Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Rosuvastatin to Predict Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

PURPOSE: To build a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model of the clinical OATP1B1/OATP1B3/BCRP victim drug rosuvastatin for the investigation and prediction of its transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDIs). METHODS: The Rosuvastatin model was developed using the open-source PBPK software PK-Sim®, following a middle-out approach. 42 clinical studies (dosing range 0.002-80.0 mg), providing rosuvastatin plasma, urine and feces data, positron emission tomography (PET) measurements of tissue concentrations and 7 different rosuvastatin DDI studies with rifampicin, gemfibrozil and probenecid as the perpetrator drugs, were included to build and qualify the model. RESULTS: The carefully developed and thoroughly evaluated model adequately describes the analyzed clinical data, including blood, liver, feces and urine measurements. The processes implemented to describe the rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and DDIs are active uptake by OATP2B1, OATP1B1/OATP1B3 and OAT3, active efflux by BCRP and Pgp, metabolism by CYP2C9 and passive glomerular filtration. The available clinical rifampicin, gemfibrozil and probenecid DDI studies were modeled using in vitro inhibition constants without adjustments. The good prediction of DDIs was demonstrated by simulated rosuvastatin plasma profiles, DDI AUClast ratios (AUClast during DDI/AUClast without co-administration) and DDI Cmax ratios (Cmax during DDI/Cmax without co-administration), with all simulated DDI ratios within 1.6-fold of the observed values. CONCLUSIONS: A whole-body PBPK model of rosuvastatin was built and qualified for the prediction of rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics and transporter-mediated DDIs. The model is freely available in the Open Systems Pharmacology model repository, to support future investigations of rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics, rosuvastatin therapy and DDI studies during model-informed drug discovery and development (MID3).

Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Models of Probenecid and Furosemide to Predict Transporter Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

PURPOSE: To provide whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models of the potent clinical organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibitor probenecid and the clinical OAT victim drug furosemide for their application in transporter-based drug-drug interaction (DDI) modeling. METHODS: PBPK models of probenecid and furosemide were developed in PK-Sim®. Drug-dependent parameters and plasma concentration-time profiles following intravenous and oral probenecid and furosemide administration were gathered from literature and used for model development. For model evaluation, plasma concentration-time profiles, areas under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) and peak plasma concentrations (Cmax) were predicted and compared to observed data. In addition, the models were applied to predict the outcome of clinical DDI studies. RESULTS: The developed models accurately describe the reported plasma concentrations of 27 clinical probenecid studies and of 42 studies using furosemide. Furthermore, application of these models to predict the probenecid-furosemide and probenecid-rifampicin DDIs demonstrates their good performance, with 6/7 of the predicted DDI AUC ratios and 4/5 of the predicted DDI Cmax ratios within 1.25-fold of the observed values, and all predicted DDI AUC and Cmax ratios within 2.0-fold. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body PBPK models of probenecid and furosemide were built and evaluated, providing useful tools to support the investigation of transporter mediated DDIs.

Optimization of a drug transporter probe cocktail: potential screening tool for transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions.

AIMS: Previous pharmacokinetic characterization of a transporter probe cocktail containing digoxin (P-gp), furosemide (OAT1, OAT3), metformin (OCT2, MATE1, MATE2-K) and rosuvastatin (OATP1B1, OATP1B3, BCRP) in healthy subjects showed increases in rosuvastatin systemic exposure compared to rosuvastatin alone. In this trial, the doses of metformin and furosemide as putative perpetrators were reduced to eliminate their drug-drug interaction (DDI) with rosuvastatin. METHODS: In a randomized, open-label, single-centre, five-treatment, five-period crossover trial, 30 healthy male subjects received as reference treatments separately 0.25 mg digoxin, 1 mg furosemide, 10 mg metformin and 10 mg rosuvastatin, and as test treatment all four drugs administered together as a cocktail. Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were AUC0-tz (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration) and Cmax (maximum plasma concentration) of each probe drug. RESULTS: Geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals of test (cocktail) to reference (single drug) for AUC0-tz were 96.4% (88.2-105.3%) for digoxin, 102.6% (93.8-112.3%) for furosemide, 97.5% (93.5-101.6%) for metformin and 105.0% (96.4-114.4%) for rosuvastatin, indicating lack of interaction. The same analysis for Cmax and for pharmacokinetic parameters of urinary excretion of all cocktail components also indicated no DDI. CONCLUSIONS: Digoxin (0.25 mg), furosemide (1 mg), metformin (10 mg) and rosuvastatin (10 mg) exhibit no mutual pharmacokinetic interactions and are well tolerated administered as a cocktail. The cocktail is thus optimized and has the potential to be used as a screening tool for clinical investigation of transporter-mediated DDI.

Phase I study of nintedanib incorporating dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This open-label phase I dose-escalation study investigated the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) effects of the oral angiokinase inhibitor nintedanib in patients with advanced solid tumors. METHODS: Nintedanib was administered once daily continuously, starting at 100 mg and later amended to allow evaluation of 250 mg b.i.d. The primary endpoint was maximum tolerated dose (MTD). DCE-MRI studies were performed at baseline and on days 2 and 28. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients received nintedanib 100-450 mg once daily (n = 40) or 250 mg b.i.d. (n = 11). Asymptomatic reversible liver enzyme elevations (grade 3) were dose limiting in 2 of 5 patients at 450 mg once daily. At 250 mg b.i.d., 2 of 11 patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (grade 3 liver enzyme elevation and gastrointestinal symptoms). Common toxicities included fatigue, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain (mainly grade ≤2). Among 45 patients, 22 (49%) achieved stable disease; 7 remained on treatment for >6 months. DCE-MRI of target lesions revealed effects in some patients at 200 and ≥400 mg once daily. CONCLUSION: Nintedanib is well tolerated by patients with advanced solid malignancies, with MTD defined as 250 mg b.i.d., and can induce changes in DCE-MRI. Disease stabilization >6 months was observed in 7 of 51 patients.

Vascular effects, efficacy and safety of nintedanib in patients with advanced, refractory colorectal cancer: a prospective phase I subanalysis.

BACKGROUND: Nintedanib is a potent, oral angiokinase inhibitor that targets VEGF, PDGF and FGF signalling, as well as RET and Flt3. The maximum tolerated dose of nintedanib was evaluated in a phase I study of treatment-refractory patients with advanced solid tumours. In this preplanned subanalysis, the effect of nintedanib on the tumour vasculature, along with efficacy and safety, was assessed in 30 patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Patients with advanced CRC who had failed conventional treatment, or for whom no therapy of proven efficacy existed, were treated with nintedanib ranging from 50-450 mg once-daily (n = 14) or 150-250 mg twice-daily (n = 16) for 28 days. After a 1-week rest, further courses were permitted in the absence of progression or undue toxicity. The primary objective was the effect on the tumour vasculature using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) and expressed as the initial area under the DCE-MRI contrast agent concentration-time curve after 60 seconds (iAUC60) or the volume transfer constant between blood plasma and extravascular extracellular space (Ktrans). RESULTS: Patients received a median of 4.0 courses (range: 1-13). Among 21 evaluable patients, 14 (67%) had a ≥40% reduction from baseline in Ktrans and 13 (62%) had a ≥40% decrease from baseline in iAUC60, representing clinically relevant effects on tumour blood flow and permeability, respectively. A ≥40% reduction from baseline in Ktrans was positively associated with non-progressive tumour status (Fisher's exact: p = 0.0032). One patient achieved a partial response at 250 mg twice-daily and 24 (80%) achieved stable disease lasting ≥8 weeks. Time to tumour progression (TTP) at 4 months was 26% and median TTP was 72.5 days (95% confidence interval: 65-114). Common drug-related adverse events (AEs) included nausea (67%), vomiting (53%) and diarrhoea (40%); three patients experienced drug-related AEs ≥ grade 3. Four patients treated with nintedanib once-daily had an alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase increase ≥ grade 3. No increases > grade 2 were seen in the twice-daily group. CONCLUSIONS: Nintedanib modulates tumour blood flow and permeability in patients with advanced, refractory CRC, while achieving antitumour activity and maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

Randomized phase II study of nintedanib in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer postdocetaxel.

This open-label, phase II trial assessed the efficacy and safety of two doses of nintedanib, a triple angiokinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor signaling, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) following progression on docetaxel-based regimens. Patients were randomized to nintedanib 150 mg (arm A, n=40) or 250 mg (arm B, n=41) twice daily for 6 months unless disease progression or adverse events (AEs) led to discontinuation. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (confirmed PSA decline of ≥20% from baseline). Eighty-one patients were enrolled. The PSA response rate was 0% (0/32) in arm A versus 11.1% (4/36) in arm B (P=0.12); 5.6% of patients (2/36) in arm B showed a PSA reduction of at least 50%. In arm B, the rate of PSA increase was significantly decelerated on treatment versus before treatment (P=0.002). The median progression-free survival was 73.5 and 76.0 days for arm A and arm B, respectively (P=0.3). AEs included gastrointestinal disorders, asthenia, hypertension, and reversible elevated transaminases. The incidence of drug-related serious AEs (no drug-related deaths) was 20.0% (arm A) and 24.4% (arm B). The primary endpoint was not met. Nintedanib (250 mg) showed only modest activity with manageable AEs in patients with mCRPC post-docetaxel.

Human Dose and Pharmacokinetic Predictions for Biologics at Boehringer Ingelheim: A Retrospective Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Accurate predictions of pharmacokinetics and efficacious doses for biologics in humans are critical for selecting appropriate first-in-human starting doses and dose ranges and for estimating clinical material needs and cost of goods. This also impacts clinical feasibility, particularly for subcutaneously administered biologics. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive comparison between predicted and observed clearances and doses in humans for a set of 22 biologic drugs developed at Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) over the last 2 decades. The analysis included biologics across three therapeutic areas comprising a wide variety of modalities: mono- and bispecific monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and nanobodies and a Fab fragment. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that observed clearances in humans were within twofold of predicted clearances for 17 out of 20 biologics (85%). Six biologics had uncharacteristically high observed human clearances (range 32-280 mL/h) for their respective molecular classes, impacting their clinical developability. For three molecules, molecular characteristics contributed to the high clearance. Clinically selected doses were within twofold of predicted for 58% of projects. With 42% and 25% of projects selecting clinical doses higher than two- or threefold the predicted value, respectively, the importance of better understanding not only the pharmacokinetic (PK) but also the predictivity of pharmacodynamic models is highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: We provide a clinical pharmacology perspective on the commonly accepted twofold range of human clearance predictions as well as the implications of higher than predicted targeted efficacious plasma concentration on clinical development. Finally, an analysis of key success factors for biologics at BI was conducted, which may be relevant for the entire pharmaceutical industry. This is one of the largest retrospective analyses for biologics and provides further evidence that successful predictions of human PK and efficacious dose will be further facilitated by gathering key translational data early in research.

A Phase I, open-label, dose-escalation study of continuous once-daily oral treatment with afatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: This trial evaluated the safety, tolerability and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of afatinib, a novel ErbB Family Blocker. METHODS: In this open-label, dose-escalation Phase I study, afatinib was administered continuously, orally, once-daily for 28 days to patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors. Dose escalation was performed in a 3 + 3 design, with a starting dose of 10 mg/day (d); doses were doubled for each successive cohort until the MTD was defined. The MTD cohort was expanded to a total of 19 patients. Incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs), antitumor activity and pharmacokinetics were assessed. RESULTS: Thirty patients received at least one dose of afatinib. Twenty-nine patients were evaluable for response. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) consisting of Grade 3 diarrhea were observed in two out of three patients treated at 60 mg/d. The MTD was determined at 40 mg/d. The most frequent treatment-related AEs were diarrhea and mucosal inflammation reported in 76.7% and 43.3% of patients respectively. Five patients had stable disease with a median progression-free survival of 111 days. No objective responses occurred. Pharmacokinetic data showed no deviation from dose-proportionality and steady-state was reached on Day 8 at the latest. CONCLUSIONS: Afatinib was well tolerated with manageable side effects when administered once-daily, continuously at a dose of 40 mg.

A Phase I, open-label, dose escalation study of afatinib, in a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: A Phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and pharmacokinetics of afatinib (BIBW 2992), a novel irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, administered orally once daily in a 3-week-on/1-week-off dosing schedule. METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received single-agent afatinib at 10, 20, 40, 55 or 65 mg/day. Safety, antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic modulation of biomarkers were assessed. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were enrolled. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred in five patients in the dose escalation phase (1/8 at 40 mg/day; 1/6 at 55 mg/day; 3/6 at 65 mg/day). The MTD was established at 55 mg/day. In the expansion cohort at the MTD, 6 patients experienced a DLT in the first 28-day treatment period. The most frequent DLT was diarrhea. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, rash, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. Overall, the afatinib safety profile in a 3-week-on/1-week-off dose schedule was similar to that of our daily-continuous schedule. Afatinib displayed dose-dependent pharmacokinetics at doses up to and including 55 mg/day, with a terminal half-life suitable for once-daily dosing. Signs of clinical antitumor activity were observed. In biopsies taken from clinically normal forearm skin, afatinib caused a reduced proliferation rate, with a concomitant increase in differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes. CONCLUSION: Afatinib in a 3-week-on/1-week-off schedule showed a good safety profile. The MTD was 55 mg/day, although excess DLTs in the expansion cohort indicated that the 40 mg/day dose would have an acceptable safety profile for future studies. Dose cohorts between 40 and 55 mg/day were not examined in this study.

Phase I dose-escalation study of afatinib, an ErbB family blocker, plus docetaxel in patients with advanced cancer.

AIMS: To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), safety and anti-tumor activity of afatinib combined with docetaxel in advanced cancer. PATIENTS & METHODS: The MTD was determined from dose-limiting toxicities in the first cycle. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients received 10, 20 and 30 mg oral afatinib, plus 60 and 75 mg/m(2) intravenous docetaxel (six cohorts; 3-week cycles). The MTD of afatinib was 20 mg/day (days 2-21) with 75 mg/m(2) docetaxel (day 1). Dose-limiting toxicities were grade 3/4 diarrhea (n = 3) and febrile neutropenia (n = 6). Most frequently occurring adverse events were diarrhea, neutropenia and rash. Disease stabilization occurred in 14 patients. CONCLUSION: Afatinib 20 mg/day plus docetaxel was suboptimal and the study could not yield Phase II dose recommendations. The combination resulted in a manageable safety profile.

A Metabolomic Analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity of 23 Previously Proposed Biomarkers for Renal Transporter-Mediated Drug-Drug Interactions.

Endogenous biomarkers are discussed as tools for detection of drug-drug interactions (DDIs) mediated by renal transport proteins, such as organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2), multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (MATE1 and MATE2-K) and organic anion transporters (OAT1 and OAT3). Whereas sensitivity of some endogenous biomarkers against at least one clinical transporter inhibitor has frequently been shown, intra-study comparisons of the extent of effects of inhibitors on different biomarkers are frequently lacking. Moreover, in vivo specificity of such discussed biomarkers has frequently not been studied. We therefore investigated changes of 10 previously described putative biomarkers for inhibition of OCT2/MATEs, as well as 15 previously described putative biomarkers for OATs in human plasma and urine samples of healthy volunteers in response to treatment with 4 inhibitors of transport proteins [verapamil (P-glycoprotein), rifampin (organic anion transporting polypeptides), cimetidine (OCT2/MATEs), and probenecid (OATs)]. Two of the putative biomarkers had been suggested for both OCT2/MATEs and OATs. All substances were unequivocally identified in an untargeted metabolomics assay. The OCT2/MATE biomarkers choline and trimethylamine N-oxide were both sensitive and specific (median log2-fold changes -1.18 in estimated renal elimination and -0.85 in urinary excretion, respectively). For renal OATs, indoleacetyl glutamine and indoleacetic acid (median log2-fold changes -3.77 and -2.85 in estimated renal elimination, respectively) were the candidates for sensitive and specific biomarkers with the most extensive change, followed by taurine, indolelactic acid, and hypoxanthine. This comprehensive study adds further knowledge on sensitivity and specificity of 23 previously described biomarkers of renal OCT2/MATE- and OAT-mediated DDIs.

N1 -Methylnicotinamide as Biomarker for MATE-Mediated Renal Drug-Drug Interactions: Impact of Cimetidine, Rifampin, Verapamil, and Probenecid.

N1 -methylnicotinamide (NMN) has been proposed as endogenous biomarker for drug-drug interactions mediated by inhibition of multidrug and toxin extrusion proteins (MATEs) at the renal proximal tubule. We analyzed NMN in plasma and urine samples of two clinical trials investigating a new probe drug cocktail (consisting of digoxin, metformin, furosemide, and rosuvastatin) dedicated to clinically relevant drug transporters. In trial 1, NMN was investigated after single-dose treatment with individual cocktail components or after cocktail treatment. In trial 2, NMN was investigated after treatment with cocktail alone or with cocktail + inhibitor (cimetidine, a MATE inhibitor; or rifampin, verapamil, or probenecid, inhibitors of other transporters). In trial 1, NMN kinetics in plasma and urine were essentially not affected by individual cocktail components or after cocktail treatment. In trial 2, NMN renal clearance from 0 to 12 hours (CLR,0-12 ) geometric mean ratio (GMR) after cocktail + cimetidine vs. cocktail alone was 75% (90% confidence interval (CI): 65-87%). NMN CLR GMR after cocktail + verapamil, + rifampin, or + probenecid vs. cocktail alone was 99% (90% CI: 81-121%), 91% (90% CI: 75-111%), and 107% (90% CI: 91-126%), respectively. Compared with creatinine CLR and creatinine area under the plasma-concentration time curve, NMN CLR was more specific and more sensitive for renal MATE inhibition. Absence of impact of the cocktail on NMN in trial 1 allows for utilization of NMN in studies using this transporter cocktail. Trial 2 data support that NMN CLR is a specific and sensitive marker for MATE-mediated renal drug-drug interactions.

Pharmacokinetics and metabolism of BIBF 1120 after oral dosing to healthy male volunteers.

The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of BIBF 1120, an oral triple angiokinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR), and fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), were studied in healthy male volunteers (n = 8) who had received a single oral dose of 100 mg [(14)C]-radiolabelled BIBF 1120 administered as solution. BIBF 1120 was well-tolerated and rapidly absorbed; median time to reach maximum plasma concentrations was 1.3 h and gMean terminal half-life was 13.7 h. A relatively high apparent total body clearance and volume of distribution possibly indicated a high tissue distribution. Plasma concentrations of BIBF 1120 plus carboxylate metabolite BIBF 1202 were lower than the total [(14)C]-radioactivity in plasma, indicating presence of additional metabolites. Total recovery in excreta was 94.7% 1 week post-dose; mass balance was considered complete after 96 h. BIBF 1120 and metabolites were mainly excreted via faeces. The major metabolic pathway for BIBF 1120 was methyl ester cleavage to BIBF 1202. Subsequently, the free carboxyl group of BIBF 1202 was glucuronidated to 1-O-acylglucuronide. Pathways of minor importance were oxidative N-demethylation to yield BIBF 1053, and oxidation of the piperazine moiety and conjugation. Glucuronidation of the parent drug and formylation of the secondary aliphatic amine of the piperazine ring played a minor role.

A Mechanistic, Enantioselective, Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model of Verapamil and Norverapamil, Built and Evaluated for Drug-Drug Interaction Studies.

The calcium channel blocker and antiarrhythmic agent verapamil is recommended by the FDA for drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies as a moderate clinical CYP3A4 index inhibitor and as a clinical Pgp inhibitor. The purpose of the presented work was to develop a mechanistic whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to investigate and predict DDIs with verapamil. The model was established in PK-Sim®, using 45 clinical studies (dosing range 0.1-250 mg), including literature as well as unpublished Boehringer Ingelheim data. The verapamil R- and S-enantiomers and their main metabolites R- and S-norverapamil are represented in the model. The processes implemented to describe the pharmacokinetics of verapamil and norverapamil include enantioselective plasma protein binding, enantioselective metabolism by CYP3A4, non-stereospecific Pgp transport, and passive glomerular filtration. To describe the auto-inhibitory and DDI potential, mechanism-based inactivation of CYP3A4 and non-competitive inhibition of Pgp by the verapamil and norverapamil enantiomers were incorporated based on in vitro literature. The resulting DDI performance was demonstrated by prediction of DDIs with midazolam, digoxin, rifampicin, and cimetidine, with 21/22 predicted DDI AUC ratios or Ctrough ratios within 1.5-fold of the observed values. The thoroughly built and qualified model will be freely available in the Open Systems Pharmacology model repository to support model-informed drug discovery and development.

A Comprehensive Whole-Body Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Drug-Drug-Gene Interaction Model of Metformin and Cimetidine in Healthy Adults and Renally Impaired Individuals.

BACKGROUND: Metformin is a widely prescribed antidiabetic BCS Class III drug (low permeability) that depends on active transport for its absorption and disposition. It is recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration as a clinical substrate of organic cation transporter 2/multidrug and toxin extrusion protein for drug-drug interaction studies. Cimetidine is a potent organic cation transporter 2/multidrug and toxin extrusion protein inhibitor. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide mechanistic whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of metformin and cimetidine, built and evaluated to describe the metformin-SLC22A2 808G>T drug-gene interaction, the cimetidine-metformin drug-drug interaction, and the impact of renal impairment on metformin exposure. METHODS: Physiologically based pharmacokinetic models were developed in PK-Sim® (version 8.0). Thirty-nine clinical studies (dosing range 0.001-2550 mg), providing metformin plasma and urine data, positron emission tomography measurements of tissue concentrations, studies in organic cation transporter 2 polymorphic volunteers, drug-drug interaction studies with cimetidine, and data from patients in different stages of chronic kidney disease, were used to develop the metformin model. Twenty-seven clinical studies (dosing range 100-800 mg), reporting cimetidine plasma and urine concentrations, were used for the cimetidine model development. RESULTS: The established physiologically based pharmacokinetic models adequately describe the available clinical data, including the investigated drug-gene interaction, drug-drug interaction, and drug-drug-gene interaction studies, as well as the metformin exposure during renal impairment. All modeled drug-drug interaction area under the curve and maximum concentration ratios are within 1.5-fold of the observed ratios. The clinical data of renally impaired patients shows the expected increase in metformin exposure with declining kidney function, but also indicates counter-regulatory mechanisms in severe renal disease; these mechanisms were implemented into the model based on findings in preclinical species. CONCLUSIONS: Whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic models of metformin and cimetidine were built and qualified for the prediction of metformin pharmacokinetics during drug-gene interaction, drug-drug interaction, and different stages of renal disease. The model files will be freely available in the Open Systems Pharmacology model repository. Current guidelines for metformin treatment of renally impaired patients should be reviewed to avoid overdosing in CKD3 and to allow metformin therapy of CKD4 patients.

Validation of a Drug Transporter Probe Cocktail Using the Prototypical Inhibitors Rifampin, Probenecid, Verapamil, and Cimetidine.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: A novel cocktail containing four substrates of key drug transporters was previously optimized to eliminate mutual drug-drug interactions between the probes digoxin (P-glycoprotein substrate), furosemide (organic anion transporter 1/3), metformin (organic cation transporter 2, multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1/2-K), and rosuvastatin (organic anion transporting polypeptide 1B1/3, breast cancer resistance protein). This clinical trial investigated the effects of four commonly employed drug transporter inhibitors on cocktail drug pharmacokinetics. METHODS: In a randomized open-label crossover trial in 45 healthy male subjects, treatment groups received the cocktail with or without single oral doses of rifampin, verapamil, cimetidine or probenecid. Concentrations of the probe drugs in serial plasma samples and urine fractions were measured by validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry assays to assess systemic exposure. RESULTS: The results were generally in accordance with known in vitro and/or clinical drug-drug interaction data. Single-dose rifampin increased rosuvastatin area under the plasma concentration-time curve up to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-tz) by 248% and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) by 1025%. Probenecid increased furosemide AUC0-tz by 172% and Cmax by 23%. Cimetidine reduced metformin renal clearance by 26%. The effect of single-dose verapamil on digoxin systemic exposure was less than expected from multiple-dose studies (AUC0-tz unaltered, Cmax + 22%). CONCLUSIONS: Taking all the interaction results together, the transporter cocktail is considered to be validated as a sensitive and specific tool for evaluating transporter-mediated drug-drug interactions in drug development. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT number 2017-001549-29.

Blocking lymphotoxin beta receptor signalling exacerbates acute DSS-induced intestinal inflammation--opposite functions for surface lymphotoxin expressed by T and B lymphocytes.

The lymphotoxin beta receptor (LTbetaR) signalling pathway is involved in the development of secondary lymphoid organs and the maintenance of organized lymphoid tissues. Additionally, previous studies clearly demonstrated the involvement of the LTbetaR interaction with its ligands in promoting intestinal inflammation. In order to dissect the role of LTbetaR activation in the mouse model of acute DSS-induced colitis we treated mice with a functional inhibitor of LTbetaR activation (LTbetaR:Ig) and compared it to disease in LTbetaR-deficient and LTalphabeta-deficient mice. All these modes of LTbetaR signalling ablation resulted in significant aggravation of the disease and in release of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF, IL-6, and IFNgamma. Finally, using mice with conditionally ablated expression of membrane bound LTbeta on T or B cells, respectively, distinct and opposite contributions of surface LTbeta expressed on T or B cells was found. Thus, activation of LTbetaR by LTalphabeta mainly expressed on T lymphocytes is crucial for the down regulation of the inflammatory response in this experimental model.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Nintedanib.

Nintedanib is an oral, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and patients with advanced non-small cell cancer of adenocarcinoma tumour histology. Nintedanib competitively binds to the kinase domains of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and fibroblast growth factor (FGF). Studies in healthy volunteers and in patients with advanced cancer have shown that nintedanib has time-independent pharmacokinetic characteristics. Maximum plasma concentrations of nintedanib are reached approximately 2-4 h after oral administration and thereafter decline at least bi-exponentially. Over the investigated dose range of 50-450 mg once daily and 150-300 mg twice daily, nintedanib exposure increases are dose proportional. Nintedanib is metabolised via hydrolytic ester cleavage, resulting in the formation of the free acid moiety that is subsequently glucuronidated and excreted in the faeces. Less than 1% of drug-related radioactivity is eliminated in urine. The terminal elimination half-life of nintedanib is about 10-15 h. Accumulation after repeated twice-daily dosing is negligible. Sex and renal function have no influence on nintedanib pharmacokinetics, while effects of ethnicity, low body weight, older age and smoking are within the inter-patient variability range of nintedanib exposure and no dose adjustments are required. Administration of nintedanib in patients with moderate or severe hepatic impairment is not recommended, and patients with mild hepatic impairment should be monitored closely and the dose adjusted accordingly. Nintedanib has a low potential for drug-drug interactions, especially with drugs metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Concomitant treatment with potent inhibitors or inducers of the P-glycoprotein transporter can affect the pharmacokinetics of nintedanib. At an investigated dose of 200 mg twice daily, nintedanib does not have proarrhythmic potential.

Effects of Metformin and Furosemide on Rosuvastatin Pharmacokinetics in Healthy Volunteers: Implications for Their Use as Probe Drugs in a Transporter Cocktail.

BACKGROUND: In a recently described probe drug cocktail for clinically relevant drug transporters containing digoxin, furosemide, metformin and rosuvastatin, mutual interactions were essentially absent except for increases in the systemic exposure of rosuvastatin. To optimize the cocktail, we further examined the dose dependence of the effects of metformin and furosemide on rosuvastatin pharmacokinetics. METHODS: This was a randomized, open label, single center, six-treatment, six-period, six-sequence crossover trial. Eighteen healthy male subjects received 10 mg rosuvastatin as reference treatment and, as test treatments, 10 mg rosuvastatin combined with 10, 50 or 500 mg metformin (T1, T2 and T3) or with 1 or 5 mg furosemide (T4 and T5). Primary pharmacokinetic endpoints were rosuvastatin C max (maximum plasma concentration) and AUC0-tz (area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration). RESULTS: The relative bioavailability of rosuvastatin was essentially unchanged when administered with metformin in T1 and T2, but in T3 it increased to 152% for AUC0-tz (90% CI 135-171%) and 154% for C max (90% CI 132-180%). Coadministration with furosemide did not change rosuvastatin relative bioavailability in T4, but in T5 it increased slightly to 116% for AUC0-tz (90% CI 102-132%) and 118% for C max (90% CI 98-142%). CONCLUSION: The increased systemic exposure of rosuvastatin when administered as part of the proposed transporter cocktail is most likely attributable to metformin and only to a minor degree to furosemide. Reduction of the doses of metformin and furosemide is expected to eliminate the previously described interaction. EudraCT no. 2015-003052-46, ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02574845.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Afatinib.

Afatinib is an oral, irreversible ErbB family blocker that covalently binds to the kinase domains of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), human EGFRs (HER) 2, and HER4, resulting in irreversible inhibition of tyrosine kinase autophosphorylation. Studies in healthy volunteers and patients with advanced solid tumours have shown that once-daily afatinib has time-independent pharmacokinetic characteristics. Maximum plasma concentrations of afatinib are reached approximately 2-5 h after oral administration and thereafter decline, at least bi-exponentially. Food reduces total exposure to afatinib. Over the clinical dose range of 20-50 mg, afatinib exposure increases slightly more than dose proportional. Afatinib metabolism is minimal, with unchanged drug predominantly excreted in the faeces and approximately 5 % in urine. Apart from the parent drug afatinib, the major circulation species in human plasma are the covalently bound adducts to plasma protein. The effective elimination half-life is approximately 37 h, consistent with an accumulation of drug exposure by 2.5- to 3.4-fold based on area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) after multiple dosing. The pharmacokinetic profile of afatinib is consistent across a range of patient populations. Age, ethnicity, smoking status and hepatic function had no influence on afatinib pharmacokinetics, while females and patients with low body weight had increased exposure to afatinib. Renal function is correlated with afatinib exposure, but, as for sex and body weight, the effect size for patients with severe renal impairment (approximately 50 % increase in AUC) is only mildly relative to the extent of unexplained interpatient variability in afatinib exposure. Afatinib has a low potential as a victim or perpetrator of drug-drug interactions, especially with cytochrome P450-modulating agents. However, concomitant treatment with potent inhibitors or inducers of the P-glycoprotein transporter can affect the pharmacokinetics of afatinib. At a dose of 50 mg, afatinib does not have proarrhythmic potential.