Impact of a Mediterranean diet on prevention and management of urologic diseases.

Compared to a Western diet, the Mediterranean diet moves away from red meat and processed foods. Universally regarded as a healthier dietary alternative, the Mediterranean diet has garnered scientific endorsement for its ability to confer an array of compelling benefits. These health benefits encompass not only a lowered incidence of Type 2 diabetes with a reduction in obesity, but also a robust protective effect on cardiovascular health. Extensive literature exists to corroborate these health benefits; however, the impact of a Mediterranean diet on urologic diseases, specifically sexual dysfunction, lower urinary tract symptoms, stone disease, and urologic cancers are not well studied. Understanding how dietary habits may impact these urologic conditions can contribute to improved prevention and treatment strategies.A total of 955 papers from PubMed and Embase were systematically reviewed and screened. After exclusion of disqualified and duplicated studies, 58 studies consisting of randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, cross sectional studies, reviews and other meta-analyses were included in this review. 11 primary studies were related to the impact of a Mediterranean diet on sexual dysfunction, 9 primary studies regarding urinary symptoms, 8 primary studies regarding stone disease, and 9 primary studies regarding urologic cancers. All primary studies included were considered of good quality based on a New-Castle Ottawa scale. The results demonstrate a Mediterranean diet as an effective means to prevent as well as improve erectile dysfunction, nephrolithiasis, lower urinary tract symptoms, and urinary incontinence. The review highlights the need for additional research to study the impact of diet on urologic cancers and other urologic conditions such as premature ejaculation, loss of libido, female sexual dysfunction, and overactive bladder.

Utility of noninvasive biomarker testing and MRI to predict a prostate cancer diagnosis.

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic performance and utility of the ExoDx IntelliScore and an OPKO4K score to predict prostate cancer in men presenting with elevated PSA-both as independent predictors and in combination with clinical/MRI characteristics. METHODS: Patients with elevated PSA were retrospectively reviewed. Abnormal tests were defined as an OPKO4K score ≥ 7.5% and an ExoDx IntelliScore ≥ 15.6. Four regression models and ROC curves were generated based on: (1) age, PSA, and DRE, (2) model 1 + OPKO4K 4Kscore ≥ 7.5%, (3) model 2 + ExoDx IntelliScore ≥ 15.6, and (4) model 3 + MRI PIRADS 4-5. RESULTS: 359 men received an OPKO4K test, 307 had MRI and 113 had ExoDx tests. 163 men proceeded to prostate biopsy and 196 (55%) were saved from biopsy. Mean age was 65.0 ± 8.7 years and mean PSA was 7.1 ± 6.1 ng/mL. Positive biopsies were found in 84 (51.5%) men. The sensitivity and negative predictive value of an OPKO4K score were 86.7% and 72.3%; values for an ExoDx test were 76.5% and 77.1%, respectively. On regression analysis, clinical markers (Age, PSA, DRE) generated an AUC of 0.559. The addition of an OPKO4K score raised the AUC to 0.653. The stepwise addition of an ExoDx score raised the AUC to 0.766. The combined use of both biomarkers, patient characteristics, and MRI yielded an AUC of 0.825. CONCLUSION: This analysis demonstrates the high negative predictive value of both the OPKO4K score and ExoDX IntelliScore independently while demonstrating that the combination of an OPKO4K score, an ExoDX IntelliScore, and MRI increases predictive capability for biopsy confirmed prostate cancer.

Hyaluronic acid and urology: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The use of hyaluronic acid as a nonsurgical treatment for various conditions within urology has been of great interest in recent literature. OBJECTIVES: In this study, we aimed to provide an updated review and analysis of the current state of hyaluronic acid use in urology, characterize its adverse effects, and briefly discuss future directions of research for hyaluronic acid in urology. METHODS: PubMed searches were run utilizing multiple terms, including "hyaluronic acid," "penile," "augmentation," "Peyronie disease," "premature ejaculation," and "cosmetic urology," among other related iterations. Relevant data extracted included International Index of Erectile Function score, intravaginal ejaculatory latency, glans circumference, penile girth, and plaque size. We also included studies which reported on complications of hyaluronic acid injections. Aggregated analysis was performed on studies with complete pre and post injection data at time closest to 6 months postinjection. RESULTS: A total of 33 studies met our inclusion criteria. Studies had marked heterogeneity in design, but most reported positive results. A total of 16 studies were included in our analysis. Intravaginal ejaculatory latency, penile girth, glans circumference, and International Index of Erectile Function were all increased on a fixed-effects model. Reduction in plaque size was not significant (P = .069). Complications were rare. CONCLUSION: Literature on hyaluronic acid for urologic issues demonstrates promising results; however, the quality of studies was variable. Our analysis of these studies largely corroborates these findings; however, the results are limited by the data available. Hyaluronic acid may be promising, but we highly implore standardization of study regimens in randomized controlled trials.

Does renal mass biopsy influence multidisciplinary treatment recommendations?

Purpose: To examine how a multidisciplinary team approach incorporating renal mass biopsy (RMB) into decision making changes the management strategy.Methods: A multidisciplinary team comprised of a radiology proceduralist, a pathologist and urologists convened monthly for renal mass conference with a structured presentation of patient demographics, co-mborbidities, tumor pathology, laboratory and radiographic features. Biopsy protocol was standardized to an 18-gauge core needle biopsy using a sheathed apparatus under renal ultrasound guidance. Biopsy diagnostic rate, and concordance with nephrectomy specimens were summarized. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate influence of RMB on management decisions.Results: A total of 83 patients with a ≤4 cm mass were discussed, and 66% of patients underwent RMB. Of those, 87% were diagnostic with 9% of core biopsies showing benign pathology. Active surveillance (AS) was recommended for 34% of patients with biopsy data as compared to 64% of those without biopsy. Ablation was recommended for 38% of the biopsy cohort compared to 7% without biopsy. Partial nephrectomy rates were similar for both cohorts, approximately 17% and 22%, respectively. Our complication rate was 1.5%, with only 1 Clavien-Dindo Grade 2 complication. Histology was concordant in 93% of patients that ultimately underwent partial nephrectomy after biopsy.Conclusions: Over half of our SRM patients underwent a RMB that provided a diagnosis in 85% of cases. RMB aided in shared decision making by providing insight into the biology of renal masses, which helps to guide multidisciplinary management and consideration of nephron sparing options.