Elucidating the role of weight loss and glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes.

AIMS: To investigate the independent contributions of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) reduction and weight loss to clinical outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) treated with antidiabetic drugs, including glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, retrospective cohort study used deidentified electronic health record-derived data from patients evaluated at the Cleveland Clinic (1 January 2000-31 December 2020). Cohort A included 8876 patients with newly diagnosed T2D treated with any of six antidiabetic drug classes. Cohort B included 4161 patients with T2D initiating GLP-1RA treatment. The effects of body mass index (BMI) and HbA1c reduction, variability, and durability on clinical outcomes were investigated. RESULTS: In Cohort A, each 1% BMI reduction was associated with 3%, 1%, and 4% reduced risk of heart failure (p = 0.017), hypertension (p = 0.006), and insulin initiation (p = 0.001), respectively. Each 1% (~11 mmol/mol) HbA1c reduction was associated with 4% and 29% reduced risk of hypertension (p = 0.041) and insulin initiation (p = 0.001), respectively. In Cohort B, each 1% BMI reduction was associated with 4% and 3% reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (p = 0.008) and insulin initiation (p = 0.002), respectively. Each 1% (~11 mmol/mol) HbA1c reduction was associated with 4% and 16% reduced risk of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.014) and insulin initiation (p = 1 × 10-4), respectively. Lower BMI variability and greater BMI durability were associated with decreased risk of clinical outcomes in both cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Antidiabetic medication-associated, and specifically GLP-1RA-associated, weight loss and HbA1c reductions independently reduce real-world clinical outcome risk.

Follow-up lipid tests and physician visits are associated with improved adherence to statin therapy.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The National Cholesterol Education Program recommends regular physician follow-up and lipid testing to promote adherence with lipid-lowering medications. The objective of this study was to determine whether lipid tests and physician visits after treatment initiation are indeed associated with adherence to statin therapy. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 19 422 enrolees in a US managed care plan who initiated treatment with a statin between October 1999 and August 2001. Computerised pharmacy, medical and laboratory records were used to study the patterns and predictors of adherence with lipid-lowering therapy for up to 3 years. Adherence was assessed in 3-month intervals with patients considered 'adherent' if > or = 80% of days were covered by lipid-lowering therapy. RESULTS: In the first 3 months, 40% of patients had follow-up lipid tests and only 21% had dyslipidaemia visits (14% had both). Those receiving such care were substantially more likely to be adherent in subsequent intervals. Compared with those without follow-up, the relative odds of adherence were 1.42 and 1.27 for patients with one or more lipid test and one or more dyslipidaemia visit, respectively (95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.33, 1.50 and 1.16, 1.39). Patients who received a follow-up visit and lipid test were 45% more likely to be adherent (95% CI 1.34, 1.55). Similar associations were observed when lipid tests and dyslipidaemia visits occurred later in therapy. CONCLUSION: Early and frequent follow-up by physicians--especially lipid testing--was associated with improved adherence to lipid-lowering therapy. A randomised prospective study is needed to determine whether this relationship is causal.