Biomarker Testing Trends in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Live in Rural Areas and Urban Clusters in the US.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data on biomarker testing rates in rural populations with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). To assess biomarker testing practices, oncologists in rural areas and urban clusters in the US were surveyed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A web-based survey was administered to oncologists spending ≥40% of their time practicing in rural areas or urban clusters and who had treated ≥2 patients with stage IV mCRC in the prior month. RESULTS: Ninety-nine oncologists completed the quantitative survey and 17 the qualitative interview. Among respondents, 97% reported ordering biomarker tests. Oncologists reported testing for KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, HER2, and mismatch repair deficiency/microsatellite instability in 72%, 65%, 63%, 56%, and 66% of patients with metastatic disease, respectively. Forty-one percent reported performing reflex testing. The most cited testing barriers were lack of insurance coverage, insufficient tissue samples, and long turnaround times. CONCLUSION: Further assessment of rural testing practices is needed.

The use of novel agents in multiple myeloma patients with hepatic impairment.

Novel drugs such as immunomodulators and proteasome inhibitors have improved the survival of patients with multiple myeloma. Like all therapeutic agents, appropriate dosing based on metabolism and clearance is important to maintain efficacy while avoiding toxicity. Hepatic impairment (HI) in multiple myeloma patients is rare but well described either due to disease or therapy-related factors. However, limited data are available on the appropriate use and dosing of the novel agent therapeutics in myeloma patients with HI. Furthermore, data on HI secondary to the novel agent toxicity are also sparse. This systematic review highlights the evidence on the use of novel agents like thalidomide, lenalidomide, pomalidomide, bortezomib and carfilzomib in patients with HI as well as their associated hepatic toxicities.

Bosutinib: a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor for chronic myelogenous leukemia.

OBJECTIVE: To review clinical trials and main characteristics of bosutinib, a second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). DATA SOURCES: Pertinent data were identified through a search of PubMed (January 1990-April 2013) using the primary search terms SKI-606, bosutinib, and CML. Additionally, preliminary reports published in abstract form by the American Society of Clinical Oncology and American Society of Hematology (January 1990-April 2013) were screened for inclusion. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: Clinical Phase 1, 2, and 3 studies reported in English evaluating the safety and efficacy of bosutinib in patients with CML were reviewed. DATA SYNTHESIS: Bosutinib is a TKI of the breakpoint cluster region/Abelson murine leukemia (BCR-ABL) gene approved by the Food and Drug Administration on September 4, 2012, for second-line treatment of chronic phase, accelerated phase, and blast phase CML. In the second-line setting, bosutinib is effective in some patients with CML resistant or intolerant to imatinib, dasatinib, and/or nilotinib, but it is not effective in patients whose disease expresses the T315I point mutation in BCR-ABL. Bosutinib also has been compared with imatinib, the standard first-line treatment, in 502 patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase CML in a Phase 3 trial. Complete cytogenetic response at 12 months, the primary efficacy end point, is similar between bosutinib and imatinib (p = 0.601); therefore, bosutinib is not indicated in the first-line setting. Common adverse events associated with bosutinib include diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events reported in at least 5% of bosutinib-treated patients include elevated serum lipase and liver aminotransferases, anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Currently available clinical trials suggest that bosutinib is generally a safe and effective treatment option for patients with CML who have failed first-line TKIs and who do not express the T315I mutation; however, tolerability may be problematic for some patients.

Cardiac arrest with residual blindness after overdose of Tessalon® (benzonatate) perles.

BACKGROUND: The extent to which benzonatate (Tessalon®), a structurally similar agent to other local anesthetics including tetracaine and procaine, poses a risk to the public is not fully appreciated as it is still one of the most widely prescribed antitussives available. OBJECTIVES: To report a case of cardiac arrest with residual blindness after Tessalon® overdose, review its clinical manifestations, toxicology and management considerations, and describe the need for rational prescribing. CASE REPORT: A 17-year-old woman with no previous medical history presented to the Emergency Department (ED) status post cardiac arrest. One to two hours prior, the patient had ingested at least 10 200-mg Tessalon® capsules as part of a suicide attempt. The patient was sedated, intubated, and given magnesium as prophylaxis against recurrent dysrhythmias. Emergent gastric lavage was performed and well tolerated. A 24-h hypothermia protocol with 6-h cooling period was initiated. Toxicological studies, chest radiograph, and a computed tomography scan of the head were all unremarkable. The patient was admitted to the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit for further work-up and supportive care. The patient was extubated and able to follow some commands 1 week post-admission. The patient developed blindness and experienced generalized confabulations, which did not resolve. CONCLUSION: Ingestion of Tessalon®, a seemingly innocuous and widely prescribed antitussive, may pose a risk to patients due to its potential for the rapid development of life-threatening adverse events and limited treatment options in the overdose setting. Rational prescribing and patient education is needed.

A survey of drug information references emergency medicine clinicians utilize for prescribing in pregnant patients.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians practicing in Emergency Departments (EDs) using outdated pocket guides and other non-pregnancy-specific references when prescribing in pregnancy may place the pregnancy or fetus at risk. OBJECTIVE: To identify the references that emergency medicine (EM) clinicians use for prescribing in pregnant patients, the prescribing trends when clinicians are given the pregnancy category information, and clinician awareness of access to drug information references. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was administered to EM clinicians. In part I, clinicians listed the top 3 drug information references that they routinely use in clinical practice. In part II, clinicians ranked their willingness to prescribe a Category A, B, C, D, or X drug using a 5-point Likert scale. In part III, clinicians selected from a list of electronic and print resources those that they consider available to them in the ED to find pregnancy-related drug prescribing information. Statistical analyses included frequency distribution and bivariate analysis. RESULTS: Fifty-five clinicians with an average of 5.71 +/- 7.95 years (+/- SD) in the profession completed the survey. The most commonly used references included Micromedex, Tarascon Pocket Pharmacopoeia, and Epocrates (29%, 18%, and 14%, respectively). Ten (18%) respondents stated that they would be willing to prescribe Category C drugs. Among the 5 pregnancy-specific drug information references that are available in our ED, only 20% of EM clinicians stated that these references were available to them. CONCLUSIONS: EM clinicians rely on general references to make prescribing decisions for pregnant patients and are willing to prescribe medications that have data to support safe use in pregnancy. A minority of EM clinicians acknowledged the availability of pregnancy-specific references in the ED. Increased awareness of references that incorporate human data into their pharmacotherapy recommendations is warranted to assist EM clinicians in achieving their goal of prescribing safely in the pregnant patient.

A prospective evaluation on the interaction of fluconazole and voriconazole on serum concentrations of budesonide in patients treated for gastrointestinal GVHD.

The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is commonly affected by acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in patients who have undergone allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). For patients developing GI GVHD, nonabsorbable corticosteroids such as budesonide may be used alone to reduce the risk of systemic corticosteroid toxicities or combined with systemic steroids to enhance clinical responses and to allow more rapid tapering of systemic corticosteroid doses. This prospective crossover study was conducted to evaluate what effect two commonly used antifungal agents, fluconazole, and voriconazole, would have on the trough (Cmin) and peak (Cmax) levels of budesonide in adult patients who had undergone allo-HSCT who subsequently developed clinical GI GVHD. Fifteen subjects were enrolled and nine completed the study and were evaluable. When coadministered with budesonide, voriconazole significantly increased the geometric mean of budesonide Cmin and Cmax levels by 8.52- and 6.63-fold, respectively. The cohort to evaluate the interaction with fluconazole did not meet accrual goals to reach definitive conclusions. In conclusion, this prospective study demonstrated that when patients with GI GVHD are treated with budesonide concurrently with voriconazole, the systemic concentrations of budesonide increase substantially which could increase the risk of steroid-associated toxicities.

Midostaurin: A New Oral Agent Targeting FMS-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3-Mutant Acute Myeloid Leukemia.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), a clonal hematologic malignancy that results in bone marrow failure, is the most common acute leukemia in adults (median age of diagnosis 67 yrs), and treatment options, especially in the elderly population, are limited. Induction chemotherapy with 7 + 3, the combination of continuous-infusion cytarabine and intermittent dosing of an anthracycline administered over 7 and 3 days, respectively, has remained the standard of care since its introduction in 1973 in the United States. Midostaurin is a first-generation FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) inhibitor (TKI) that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in April 2017 for the treatment of FLT3-mutant AML. We performed a search of the PubMed database (January 1990-January 2017) to review pertinent clinical trials of midostaurin. Phase I, II, and III trials reported in English evaluating the safety and efficacy of midostaurin in patients with AML or myelodysplastic syndrome were included. The ClinicalTrials.gov database was also searched for ongoing trials. In the only phase III trial that has been conducted to date, midostaurin demonstrated significant improvement compared with placebo in overall and event-free survival in patients aged 18-59 years with newly diagnosed FLT3-mutant AML treated with standard induction chemotherapy. The median overall survival for patients randomized to the midostaurin group was 74.7 months versus 25.6 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.63-0.96, p=0.009). Median event-free survival was 8.2 months with midostaurin compared with 3.0 months with placebo (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66-0.93, p=0.002). In addition to being evaluated in combination with conventional chemotherapy, midostaurin has been studied as monotherapy, in combination with the hypomethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine, and as single-agent maintenance. Studies evaluating midostaurin in the maintenance setting after allogeneic stem cell transplantation are underway. Midostaurin is the first oral multitargeted TKI to improve overall survival in patients with FLT3-mutant AML and represents an important addition to the limited armamentarium against AML.