Association of outcomes in point-of-care lung ultrasound for bronchiolitis in the pediatric emergency department.

BACKGROUND: Acute bronchiolitis (AB) is the most common lower respiratory tract infection in infants. Objective scoring tools and plain film radiography have limited application, thus diagnosis is clinical. The role of point-of-care lung ultrasound (LUS) is not well established. OBJECTIVE: We sought to characterize LUS findings in infants presenting to the pediatric ED diagnosed with AB, and to identify associations between LUS and respiratory support (RS) at 12 and 24 h, maximum RS during hospitalization, disposition, and hospital length of stay (LOS). METHODS: Infants ≤12 months presenting to the ED and diagnosed with AB were enrolled. LUS was performed at the bedside by a physician. Lungs were divided into 12 segments and scanned, then scored and summated (min. 0, max. 36) in real time accordingly: 0 - A lines with <3 B lines per lung segment. 1 - ≥3 B lines per lung segment, but not consolidated. 2 - consolidated B lines, but no subpleural consolidation. 3 - subpleural consolidation with any findings scoring 1 or 2. Chart review was performed for all patients after discharge. RS was categorized accordingly: RS (room air), low RS (wall O2 or heated high flow nasal cannula <1 L/kg), and high RS (heated high flow nasal cannula ≥1 L/kg or positive pressure). RESULTS: 82 subjects were enrolled. Regarding disposition, the mean (SD) LUS scores were: discharged 1.18 (1.33); admitted to the floor 4.34 (3.62); and admitted to the ICU was 10.84 (6.54). For RS, the mean (SD) LUS scores at 12 h were: no RS 1.56 (1.93), low RS 4.34 (3.51), and high RS 11.94 (6.17). At 24 h: no RS 2.11 (2.35), low RS 4.91 (3.86), and high RS 12.64 (6.48). Maximum RS: no RS 1.22 (1.31), low RS 4.11 (3.61), and high RS 10.45 (6.16). Mean differences for all dispositions and RS time points were statistically significant (p < 0.05, CI >95%). The mean (SD) hospital LOS was 84.5 h (SD 62.9). The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) comparing LOS and LUS was 0.489 (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Higher LUS scores for AB were associated with increased respiratory support, longer LOS, and more acute disposition. The use of bedside LUS in the ED may assist the clinician in the management and disposition of patient's diagnosed with AB.

Impact of point-of-care ultrasound on treatment time for ectopic pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is useful in the evaluation of early pregnancy by confirming intrauterine pregnancy and recognizing hemorrhage from ectopic pregnancy. We sought to determine whether transabdominal POCUS by itself or in conjunction with consultative radiology ultrasound (RADUS), reduces Emergency Department (ED) treatment time for patients with ectopic pregnancy requiring operative care, when compared to RADUS alone. A secondary objective was to determine whether the incorporation of POCUS reduces time to operative care for patients with ruptured ectopic pregnancy specifically, when compared to RADUS alone. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients admitted for operative management of ectopic pregnancy. We excluded patients with known ectopic pregnancy and/or imaging prior to arriving to the treatment area, found not to have an ectopic pregnancy, or did not undergo operative care. Descriptive statistics, classical and nonparametric statistical analysis, and linear regression were performed. RESULTS: There were 220 patients admitted with ectopic pregnancy, 111 met exclusion criteria, yielding 109 for analysis. Of 109, 36 received POCUS (23/36 also had RADUS), while 73 received RADUS only. Among the POCUS group 31/36 (86%) were classified as ruptured versus 47/73 (64%) in the RADUS group. The average ED treatment time in the POCUS group for all admitted ectopic pregnancies was 157.9 min (standard deviation [SD] 101.3) versus 206.3 min (SD 76.6) in the RADUS group (p = 0.0141). The median time to operating room (OR) for ruptured ectopic pregnancies was 203.0 min (interquartile range [IQR] 159.0) in the POCUS group versus 293.0 min (IQR 139.0) in the RADUS group (p = 0.0002). Regression analysis of the primary outcome was limited by multiple interactions and sample size. When controlling for race, positive shock index and ED visit time, POCUS was found to be associated with a significantly shorter time to OR among ruptured ectopic pregnancies compared to RADUS (p = 0.0052). CONCLUSION: Compared to RADUS alone, incorporation of POCUS was associated with significantly faster ED treatment time for all ectopic pregnancies and significantly faster time to OR for ruptured ectopic pregnancies, even when combined with RADUS. When controlling for clinical differences, time to OR was still faster for patients who underwent POCUS. The integration of POCUS should be considered to expedite care for patients with ectopic pregnancy requiring operative care.