RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Oxygenators, as used in cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuits, are components with good air removal properties. However, under some conditions the semipermeable characteristics of hollow fibers allow air to accidentally enter the blood side of the CPB circuit. This may occur when a fluid in motion is stopped suddenly by which the rapid change in momentum may cause a relative negative pressure drop, the so-called hammer effect. The hammer effect is not yet described in literature related to CPB. The aim of this in vitro study was to reproduce the hammer effect. METHODS: The in vitro setup consisted of a CPB circuit with a fully occluded roller pump and one of four test oxygenators. The hammer test was performed by a sudden pump stop. The pressure wave was measured and after the test the residual air present in the oxygenator was forced into the arterial line and measured with a bubble detector. RESULTS: We showed that a sudden pump stop could lead to the hammer effect, represented as a relative negative pressure drop in the arterial line. This hammer effect resulted in air release through the semipermeable fibers as we showed in two of the four tested brands of oxygenators. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the hammer effect may occur before connection of the CPB system to the patient, and this may result in air release into the arterial blood side of the oxygenator. The hammer effect can be caused by clamping of the tubing in combination with a centrifugal pump, or by suddenly stopping the roller pump. With this study we would like to raise awareness of the hammer effect.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: During cardiac surgery the use of a minimal extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) system may reduce the adverse effects for the patient. This is probably caused by reduced inflammation and hemodilution. For the use of a MiECC circuit, a venous bubble trap (VBT) is warranted for safety reasons. The aim of this study was to assess if an arterial filter with a small prime volume has the same (or better) air removal capacities as a VBT in a MiECC circuit and subsequentially may be used as an alternative. METHODS: In an in vitro study, air removal properties were compared between the arterial filter and three VBT's on the market, VBT160 (Getinge), VBT 8 (LivaNova and VARD (Medtronic). In a MiECC circuit, the filter devices were placed in a venous position and challenged with massive and micro air. Gaseous microemboli (GME) were measured with a bubble counter proximal and distal of the VBT device. RESULTS: More than 99.9 % of the air was removed after a bolus air challenge by all VBT's. Both the VARD and the AF100 showed better GME removal properties (not significant for the AF100) compared to the other devices. All filters showed GME generation after a challenge with massive air. Compared to the other filters, only the VARD showed no passing of larger bubbles when a volume of 50 mL of air was present in the filter. CONCLUSIONS: The AF100 seems to be a safe and low prime alternative for use in a MiECC system as a venous air trap. A word of caution, placement of the AF100 arterial filter in the venous line is off label use.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), gaseous microemboli (GME) that originate from the extracorporeal circuit are released into the arterial blood stream of the patient. Gaseous microemboli may contribute to adverse outcome after cardiac surgery with CPB. Possibly, air may be collected in the right atrium during induction of anesthesia and released during CPB start. The aim of this study was to assess if the GME load entering the venous line of the CPB circuit could be reduced by training of anesthesia personal in avoiding air introduction during administration of intravenous medication. METHODS: In 94 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with CPB, GME number and volume were measured intraoperatively with a bubble counter (BCC300). The quantity and the relationship between GME number and volume in the venous and arterial line were determined in 2 periods before and after education of the anesthesiologists and nurses. RESULTS: In the venous line no significant differences were observed between numbers and volumes of GME between groups. Comparing patients with low versus high GME load, showed significantly more patients from the intervention group in the low GME-load group, namely 29 versus 18. Administration of medication by anesthesia was confirmed as a clear cause of GME/air-introduction into the venous circulation. Scavenging properties of the CPB circuit including the oxygenator showed a 99.9% reduction of GME. CONCLUSIONS: A wide spread of GME generation during perfusion was present with no difference in generation of GME between groups. Lower GME load observed in patients (intervention group) and examples of air introduction during drug administration suggest that air introduced by anesthesia contributes to the GME load during CPB. Scavenging properties of the CPB circuit contribute very much to patient safety regarding reduction of venous air. Awareness and education create the possibilities for further reduction of GME during cardiopulmonary bypass.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Heparin rebound is a common observed phenomenon after cardiac surgery with CPB and is associated with increased postoperative blood loss. However, the administration of extra protamine may lead to increased blood loss as well. Therefore, we want to investigate the relation between heparin rebound and postoperative blood loss and the necessity to provide extra protamine to reverse heparin rebound. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Web of Science to review the question: "Does heparin rebound lead to postoperative blood loss in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass." Combination of search words were framed within four major categories: heparin rebound, blood loss, cardiac surgery and cardiopulmonary bypass. All studies that met our question were included. Quality assessment was performed using the Cochrane risk of bias (RoB2) tool for randomized controlled trials and the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of intervention (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised trials. RESULTS: 4 randomized and 17 non-randomized studies were included. The mean incidence of heparin rebound was 40%. The postoperative heparin levels, due to heparin rebound, were often below or equal to 0.2 IU/mL. We could not demonstrate an association between heparin rebound and postoperative blood loss or transfusion requirements. However the quality of evidence was poor due to a broad variety of definitions of heparin rebound, measured by various coagulation tests and studies with small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: The influence of heparin rebound on postoperative bleeding seems to be negligible, but might get significant in conjunction with incomplete heparin reversal or other coagulopathies. For that reason, it might be useful to get a picture of the entire coagulation spectrum after cardiac surgery, as can be done by the use of a viscoelastic test in conjunction with an aggregometry test.
RESUMO
The landmark 2016 Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society (MiECTiS) position paper promoted the creation of a common language between cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists and perfusionists which led to the development of a stable framework that paved the way for the advancement of minimal invasive perfusion and related technologies. The current expert consensus document offers an update in areas for which new evidence has emerged. In the light of published literature, modular minimal invasive extracorporeal circulation (MiECC) has been established as a safe and effective perfusion technique that increases biocompatibility and ultimately ensures perfusion safety in all adult cardiac surgical procedures, including re-operations, aortic arch and emergency surgery. Moreover, it was recognized that incorporation of MiECC strategies advances minimal invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) by combining reduced surgical trauma with minimal physiologic derangements. Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Technologies International Society considers MiECC as a physiologically-based multidisciplinary strategy for performing cardiac surgery that is associated with significant evidence-based clinical benefit that has accrued over the years. Widespread adoption of this technology is thus strongly advocated to obtain additional healthcare benefit while advancing patient care.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos , Adulto , Humanos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Perfusão , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , CoraçãoRESUMO
AIMS: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation is a non-thermal ablation method based on the application of direct current between a multi-electrode catheter and skin electrode. The delivery of current through blood leads to electrolysis. Some studies suggest that gaseous (micro)emboli might be associated with myocardial damage and/or (a)symptomatic cerebral ischaemic events. The aim of this study was to compare the amount of gas generated during IRE ablation and during radiofrequency (RF) ablation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In six 60-75 kg pigs, an extracorporeal femoral shunt was outfitted with a bubble-counter to detect the size and total volume of gas bubbles. Anodal and cathodal 200 J IRE applications were delivered in the left atrium (LA) using a 14-electrode circular catheter. The 30 and 60 s 40 W RF point-by-point ablations were performed. Using transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE), gas formation was visualized. Average gas volumes were 0.6 ± 0.6 and 56.9 ± 19.1 µL (P < 0.01) for each anodal and cathodal IRE application, respectively. Also, qualitative TOE imaging showed significantly less LA bubble contrast with anodal than with cathodal applications. Radiofrequency ablations produced 1.7 ± 2.9 and 6.7 ± 7.4 µL of gas, for 30 and 60 s ablation time, respectively. CONCLUSION: Anodal IRE applications result in significantly less gas formation than both cathodal IRE applications and RF applications. This finding is supported by TOE observations.
Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter , Animais , Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Catéteres , Eletroporação , Gases , Átrios do Coração/diagnóstico por imagem , Átrios do Coração/cirurgia , SuínosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gaseous microemboli that originate from the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit may contribute to adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. We prospectively evaluated the influence of gaseous microemboli on the release of various biomarkers after use of a minimally invasive extracorporeal technology system. METHODS: In 70 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with minimized cardiopulmonary bypass, gaseous microemboli were measured intraoperatively with a bubble counter. Intra- and postoperative biomarker levels for inflammatory response (interleukin-6, C5b-9), endothelial damage (von Willebrand factor, soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1), oxidative stress (malondialdehyde, 8-isoprostane, neuroketal), and neurological injury (neuron-specific enolase, brain-type fatty acid-binding protein) were analyzed using immune assay techniques. The relationship between gaseous microemboli number or volume and the incremental area under the curve (iAUC24h) or peak change for the biomarkers was calculated. RESULTS: All biomarkers except for malondialdehyde increased at least temporarily after coronary artery bypass grafting with a minimally invasive extracorporeal technology system. The median total gaseous microemboli number was 6,174 (interquartile range: 3,507-10,531) and the median total gaseous microemboli volume was 4.31 µL (interquartile range: 2.71-8.50). There were no significant correlations between total gaseous microemboli number or volume and iAUC24h or peak change for any of the biomarkers. After controlling for the variance of possible other predictor variables, multiple linear regression analysis showed no association between gaseous microemboli parameters and release of biomarkers. CONCLUSION: This study showed no evidence that gaseous microemboli contribute to increased biomarker levels after coronary artery bypass grafting with cardiopulmonary bypass. A reason for the absence of damage by gaseous microemboli may be the relative and considerably small amount of gaseous microemboli entering the patients in this study.
Assuntos
Biomarcadores/sangue , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Gases/metabolismo , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Recent studies demonstrated that irreversible electroporation (IRE) ablation may be an alternative method for thermal ablation for pulmonary vein isolation. Development of gaseous microemboli during catheter ablation might lead to asymptomatic ischemic events and is therefore an important research topic. Gas formation during arcing with direct current catheter ablation has been studied in the past, however not for nonarcing IRE-ablation. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to visualize, quantify, and characterize gas formation during nonarcing millisecond IRE-pulses using a multielectrode circular catheter. METHODS: In vitro, gas formation during IRE-pulses was studied using a high-speed imaging, direct volume measurements, and a bubble counter. Gas formation was compared between cathodal and anodal IRE-pulses and between a small and large catheter hoop diameter. RESULTS: High-speed images showed the location and dynamics of gas formation during cathodal and anodal millisecond IRE-pulses. The direct volume measurements demonstrated a significantly larger volume for cathodal than for anodal IRE-pulses (P < .001), and no significant difference between small and large hoop diameters. A strong linear relationship was found between delivered charge and total gas volume (r = 0.99). Bubble counter measurements showed that cathodal IRE-pulses produced more and larger gas bubbles than anodal IRE-pulses. The ratio of total gas volume between cathodal and anodal IRE-pulses is different as predicted from electrolysis theory. CONCLUSION: In vitro, millisecond anodal IRE-pulses produce significantly less and smaller gas bubbles than millisecond cathodal IRE-pulses. In vivo experiments are required to investigate the clinical implication of these observations.
Assuntos
Ablação por Cateter/efeitos adversos , Eletroporação , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Cateteres Cardíacos , Ablação por Cateter/instrumentação , Eletroporação/instrumentação , Desenho de Equipamento , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems are developed to decrease the deleterious effects of cardiopulmonary bypass. For instance, prime volume and foreign surface area are decreased in these systems. However, because of the lack of a venous reservoir in minimized systems, air handling properties of these minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems may be decreased as compared to conventional cardiopulmonary bypass systems. The aim of this in vitro study is to compare the air handling properties of two complete minimized cardiopulmonary bypass systems of two manufacturers, of which one system is provided with the air purge control. In an in vitro study, two minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems, Inspire Min.I manufactured by Sorin Group Italia, Mirandola, Italy (LivaNova, London, United Kingdom) and minimized extracorporeal circulation manufactured by Maquet, Rastatt, Germany (Getinge, Germany), were challenged with two types of air challenges; a bolus air challenge and a gaseous microemboli challenge. The air removal characteristics of the venous bubble traps and of the complete minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems were assessed by measuring the gaseous microemboli volume and number downstream of the venous bubble traps in the arterial line with a bubble counter. No significant differences were observed in air reduction between the venous bubble traps of Getinge (venous bubble traps) and LivaNova (Inspire venous bubble traps 8 in conjunction with the air purge control). Similarly, no significant differences were observed in volume and number of gaseous microemboli in the arterial line of both complete minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems. However, the gaseous microemboli load of the Inspire Min.I system was marginally lower after both the bolus air and the gaseous microemboli challenges. Both minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation systems assessed in this study, the LivaNova Inspire Min.I and the Getinge minimized extracorporeal circulation, showed comparable air removal properties, after both bolus and gaseous microemboli air challenges. Besides, air purge control automatic air removal system provided with the LivaNova Inspire Min.I. system may enhance patient's safety with the use of a minimally invasive extracorporeal circulation system. We consider both systems equally safe for clinical use.
Assuntos
Circulação Extracorpórea/métodos , Humanos , Técnicas In VitroRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Gaseous microemboli (GME) introduced during cardiac surgery are considered as a potential source of morbidity, which has driven the development of the first bubble counters. Two new generation bubble counters, introduced in the early 2000s, claim correct sizing and counting of GME. This in-vitro study aims to validate the accuracy of two bubble counters using monodisperse bubbles in a highly controlled setting at low GME concentrations. METHODS: Monodisperse GME with a radius of 43 µm were produced in a microfluidic chip. Directly after their formation, they were injected one-by-one into the BCC200 and the EDAC sensors. GME size and count, measured with the bubble counters, were optically verified using high-speed imaging. RESULTS: During best-case scenarios or low GME concentrations of GME with a size of 43 µm in radius in an in-vitro setup, the BCC200 overestimates GME size by a factor of 2 to 3 while the EDAC underestimates the average GME size by at least a factor of two. The BCC200 overestimates the GME concentration by approximately 20% while the EDAC overestimates the concentration by nearly one order of magnitude. Nevertheless, the calculated total GME volume is only over-predicted by a factor 2 since the EDAC underestimates the actual GME size. For the BCC200, the total GME volume was over-predicted by 25 times due to the over-estimation of GME size. CONCLUSIONS: The measured errors in the absolute sizing/counting of GME do not imply that all results obtained using the bubble counters are insignificant or invalid. A relative change in bubble size or bubble concentration can accurately be measured. However, care must be taken in the interpretation of the results and their absolute values. Moreover, the devices cannot be used interchangeably when reporting GME activity. Nevertheless, both devices can be used to study the relative air removal characteristics of CPB components or for the quantitative monitoring of GME production during CPB interventions.
Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Desenho de Equipamento/métodos , HumanosRESUMO
Recently, an oxygenator with an integrated centrifugal blood pump (IP) was designed to minimize priming volume and to reduce blood foreign surface contact even further. The use of this oxygenator with or without integrated arterial filter was compared with a conventional oxygenator and nonintegrated centrifugal pump. To compare the air removal characteristics 60 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting were alternately assigned into one of three groups to be perfused with a minimized extracorporeal circuit either with the conventional oxygenator, the oxygenator with IP, or the oxygenator with IP plus integrated arterial filter (IAF). Air entering and leaving the three devices was measured accurately with a bubble counter during cardiopulmonary bypass. No significant differences between all groups were detected, considering air entering the devices. Our major finding was that in both integrated devices groups incidental spontaneous release of air into the arterial line in approximately 40% of the patients was observed. Here, detectable bolus air (>500 µm) was shown in the arterial line, whereas in the minimal extracorporeal circulation circuit (MECC) group this phenomenon was not present. We decided to conduct an amendment of the initial design with METC-approval. Ten patients were assigned to be perfused with an oxygenator with IP and IAF. Importantly, the integrated perfusion systems used in these patients were flushed with carbon dioxide (CO2 ) prior to priming of the systems. In the group with CO2 flush no spontaneous air release was observed in all cases and this was significantly different from the initial study with the group with the integrated device and IAF. This suggests that air spilling may be caused by residual air in the integrated device. In conclusion, integration of a blood pump may cause spontaneous release of large air bubbles (>500 µm) into the arterial line, despite the presence of an integrated arterial filter. CO2 flushing of an integrated cardiopulmonary bypass system prior to priming may prevent spontaneous air release and is strongly recommended to secure patient safety.
Assuntos
Dióxido de Carbono , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/instrumentação , Catéteres , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Embolia Aérea/prevenção & controle , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentação , Coração Auxiliar , Oxigenadores , Perfusão/instrumentação , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Embolia Aérea/diagnóstico , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Perfusão/efeitos adversos , Desenho de Prótese , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of CO2 insufflation during open heart surgery in our hospital, we incidentally observed thrombus formation in the dissected heart, in the pericardium and in the cardiotomy reservoir of the cardiopulmonary bypass system. Furthermore, we measured very high levels of pCO2, causing severe acidosis, in stagnant blood in the pericardium and cardiotomy reservoir. OBJECTIVES: In this in vitro study, we assessed the influence of acidosis and hypothermia on heparin potency and thrombin formation. METHODS: We assessed heparin potency in function of pH (pH 5.0-7.4) and temperature (24-37°C) by comparing the activated partial thromboplastin time in platelet-poor plasma between samples with and without unfractionated heparin. We measured thrombin formation in platelet-poor plasma by means of fluorescent, calibrated, automated thrombography in function of pH (pH 5.0-7.4) and temperature (24-37°C). The parameters of interest were the endogenous thrombin potential and the peak amount of thrombin generation. RESULTS: The major finding of this study is the significant decrease in the efficiency of unfractionated heparin in delaying thrombus formation at acidotic (pH 5.0-7.0) conditions (p=0.034-0.05). Furthermore, we found that thrombin formation is significantly increased at hypothermic (24-34°C) conditions (p=<0.001-0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Based on the results of our in-vitro study, we conclude that acidosis may lead to a decreased heparin potency. Acidosis, as induced by CO2 insufflation, may predispose patients to incidental thrombus formation in stagnant blood in the open thorax and in the cardiotomy reservoir. Hypothermia might further increase this risk. Therefore, we recommend reconsidering the potential advantages and disadvantages of using CO2 insufflation during cardiopulmonary bypass.
Assuntos
Acidose/sangue , Anticoagulantes/farmacologia , Coagulação Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Dióxido de Carbono/sangue , Heparina/farmacologia , Insuflação/efeitos adversos , Trombose/etiologia , Acidose/etiologia , Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Gasometria , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Hipotermia Induzida/efeitos adversos , Hipotermia Induzida/métodos , Insuflação/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Trombose/sangue , Trombose/prevenção & controleRESUMO
Gaseous microemboli (GME) may originate from the extracorporeal circuit and enter the arterial circulation of the patient. GME are thought to contribute to cerebral deficit and to adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. The arterial filter is a specially designed component for removing both gaseous and solid microemboli. Integration of an arterial filter with an oxygenator is a contemporary concept, reducing both prime volume and foreign surface area. This study aims to determine the air-handling properties of four contemporary oxygenator devices with an integrated arterial filter. Two oxygenator devices, the Capiox FX25 and the Fusion, showed significant increased volume of GME reduction rates (95.03 ± 3.13% and 95.74 ± 2.69%, respectively) compared with both the Quadrox-IF (85.23 ± 5.84%) and the Inspire 6F M (84.41 ± 12.93%). Notably, both the Quadrox-IF and the Inspire 6F M as well as the Capiox FX 25 and the Fusion showed very similar characteristics in volume and number reduction rates and in detailed distribution properties. The Capiox FX25 and the Fusion devices showed significantly increased number and volume reduction rates compared with the Quadrox-IF and the Inspire 6F M devices. Despite the large differences in design of all four devices, our study results suggest that the oxygenator devices can be subdivided into two groups based on their fibre design, which results in screen filter (Quadrox-IF and Inspire 6F M) and depth filter (Capiox FX25 and Fusion) properties. Depth filter properties, as present in the Capiox FX25 and Fusion devices, reduced fractionation of air and may ameliorate GME removal.
Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar/instrumentação , Dispositivos de Proteção Embólica , Embolia Aérea/prevenção & controle , Oxigenadores , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artérias/cirurgia , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oxigenadores/efeitos adversos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Various techniques for administration of blood cardioplegia are used worldwide. In this study, the effect of warm blood cardioplegia administration with or without the use of a roller pump on perioperative myocardial injury was studied in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting using minimal extra-corporeal circuits (MECCs). Sixty-eight patients undergoing elective coronary bypass surgery with an MECC system were consecutively enrolled and randomized into a pumpless group (PL group: blood cardioplegia administration without roller pump) or roller pump group (RP group: blood cardioplegia administration with roller pump). No statistically significant differences were found between the PL group and RP group regarding release of cardiac biomarkers. Maximum postoperative biomarker values reached at T1 (after arrival intensive care unit) for heart-type fatty acid binding protein (2.7 [1.5; 6.0] ng/mL PL group vs. 3.2 [1.6; 6.3] ng/mL RP group, p = .63) and at T3 (first postoperative day) for troponin T high-sensitive (22.0 [14.5; 29.3] ng/L PL group vs. 21.1 [15.3; 31.6] ng/L RP group, p = .91), N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (2.1 [1.7; 2.9] ng/mL PL group vs. 2.6 [1.6; 3.6] ng/mL RP group, p = .48), and C-reactive protein (138 [106; 175] µg/mL PL group vs. 129 [105; 161] µg/mL RP group, p = .65). Besides this, blood cardioplegia flow, blood cardioplegia line pressure, and aortic root pressure during blood cardioplegia administration were similar between the two groups. Administration of warm blood cardioplegia with or without the use of a roller pump results in similar clinically acceptable myocardial protection.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/métodos , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Proteína C-Reativa/análise , Proteína 3 Ligante de Ácido Graxo , Proteínas de Ligação a Ácido Graxo/sangue , Feminino , Parada Cardíaca Induzida/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Troponina T/sangueRESUMO
The use of minimized extracorporeal circuits (MECC) in cardiac surgery is expanding. These circuits eliminate volume storage and bubble trap reservoirs to minimize the circuit. However, this may increase the risk of gaseous micro emboli (GME). To reduce this risk, a venous bubble trap was designed. This study was performed to evaluate if incorporation of a venous bubble trap in a MECC system as compared to our standard minimized extracorporeal circuit without venous bubble trap reduces gaseous micro emboli during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Forty patients were randomly assigned to be perfused either with or without an integrated venous bubble trap. After preliminary evaluation of the data of 23 patients, the study was terminated prior to study completion. The quantity and volume of GME were significantly lower in patients perfused with a venous bubble trap compared to patients perfused without a venous bubble trap. The present study demonstrates that a MECC system with a venous bubble trap significantly reduces the volume of GME and strongly reduces the quantity of large GME (>500 µm). Therefore, the use of a venous bubble trap in a MECC system is warranted.
Assuntos
Ponte de Artéria Coronária/instrumentação , Doença da Artéria Coronariana/cirurgia , Embolia Aérea/cirurgia , Circulação Extracorpórea/instrumentação , Idoso , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
During cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), gaseous microemboli (GME) are released into the patients' arterial bloodstream. Gaseous microemboli may contribute to the adverse outcome after cardiac surgery. Recently, two oxygenator models with or without integrated arterial filter (IAF) were designed and only differ in size, leading to a change of 20% in surface area of the hollow fibers and 25% in blood velocities. The aim of this study was to assess the air removal characteristics of the inspire oxygenators with or without IAF. Sixty-eight patients were randomly assigned to four different groups: optimized adult and full adult and an additional IAF. Gaseous microemboli reduction rates were measured with a bubble counter. The number of GME reduction rates showed no differences. However, both models reduced significantly less volume of GME (optimized adult: 40.6% and full adult: 50.3%) compared with both models with IAF (88.7% and 88.5%, respectively). No significant differences of reduction rates were found between both devices without IAF and also not between both models with IAF. In conclusion, the larger inspire oxygenator tends to remove more GME. No effect from size of oxygenator device with integrated screen filter on GME reduction was observed. The inspire oxygenators with IAF may be considered as an adequate GME filter.
Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Embolia Aérea/prevenção & controle , Oxigenadores , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Artérias , Feminino , Filtração , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Introduction of gaseous microemboli (GME) into the arterial line of a pediatric cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit may lead to cognitive decline and adverse outcomes of the pediatric patient.Arterial filters are incorporated into CPB circuits as a safeguard for gross air and to reduce GME. Recently, arterial filters were integrated in two neonatal oxygenators to reduce volume and foreign surface area. In this study a clinical CPB scenario was simulated. The oxygenators, the corresponding venous reservoirs and the complete CPB circuits were compared regarding air removal and bubble size distribution after the introduction of an air bolus or GME. During a GME challenge, the Capiox FX05 oxygenator removed a significantly higher volume of GME than the QUADROX-i Neonatal oxygenator (97% vs. 86%). Detailed air removal characteristics showed that more GME in the range of 20-50 µm were leaving the devices than were entering. This phenomenon seems to be more present in the Capiox FX05. The circuits were also challenged with an air bolus. Each individual component tested removed 99.9%, which resulted in an air volume reduction of 99.99% by either complete CBP circuit. Overall, we conclude that both CPB systems were very adequate in removing GME and gross air. The air removal properties of both systems are considered safe and reliable. Detailed GME distribution data show that the Capiox FX05 showed more small GME (<50 µm) due to fractionation of larger GME when compared to the QUADROX-i Neonatal. We may conclude that filtration may lead to fractionation.
Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar/instrumentação , Embolia Aérea/prevenção & controle , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentação , Filtração/instrumentação , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Teste de Materiais , MiniaturizaçãoRESUMO
The use of minimized extracorporeal circuits (MECC) in cardiac surgery is an important measure to increase the biocompatibility of cardiopulmonary bypass during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). These circuits eliminate volume storage reservoirs and bubble traps to minimize the circuit. However, the reduction in volume may increase the risk of gaseous microemboli (GME). The MECC system as used by our group consists of a venous bubble trap, centrifugal pump, and an oxygenator. To further reduce the risk of introducing GME, an oxygenator with an integrated arterial filter was developed based on the concept of minimal volume and foreign surface. We studied the air removal characteristics of this oxygenator with and without integrated arterial filter. The quantity and volume of GME were measured with precision at both the inlet and outlet of the devices. Our results showed that integration of an arterial filter into this oxygenator increased GME reducing capacity from 69.2% to 92%. Moreover, we were able to obtain data on the impact of an arterial filter on the exact size-distribution of GME entering the arterial line. The present study demonstrates that an MECC system and oxygenator with integrated arterial filter significantly reduces the volume and size of GME. The use of an integrated arterial filter in an MECC system may protect the patient from the deleterious effects of CPB and may further improve patient safety.
Assuntos
Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Embolia Aérea/prevenção & controle , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/instrumentação , Oxigenadores de Membrana , Idoso , Ponte Cardiopulmonar/efeitos adversos , Distribuição de Qui-Quadrado , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Embolia Aérea/etiologia , Desenho de Equipamento , Segurança de Equipamentos , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Miniaturização , Países Baixos , Estudos Prospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
The microcirculation is essential for delivery of oxygen and nutrients to tissue. However, the human microvascular response to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is unknown. We report on the first use of sidestream dark field imaging to assess the human microcirculation during CPR with a mechanical chest compression/decompression device (mCPR). mCPR was able to provide microvascular perfusion. Capillary flow persisted even during brief mCPR interruption. However, indices of microvascular perfusion were low and improved vastly after return of spontaneous circulation. Microvascular perfusion was relatively independent from blood pressure. The microcirculation may be a useful monitor for determining the adequacy of CPR.