Active Vitamin D3 (Calcitriol) Increases Adipose Graft Retention in a Xenograft Model.

BACKGROUND: Autologous fat grafting, although broadly indicated, is limited by unsatisfactory retention and often requires multiple procedures to achieve durable outcomes. Graft survival is strongly influenced by the magnitude and duration of post-engraftment ischemia. Calcitriol is a pleiotropic, safe nutrient with cell-specific influence on viability and metabolic flux. OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the efficacy of activated vitamin D3 (calcitriol) in improving grafting outcomes and examine its mechanisms. METHODS: Lipoaspirate was collected for ex vivo culture (7 unique donors), in vitro bioenergetic analysis (6 unique donors), and in vivo transplantation (5 unique donors). Ex vivo samples were incubated for up to 2 weeks before extraction of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) for viability or flow cytometry. SVF was collected for Seahorse (Agilent; Santa Clara, CA) analysis of metabolic activity. Human endothelial cell lines were utilized for analyses of endothelial function. In vivo, samples were implanted into athymic mice with calcitriol treatment either (1) once locally or (2) 3 times weekly via intraperitoneal injection. Grafts were assessed photographically, volumetrically, and histologically at 1, 4, and 12 weeks. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), Sirius red, perilipin, HIF1α, and CD31 tests were performed. RESULTS: Calcitriol-treated lipoaspirate demonstrated dose-dependent increases in SVF viability and metabolic reserve during hypoxic stress. Calcitriol treatment enhanced endothelial mobility ex vivo and endothelial function in vitro. In vivo, calcitriol enhanced adipocyte viability, reduced fibrosis, and improved vascularity. Continuous calcitriol was sufficient to improve graft retention at 12 weeks (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Calcitriol increased fat graft retention in a xenograft model. Calcitriol has potential to be a simple, economical means of increasing fat graft retention and long-term outcomes.

The Impact of Fellowship Training in Academic Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The competitive nature of an academic plastic surgery career has contributed to an increase in sub-specialization. The aim of this study is to assess the benefits of subspecialty fellowship training to pursue a career in academic plastic surgery. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted of all current academic plastic surgeons (APSs) participating in Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education-certified residency programs. Online faculty website listings were used to collect their demographics, training and practice characteristics, academic rank and leadership positions, and research productivity. RESULTS: A total of 927 APSs met the inclusion criteria, of which 70.2% had undergone fellowship training, with an overall significant increase in fellowship-trained surgeons within the last 10 years (odds ratio [OR], 1.66; P = 0.0005). Hand training was the most common fellowship (35.6%), followed by craniofacial (32.0%) and microsurgery (28.1%). Fellowship training was more prevalent among younger (48.7 vs 53.5 years, P < 0.0001), White (67.8%), and non-White (77.4%, P = 0.0058) APSs who had received either integrated (67.1%) or independent (81.8%, P < 0.0001) plastic surgery training and are currently working in a department (OR, 1.44; P = 0.028). Fellowship training was shown to influence academic rank (associate professor: OR, 1.68 [P = 0.0073]; full professor: OR, 0.58 [P = 0.0008]), leadership position (fellowship director OR, 10.09; P < 0.0001) and research productivity (publications: 26 vs 16.5; P = 0.0009). In addition, fellowship attainment did not correlate with the size of the employing academic program, population of the city of practice, or being a residency director or chair. CONCLUSION: The majority of APSs have undergone fellowship training, and there is very strong evidence supporting its impact in current entry and advancement in academic plastic surgery.

An Evaluation of Race Disparities in Academic Plastic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Academic plastic surgery has a history of underrepresentation of ethnic and racial minority groups. Recent policy shifts by national medical groups and plastic surgery societies have focused on reversing these inequalities. This study seeks to measure ethnic and racial representation at academic and leadership positions following recent changes. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted in June of 2018, measuring ethnic and racial diversity of U.S. academic plastic surgery faculty. Among faculty, career qualifications, years of experience, faculty positions, and leadership ethnicity were compared. RESULTS: A total of 930 academic plastic surgeons were included in the study. Classified collectively as nonwhite, this group graduated more recently than other academic plastic surgeons (2006 versus 2001; p < 0.0001) and had greater rates of clinical fellowship attainment (OR, 1.62; 95 percent CI, 1.16 to 2.26). Nonwhite individuals were less likely to be employed in the full professor position compared with their white colleagues (OR, 0.6; 95 percent CI, 0.42 to 0.88; p = 0.0077). However, after adjustment for differences in years of postresidency experience, this disparity was no longer significant (OR, 1.06; 95 percent CI, 0.62 to 1.83; p = 0.82), indicating the importance of current cohort experience differences. Assessment of program leadership found that nonwhite chairs employed significantly more nonwhite faculty (42.5 percent versus 20.9 percent; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Academic plastic surgery continues to face disparities in representation of both ethnic and racial minorities. Current inequalities are most severe at senior academic positions and may be linked to cohort experience differences along with leadership and promotion biases.

Reduction Mammaplasty in Adolescents: A Comparison of Wise and Vertical Incision Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Reduction mammaplasty was shown to ameliorate physical and psychological problems in adolescents suffering from macromastia. However, benefits of the Wise compared to the vertical incision pattern have not yet been established in this population. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of these 2 techniques in adolescents undergoing reduction mammaplasty. METHODS: A retrospective study of adolescents undergoing breast reduction by a single surgeon between 2011 and 2017 was conducted. Wise and vertical reduction techniques were compared based on demographics, surgical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and aesthetic outcomes. Patient satisfaction was determined using the validated BREAST-Q survey, and aesthetic outcomes using the validated ABNSW system. RESULTS: A total of 60 adolescents underwent reduction mammaplasty (Wise/inferior pedicle = 80.0%, Wise/superior medial pedicle = 1.7%, vertical/superior medial pedicle = 18.3%). Patients who reported preoperative pain (Wise = 95.9%, vertical = 72.7%, P = 0.039) were more likely to undergo Wise reduction. Patients with Wise reductions also were more likely to undergo bilateral reduction (Wise = 93.9%; vertical = 63.6%, P = 0.017). The major and minor complication rates were 1.7% (Wise = 2.0%, vertical = 0%, P = NS) and 23.3% (Wise = 20.4%, vertical = 36.4%, P = NS), respectively. Adolescents undergoing Wise incision demonstrated statistically significant improvement in NAC contour (Wise = 61%, vertical = 47%, P = 0.028) and overall aesthetic outcome (Wise = 25%, vertical = 17%, P = 0.008) with scarring not being a negative factor (Wise = -16%; vertical = -35%, P = 0.004). Patient satisfaction was comparable in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Reduction mammaplasty is a safe, effective treatment for adolescent macromastia. The similarity in complication and satisfaction rates between Wise and vertical patterns suggests that both techniques can be safely performed in the adolescent population and allow for overall improvements in aesthetic outcomes.