (LEB) in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. METHODS: The Vascular Quality Initiative LEB database from 2003 to 2020 was queried for this study, to identify LEB in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia. Primary outcomes were graft patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), and MALE-free survival at 1 year. Standard statistical methods were used as appropriate. RESULTS: We identified 22,671 LEB procedures (12,810 GSV, 6002 PC, 1907 AAC, and 1952 NABC). Compared with the GSV group, the other conduit patients were significantly older, had more comorbidities, had an increased rate of prior lower extremity interventions, had a higher rate of infrageniculate bypass targets, and were less ambulatory at baseline. The PC, AAC, and NABC groups had significantly higher rates of postoperative morbidity compared with the GSV group. The PC group had a higher 30-day mortality compared with the GSV, AAC, and NABC groups (3% PC vs 2% GSV, 2% AAC, 2% NABC; P = .049). Both PC and NABC had higher 1-year mortality compared with GSV and AAC (13% PC and 13% NABC vs 10% GSV, 10% AAC; P = .02). In an adjusted Cox regression model (stratified by infrageniculate target and adjusted for age, comorbidities, and prior vascular interventions) PC was not significantly different from GSV, but AAC (hazard ratio [HR], 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19-1.67; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.61-2.25; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of loss of primary patency. A similar association with MALE was observed: both AAC (HR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.15-1.58; P < .001) and NABC (HR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.53-2.11; P < .001) were associated with an increased risk of MALE compared with GSV; PC was not significantly different from GSV. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of GSV, alternative conduits (autologous or nonautologous biologic) do not confer a benefit with regard to graft patency or MALE compared with PCs. Increased operating time or costs associated with the use of these conduits is not justified based on this study.

Young patients without prior vascular disease are at increased risk of limb loss and reintervention after acute limb ischemia.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the present study was to categorize the presentation and treatment of acute limb ischemia (ALI) in young patients and compare the adverse outcomes after revascularization compared with that of older patients. METHODS: All the patients who had presented to a multi-institution healthcare system with ALI from 2016 to 2020 were identified. The presenting features, operative details, and outcomes were included in the present analysis. Patients with existing peripheral arterial disease (acute on chronic) were analyzed separately from those without (de novo thrombosis or embolus). Within these groups, younger patients (age, ≤50 years) were compared with older patients (age, >50 years). The 3-month major adverse limb event-free survival was the primary outcome. RESULTS: A total of 232 patients (age, 60 ± 16 years; 44% female sex, 87% white race) were included in the analysis. Of the 232 patients, 119 were in the acute on chronic cohort and 113 were in the de novo thrombosis/embolism cohort. Age did not affect the overall outcomes (P = .45) or the outcomes for the acute on chronic group (P = .17). However, in the de novo thrombosis/embolism cohort, patients aged ≤50 years had worse major adverse limb event-free survival compared with patients aged >50 years (hazard ratio, 2.47; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-5.68; P = .03) after adjustment for Rutherford class, interval from presentation to the operating room, and smoking status. In the de novo thrombosis/embolism group, the operative approach was similar across the age groups (endovascular, 12% vs 14%; open, 48% vs 41%; hybrid, 41% vs 45%; P = .78). In the younger patients, embolism was more likely from a proximal arterial source (71%). In contrast, in the older patients, the source of embolism was more often a cardiac source (86%). The rates of hypercoagulable disease were equal across the age groups (10% vs 10%; P = .95). The In-hospital mortality was 3% overall (acute on chronic, 5%; de novo, 3%). CONCLUSIONS: Despite advances in interventional options, for patients with ALI due to de novo thrombosis or embolus, younger age was associated with worse short-term limb-related outcomes.

Any Postoperative Surveillance Improves Survival after Endovascular Repair of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) has advanced the care of patients with ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms (rAAA) with improved early postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, this comes at the cost of a rigorous postoperative surveillance schedule to monitor for further aneurysmal degeneration. Adherence to surveillance recommendations is known to be poor in the elective setting, but has yet to be studied in the ruptured population. The aim of this study is to investigate predictors of incomplete surveillance after EVAR for rAAA (rEVAR) and examine how adherence impacts outcomes. METHODS: This was a retrospective case control study of patients undergoing rEVAR at a multiple hospital single healthcare center (2003-2020). Patients were excluded if they underwent open conversion during their index hospitalization or died within 60 days of surgery. Follow-up was broadly categorized as complete surveillance (60-day postoperative visit and annually thereafter) or incomplete surveillance, comprising both patients with less than recommended surveillance (minimal surveillance) and completely lost to follow-up (LTF). Any follow-up was defined as patients with complete or minimal surveillance. We investigated predictors of complete versus incomplete surveillance by multivariate logistic regression. Secondary outcomes included overall survival and cumulative incidence of reintervention controlling for the competing risk of mortality, generating hazard ratios (HR) and subdistribution hazard ratios (SHR). RESULTS: One-hundred and sixty patients (mean age 74 ± 10.1 years, 81.2% male) out of 673 total rAAA met study inclusion criteria. Complete surveillance was seen in 41.3% of our cohort, with the remainder with minimal surveillance (29.4%) or LTF (29.4%). Incomplete surveillance was associated with male sex (odds ratio [OR] 2.56; 95% CI 1.02-6.43), lack of a primary care provider (PCP; OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04-0.99), and longer driving distance from home to treating hospital (OR 2.37; 95% CI 1.08-5.20). Survival was not different between complete and incomplete surveillance groups, however any follow-up conferred improved survival over LTF (HR 0.57; 95% CI 0.331-0.997; P = 0.049). Reintervention was associated with incomplete surveillance (SHR 0.29; 95% CI 0.11-0.75), and discharge to a facility (SHR 0.25; 95% CI 0.067-0.94). CONCLUSIONS: Incomplete surveillance was observed in over 50% of patients who underwent rEVAR and was associated with male sex, lack of PCP, and longer driving distance. Any follow-up conferred a survival benefit, yet incomplete surveillance was associated with a lower risk of reintervention. Targeted strategies to prevent LTF, and less stringent, personalized follow-up plans that may confer similar survival benefit with better patient adherence should be investigated.

Predictive Factors of Perioperative Stroke-Related Mortality Following Vascular Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Vascular surgical procedures have one of the highest risks of perioperative stroke and stroke-related mortality, yet the independent risk factors contributing to this increased mortality have not been described. Perioperative strokes are thought to result from a combination of embolism and hypoperfusion mechanisms. The purpose of this study is to describe the independent predictors of perioperative stroke-related mortality in the vascular surgical population using the Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council (PHC4) database which collects cause of death data. METHODS: This retrospective, case-control study evaluated 4,128 patients aged 18-99 who underwent a vascular, non-carotid surgical procedure and subsequently suffered perioperative mortality. Common surgical comorbidities and risk factors for perioperative stroke, including carotid stenosis and atrial fibrillation, were evaluated in multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with carotid stenosis were 2.6 (aOR, 95% CI 1.4-4.5) times more likely to suffer perioperative mortality from stroke than from other causes. Additionally, in-hospital stroke, history of stroke, admission from a healthcare facility, and cancer were all positive predictive factors, whereas atrial fibrillation, emergency admission, hypertension, and diabetes were associated with decreased risk of perioperative stroke-related mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of vascular surgical population-specific predictors of stroke-related mortality can help to enhance preoperative risk-stratification tools and guide perioperative management of identified high-risk patients. Increased neurophysiologic monitoring in the perioperative period to prevent delays in diagnosis of perioperative stroke offers a strategy to reduce risk of perioperative stroke-related mortality in vascular surgical patients.

Rationale and Design for the Remote Ischemic Preconditioning for Carotid Endarterectomy Trial.

BACKGROUND: While the perioperative stroke rate after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is low, "silent" microinfarctions identified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are common and have been correlated with postoperative neurocognitive decline. Our study will investigate the role of remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) as a potential neuroprotective mechanism. RIPC is a well-tolerated stimulus that, through neuronal and humoral pathways, generates a systemic environment of greater resistance to subsequent ischemic insults. We hypothesized that patients undergoing RIPC before CEA will have improved postoperative neurocognitive scores compared with those of patients undergoing standard care. METHODS: Patients undergoing CEA will be randomized 1:1 to RIPC or standard clinical care. Those randomized to RIPC will undergo a standard protocol of 4 cycles of RIPC. Each RIPC cycle will involve 5 min of forearm ischemia with 5 min of reperfusion. Forearm ischemia will be induced by a blood pressure cuff inflated to 200 mm Hg or at least 15 mm Hg higher than the systolic pressure if it is >185 mm Hg. This will occur after anesthesia induction and during incision/dissection but before manipulation or clamping of the carotid; thus, patients will be blinded to their assignment. Before carotid endarterectomy, all patients will undergo baseline neurocognitive testing in the form of a Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and National Institutes of Health (NIH) Toolbox. MoCA testing only will be conducted on postoperative day 1 in the hospital. The full neurocognitive testing battery will again be conducted at 1-month follow-up in the office. Changes from baseline will be compared between arms at the follow-up time points. Assuming no drop-ins or dropouts and a 10% loss to follow-up, we would need a sample size of 43 patients for 80% power per treatment arm. The primary endpoint, change in MoCA scores, will be analyzed using a random effects model, and secondary outcomes will be analyzed using either linear or logistic regression where appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: RIPC, if shown to be effective in protecting patients from neurocognitive decline after CEA, represents a safe, inexpensive, and easily implementable method of neuroprotection.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of drug-coated therapies in the superficial femoral artery.

OBJECTIVE: Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) may increase durability of endovascular treatment of superficial femoral artery (SFA) disease while avoiding stent-related risks. The purpose of this study was to use meta-analytic data of DCB studies to compare the cost-effectiveness of potential SFA treatments: DCB, drug-eluting stent (DES), plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA), or bare-metal stent (BMS). METHODS: A search for randomized controlled trials comparing DCB with POBA for treatment of SFA disease was performed. Hazard ratios were extracted to account for the time-to-event primary outcome of target lesion revascularization. Odds ratios were calculated for the secondary outcomes of primary patency (PP) and major amputation. Incorporating pooled data from the meta-analysis, cost-effectiveness analysis, assuming a payer perspective, used a decision model to simulate patency at 1 year and 2 years for each index treatment modality: POBA, BMS, DCB, or DES. Costs were based on current Medicare outpatient reimbursement rates. RESULTS: Eight studies (1352 patients) met inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. DCB outperformed POBA with respect to target lesion revascularization over time (pooled hazard ratio, 0.41; P < .001). Risk of major amputation at 12 months was not significantly different between groups. There was significantly improved 1-year PP in the DCB group compared with POBA (pooled odds ratio, 3.30; P < .001). In the decision model, the highest PP at 1 year was seen in the DES index therapy strategy (79%), followed by DCB (74%), BMS (71%), and POBA (64%). With a baseline cost of $9259.39 per patent limb at 1 year in the POBA-first group, the incremental cost per patent limb for each other strategy compared with POBA was calculated: $14,136.10/additional patent limb for DCB, $38,549.80/limb for DES, and $59,748,85/limb for BMS. The primary BMS option is dominated by being more expensive and less effective than DCB. Compared directly with DCB, DES costs $87,377.20 per additional patent limb at 1 year. Based on the projected PP at 1 year in the decision model, the number needed to treat for DES compared with DCB is 20. At current reimbursement, the use of more than two DCBs per procedure would no longer be cost-effective compared with DES. At 2 years, DCB emerges as the most cost-effective index strategy with the lowest overall cost and highest patency rates over that time horizon. CONCLUSIONS: Current data and reimbursements support the use of DCB as a cost-effective strategy for endovascular intervention in the SFA; any additional effectiveness of DES comes at a high price. Use of more than one DCB per intervention significantly decreases cost-effectiveness.

The associations of hemodialysis access type and access satisfaction with health-related quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: In addition to age and comorbidities, health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is known to predict mortality in hemodialysis (HD) patients. Understanding the association of vascular access type with HRQOL can help surgeons to provide patient-centered dialysis access recommendations. We sought to understand the impact of HD access type on HRQOL. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional prospective study of community-dwelling prevalent HD patients in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. We assessed patient satisfaction with their access using the Vascular Access Questionnaire (VAQ) and HRQOL with the Short Form Health Survey. We compared access satisfaction and HRQOL across access types. We used logistic regression modeling to evaluate the association of access type with satisfaction and multivariate analysis of variance to evaluate the association of both of these variables on HRQOL. RESULTS: We surveyed 77 patients. The mean age was 61.8 ± 15.9 years. Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) was used by 62.3%, tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC) by 23.4%, and arteriovenous graft (AVG) by 14.3%. There was a significant difference in satisfaction by access type with lowest median VAQ score (indicating highest satisfaction) in patients with AVF followed by TDC and AVG (4.5 vs 6.5 vs 7.0; P = .013). Defining a VAQ score of <7 to denote satisfaction, AVF patients were more likely to be satisfied with their access, compared with TDC or AVG (77% vs 56% vs 55%; P = NS). Multivariate regression analysis yielded a model that predicted 46% of the variance of VAQ score; important predictors of dissatisfaction included <1 year on dialysis (ß = 3.36; P < .001), increasing number of access-related hospital admissions in the last year (ß = 1.69; P < .001), and AVG (ß = 1.72; P = .04) or TDC (ß = 1.67; P = .02) access. Mean physical and mental QOL scores (the composite scores of Short Form Health Survey) were not different by access type (P = .49; P = .41). In an additive multivariate analysis of variance with the two composite QOL scores as dependent variables, 25.8% of the generalized variance in HRQOL (effect size) was accounted for by access satisfaction with only an additional 3% accounted for by access type. CONCLUSIONS: HD patients experience greatest satisfaction with fistula, and access satisfaction is significantly associated with better HRQOL. Controlling for access satisfaction, there is no significant independent association of access type on HRQOL. Future research should investigate the relationship between access satisfaction, adherence to dialysis regimens, mortality, and the consequent implications for patient-centered care.