The effect of clopidogrel on platelet activity in patients with and without type-2 diabetes mellitus: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Although antiplatelet therapy involving clopidogrel is a standard treatment for preventing cardiovascular events after coronary stent implantation, patients can display differential responses. Here, we assessed the effectiveness of clopidogrel on platelet function inhibition in subjects with and without type-2 diabetes and stable coronary artery disease. In addition, we investigated the correlation between platelet function and routine clinical parameters. METHODS: A total of 64 patients with stable coronary heart disease were enrolled in the study. Among these, 32 had known type-2 diabetes, whereas the remaining 32 subjects were non-diabetics (control group). A loading dose of 300 mg clopidogrel was given to clopidogrel-naïve patients (13 patients in the diabetes group and 14 control patients). All patients were given a daily maintenance dose of 75 mg clopidogrel. In addition, all patients received 100 mg ASA per day. Agonist-induced platelet aggregation measurements were performed on hirudin-anticoagulated blood using an impedance aggregometer (Multiple Platelet Function Analyzer, Dynabyte, Munich, Germany). Blood samples were drawn from the antecubital vein 24 h after coronary angiography with percutaneous coronary intervention. The platelets were then stimulated with ADP alone or ADP and prostaglandin-E (ADP and ADP-PGE tests, respectively) in order to evaluate clopidogrel-mediated inhibition of platelet function. The effectiveness of ASA was measured by stimulation with arachidonic acid (ASPI test). In addition, maximal platelet aggregation was assessed via stimulation with thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP test). RESULTS: Patients with diabetes exhibited significantly less inhibition of platelet function than patients without diabetes (ADP-PGE test p = 0.003; ASPI test p = 0.022). Administering a clopidogrel loading dose of 300 mg did not result in a lower level of ADP-PGE-induced platelet reactivity in comparison to the use of a 75 mg maintenance dose. Moreover, we observed that ADP-PGE-induced platelet inhibition was positively correlated with fasting blood glucose and HbA1c (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with type-2 diabetes exhibited increased platelet reactivity compared to patients without diabetes despite combined treatment with clopidogrel and ASA. Using a loading dose of clopidogrel rather than small daily doses was not sufficient for adequately overcoming increased platelet reactivity in patients with type-2 diabetes, highlighting the need for more effective anti-platelet drugs for such patients.

Prolonged application of clopidogrel reduces inflammation after percutaneous coronary intervention in the porcine model.

OBJECTIVE: We determined the effect of prolonged treatment with clopidogrel on C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations and blood thrombogenicity after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty followed by intracoronary brachytherapy in the porcine model. ANIMAL MODEL: All 48 pigs received antiplatelet therapy, including aspirin (325 mg, daily) and clopidogrel (300 mg, loading dose) 1 day before PCI, followed by a daily dose of clopidogrel (75 mg/day) in addition to aspirin. During PCI, one of two balloon-injured arteries was randomly assigned to receive immediate radiation treatment. Animals were sacrificed after 24 h, 1 month, and 3 months post-PCI. The pigs, which were sacrificed 3 months post-PCI, were divided into two groups. The first group received clopidogrel in addition to aspirin for 3 months, and the second group received clopidogrel in addition to aspirin for only 1 month after PCI and then aspirin alone. METHODS: Blood was taken from all pigs before intervention, immediately after intervention, and before sacrifice. Serum CRP was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. To analyze the procoagulant effects of PCI on blood thrombogenicity, a one-stage clotting assay was performed. RESULTS: Clopidogrel treatment for 3 months reduced CRP levels more than did clopidogrel therapy for 1 month only at 3 months post-PCI (27.9+/-3.9 vs. 56.6+/-11.3 microg/ml; P=.019). Baseline CRP levels were found to be 50.4+/-4.8 microg/ml. Plasma clotting was not affected by prolonged clopidogrel therapy (322.8+/-59.3 s vs. 295.2+/-52.5 s; P=ns). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged treatment with clopidogrel reduced CRP levels post-PCI.

Doubling the clopidogrel dose in patients with reduced responsiveness to the standard dose is associated with a limited effectiveness as evaluated by impedance aggregometry.

BACKGROUND: Different methods are available for quantifying platelet function inhibition. Measuring vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation is currently the most specific method for assessing the clopidogrel effect. The aim of our study was to compare different tests in view of a clinically applicable bedside test. Further, we examined whether doubling the clopidogrel dose to 150mg/d in clopidogrel low-responder would lead to a reduction in platelet reactivity. METHODS AND RESULTS: ADP-, ADP Hs-, and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation were measured by impedance aggregometry in 100 patients with CAD and 18 healthy controls. Moreover, platelet aggregation was assessed by flow cytometrical detection of VASP-phosphorylation and surface P-selectin in a subgroup of 34 patients and in healthy controls. Another 10 patients with CAD, identified as low-responder, were treated with a clopidogrel dose of 150mg/d. Thereafter, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed by impedance aggregometry. Significant correlations were observed between ADP-induced platelet aggregation assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and by impedance aggregometry. Doubling the dose of clopidogrel to 150mg/d was associated with a reduction of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in only 60% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Impedance aggregometry is a valuable bedside test to assess platelet function inhibition. Doubling the clopidogrel dose is not effective to reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity in almost half of these patients, pointing to the need of a more powerful platelet inhibitor.

Postmenopausal women have an increased maximal platelet reactivity compared to men despite dual antiplatelet therapy.

Dual antiplatelet medication with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and clopidogrel is the main therapy for patients with stable coronary vessel disease (CVD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite platelet inhibition subgroups of patients have been shown to exhibit an increase of risk for adverse cardiovascular events. The aim of our study was to elucidate the influence of sex on platelet reactivity in patients with CVD under medication with ASA and clopidogrel. Two hundred and thirty patients with CVD on combined therapy with ASA (100 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) were included into our study. These patients were divided into a male (n = 128) and female (n = 102) group. Platelet reactivity was assessed by impedance aggregometry. Women demonstrated a significantly higher thrombin receptor-activating peptide (TRAP)-induced platelet reactivity than men (male 79.43 ± 28.55 U vs. female 89.3 ± 30.69 U; P < 0.05). The ADP-induced (male 19.81 ± 15.51 U vs. female 23.73 ± 17.68 U; P > 0.05) or arachidonic acid-induced (male 10.3 ± 12.87 U vs. female 12.76 ± 14.44 U; P > 0.05) platelet aggregation did not differ significantly between women and men. A multivariate linear regression model revealed female sex to be a significant prognostic marker for an increased TRAP-induced platelet reactivity, independent of the ASA and clopidogrel-associated platelet function inhibition. Sex differences did not influence the effectiveness of ASA or clopidogrel-mediated platelet function inhibition. Nevertheless, women had a significantly increased maximal platelet reactivity compared to men despite antiplatelet therapy.

The amount of fibrinogen-positive platelets predicts the occurrence of in-stent restenosis.

AIMS: To determine the value of fibrinogen-positive platelet-analysis in predicting restenosis after stent implantation in acute myocardial infarction patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Our patient population comprised 50 patients who underwent intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) guided stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. In all cases, IVUS confirmed a deep vessel wall injury due to a ruptured plaque within the culprit lesion. Flow cytometry quantified the amount of platelets with surface-bound fibrinogen and thrombospondin before and immediately after the intervention. After 5 months, IVUS was repeated to assess the long-term results. In-stent restenosis - defined as a percent diameter stenosis of >50% - was detected in 11 of 45 patients who attended follow-up angiography. The amount of fibrinogen-positive platelets was significantly higher among patients who subsequently developed in-stent restenosis (50.5+/-6.8% fibrinogen-positive platelets immediately after intervention) than among those who did not (39.7+/-12.3% fibrinogen-positive platelets, p<0.005). Receiver operating characteristic curve revealed a 40% cut-off for fibrinogen-positive platelets immediately after the intervention to predict restenosis (p<0.05, sensitivity: 90.9%, specificity: 47.1%). CONCLUSION: The amount of fibrinogen-positive platelets immediately after stent implantation predicts the occurrence of in-stent restenosis, as confirmed by IVUS in acute myocardial infarction patients.

Treatment with ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin compared with higher-dose atorvastatin alone: is sufficient cholesterol-lowering enough to inhibit platelets?

OBJECTIVES: We sought to test the platelet inhibitory and anti-inflammatory effects of a higher statin dosage compared with combined treatment with ezetimibe plus a low statin dose. BACKGROUND: Reducing the level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with statins induces important pleiotropic effects such as platelet inhibition. An insufficient LDL-C reduction often is treated with ezetimibe, an intestinal cholesterol absorption inhibitor, in combination with a low statin dose. It is not known whether this combination therapy has the same pleiotropic effects as a statin monotherapy. METHODS: Fifty-six patients with coronary artery disease were assigned randomly to receive either 40 mg/day of atorvastatin or 10 mg/day of ezetimibe plus 10 mg/day of atorvastatin for 4 weeks. The levels of LDL-C, platelet activation markers after stimulation, platelet aggregation, and plasma chemokine levels (i.e., regulated on activation normally T-cell expressed and secreted [RANTES]) were measured before and after changing lipid-lowering medication. RESULTS: Platelet activation markers (P-selectin) after stimulation (adenosine diphosphate) were reduced by 40 mg/day of atorvastatin (-5.2 +/- 1.6 arbitrary units) but not by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin (2.1 +/- 1.8 arbitrary units; p < 0.005) despite a similar reduction of LDL-C (atorvastatin -1.01 +/- 0.18 mmol/l vs. ezetimibe plus atorvastatin -1.36 +/- 0.22 mmol/l, p = NS). Thrombin receptor-activating peptide-induced platelet aggregation as well as plasma RANTES levels were reduced by 40 mg/day of atorvastatin but not by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin. CONCLUSIONS: Platelet reactivity and a proinflammatory chemokine were reduced more by the higher atorvastatin dose than by ezetimibe plus low-dose atorvastatin. In patients with coronary artery disease, it might be important to combine ezetimibe with higher statin dosages to benefit from cholesterol-independent pleiotropic effects.