Comparative Safety Analysis of Nabilone Versus Opioids: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Some have advocated that nabilone be used rather than opioids to manage chronic, noncancer pain, since the former drug may have a better safety profile. OBJECTIVE: We compared the safety of incident nabilone use relative to incident opioid use with respect to multiple clinically important outcomes. DESIGN: A population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Province of Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Persons aged 12 years and older, diagnosed with a musculoskeletal condition within the past 3 years prior to the index date. EXPOSURES: Incident nabilone use, with incident opioid use serving as the reference group. MEASUREMENTS: Within 3 months following the index date, we separately evaluated for pneumonia, motor vehicle accidents, falls or fractures, mental and behavioral disorder due to psychoactive substance use, and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: A total of 18,863 incident nabilone users were propensity score matched to an equal number of opioid users. In the overall matched analysis, incident nabilone users vs. incident opioid users had significantly lower rates of pneumonia (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, 95% CI 0.63-0.96), falls or fractures (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.50-0.64), and all-cause mortality (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.95), but significantly higher rate of mental or behavioral disorder (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.45-3.43). There was no significant difference between groups with respect to rate of motor vehicle accidents. LIMITATIONS: Unmeasured confounding may have influenced results. CONCLUSIONS: While usage of nabilone relative to opioids was associated with reduced rates of pneumonia, falls or fractures, and all-cause mortality, it was simultaneously associated with an increased rate of adverse mental health outcomes. This picture of mixed safety results raises concerns with the policy approach of broadly substituting use of opioids with nabilone. FUNDING SOURCE: Ontario Ministry of Health.

Sleep breathing disorder frequency, risk factors, and treatment among adults with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Our understanding of the epidemiology of sleep breathing disorders among adults with cystic fibrosis (CF) is limited. Our purpose was to describe the frequency, risk factors and treatment of sleep breathing disorders among adults with CF. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of linked data from laboratory-based diagnostic polysomnography (PSG) undertaken at St. Michael's Hospital (Toronto, Canada) and the Canadian CF Registry. Adults (≥19 years old) with CF that underwent a diagnostic PSG at St. Michael's Hospital between 2002 and 2021 were included. Sleep breathing disorder frequency, risk factors, and treatment were described, using descriptive statistics and logistic regression. RESULTS: There were 42 patients included (33.3 % women and median age at diagnostic PSG was 34.7 years). Obstructive sleep apnea [OSA] was the most commonly observed sleep breathing disorder (found in 64.3 %), followed by sustained nocturnal hypoxemia (16.7 %), and sleep hypoventilation (9.5 %). Only 41 % of individuals with an elevated total apnea-hypopnea index were receiving positive airway pressure [PAP] therapy. Corticosteroid use (either oral or inhaled) was the only factor with a significant positive association with presence of any sleep breathing disorder (odds ratio 5.00, 95 % confidence interval 1.28-22.78). CONCLUSIONS: Among adults with CF, OSA occurs more commonly than previously appreciated and the majority of sleep breathing disorders were not being treated with PAP or supplemental oxygen. Management of sleep breathing disorders among adults with CF reflects a potentially important care gap, but further research is needed to determine the health impacts of treating sleep breathing disorders in CF.

Clinical outcomes after liver transplant in people with cystic fibrosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data on the impact of liver transplantation (LT) in cystic fibrosis (CF) on lung function and exacerbations are limited. The objective of this study was to summarize the literature on lung function, nutritional status, survival, and complications following LT in people with CF. METHODS: Three databases were searched until September 2023, to identify the impact of LT in CF. Lung transplant prior to LT and simultaneous liver-lung transplant were excluded. Pooled hazard ratios were calculated using random-effects models. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included in this review, with 3 and 9 studies included in meta-analyses for nutritional status and lung function, respectively. Eighty-three percent of the studies used data that was more than a decade old. There was a significant increase in percent-predicted forced expiratory volume with mean change of 7.16 % (2.13, 12.19; p = 0.005) one year post-LT. Pulmonary exacerbations decreased in the short-term, however there was no significant change in body mass index (BMI). One-year survival post-LT ranged between 75 and 100 %, while five-year survival was lower at 64-89 %. CONCLUSION: Existing data suggest that LT improves lung function in the short term and does not increase the likelihood of pulmonary exacerbations, despite ongoing immunosuppression in the setting of chronic lung infection.

Socioeconomic burden of cystic fibrosis in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Cost of illness studies are important tools to summarise the burden of disease for individuals, the healthcare system and society. The lack of standardised methods for reporting costs for cystic fibrosis (CF) makes it difficult to quantify the total socioeconomic burden. In this study, we aimed to comprehensively report the socioeconomic burden of CF in Canada. METHODS: The total cost of CF in Canada was calculated by triangulating information from three sources (Canadian CF Registry, customised Burden of Disease survey and publicly available information). A prevalence-based, bottom-up, human capital approach was applied, and costs were categorised into four perspectives (ie, healthcare system, individual/caregiver, variable (ie, medicines) and society) and three domains (ie, direct, indirect and intangible). All costs were converted into 2021 Canadian dollars (CAD) and adjusted for inflation. The cost of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapies was excluded. RESULTS: The total socioeconomic burden of CF in Canada in 2021 across the four perspectives was $C414 million. Direct costs accounted for two-thirds of the total costs, with medications comprising half of all direct costs. Out-of-pocket costs to individuals and caregivers represented 18.7% of all direct costs. Indirect costs representing absenteeism accounted for one-third of the total cost. CONCLUSION: This comprehensive cost of illness study for CF represents a community-oriented approach describing the socioeconomic burden of living with CF and serves as a benchmark for future studies.